Skip to main content

Intraovarian injection of autologous human mesenchymal stem cells increases estrogen production and reduces menopausal symptoms in women with premature ovarian failure: two case reports and a review of the literature



Premature ovarian failure is a relatively common condition that affects 1–3% of adult women. Premature ovarian failure occurs when there is loss of ovarian function in women younger than 40 years of age. The causes are mostly iatrogenic or idiopathic. Amenorrhea and infertility are the most important clinical manifestations. So far, no therapeutic intervention has been proved effective in restoring fertility in patients with premature ovarian failure. Attempts to stimulate ovarian function through hormone manipulation typically prove unsuccessful, and patients usually resort to egg donation to achieve pregnancy. In our preclinical work, intraovarian administration of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells was able to restore ovarian hormone production, reactivate folliculogenesis, and reverse infertility in a chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure mouse model.

Case presentation

We present two cases of Caucasian women with premature ovarian failure who resumed ovarian estrogen production and menses 7 months following autologous bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cell injections into the ovary. This pilot clinical study is registered with (identifier NCT02696889). In this report, we present data from our first two cases that have completed study procedures so far. The bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells were harvested from the bone marrow of the iliac crest of the patients with premature ovarian failure and nucleated cells concentrated and enriched in bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells intraoperatively, and then injected into the patient’s right ovary via laparoscopy. Autologous bone marrow stem cell engraftment into the ovary resulted in several improvements in the treated patients with premature ovarian failure. In measurements by transvaginal ultrasound, there were increases of approximately 50% in volume of the treated ovaries in comparison with the contralateral control ovaries that persisted to the end of the study (1 year). Serum levels of estrogen increased by approximately 150% compared with the preoperative levels. Each of the two patients had an episode of menses, and also both of them reported marked improvement of their menopausal symptoms that also persisted to the end of the study (1 year). The bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cell implantation procedure was very well tolerated with no reported adverse events.


Our study reveals promising improvement of premature ovarian failure–related clinical manifestations in two patients after intraovarian autologous bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells engraftment. These early observations call for additional assessment and further development of intraovarian bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cell injection for possible treatment of patients with premature ovarian failure.

Peer Review reports


Premature ovarian failure (POF), also called premature ovarian insufficiency, is a challenging reproductive issue causing loss of ovarian function in women younger than 40 years of age [1,2,3,4,5]. Despite intense research, the causes of POF remain a mystery in most cases [3, 6]. POF is characterized by hypoestrogenism; increased serum gonadotropin levels; and, most important, amenorrhea [1, 3, 5, 6]. POF affects about 1–3% of women in the general population [7], but its prevalence is up to 10–28% in females with primary amenorrhea and about 4–18% in women with secondary amenorrhea [7]. POF is a devastating diagnosis for women of reproductive age [2]. Ovaries of patients with POF are characterized by loss of secondary follicles and arrested folliculogenesis, which leads to a decrease or elimination of estrogen production and infertility. The mechanism of the ovarian follicles’ depletion in patients with POF is most likely an accelerated follicular atresia, but the detailed pathogenesis is not fully understood yet [8]. In addition, estrogens are essential for normal folliculogenesis beyond the antral stage [9] and are known to be decreased in patients with POF. Also, POF is associated with serious health consequences, including psychological distress, osteoporosis, autoimmune disorders, ischemic heart disease, Alzheimer disease, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and increased risk of mortality [2].

For patients with POF who desire pregnancy, the only current option is to receive donor eggs. Recently, several lines of preclinical evidence suggest that cell therapy (CT) using bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) [10] can restore the structure and function of injured ovarian tissues [11,12,13,14]. CT is based on groundbreaking scientific discoveries and technological advancements. Most cell-based therapies are currently experimental, with a few exceptions [10]. CT is defined as the transfer or engraftment of living cells into damaged tissue [15]. CTs can be classified mainly by the origin of cells (autologous or allogeneic transplant) or by their treatment indications (for example, hematological, reproductive, or neurological pathologies). The most common type of CT is the replacement of mature cells through blood and platelet transfusions. Other potential therapeutic applications of CT include treating urinary problems or infectious diseases; rebuilding damaged cartilage in joints; and helping patients with neurological disorders, brain or spinal cord injuries, heart disease, diabetes [16], and, more recently, cancer [17].

Human stem cells play a key role and have important potential application in cell-based therapies that represent a possible alternative for a variety of diseases, including reproductive dysfunction. Our preclinical study of POF animal models treated with human BMSCs showed that BMSC-treated animals recovered ovarian function, resulting in folliculogenesis and estrogen production [13, 18]. In another study, using cisplatin to induce granulosa cell apoptosis, the authors demonstrated that the apoptosis was reduced by BMSCs in vitro [19]. In addition, the MSC treatment group showed increased antral follicle count and estradiol (E2) after 1 month compared with the untreated POF group [20]. According to these results, BMSCs may potentially revive prematurely failed ovaries in both follicular and hormonal aspects. The role of stem cells in treating diseases is related to their unique regenerative abilities, giving rise to different cells and tissues [21].

Stem cell therapies can be applied directly, as in the context of bone marrow transplantation, or by the use of more or less mature cells produced in vitro from stem cells. Today, donated cells, tissues, and organs from healthy donors are often used to replace diseased or destroyed tissue [22], but in certain cases, such as in POF, some patients are unwilling to choose this option. Thus, there is a critical need to develop novel effective approaches for POF treatment. In this study, we report early observations of the biological effect of BMSCs as a possible therapeutic tool on the phenotype of POF.


Patients were recruited into the study according to the following inclusion criteria: age over 18, primary or secondary amenorrhea at least for 6 months, at least two menopausal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (> 40 IU/L), normal karyotype 46,XX, and presence of at least one ovary. The study was approved by the Augusta University Institutional Review Board (no. 723327-2), and study procedures were initiated only after patients signed informed consent. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized in Table 1. In addition, the hormone levels prior to and 12 months after mesenchymal stem cell injection into the right ovary are summurized in Table 2.

Table 1 Summary of inclusion and exclusion criteria
Table 2 Hormone levels prior to and 12 months after mesenchymal stem cell injection into the right ovary

First case

A 36-year-old Caucasian woman presented with secondary amenorrhea of 4 years’ duration. She is a pediatric dentist from the Toronto area in Canada. She was married in 2009 and immediately started using combined oral contraceptive pills for 3 years to delay childbearing. After she stopped taking oral contraceptive pills in January 2012 to attempt pregnancy, her periods never came back, and she had amenorrhea. Her Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Physician (REI) diagnosed her with POF FSH (110 IU/L). Since then, she had been treated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on and off to control menopausal symptoms. She stopped any external hormones in March 2016 and was only using prenatal vitamins as supplements. She is gravida 0, para 0 (G0 P0). She had menarche at the age of 11. Her menses were regular every 28 days. She denies a history of sexually transmitted disease. She has no other chronic medical conditions, and her past surgical history includes only wisdom teeth removal. She has no known allergies, and she denies use of tobacco, alcohol, or other drugs. Her family history includes only a father with diabetes. Her physical examination showed Tanner stage V with normal anatomy. The complete results of her physical examination are listed in Table 3. The diagnosis of POF was confirmed in May 2012 according to laboratory tests that revealed persistently high serum FSH (110 IU/L) and luteinizing hormone (LH) (53.89 IU/L), as well as low E2 (< 10 pg/ml). She has a normal karyotype (46,XX) and a negative genetic test result for fragile X syndrome (FMR1). She was placed on dehydroepiandrosterone for approximately 6 months, then a follow-up ultrasound examination in July 2013 revealed no antral follicles. She started experiencing menopausal symptoms (hot flushes and vaginal dryness) and received on-and-off HRT for relief from her primary care physician in August 2013. Very rarely, they have found one or two follicles during the cycles, but she did not ovulate. She desired treatment for infertility but refused egg donation for religious reasons. At admission, all her routine preoperative laboratory test results were normal, as listed in Table 3.

Table 3 Summary of physical examination and laboratory test results at admission

Second case

A 42-year-old Caucasian woman, G0 P0, presented with secondary amenorrhea. She is a scientist with a doctoral degree at Temple University in Philadelphia with a focus on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. She presented with high FSH (155 IU/L) and a normal karyotype (46,XX). She had had normal regular menses until 2014. Then, she was diagnosed with a large left ovarian cyst and needed surgery. She underwent robotic laparoscopy, but this had to be changed to midline open laparotomy, and she underwent left oophorectomy and also a myomectomy. After surgery, she had secondary amenorrhea, and she was then diagnosed with POF. She has experienced some menopausal symptoms but denied using any medication for these. She and her husband have been actively trying to achieve a pregnancy through regular intercourse but have not attempted any additional fertility treatments. She had normal hysterosalpingogram and a normal right ovary by ultrasound. Her past medical history only included occasional low blood pressure and remote tonsillectomy. She has no known allergies, and she denies use of tobacco, alcohol, or other drugs. She had a normal physical examination and laboratory workup, the results of which are listed in Table 3. The patient sought infertility treatment but refused egg donation for cultural reasons. She and the patient in case 1 both fit the criteria for inclusion in the present study according to the screening of their medical, surgical, and social histories and physical examinations.


Preparation of autologous bone marrow MSC-derived stem cells

With the patients under general anesthesia, the procedure involved the collection of bone marrow tissue from the iliac bone (posterior iliac crest) using a bone marrow aspiration kit soaked in heparin (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, United States of America (USA)). About 150 ml of marrow tissue was harvested and subjected to concentration. We used a U.S. Food and Drug Administration–cleared class 2 medical Angel device (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) that allowed us to concentrate 160 ml of bone marrow aspirate in about 20 minutes. The collected cell pellet was resuspended in 4 ml of bone marrow nucleated cell concentrate (~ 5 × 108 total nucleated cells and an average of 5–15 million MSCs).

Laparoscopy and direct injection of right ovary

We used laparoscopy for direct injection of the harvested BMSCs (4 ml) into the right ovary. A similar amount (4 ml) of normal saline was injected into the left ovary to serve as a control. In case 2, this was not done, because the patient had undergone prior left oophorectomy. Injection was conducted using a 5-mm injector (22-gauge needle). An assistant firmly stabilized the ovary using an atraumatic grasper (Fig. 1). The surgeon inserted the needle via one entry through the ovarian capsule toward the center of the ovary and slowly injected the cell concentrate over a 5-minute time period to allow gradual expansion of the ovary. After all solution was injected, the needle was left in situ for another 5 minutes, acting as a stopper to avoid backflow of injected cells out of the ovary.

Fig. 1

Ovarian morphologic changes after mesenchymal stem cell injection. a Atrophic ovary before injection (green arrows) (low magnification). b Atrophic ovary before injection (green arrow) (zoom-in). c Laparoscopic grasper (green arrow) to stabilize the ovary during injection process via stem cell injector (red arrow). d Atrophic ovary (green arrow) stabilized in place just before injection process. e Injection of the stem cells. f Ovary (green arrow) near end of injection process (Notice the swelling and apparent increase in ovarian size.)

Transvaginal ultrasound imaging

After MSC engraftment, a standard transvaginal ultrasound technique was used for the measurement of endometrial thickness, ovarian volume, and antral follicle count (AFC) at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months.

Biochemical evaluation of serum hormone levels and symptom evaluation

Serum hormone profiles were checked for 1 year postengraftment at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The examined hormones included FSH, LH, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), E2, and progesterone. The serum hormone quantification was done by radioimmunoassay using standard laboratory techniques [23]. Symptoms were self-reported by both patients to the study coordinators.


Autologous BMSCs were injected laparoscopically into the right ovary. The left ovary (in the first case) was subjected to sham surgery for control (Fig. 1). After injection, the volume of the right ovary exhibited a significant increase in size, confirming proper injection and cell delivery inside the ovary. Ovarian volume and hormone levels were monitored at various time points per study protocol; however, several data points were missing in the second case because of noncompliance. Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 are from the first case.

Fig. 2

Ovarian volume measured in cubic centimeters after mesenchymal stem cell implantation into ovary of patient 1

Fig. 3

Serum estrogen level quantified at pre– and post–mesenchymal stem cell ovarian implantation. The arrow indicates the menses that resume within 7 months following mesenchymal stem cell engraftment

Fig. 4

Serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level reported pre– and post–mesenchymal stem cell ovarian implantation

Fig. 5

Serum luteinizing hormone (LH) level examined pre– and post–mesenchymal stem cell ovarian implantation

First case

Ovarian volume of the test ovary increased from 0.63 cm3 before injection to 2.5 cm3 at week 1 of follow-up, then 2.05 cm3 3 weeks later. Follow-up at months 3 and 6 displayed stability in ovarian volume, measuring at 2.3 cm3 and 2.7 cm3, respectively, with an increase in size after regaining menses at 7 months (Fig. 2). These data suggest that the right ovary responded specifically to the BMSC injection in situ. Furthermore, we noticed an overall increase in serum estrogen level after BMSC engraftment (Fig. 3). The estrogen level was < 10.9 pg/ml prior to MSC implantation and 1 week after MSC implantation, and it increased by three times to 20 pg/ml (Fig. 3). At 6 months after MSC injection, estrogen level reached of 26.1 pg/ml. There were also changes in serum levels of FSH and LH, as shown in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively, but no changes were observed in serum progesterone levels, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, or antral follicle counts after BMSC implantation compared with preprocedural levels.

Second case

We observed an increase in estrogen levels at 9-month follow-up. There were no changes in the FSH, LH, or progesterone levels. Unfortunately, because of this patient’s noncompliance, we are missing several data on serum hormone panels. A decrease of menopausal symptoms, such as hot flushes, night sweats, and painful intercourse, was reported by both patients. Both patients reported one incident of menses (3 days of vaginal bleeding, mild to moderate in amount) at 7 months after BMSC implantation.


POF is a devastating medical condition with currently very limited treatment options, which usually fail to address the patients’ issues and needs. POF interferes with fertility and causes menopausal symptoms as well as serious psychological sequelae [24]. All together, these challenges require a multidisciplinary approach in diagnosis and treatment as well as special attention. The current established modalities for treating POF mainly target the hypoestrogenism-related symptoms by using external HRT [25]. There are no controlled studies regarding the ideal hormone replacement strategy for young women with spontaneous POF [26]. The absence of evidence-based guidelines regarding the ideal hormone replacement strategy for young women with POF poses a clear challenge.

Spontaneous resumption of ovarian activity is possible in women with POF, indicating that this condition is not irreversible and is likely due to the presence of residual oocytes in these so-called failed ovaries. Women may conceive spontaneously or following different regimens of ovulation induction, thus indicating that ovarian failure is not always permanent [27]. Recently, in vitro maturation (IVM) using ovarian fragmentation combined with Akt stimulation treatment to disrupt ovarian Hippo signaling was developed. A viable birth was reported using IVM followed by in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer [28]. In a clinical trial including 14 patients with POF, follicle development waves were detected in 43% of the examined patients. After IVF of retrieved oocytes, four early embryos were derived; one patient became pregnant and delivered a healthy baby boy after embryo transfer [29]. In another study, ovarian tissue cryopreservation using verification followed by IVM was done for infertility management in 37 patients with POF. The reported results of this study showed that 54% of women had residual follicles and 9 of 20 showed follicular growth with 24 oocytes in autografts retrieved from 6 patients. Following IVF and embryo transfer into four patients, three chemical pregnancies were detected, followed by one miscarriage and two successful deliveries [30]. This method has multiple limitations, including multiple surgical interventions: one for the collection of the ovarian tissue and another for implantation after IVM and the additional IVF protocols and procedures.

Due to the ability of BMSCs in restoring physiological function of many organs, there are 344 registered clinical trials trying to evaluate the potential of BMSC-based CT against a plethora of human diseases worldwide. BMSCs have been shown to be effective in the treatment of many diseases with the advancement of preclinical studies [31]. Furthermore, MSCs have been shown in almost all tissues. They can be easily isolated from the bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord, fetal liver, muscle, and lung and can be successfully expanded in vitro [32]. It is better to use freshly isolated MSCs in stem cell therapy, because it has been shown that major histocompatibility complex II molecules could be increased during in vitro expansion of the stem cells, which may increase their allogenicity [33]. Recent studies have suggested that the allogenicity of MSCs has no significant adverse impact on their engraftment in wound healing, though [34]. Multiple studies have also demonstrated the ability of stem cell bioactive factors (the secretome) to restore the ovarian function and regeneration [35,36,37]. Earlier research primarily attributed the effects of the MSC potential therapy to these cells’ capacity for local differentiation into various tissue types. However, recently, research studies have indicated that implanted MSCs have short lifespans, and their therapeutic benefits could be due to their secretome [38]. The secretome is formed of molecules secreted into the extracellular space and consists of soluble proteins, free nucleic acids, lipids, and extracellular vesicles. These vesicles include apoptotic bodies, microparticles, and exosomes. Gu et al. studied the reparative effects of MSCs on vascular tissues. They found that two mechanisms are involved in vascular regeneration: the MSCs’ multipotent differentiation ability to produce endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and other cell types, as well as their capacity to secrete various trophic factors. These factors are potent in promoting angiogenesis, inhibiting apoptosis, and modulating immunoreactions [39].

The immunomodulatory effect of MSCs works through immune cells such as natural killer (NK) cells, B and T cells, and dendritic cell (DC) differentiation and migration [40]. Additionally, coculture of the MSC secretome promotes the anti-inflammatory phenotype of DCs, T cells, macrophages, and NK cells [41, 42]. In addition, the MSC secretome includes a number of molecules, such as prostaglandin E2, tumor necrosis factor-α-stimulated gene-6, transforming growth factor-β, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and interleukin-10, which may mediate the immunomodulatory function of MSCs [43, 44]. In the context of POF, the regenerative mechanism of BMSCs in the ovary could be mainly via the promotion of the angiogenesis. Like in other reported models, MSCs produce a large variety of humoral factors that may play a role in tubular formation by recruiting ovarian endothelial microvessel cells [45, 46]. The data from our experiments in our lab suggest that the MSC secretome can produce similar effects on human granulosa cells in vitro [47]. In a recent publication by our group, Park et al. reported that the expression of proliferation marker Ki67 was significantly increased by treatment with the MSC secretome in human ovarian endothelial cells [48]. MSC secretome treatment also induced significantly higher expression of several angiogenic markers, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2, Tie2/Tek, VE-cadherin, endoglin, and VEGF, than of matched controls. It suggests that the MSC secretome likely contains bioactive factors that can enhance ovarian angiogenesis. Other studies have indicated that BMSCs are able to differentiate into endothelial cells, pericytes, or even vessel walls to support the formation of blood vessels [49]. Furthermore, it was suggested that MSCs are also capable of protecting endothelial cells from apoptosis, including oxidative stress–related apoptosis in the initial phase of angiogenesis [50]. The role of MSCs in promoting angiogenesis was reported in various studies demonstrating that MSCs support the late phases of angiogenesis, including blood vessel maturation [51, 52]. This is also consistent with our preclinical work where estrogen-responsive organs demonstrated remarkable increases in the mean weight, such as for the ovaries, uterus, kidneys, and liver [13]. Also, multiple studies demonstrate that transplanted MSCs may play an important role in the ovarian microenvironment paracrine regulation, producing a wide array of cytokines, such as VEGF, insulin-like growth factor-1, and HGF, that inhibit apoptosis [53].

The results of the first case show that the use of autologous BMSCs injected into the ovaries of patients with POF has a measurable/quantifiable effect with promising results that may make this method a potential treatment option for these patients in the future. In our study, the patients underwent BMSC collection and injection in the same setting while under general anesthesia, which is widely acceptable to patients interested in this trial. In a similar study using MSCs to treat POF, researchers claimed that the use of a similar protocol in patients with POF resulted in spontaneous pregnancy in one patient, but the MSC preparation details, post-procedural serum hormone levels, and imaging data were lacking from that brief report [54].

Our data show an immediate impact on ovarian volume that persisted throughout the following assessments. There was a consistent and sustained increase in serum estrogen levels through follow-up at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. Such partial correction of a hypoestrogenic state may explain the patient-reported reversal of several menopausal symptoms particularly noticed about 3 months after MSC implantation and onward. Interestingly, there was no increase in the volume of the left control ovary. Both patients reported one incident of spontaneous menses about 7 months after BMSC implantation after several years of absolute amenorrhea, potentially due to the partial correction of E2 hormone levels. Because there was no increase in serum progesterone levels and transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) revealed no detectable antral follicles, one assumes that this anovulatory menstrual bleeding is likely due to the effect of increasing serum estrogen levels on the endometrium after BMSC implantation. These results can be due to the effect of MSCs on the regeneration of the granulosa cells and initiation of folliculogenesis likely up to the secondary follicle stage, which may explain the increase in serum E2 levels with no change in AFC. The increase in size of the right (treated) ovary versus pretreatment size and also compared with the left (control) ovary suggests resumption of folliculogenesis as well as likely stimulated angiogenesis in these injected ovaries. Neither patient seemed to achieve ovulation or reported pregnancies during the 1-year study period. This can be due to a number of factors; for example, the 12-month duration of this trial may not be sufficient to restart the long-stagnant folliculogenesis. Another reason may be the use of autologous MSCs, because several reports have suggested that autologous MSCs from patients with systemic diseases may be suboptimal and possess inferior regenerative abilities compared with such cells from healthy donors [55,56,57]. Although these early observations are encouraging, we recognize the limitation of our report due to a small number of cases and the lack of several data points from the second case. Our study is active and registered with ( with additional enrollment. Additional research in this area is urgently needed to fully explore the potential of MSCs as a promising treatment for this devastating disease.


Our study reveals encouraging preliminary data observed after autologous BMSC engraftment into the ovaries of patients with POF. The BMSC delivery into the ovary diminished menopausal symptoms observed at preoperative assessments. The treated patients were able to resume menses within 7 months following MSC engraftment. In addition, no complications or safety concerns were reported in our study. More studies are needed to evaluate this approach, and we will also continue reporting our ongoing clinical trial.

Availability of data and materials

Our study is active and is registered with (



Antral follicle count


Anti-Müllerian hormone


Activated partial thromboplastin time


Bone marrow–derived stem cell

CA 125:

Cancer antigen 125


Cell therapy


Dendritic cell




Follicle-stimulating hormone






Hepatocyte growth factor


Hormone replacement therapy


International normalized ratio


In vitro fertilization


In vitro maturation


Luteinizing hormone


Mean corpuscular hemoglobin


Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration


Mean corpuscular volume


Mean platelet volume


Natural killer


Premature ovarian failure


Red blood cells


Red blood cell distribution width


Vascular endothelial growth factor


White blood cells


  1. 1.

    Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L. Premature ovarian failure. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jankowska K. Premature ovarian failure. Prz Menopauzalny. 2017;16(2):51–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nelson LM. Clinical practice. Primary ovarian insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(6):606–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sükür YE, Kıvançlı IB, Ozmen B. Ovarian aging and premature ovarian failure. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2014;15(3):190–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Torrealday S, Kodaman P, Pal L. Premature ovarian insufficiency - an update on recent advances in understanding and management. F1000Res. 2017;6:2069.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sheikhansari G, Aghebati-Maleki L, Nouri M, Jadidi-Niaragh F, Yousefi M. Current approaches for the treatment of premature ovarian failure with stem cell therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;102:254–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Coulam CB, Adamson SC, Annegers JF. Incidence of premature ovarian failure. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(4):604–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hirshfield AN. Development of follicles in the mammalian ovary. Int Rev Cytol. 1991;124:43–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Findlay JK, Hutt KJ, Hickey M, Anderson RA. What is the “ovarian reserve”? Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):628–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mount NM, Ward SJ, Kefalas P, Hyllner J. Cell-based therapy technology classifications and translational challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1680):20150017.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bao R, Xu P, Wang Y, et al. Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells transplantation rescues premature ovarian insufficiency induced by chemotherapy. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34(4):320–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dimarino AM, Caplan AI, Bonfield TL. Mesenchymal stem cells in tissue repair. Front Immunol. 2013;4:201.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mohamed SA, Shalaby SM, Abdelaziz M, Brakta S, Hill WD, Ismail N, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells partially reverse infertility in chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(1):51–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Satoh H, Kishi K, Tanaka T, Kubota Y, Nakajima T, Akasaka Y, et al. Transplanted mesenchymal stem cells are effective for skin regeneration in acute cutaneous wounds. Cell Transplant. 2004;13(4):405–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    ASGCT - American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2018.

  16. 16.

    Stoltz JF, Decot V, Huseltein C, He X, Zhang L, Magdalou J, et al. Introduction to regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. Biomed Mater Eng. 2012;22(1-3):3–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gill S, Maus MV, Porter DL. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: 25 years in the making. Blood Rev. 2016;30(3):157–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ghadami M, El-Demerdash E, Zhang D, Salama SA, Binhazim AA, Archibong AE, et al. Bone marrow transplantation restores follicular maturation and steroid hormones production in a mouse model for primary ovarian failure. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32462.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guo JQ, Gao X, Lin ZJ, Wu WZ, Huang LH, Dong HY, Chen J, Lu J, Fu YF, Wang J, Ma YJ, Chen XW, Wu ZX, He FQ, Yang SL, Liao LM, Zheng F, Tan JM. BMSCs reduce rat granulosa cell apoptosis induced by cisplatin and perimenopause. BMC Cell Biology 2013;14:18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Liu T, Huang Y, Zhang J, Qin W, Chi H, Chen J, et al. Transplantation of human menstrual blood stem cells to treat premature ovarian failure in mouse model. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23(13):1548–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lorzadeh N, Kazemirad N. Application of stem cells to infertility treatment with emphasis on mesenchymal stem cells and ovarian stem cells. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35(12):1142–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    National Institutes of Health (NIH). Stem cell information: stem cell basics. Accessed 7 Jan 2019.

  23. 23.

    Dorgan JF, Fears TR, McMahon RP, Aronson Friedman L, Patterson BH, Greenhut SF. Measurement of steroid sex hormones in serum: a comparison of radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry. Steroids. 2002;67(3):151–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ebrahimi M, Akbari Asbagh F. Pathogenesis and causes of premature ovarian failure: an update. Int J Fertil Steril. 2011;5(2):54–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kalu E, Panay N. Spontaneous premature ovarian failure: management challenges. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2008;24(5):273–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nelson LM, Covington SN, Rebar RW. An update: spontaneous premature ovarian failure is not an early menopause. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(5):1327–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Dragojević-Dikić S, Rakić S, Nikolić B, Popovac S. Hormone replacement therapy and successful pregnancy in a patient with premature ovarian failure. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25(12):769–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kawamura K, Cheng Y, Suzuki N, Deguchi M, Sato Y, Takae S, et al. Hippo signaling disruption and Akt stimulation of ovarian follicles for infertility treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(43):17474–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhai J, Yao G, Dong F, Bu Z, Cheng Y, Sato Y, et al. In vitro activation of follicles and fresh tissue auto-transplantation in primary ovarian insufficiency patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(11):4405–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Suzuki N, Yoshioka N, Takae S, Sugishita Y, Tamura M, Hashimoto S, et al. Successful fertility preservation following ovarian tissue vitrification in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(3):608–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wei X, Yang X, Han ZP, Qu FF, Shao L, Shi YF. Mesenchymal stem cells: a new trend for cell therapy. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2013;34(6):747–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bianco P, Robey PG, Simmons PJ. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2(4):313–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tarte K, Gaillard J, Lataillade JJ, Fouillard L, Becker M, Mossafa H, et al. Clinical-grade production of human mesenchymal stromal cells: occurrence of aneuploidy without transformation. Blood. 2010;115(8):1549–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chen L, Tredget EE, Liu C, Wu Y. Analysis of allogenicity of mesenchymal stem cells in engraftment and wound healing in mice. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e7119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Huang B, Lu J, Ding C, Zou Q, Wang W, Li H. Exosomes derived from human adipose mesenchymal stem cells improve ovary function of premature ovarian insufficiency by targeting SMAD. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):216.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang Q, Bu S, Sun J, Xu M, Yao X, He K, et al. Paracrine effects of human amniotic epithelial cells protect against chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):270.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Khanmohammadi N, Sameni HR, Mohammadi M, Pakdel A, Mirmohammadkhani M, Parsaie H, et al. Effect of transplantation of bone marrow stromal cell- conditioned medium on ovarian function, morphology and cell death in cyclophosphamide-treated rats. Cell J. 2018;20(1):10–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Beer L, Mildner M, Ankersmit HJ. Cell secretome based drug substances in regenerative medicine: when regulatory affairs meet basic science. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(7):170.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gu W, Hong X, Potter C, Qu A, Xu Q. Mesenchymal stem cells and vascular regeneration. Microcirculation. 2017;24:e12324.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ivanova-Todorova E, Bochev I, Mourdjeva M, Dimitrov R, Bukarev D, Kyurkchiev S, et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells are more potent suppressors of dendritic cells differentiation compared to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Immunol Lett. 2009;126(1-2):37–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 2005;105(4):1815–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Maggini J, Mirkin G, Bognanni I, Holmberg J, Piazzon IM, Nepomnaschy I, et al. Mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells turn activated macrophages into a regulatory-like profile. PLoS One. 2010;5(2):e9252.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Paul G, Anisimov SV. The secretome of mesenchymal stem cells: potential implications for neuroregeneration. Biochimie. 2013;95(12):2246–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bernardo ME, Fibbe WE. Mesenchymal stromal cells: sensors and switchers of inflammation. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13(4):392–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gong M, Yu B, Wang J, Wang Y, Liu M, Paul C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells release exosomes that transfer miRNAs to endothelial cells and promote angiogenesis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(28):45200–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bian S, Zhang L, Duan L, Wang X, Min Y, Yu H. Extracellular vesicles derived from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote angiogenesis in a rat myocardial infarction model. J Mol Med (Berl). 2014;92(4):387–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hobeika E, et al. Regulation of anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) by oocyte specific growth factors in human cumulus granulosa cells. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3 Suppl):e144–5.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Park HS, Ashour D, Elsharoud A, et al. Towards cell free therapy of premature ovarian insufficiency: human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells secretome enhances angiogenesis in human ovarian microvascular endothelial cells. HSOA J Stem Cells Res Dev Ther. 2019;5(2):019.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Au P, Tam J, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells facilitate engineering of long-lasting functional vasculature. Blood. 2008;111(9):4551–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Liu SH, Huang JP, Lee RK, Huang MC, Wu YH, Chen CY, et al. Paracrine factors from human placental multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells protect endothelium from oxidative injury via STAT3 and manganese superoxide dismutase activation. Biol Reprod. 2010;82(5):905–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Duffy GP, Ahsan T, O’Brien T, Barry F, Nerem RM. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote angiogenic processes in a time- and dose-dependent manner in vitro. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(9):2459–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Sorrell JM, Baber MA, Caplan AI. Influence of adult mesenchymal stem cells on in vitro vascular formation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(7):1751–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Fu X, He Y, Xie C, Liu W. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation improves ovarian function and structure in rats with chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage. Cytotherapy. 2008;10(4):353–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Edessy M, Hosni HN, Shady Y, Waf Y, Bakr S, Kamel M. Autologous stem cells therapy: the first baby of idiopathic premature ovarian failure. Acta Med Int. 2016;3(1):19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Collins E, Gu F, Qi M, et al. Differential efficacy of human mesenchymal stem cells based on source of origin. J Immunol. 2014;193(9):4381–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sun LY, Zhang HY, Feng XB, Hou YY, Lu LW, Fan LM. Abnormality of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2007;16(2):121–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Carrion F, Nova E, Ruiz C, Diaz F, Inostroza C, Rojo D, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell treatment increased T regulatory cells with no effect on disease activity in two systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2010;19(3):317–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are funded by National Institutes of Health grant R01 HD094378 (AAE) and University of Illinois at Chicago startup funds.

Author information




PI collected clinical data. AEA conceived and wrote the manuscript. US prepared the literature review portion of the manuscript. HT supported manuscript preparation. AES supported manuscript preparation, writing, and editing. AM supported manuscript editing. LGJ provided clinical support. SL performed patient screening and recruitment. AAH guided the clinical trial and the implantation of the stem cells into the ovary and reviewed and edited the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayman Al-Hendy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Augusta University Institutional Review Board (no. 723327-2), and study procedures were initiated only after patients signed informed consent.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Igboeli, P., El Andaloussi, A., Sheikh, U. et al. Intraovarian injection of autologous human mesenchymal stem cells increases estrogen production and reduces menopausal symptoms in women with premature ovarian failure: two case reports and a review of the literature. J Med Case Reports 14, 108 (2020).

Download citation


  • Premature ovarian failure
  • Infertility
  • Cell therapy
  • MSCs
  • BMSCs
  • Bone marrow–derived stem cells
  • Mesenchymal stem cells
  • Case report