- Case report
- Open Access
"Floating arm" injury in a child with fractures of the proximal and distal parts of the humerus: a case report
© Güven et al.; licensee Cases Network Ltd. 2009
- Received: 14 January 2009
- Accepted: 9 June 2009
- Published: 17 September 2009
Simultaneous supracondylar humerus fracture and ipsilateral fracture of the proximal humerus in children is rare.
A 10-year-old Turkish boy with an extension type supracondylar humerus fracture and ipsilateral fracture at the proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the humerus was treated by closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. Closed reduction was performed using a Kirschner wire as a "joystick" to manipulate the humeral shaft after some swelling occurred around the elbow and shoulder.
The combination of fractures at the proximal and distal parts of the humerus can be termed as "floating arm" injury. Initial treatment of this unusual injury should be focused on the supracondylar humerus fracture. However, closed reduction can be difficult to perform with the swelling around the elbow and shoulder. A temporary Kirschner wire can be used as a "joystick" to fix and reduce the fracture.
- Closed Reduction
- Kirschner Wire
- Proximal Humeral Fracture
- Humeral Shaft
- Proximal Humerus Fracture
Supracondylar humerus fractures are usually isolated injuries in children, but sometimes they can be associated with ipsilateral fractures of the forearm. The combination of such injuries is known as "floating elbow" -. However the combination of supracondylar humerus fracture with an ipsilateral fracture of the proximal humerus is extremely rare. To the best of our knowledge, only two cases have been reported in the literature previously [5, 6]. It was pointed out in these reports that swelling around the elbow and shoulder regions could make closed reduction difficult. We describe the case of a 10-year-old boy who had an extension type supracondylar humerus fracture and ipsilateral fracture at the proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the humerus. Both fractures were treated successfully by closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation.
Stanitski and Micheli  first used the descriptive term "floating elbow" to describe the combination of ipsilateral fracture of the elbow and forearm. Gausepohl et al. reported a case with fracture dislocation of the elbow combined with unstable distal forearm fracture of the ipsilateral upper extremity and termed this injury as "floating forearm". Similarly, we prefer the term "floating arm" to describe this rare combination of the fractures at the elbow and shoulder regions.
We have found only two cases in the English language literature in which the combination of ipsilateral proximal humerus fracture, flexion type supracondylar humerus fracture and olecranon fracture were present [5, 6]. The authors of both reports recommended that the supracondylar humerus fracture should be reduced first and percutaneously fixed before the reduction of proximal humerus fracture. However, they could not achieve closed reduction for the supracondylar humerus fracture due to the combination of fractures in the same extremity and resulting instability. Therefore, they performed open reduction.
Extension types of supracondylar humerus fractures are mostly accepted as pure hyperextension injuries that are caused by a fall onto the outstretched hand with hyperextension of the elbow . Proximal humerus fractures in children can occur as a result of a direct blow to the shoulder area or indirectly as a fall onto an outstretched hand. This causes a forced position of the upper extremity resulting in a fracture of the proximal humerus . The "floating arm" injury presents a more serious injury than an isolated supracondylar fracture or an isolated fracture of the proximal humerus and reflects a more violent episode of trauma. Due to swelling around the elbow and shoulder, closed reduction, especially for the supracondylar humerus fracture, is not always possible. Parmaksizoglu et al. described an alternative closed reduction method to avoid open reduction for supracondylar humerus fractures in children. They concluded that a temporary Kirschner wire driven as a "joystick" to the humeral shaft before percutaneous fixation made reduction and fixation of the supracondylar humerus fracture easier by controlling the proximal fragment. This technical trick also facilitates closed reduction of the supracondylar humerus fracture in a "floating arm" injury like in our case. A temporary Kirschner wire allows the surgeon to stabilize the humeral shaft and control the motion in the coronal, sagittal and horizontal planes for both supracondylar and proximal humeral fractures.
The supracondylar humerus fracture should be reduced initially in a "floating arm" injury. However, closed reduction can be difficult to perform due to severe swelling around the elbow and shoulder regions associated with this injury. In such cases, a temporary Kirschner wire can be used as a "joystick".
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's parents for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
No funding has been received for the study.
- Stanitski CL, Micheli LJ: Simultaneous ipsilateral fractures of the arm and forearm in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980, 153: 218-222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roposch A, Reis M, Molina M, Davids J, Stanley E, Wilkins K, Chambers HG: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus associated with ipsilateral forearm fractures in children: a report of forty-seven cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001, 21: 307-312. 10.1097/00004694-200105000-00009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Biyani A, Gupta SP, Sharma JC: Ipsilateral supracondylar fracture of humerus and forearm bones in children. Injury. 1989, 20: 203-207. 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90112-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrington P, Sharif I, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE, Moore DP: Management of the floating elbow injury in children. Simultaneous ipsilateral fractures of the elbow and forearm. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000, 120: 205-208. 10.1007/s004020050045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gül A, Sambandam S: Ipsilateral proximal and flexion supracondylar humerus fracture with an associated olecranon fracture in a 4-year-old child: a case report. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2006, 16: 237-239. 10.1007/s00590-006-0085-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- James P, Heinrich SD: Ipsilateral proximal metaphyseal and flexion supracondylar humerus fractures with an associated olecranon avulsion fracture. Orthopedics. 1991, 14: 713-716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gausepohl T, Mader K, Kirschner S, Pennig D: The "floating forearm" injury in a child: a case report. Strat Traum Limb Recon. 2007, 2: 48-54. 10.1007/s11751-007-0017-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kasser JR, Beaty JH: Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus. In Rockwood and Wilkins' Fractures in Children. Edited by: Beaty JHKasser JR. 2001, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1: 617-621. 5Google Scholar
- Kwon Y, Sarwark JF: Proximal humerus, scapula and clavicle. In Rockwood and Wilkins' Fractures in Children. Edited by: Beaty JHKasser JR. 2001, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1: 741-751. 5Google Scholar
- Parmaksizoglu AS, Ozkaya U, Bilgili F, Sayın E, Kabukcuoglu Y: Closed reduction of the pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: the "joystick" method. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008, 10.1007/s00402-008-0790-8.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.