Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Chordoma dedifferentiation after proton beam therapy: a case report and review of the literature

Journal of Medical Case Reports201610:280

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-1076-3

Received: 22 June 2016

Accepted: 23 September 2016

Published: 12 October 2016

Abstract

Background

Chordoma is a rare invasive bone tumor that may occur anywhere along the neuraxis. A total of three primary histological varieties have been identified: conventional, chondroid, and dedifferentiated.

Case presentation

We report a case of an 8-year-old white girl who presented with conventional chordoma, was treated with surgical resection and mixed proton and photon beam therapy, and had a recurrence in the resection cavity 2.5 years later with dedifferentiated morphology. The recurrent tumor did not express brachyury, a recently identified protein specific to tissue of notochordal origin.

Conclusions

The short time period between radiation therapy and dedifferentiation, low dose of photons, and rarity of dedifferentiated skull base chordomas in pediatric patients should alert clinicians to the possibility of chordoma dedifferentiation after proton beam therapy.

Keywords

Chordoma Proton beam therapy Dedifferentiation Pediatric tumors Oncology Case report

Background

Chordoma is a rare, locally invasive bone tumor of notochordal origin with an incidence of 0.1 to 0.8/1,000,000 [13]. It is 40 % less likely in females compared to males [2, 4]. The tumor can present at the base of the skull, in the vertebral column, or in the sacral region, but there is controversy over the relative incidence at these sites [2, 5]. Although chordomas are typically a tumor of the aged, presentation in younger individuals tends to occur at the skull base [2, 4, 6]. In addition, female gender is associated with greater likelihood of presentation in the skull base [2, 4]. The overall median survival after chordoma diagnosis is approximately 6 years, but it is higher for tumors with chondroid histology and lower for those with dedifferentiated histology compared to the conventional variety [2, 7].

Skull base chordomas are typically surgically resected and proton beam therapy is often used to treat residual tumor [8, 9]. We report the first case, to the best of our knowledge, of a skull base chordoma that dedifferentiated after proton beam therapy. A timeline of the case is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Timeline of the patient’s clinical course

Date

Event

16 Jun 2012

Initial presentation with headaches and emesis prompts magnetic resonance imaging that shows a large heterogeneous skull base mass suspicious for chordoma.

2 Jul 2012

Endonasal surgical resection. Surgical pathology confirms chordoma diagnosis.

2 Nov – 29 Nov 2012

Fractionated proton and photon beam therapy: 77.4 Gy total, 59.4 Gy (cobalt gray equivalent) in 33 fractions with protons and 18 Gy in 10 fractions with photons.

18 Jun – 11 Dec 2013

Interval decrease in tumor size visualized at scheduled magnetic resonance imagings.

3 Jan 2015

Visual disturbances prompt magnetic resonance imaging, which shows an enhancing mass in the resection site suspicious for recurrence with dedifferentiation.

21 Jan 2015

Retrosigmoid craniotomy. Surgical pathology shows complete dedifferentiation.

29 Mar 2015

Begins ifosfamide and etoposide alternating every 2 weeks with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide.

23 Apr 2015 – 25 Mar 2016

Interval decrease in tumor size visualized at scheduled magnetic resonance imagings. Continues ifosfamide and etoposide alternating every 2 weeks with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide.

26 Apr 2016

Last of 17 cycles of ifosfamide and etoposide alternating with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Begins maintenance capecitabine.

Case presentation

Clinical course

An 8-year-old white girl with no family history of skin cancer except for skin cancer in her grandfather complained of 4 weeks of pressure-like headaches, mostly in the posterior occipital area, and intermittent nausea with several episodes of emesis in June of 2012. A physical examination was significant for decreased sensation to light touch over the right side of her face and her right upper extremity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of her brain revealed a large heterogeneous skull base mass. Chordoma was suspected over chondrosarcoma, and the diagnosis was confirmed by pathology after tissue was obtained during an endonasal surgical resection. Resection of the chordoma left residual tumor in her lateral skull base at the hypoglossal canal and jugular foramen. She was referred to a proton facility where she received fractionated proton and photon beam therapy: 77.4 Gy total, 59.4 Gy (cobalt gray equivalent) in 33 fractions with protons and 18 Gy in 10 fractions with photons. She was returned to our care afterwards. Scheduled MRIs showed decreasing lesion size through postoperative year 2. However, she experienced acute cranial nerve 6 palsy approximately 2.5 years after surgical resection. An MRI showed a 3×1.5×4 cm mass in the resection cavity with signal change suspicious for dedifferentiation. A subsequent biopsy obtained during a retrosigmoid craniotomy confirmed high-grade sarcoma. She has since completed 17 cycles of ifosfamide and etoposide alternating with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide with the last round in April 2016. She began maintenance capecitabine on 26 April 2016. The most recent MRI, approximately 14 months after her second surgery, showed a mild interval decrease in tumor size.

Imaging findings

MRI of our patient’s brain with and without contrast at her initial presentation showed a large heterogeneous mass emanating intracranially from the base of her clivus and extending through the foramen magnum to C1–C2. A small portion was anterior to C1–C2 in her nasopharyngeal soft tissues with extension through her left hypoglossal canal. Posteriorly, the lesion displaced her pons and medulla. Multiple cranial nerves were not well seen and were either displaced or encased by the mass as it filled the right cerebellomedullary angle. The lesion was T1 isointense to muscle (Fig. 1a), and only mildly enhanced in portions (Fig. 1b). The lesion had a predominantly very bright T2 signal (Fig. 1c). There was restricted diffusion with bright diffusion-weighted imaging and dark apparent diffusion coefficient signals, indicating hypercellularity (Fig. 1d, e).
Fig. 1

a T1-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging showing a lesion isointense to muscle which displaced pons and medulla posteriorly and with a small nasopharyngeal component (arrow). b Post-contrast axial T1-weighted image showed mild enhancement (arrow). c Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging showing bright signal (arrows). d Restricted diffusion with bright diffusion-weighted imaging signal (arrow). e Restricted diffusion with dark apparent diffusion coefficient signal (arrow)

Follow-up MRI 2.5 years after the initial MRI, and after surgery and proton beam therapy, showed local recurrence. The recurrent tumor was centered at the rightward aspect of her clivus and extended superiorly to the dorsum sella and inferiorly to the level of the occipital condyle. The signal intensity of this mass was intermediate to dark, isointense to gray matter on T2-weighted images in contrast to the very T2 hyperintense signal like cerebral spinal fluid as seen on the initial presentation (Fig. 2a). In addition, on follow-up the lesion was avidly enhancing post-contrast on T1-weighted imaging (Fig. 2b) as compared to the initial lesion where there was only mild enhancement.
Fig. 2

a Axial T2-weighted image of the recurrent tumor showing intermediate to dark, isointense to gray matter signal intensity (arrow). b Axial T1-weighted post-contrast image showing avid enhancement (arrow)

Pathology findings

The biopsy from the initial lesion showed classic chordoma histology with physaliphorous cells with multivacuolated cytoplasm mixed with epithelioid cells arranged in anastomosing cords, clusters, and chains. There was a myxoid matrix and occasional fibrous septa (Fig. 3). No immunohistochemical stains were performed as histology provided a definitive diagnosis.
Fig. 3

Hematoxylin and eosin stain showing pathognomonic physaliphorous cells with multivacuolated cytoplasm (arrows), mixed with epithelioid cells. Nuclei are relatively bland without significant pleomorphism. Magnification 40×

Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the recurrent tumor obtained during our patient’s second surgery, however, showed a high-grade anaplastic spindle cell neoplasm. There were areas of geographical necrosis with no particular architectural pattern visible at low magnification (Fig. 4a). In the higher power images, the cells were very pleomorphic with epithelioid and spindle shapes, and there were mitotic figures present (Fig. 4b). Myofibroblastic tumor and fibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma were ruled out with immunohistochemistry. Vimentin was positive, consistent with sarcoma in general. Ki-67, a proliferation index that is normally very low in a chordoma, was scored at 80 %, indicating rapid cellular division. Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), cytokeratin, and brachyury were negative, indicating full dedifferentiation.
Fig. 4

a Unlike tissue from the first biopsy, the recurrent tumor had prominent areas of necrosis (arrows; 5× magnification). b Mitotic figure (circled) and nuclear pleomorphism were seen at 40× magnification. Spindle cells were seen, but physaliphorous cells were not noted

Discussion

Less than 5 % of chordoma diagnoses occur in children under 10 years of age [2]. Among childhood cases, Borba and colleagues found a distinct difference in presentation, tumor morphology, and prognosis between cases occurring in children under and over age 5 [10]. Children under age 5 frequently have long tract deficits [11, 12] and intracranial hypertension, and the tumor is often of an atypical morphology, which has a poor prognosis [10]. Children over age 5 most frequently present with double vision [1317] and headaches [13, 18, 19], have typical tumor morphology, and, thus, survive for longer [10]. Our patient, an 8-year-old girl presenting with headaches and nausea, was found to have a typical clival chordoma, which initially fit the expected pattern of disease presentation. The histology and imaging appearance of her tumor, though, changed with recurrence 2.5 years after the initial surgical resection and radiation therapy.

Chordomas show dual epithelial-mesenchymal differentiation as they arise from embryonic remnants of the notochord [20]. Although the molecular pathogenesis of chordoma is not fully known, brachyury has been shown to be both a regulator of notochordal differentiation and a chordoma marker. Cytogenetic studies have shown that mutations on multiple chromosomes are associated with chordoma [21]. Conventional chordomas feature large polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic to amphophilic cytoplasm, variable nuclei, and occasional vacuoles (physaliferous cells) arranged in cords and sheets in a myxoid stroma [22, 23]. Chondroid chordomas have regions where the stroma resembles hyaline cartilage and neoplastic, sometimes physaliferous, cells grow in lacunae [22, 23]. Finally, dedifferentiated chordomas have regions of or have become entirely composed of malignant sarcomatous cells [22, 24]. Previous reports have shown possible loss of EMA and cytokeratin [24, 25], but our case is the first to report absence of brachyury in the dedifferentiated tumor. In addition, dedifferentiation was faster than in earlier reports of completely dedifferentiated chordoma occurring after conventional radiotherapy [26, 27].

T1-weighted MRI shows chordomas as having predominantly intermediate to dark signal [28]. They are typically bright on T2-weighted MRI, but dedifferentiated chordomas are not [29]. Diffusion-weighted MRI will show diffusion restriction, but this may be difficult to interpret in skull base tumors due to artifact at the skull base [30]. Contrast enhancement is variable [31]. Further advancements in molecular imaging may allow for definitive diagnosis without the need for biopsy. Much as immunohistochemistry is used to identify proteins in biopsies, radiolabeled molecular probes and targeted MRI contrasts may be used in the future to identify unique proteins in neoplasms [32]. Skull base chordomas most often involve the upper half of the clivus and often extend to the lower half of the clivus, posterior clinoid process, cavernous sinus, and occipital condyle [30]. Our patient’s tumor showed typical MRI presentation when she first presented to us. However, the resection site recurrence had intermediate to dark signal on T2-weighted images.

Most recent research indicates the overall prognosis for younger patients is better than for adult patients with chordoma, although there have been contradictory findings [3, 4, 23, 30]. Surgical margins are the most important prognostic indicator for patients without dedifferentiated chordoma, and gross resection or debulking is recommended for patients without contraindications [8]. However, dedifferentiated chordomas are less responsive to surgery and carry a worse prognosis [8, 33]. Residual tumor in the resection cavity responds best to high doses of radiation, which creates a difficulty when treating clival tumors because the adjacent structures are critical and radiosensitive [8]. Proton beam therapy is used to deliver high doses of radiation (70 to 80 GyE) with less damage to non-neoplastic tissue than conventional photon radiotherapy due to its sharp Bragg peak [9, 34]. However, side effects such as radiation necrosis of the optic nerve and temporal lobe, epilepsy, inhibition of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis, and other endocrinopathies have been reported [8, 34, 35]. Hara and colleagues reported the only case of a sarcomatoid transformation after proton beam therapy, which occurred 3 years after the initial treatment and 1 year after a second course of proton beam therapy [36]. It is important to note that some authors distinguish between sarcomatoid chordoma and dedifferentiated chordoma in that the first retains immunoreactivity for cytokeratin, whereas the latter does not [24, 37].

Conclusions

Our patient’s case is the first report, to the best of our knowledge, of a chordoma that dedifferentiated after protein beam therapy. There are reports of dedifferentiation after conventional radiation therapy, although the typical photon dose in those cases is severalfold greater than 18 Gy and disease progression much longer than 2.5 years [27, 38, 39]. The case reported here should alert clinicians to the possibility of dedifferentiation after proton beam therapy and prompt histologic analysis of recurrent tumors in this setting. We did not identify any other cases of dedifferentiated skull base chordoma in pediatric patients when reviewing 29 cases published after Borba and colleagues’ 1996 literature review [10]. This highlights the unusual nature of this presentation and the likelihood that proton beam therapy may have contributed to the tumor’s dedifferentiation.

Abbreviations

EMA: 

Epithelial membrane antigen

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the physicians, nurses, and pharmacists who cared for the patient, and the patient’s family for allowing this case report.

Funding

No outside funding was used to support this research.

Availability of data and materials

The author’s original submitted files for images are available within the article.

Authors’ contributions

Identification of the case: JF and RK. Literature review: JF. Drafting report: JF, CG, BS, GML, and RK. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: JF, CG, BS, GML, AC, and RK. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian(s) for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional review board approval was not required for this case report.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Arizona College of Medicine
(2)
Department of Pathology, University of Arizona College of Medicine
(3)
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine
(4)
Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine
(5)
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine
(6)
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona College of Medicine

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. McMaster ML, Goldstein AM, Bromley CM, Ishibe N, Parry DM. Chordoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1973-1995. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Smoll NR, Gautschi OP, Radovanovic I, Schaller K, Weber DC. Incidence and relative survival of chordomas. Cancer. 2013;119:2029–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee J, Bhatia NN, Hoang BH, Ziogas A, Zell JA. Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Patients with Chordoma with Use of the California Cancer Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:356–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. World Health Organization. Classification of Tumours. Lyon: IARC; 2002. p. 12–224.Google Scholar
  6. Menezes AH. Craniovertebral junction neoplasms in the pediatric population. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24:1173–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Casali PG, Stacchiotti S, Sangalli C, Olmi P, Gronchi A. Chordoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007;19:367–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Amichetti M, Cianchetti M, Amelio D, Enrici RM, Minniti G. Proton therapy in chordoma of the base of the skull: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2009;32:403–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rutz HP, Weber DC, Goitein G, Ares C, Bolsi A, Lomax AJ, Pedroni E, Coray A, Hug EB, Timmermann B. Postoperative spot-scanning proton radiation therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma in children and adolescents: initial experience at paul scherrer institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:220–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Borba LA, Al-Mefty O, Mrak RE, Suen J. Cranial chordomas in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:584–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kombogiorgas D, St George EJ, Chapman S, English M, Solanki GA. Infantile clivus chordoma without clivus involvement: case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22:1369–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pirris SM, Pollack IF, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Spiro RM, Tyler-Kabara E, Kassam AB. Corridor surgery: the current paradigm for skull base surgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23:377–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bozbuğa M, Turan Süslü H, Güler I, Bilgi B, Bayindir C. Removal of clival chordoma in an adolescent thorough combned pterional transsylvian and anterior temporal approach. Turk Neurosurg. 2007;17:55–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Harada T, Ohashi T, Ohki K, Sawamura Y, Yoshida K, Ito T, Nagashima K, Matsuda H. Clival chordoma presenting as acute esotropia due to bilateral abducens palsy. Ophthalmologica. 1997;211:109–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mekari-Sabbagh ON, DaCunha RP. Crossed eyes in a six-year-old girl. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;45:331–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore KA, Bohnstedt BN, Shah SU, Abdulkader MM, Bonnin JM, Ackerman LL, Shaikh KA, Kralik SF, Shah MV. Intracranial chordoma presenting as acute hemorrhage in a child: Case report and literature review. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Shinde SV, Monipanda K. Craniospinal dissemination of clival chondroid chordoma. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51:220–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Anderson S, Sato Y, Kirby P, Buatti JM, Menezes A. Disseminated subarachnoid chordoma: long-term favorable follow-up of a pediatric patient. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42:878–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chang SW, Gore PA, Nakaji P, Rekate HL. Juvenile intradural chordoma: case report. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:E525–6. discussion E527.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chugh R, Tawbi H, Lucas DR, Biermann JS, Schuetze SM, Baker LH. Chordoma: the nonsarcoma primary bone tumor. Oncologist. 2007;12:1344–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sun X, Hornicek F, Schwab JH. Chordoma: an update on the pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms. Curr Rev Muscoskelet Med. 2015;8:344–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Heffelfinger MJ, Dahlin DC, Maccarty CS, Beabout JW. Chordomas and cartilaginous tumors at the skull base. Cancer. 1973;32:410–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoch BL, Nielsen GP, Liebsch NJ, Rosenberg AE. Base of skull chordomas in children and adolescents: a clinicopathologic study of 73 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:811–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Meis JM, Raymond AK, Evans HL, Charles RE, Giraldo AA. “Dedifferentiated” chordoma. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of three cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11:516–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fukuda T, Aihara T, Ban S, Nakajima T, Machinami R. Sacrococcygeal chordoma with a malignant spindle cell component. A report of two autopsy cases with a review of the literature. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1992;42:448–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Belza MG, Urich H. Chordoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Evidence for transformation. Cancer. 1986;58:1082–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Halpern J, Kopolovic J, Catane R. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma developing in irradiated sacral chordoma. Cancer. 1984;53:2661–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Doucet V, Peretti-Viton P, Figarella-Branger D, Manera L, Salamon G. MRI of intracranial chordomas. Extent of tumour and contrast enhancement: criteria for differential diagnosis. Neuroradiology. 1997;39:571–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanna SA, Tirabosco R, Amin A, Pollock RC, Skinner JA, Cannon SR, Saifuddin A, Briggs TWR. Dedifferentiated chordoma: a report of four cases arising “de novo.”. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90:652–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Gompel JJ, Janus JR. Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015;48:501–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bag AK, Chapman PR. Neuroimaging: Intrinsic Lesions of the Central Skull Base Region. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2013;34:412–35 [Central Skull Base].View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaller BJ, Modo M, Buchfelder M. Molecular imaging of brain tumors: a bridge between clinical and molecular medicine? Mol Imaging Biol. 2007;9:60–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ouyang T, Zhang N, Zhang Y, Jiao J, Ren J, Huang T, Chen J. Clinical characteristics, immunohistochemistry, and outcomes of 77 patients with skull base chordomas. World Neurosurg. 2014;81:790–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bowyer J, Natha S, Marsh I, Foy P. Visual complications of proton beam therapy for clival chordoma. Eye (Lond). 2003;17:318–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Roda RH, Gallia GL, Eberhart CG, Weingart JD, Laterra J. Epilepsy and temporal lobe injury after skull base proton beam therapy. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16:1220–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hara T, Kawahara N, Tsuboi K, Shibahara J, Ushiku T, Kirino T. Sarcomatous transformation of clival chordoma after charged-particle radiotherapy. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:136–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Morimitsu Y, Aoki T, Yokoyama K, Hashimoto H. Sarcomatoid chordoma: chordoma with a massive malignant spindle-cell component. Skeletal Radiol. 2000;29:721–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hruban RH, May M, Marcove RC, Huvos AG. Lumbo-sacral chordoma with high-grade malignant cartilaginous and spindle cell components. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990;14:384–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rabade N, Goel N, Goel A. Clival dedifferentiated chordoma: a case report. Anal Quant Cytopathol Histopathol. 2014;36:330–4.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement