Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Successful total en bloc spondylectomy of the L3 vertebra with a paravertebral giant cell tumor following preoperative treatment with denosumab: a case report

  • 1, 3Email author,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 3,
  • 3, 5,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Journal of Medical Case Reports201913:116

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-019-2029-4

  • Received: 10 August 2018
  • Accepted: 24 February 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Giant cell tumor is known to be a benign neoplasm that arises most commonly in the long bones, while cases in the spine are rare. Recently, denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa β ligand, has been used to treat patients with giant cell tumor. However, there are few reports of total en bloc spondylectomy being used for paravertebral giant cell tumor lesions following denosumab therapy.

Case presentation

Our patient was a 20-year-old Japanese woman with a 4-month history of lower back pain. A spinal computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging of her lumbar spine revealed an osteolytic lesion involving the L3 vertebral body, and the tumor extended toward the left side of the paravertebral soft tissue and into the left pedicle. The lesion was diagnosed as a giant cell tumor by needle biopsy. Denosumab treatment calcified the paravertebral giant cell tumor lesion and the tumor vertebral body was removed completely by total en bloc spondylectomy.

Conclusion

This case report describes a patient with a paravertebral giant cell tumor who was successfully treated by preoperative denosumab injection followed by total en bloc spondylectomy.

Keywords

  • Giant cell tumor
  • Denosumab
  • Total en bloc spondylectomy
  • Paravertebral lesion

Background

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) account for 4–8% of all primary bone tumors, and they are most frequently located in the juxta-articular metaphysis of the long bones [1], while 2–3% of GCTs develop in the spine and sacrum [2]. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa β ligand (RANKL), is used in patients with GCT, inhibiting osteoclast-like giant cell recruitment, thereby preventing the osteolysis typical of GCT [3]. Treatments for GCT depend on its location; excision and intralesional curettage are used for GCTs in the extremities, whereas denosumab followed by total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is used for spinal GCTs. TES may be difficult in some patients, however, because of the fragility or paravertebral location of GCT. This case report describes a patient with a paravertebral GCT who was successfully treated by TES of the L3 vertebra following denosumab therapy.

Case presentation

A 20-year-old Japanese woman with a 4-month history of severe lower back pain was referred to our out-patient department. She had no history of fever, trauma, weight loss, or previous infection.

Radiographic analysis showed collapse of the left side of the L3 vertebral body and swelling of the iliopsoas muscle. Spinal computed tomography (CT) revealed an osteolytic lesion involving the L3 vertebral body and surrounding soft tissue, causing vertebral body collapse (Fig. 1a, b). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of her lumbar spine showed the tumor extending toward the left side of the paravertebral soft tissue and into the left pedicle (Enneking SIII) (Fig. 1c, d). Pathological and immunohistochemical analyses of a needle biopsy specimen showed a GCT with multinucleate giant cells surrounded by neoplastic stromal cells (Fig. 2a). A phase 2 trial showed no adverse effects or complications of denosumab, so she was prescribed six cycles of monthly subcutaneous injections of 120-mg denosumab [4]. Lumbar CT during denosumab treatment showed that the tumor included a paravertebral lesion with progressive calcification (Fig. 2b–d).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a, b Computed tomography prior to denosumab treatment, showing an osteolytic lesion involving the L3 vertebral body, which collapsed and expanded into the left side of the iliopsoas muscle (arrowhead). c, d T2-weighted magnetic resonance images prior to denosumab therapy, showing the tumor extending toward the left side of the paravertebral soft tissue (arrowhead). T2WI T2-weighted image

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

a Histologic examination of a tumor biopsy specimen prior to denosumab therapy, showing multinucleate giant cells surrounded by neoplastic stromal cells (hematoxylin and eosin staining; scale bar, 100 μm). b-c Computed tomography images after 6 months of denosumab treatment show a clear border between the vertebral tumor body and soft tissue, indicating calcification of the tumor body (arrowhead). b Coronal view. c Axial view. d Three-dimensional reconstructed image from enhanced computed tomography

Following denosumab treatment, she underwent two-stage (anteroposterior) L3 TES. Stage 1 utilized a posterior approach for resecting the posterior vertebral component; the total operation took 5 hours 16 minutes and the total bleeding was 1520 ml. Stage 2 utilized an anterior retroperitoneal approach for resecting the anterior vertebral component followed by intervertebral cage insertion; the total operation took 6 hours 43 minutes, and the total bleeding was 2320 ml (Fig. 3a, b). The day before the second-stage operation, preoperative angiography and segmental artery embolization from L3 to L4 were performed to reduce intraoperative bleeding. The vertebral body was removed completely after the discectomies, and the bilateral psoas muscle was released from the L3 vertebral body (Fig. 3c, d). There were no complications during or after the surgery. She was discharged on the seventh postoperative day, ambulatory and without neurological deficits. Two years after surgery, she has not experienced GCT recurrence or implant failure.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

a Intraoperative examination of the tumor at anterior retroperitoneal approach. b Plain radiographs of the anteroposterior and lateral view. c, d Results showing that the L3 vertebral tumor body had been completely removed by the anterior transperitoneal approach

Discussion and conclusions

GCT, or osteoclastoma, is a relatively common benign bone tumor, usually arising from the metaphysis of long bones and extending into the epiphysis. Spinal GCT is rare, accounting for < 2–3% of GCTs [5], and its treatment remains challenging. Surgery for GCT traditionally consists of intralesional curettage with local adjuvant treatment (for example, polymethylmethacrylate known as PMMA, liquid nitrogen, phenol) or TES, which is effective for lumbar spine tumors without significant risks of neurological deficits or mortality [6, 7]. Optimal TES candidates are patients with Enneking SIII, an aggressive benign spine tumor [8]. Because local recurrence is common following intralesional curettage with adjuvants, reoperation and/or postoperative radiotherapy may be required [9]. In contrast, TES exhibits rarer local recurrence. Local recurrence rates following intralesional curettage and TES are reportedly 50–80% and 0–15%, respectively [10]. As other studies have reported that TES is effective for thoracic GCT [11, 12], we performed TES for this case of an L3 vertebra with a paravertebral GCT. However, there is no report that TES of huge spinal and paravertebral GCT following preoperative denosumab as in the current case is effective. The current case will be a meaningful report that denosumab is effective even for a huge GCT extending to the soft tissue around the vertebral body.

Denosumab was recently approved for GCT, and for those with severe osteoporosis [13]. Denosumab inhibits the recruitment of osteoclast-like giant cells by neoplastic stromal cells [3], thereby preventing the osteolysis typically seen in GCT. An open-label phase II study (NCT00396279) of denosumab in patients with GCT reported that 86% had objective responses, that is, elimination of > 90% giant cells or absence of radiographic progression of the target lesion [14]. Preoperative treatment of our patient with denosumab successfully induced GCT calcification and facilitated TES of the tumor vertebrae. Although denosumab is effective for osteoporosis and GCT, it has side effects of hypocalcemia. Salim et al. reported hypocalcemia in an estimated 8–14% of the patients treated with denosumab and even more frequently among those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [15]. To prevent the side effect it is important to assess carefully the vitamin D status and parathyroid hormone (PTH) status in patients with CKD before denosumab exposure and to closely monitor serum calcium levels subsequently.

The need for postoperative denosumab is still to be determined. Inhibition of RANKL may increase the risk of new malignancies by inducing immunosuppression [16]. Broehm et al. reported two cases of sarcoma that arose from bone GCTs by long-term denosumab administration [17]. On the other hand, there have been cases of GCT recurrence following the cessation of denosumab therapy. Although the previous report showed that the mean time to recurrence was approximately 2 years after surgery [18], there has been no recurrence in the current case 2 years after the operation, suggesting the possibility that TES combined with preoperative denosumab is effective for giant spinal GCT. Furthermore, as the use of denosumab to treat GCT will probably increase, further controlled studies to determine the optimal period to use denosumab without promoting malignant transformation and recurrence are needed.

In conclusion, this case report describes a patient with paravertebral GCT who was successfully treated by preoperative denosumab injection followed by TES.

Abbreviations

CKD: 

Chronic kidney disease

CT: 

Computed tomography

GCT: 

Giant cell tumor

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

PMMA: 

Polymethylmethacrylate

PTH: 

Parathyroid hormone

RANKL: 

Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa β ligand

TES: 

Total en bloc spondylectomy

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff and management at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Chiba University.

Funding

All authors received no specific funding for the report.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

HK, SO, KI, KA, MI, MN, TU, KF, YS, HirohitoK, TF, KT, and SeO analyzed and interpreted the patient data. HK, SO, and SeO performed the surgery and followed up the case. KT, TY, TI, SI, HirotoK, and TT advised of the diagnosis and treatment of the case. HK, SO, and SeO were major contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable for case reports.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
(2)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saiseikai Narashino Hospital, 1-1-1, Izumicho, Narashino Chiba, 275-8580, Japan
(3)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitonacho, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan
(4)
Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
(5)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tsukuba University, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan

References

  1. Harrop JS, Schmidt MH, Boriani S, Shaffrey CI. Aggressive “benign” primary spine neoplasms: Osteoblastoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, and giant cell tumor. Spine. 2009;34:39–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zheng MH, Robbins P, Xu J, et al. The histogenesis of giant cell tumour of bone: a model of interaction between neoplastic cells and osteoclasts. Histol Histopathol. 2001;16:297–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Van Der Heijden L, Dijkstra PDS, Blay JY, Gelderblom H. Giant cell tumour of bone in the denosumab era. Eur J Cancer. 2017;77:75–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kroep J, Grimer R, Reichardt P, Rutkowski P, et al. Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: Interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:901–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahlin D. Giant-cell tumor of vertebrae above the sacrum: a review of 31 cases. Cancer. 1977;39:1350–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Santiago-Dieppa DR, Hwang LS, Bydon A, et al. L4 and L5 spondylectomy for en bloc resection of giant cell tumor and review of the literature. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2014;5:151–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy of the lower lumbar spine: a surgical techniques of combined posterior and anterior approach. Spine. 2011;36:74–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R. Primary bone tumors of the spine. Terminology and surgical staging. Spine. 1997;22:1036–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarkson PW, Hurlbert J, Fox R, Zhang H, Lewis S, Riaz S, et al. Surgical management of primary bone tumors of the spine: Validation of an approach to enhance cure and reduce local recurrence. Spine. 2011;36:830–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ouyang HQ, Jiang L, Liu XG, Wei F, Yang SM, Meng N, Jiang P, Yu M, Wu FL, Dang L, Zhou H, Zhang H, Liu ZJ. Recurrence Factors in Giant Cell Tumors of the Spine. Chin Med J. 2017;130:1557–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Inoue G, Imura T, Miyagi M, Saito W, Tazawa R, Nakazawa T, Takaso M. Total en bloc spondylectomy of the eleventh thoracic vertebra following denosumab therapy for the treatment of a giant cell tumor. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:4005–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldschlager T, Dea N, Boyd M, Reynolds J, Patel S, Rhines LD, Mendel E, Pacheco M, Ramos E, Mattei TA, Fisher CG. Giant cell tumors of the spine: has denosumab changed the treatment paradigm? J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22:526–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. McClung MR, Lewiecki EM, Cohen SB, Bolognese MA, Woodson GC, Moffett AH, et al. Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:821–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomas D, Henshaw R, Skubitz K, Chawla S, Staddon A, Blay JY, et al. Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:275–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Salim SA, Nair LR, Thomas L, Garla V, Palabindala V, Agarwal M, Fülöp T. Denosumab-Associated Severe Hypocalcemia in a Patient With Chronic Kidney Disease. Am J Med Sci. 2018;355:506–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Errani C, Tsukamoto S, Mavrogenis AF. How safe and effective is denosumab for bone giant cell tumour? Int Orthop. 2017;41:2397–400.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Broehm CJ, Garbrecht EL, Wood J, Bocklage T. Two Cases of Sarcoma Arising in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Treated with Denosumab. Case Rep Med. 2015;2015:767198.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kajiwara D, Kamoda H, Yonemoto T, Iwata S, Ishii T, Tsukanishi T, Ohtori S, Yamazaki M, Okawa A. Denosumab for Treatment of a Recurrent Cervical Giant-Cell Tumor. Asian Spine J. 2016;10:553–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement