- Case report
- Open Access
Metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma to the pleura: a case report
Journal of Medical Case Reports volume 16, Article number: 69 (2022)
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common malignant neoplasm arising from the salivary glands (Ali et al. in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 20(2): 141-2, 2008, Xi et al. in World J Surg Oncol 10: 232, 2012). When arising from anatomic sites other than the salivary glands it can be a diagnostic challenge. Primary and metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma from and to the pleura are extremely rare entities that are frequently misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or squamous cell carcinoma (Xi et al. in World J Surg Oncol 10: 232, 2012).
We describe an unusual case of a 64-year-old Caucasian female patient with metastatic high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma to the pleura, morphologically resembling squamous cell carcinoma. Molecular studies of both the parotid gland and pleural tumors helped prove the metastatic nature of the pleural lesion.
Metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma to the pleura is a rare entity, frequently misdiagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma. Differentiating between a lung primary and a metastatic disease has treatment implications and prognostic significance for the patient. When morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap exists, molecular testing can help distinguish mucoepidermoid carcinoma from other neoplasms.
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant neoplasm arising from the salivary glands [1, 2]. It frequently affects the parotid gland, followed by the submandibular, sublingual, and minor salivary glands . It can also arise from the nasal cavity, bronchial wall, lungs, and pleura [3,4,5,6].
MECs are composed of mucinous, epidermoid, and intermediate cells in various degrees in an admixed solid and cystic architecture [6, 7]. High-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma comprises solid sheets of epidermoid and clear cells with necrosis, nuclear pleomorphism, increased mitotic activity, and, rarely, focal keratinization [8, 9].
When arising in areas other than the salivary glands, it can be challenging and commonly misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma .
A 64-year-old Caucasian female with a past medical history of asthma, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus presented to the emergency department with worsening dyspnea and cough for 3 weeks, which showed no improvement with antibiotics. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest revealed a right lung nodule measuring 1.2 cm in the largest dimension, bilateral pleural effusions, and multiple pleural-based nodules. The largest pleural nodule in the right chest measured 5.8 cm and in the left chest measured 4.8 cm (Fig. 1). The findings of multiple nodularities involving both lungs and pleura were suspicious for metastatic disease.
Cytological examination of the pleural fluid showed reactive mesothelial cells and inflammatory cells with no evidence of malignancy. Subsequent biopsy of the right pleural nodule showed sheets of tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and few scattered clear cells (Fig. 2A). Mucocytes were absent. The tumor cells were positive for p63 and negative for thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 2B). A review of the patient’s past medical history was significant for a high-grade salivary gland neoplasm, which was resected and radiated 6 years prior at an outside facility. At this point, the differential diagnosis included squamous cell carcinoma of the lung with pleural involvement or metastasis from the previously resected salivary gland neoplasm.
A review of the prior parotidectomy specimen and comparison of both lesions showed similar morphologic characteristics (Fig. 3A, B). The tumor cells from the previous resection were positive for cytokeratin 7(CK7), CAM5.2, p63, and CK5/6. Mucicarmine special stain highlighted a few mucocytes (Fig. 3C, D). The tumor cells were negative for vimentin, CDX2, estrogen receptor (ER), CK20, chromogranin, TTF-1, smooth muscle actin (SMA), synaptophysin, S100, and calponin. This tumor was diagnosed as high-grade salivary gland neoplasm at the referring institution without further subcategorization. Based on morphology and immunoprofile, the differential diagnosis included high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma and hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma.
Molecular studies performed on both specimens detected a CRTC1 (19p13) and MAML2 (11q21) fusion. The overall findings were thus consistent with metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma to the pleura.
After diagnosing metastatic MEC to the pleura, the patient became severely short of breath and developed bilateral pleural effusions that persisted despite evacuation. She developed respiratory distress, could not be weaned off the ventilator, and passed away 2 months after the diagnosis.
Primary salivary gland-like tumors of the lung and pleura are rare. They represent less than 1% of all lung and primary pleural neoplasms . Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) tops the list, followed by adenoid cystic carcinoma . MEC of the lung is typically centrally located, as they arise from mucous glands of the proximal tracheobronchial tree. The majority of these tumors are low grade and are more common in females than males [5, 10]. Primary pleural neoplasms are commonly mesotheliomas or adenocarcinomas, with salivary gland-like neoplasms being a rare occurrence. Moran and Suster theorize that since there are no salivary gland structures in the pleura, these neoplasms most likely arise from ectopic salivary gland tissue entrapped in the pleura . Another important differential diagnosis to keep in mind when the tumor is pleural-based is solitary fibrous tumor. Outside these instances, any other primary disease of the pleura represents a rarity [5, 11]. As such, metastatic MEC is an infrequent occurrence, with, to our knowledge, only one other case described and presented at a meeting in 2012 by Jimenez and Singh .
Primary MECs of the lung and pleura are typically low-grade tumors, representing 0.1–0.2% of all primary pulmonary malignancies, affecting a younger patient population than its primary salivary gland counterpart [5, 11, 13].
In the salivary glands, they represent the most common malignancy, representing 10–25% of all malignant tumors in that region [8, 14,15,16,17]. They commonly arise from the parotid gland , followed by the submandibular gland and minor salivary glands (palate or buccal mucosa) [19,20,21].
Clinically, MEC can be asymptomatic or present as a solitary, painless, slow-growing mass. Less commonly, MEC presents with pain, facial numbness, paralysis, or respiratory symptoms such as dyspnea, cough, chest pain, and mucopurulent expectoration depending on location, size, extension, and compressive effects over underlying nerves. Pulmonary MEC usually present as endobronchial tumors with a polypoid growth, obstructing the bronchial lumen [3, 22,23,24,25].
MEC has a variable mucinous, epidermoid (squamoid), and intermediate cell component, forming variably cystic spaces [3, 7, 26]. The mucocytes can be arranged in nests or scattered as single cells within the tumor as intracytoplasmic mucin. Intermediate cells are large and polygonal, frequently with a clear cytoplasm found in nests and sheets, and it can be the predominant cell population, imparting a clear look under the microscope . The cystic spaces are characteristic of low- to intermediate-grade neoplasms, often containing mucin with occasional papillary projections [3, 22]. Epidermoid cells form nests or can present as scattered polygonal cells. Mucoepidermoid carcinomas are associated with a dense peritumoral lymphoid infiltrate, known as tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation (TALP). TALP is typically present at advancing tumor edges, with the occasional germinal center formation, and can be confused with metastatic disease to lymph nodes. In this respect, CAM5.2 can help in cases where TALP and lymph node metastasis are not clear. CAM5.2 is positive in extrafollicular reticulum cells within lymph nodes and negative in TALP .
A set histologic criterion exists to grade MEC, based on the percentage of solid/cystic component, perineural invasion, and mitotic activity, subdividing this neoplasm into low-, intermediate-, and high-grade [28, 29]. Low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas rarely metastasize. Perineural invasion and positive surgical resection margins can hinder the excellent prognosis of low-grade MECs [18, 28, 30]. Tumor grading helps predict outcome and management, with high-grade MECs having a higher recurrence rate and metastasis [3, 26].
Typical immunoprofile of MEC shows strong nuclear reaction for p63 in the epidermoid and intermediate cells . CK5/6 is also positive in epidermoid cells . Ki67 shows higher expression in highly proliferative lesions, is indicative of a high-grade tumor, and its overexpression indicates poor prognosis [31, 32]. HER2 also tends to be strongly expressed in high-grade lesions, and this reactivity might guide future therapies with targeted anti-HER2 drugs . P16 is positive in up to 60% of tumors, with a higher expression in the glandular component than in the squamoid component, and is not related to transcriptionally active human papillomavirus (HPV) [33, 34].
Up to 65% of MECs are reported to show t(11;19) translocation [15, 28, 35]. This translocation fuses CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1 (CRTC1) (exon 1 of gene 19p13) with mastermind-like gene family (MAML2) (exons 2–5 of the gene at 11q21) [36, 37]. This translocation is present in low- to intermediate-grade tumors. Other genetic alterations have been found, such as t(11;15) (q21;q26) translocation resulting in CRTC3/MAML2 gene fusion (5% of tumors), usually seen in younger patients. Translocation (6;22) (p21;q12) with EWSR1-POU5F1 gene fusion, seen in high-grade tumors as well as CDKN2A deletions, seen in more aggressive MAML2 fusion-positive tumors . Aneuploid tumors show a higher recurrence rate and cervical lymph node involvement, with decreased survival [36,37,38,39].
Treatment for pulmonary and pleural MEC is complete resection and either lobectomy, decortication, or simple resection of the pleura’s focal tumor area [2, 40]. Prognosis is dependent on tumor grade but is not very clear since so few cases have been reported [2, 12]. High-grade tumors may require medical treatment in addition to surgical resection .
Because these tumors are more common in the salivary glands or trachea, it is essential to obtain a careful clinical history of previous head and neck surgery or tumors. Histomorphology of primary and metastatic disease is often very similar. Metastatic tumors are common to the lung parenchyma, whereas primary tumors of the respiratory tract are primarily centrally located. Immunohistochemistry and molecular features are identical in this case; hence the history of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck area is of utmost importance.
Pleura is an uncommon site for metastasis from primary salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma but should be part of the differential diagnosis. An extensive review of the patient’s past medical history plays a crucial role in correctly classifying these lesions as primary or metastatic. Differential diagnoses should include primary squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, mesothelioma, and the pleura’s rare primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
Prognostically, grade is one of the most important factors, followed by the pathologic and clinical stages. Low-grade tumors rarely metastasize, with 95% disease-specific survival (DDS) of 5 years. High-grade tumors metastasize in 55–80% of cases, with 65% DSS of 5 years [42, 43]. Positive surgical resection margins are predictive of recurrence [34, 44]. Negative predictive factors include high-grade tumors (mitoses of more than 4/10 high-power field (HPF) and necrosis), nuclear pleomorphism, focal keratinization, desmoplasia, and lymph node metastatsis [34, 44]; increasing patient age, tumor size, and extra parenchymal extension are less significant . Lymph node metastasis has been reported more commonly in males than females, is more common in submandibular gland primaries, and develops more frequently in high-grade tumors than low and intermediate grades [45, 46]. Metastases are predictive of poor prognosis and commonly occur in the lung, bone, and brain. Some sites show aggressive behavior regardless of tumor gradings, such as the submandibular gland, which has a prognosis similar to high-grade tumors, tongue, and mouth floor.
Metastatic MEC to the pleura is exceedingly rare and, to our knowledge, this is the second case reported on this occurrence. Differentiating between a lung primary versus a metastatic disease has treatment implications and prognostic significance for the patient. When morphologic and immunophenotype overlap exists, the molecular diagnosis should be included in the diagnostic arsenal.
Availability of data and materials
Ali SA, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of parotid presenting as unilocular cyst. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(2):141–2.
Xi JJ, et al. Primary pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: an analysis of 21 cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:232.
Coca-Pelaz A, et al. Salivary mucoepidermoid carcinoma revisited. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(4):799–819.
Kut A, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the bronchus: a rare entity in childhood. Pediatr Int. 2005;47(2):203–5.
Moran CA, Suster S. Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the pleura. A clinicopathologic study of two cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120(3):381–5.
Almas T, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland presenting as a fungating exophytic mass: a surgical challenge rooted in extensive nerve encasement. Cureus. 2020;12(10):e10990.
Devaraju R, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-202776.
Dombrowski ND, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;120:93–9.
Lee H, et al. High grade transformation in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the minor salivary gland with polyploidy of the rearranged MAML2 gene. Head Neck Pathol. 2020;14(3):822–7.
Luna MA. Salivary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: revisited. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006;13(6):293–307.
Salem A, et al. Clinicopathologic and genetic features of primary bronchopulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience and comprehensive review of the literature. Virchows Arch. 2017;470(6):619–26.
Jimenez M, Singh R. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma with involvement of the lung pleura. Chest. 2012;142(4):587A.
Belgod SR, Reddy RH, Kumar SP. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lung: a rare entity. Oxf Med Case Rep. 2015;2015(2):203–5.
Belghiti H, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland in young children. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2011;112(2):110–2.
Bell D, Holsinger CF, El-Naggar AK. CRTC1/MAML2 fusion transcript in central mucoepidermoid carcinoma of mandible–diagnostic and histogenetic implications. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2010;14(6):396–401.
Bell D, et al. CRTC1/MAML2 fusion transcript in Warthin’s tumor and mucoepidermoid carcinoma: evidence for a common genetic association. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008;47(4):309–14.
Dossani RH, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of palatal minor salivary glands with intracranial extension: a case report and literature review. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2016;77(4):e156–9.
Ozawa H, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck: clinical analysis of 43 patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38(6):414–8.
Rajasekaran K, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland: a National Cancer Database study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018;39(3):321–6.
Sato K, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the sublingual gland harboring a translocation of the MAML2 gene: a case report. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(3):2970–4.
Schwarz S, et al. Salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a clinically, morphologically and genetically heterogeneous entity: a clinicopathological study of 40 cases with emphasis on grading, histological variants and presence of the t(11;19) translocation. Histopathology. 2011;58(4):557–70.
Fink DD, et al. Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lung with prominent clear cells. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2017;30(3):322–4.
Fois AG, et al. Bronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;31:159–62.
El-Sameed YA, Al Marzooqi SH. Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lung. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2012;19(3):203–5.
Abdalla M, et al. A rare case of pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma in an 81-year-old male. Am J Case Rep. 2018;19:1499–502.
Buch SA, et al. A rare case of long-standing mucoepidermoid carcinoma of minor salivary glands of the palate. Stomatologija. 2019;21(3):92–6.
Kurian EM, et al. Low molecular weight cytokeratin immunostaining for extrafollicular reticulum cells is an effective means of separating salivary gland tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation from true lymph node involvement. Head Neck Pathol. 2020;14(3):593–7.
Birkeland AC, et al. Correlation of Crtc1/3-Maml2 fusion status, grade and survival in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2017;68:5–8.
Akaev I, et al. Low grade parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma with tumour associated lymphoid proliferation (“Warthin-like”) and CRTC1-MAML2 fusion transcript: definitive diagnosis with molecular investigation only. Oral Oncol. 2018;80:98–9.
Chen MM, et al. Histologic grade as prognostic indicator for mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a population-level analysis of 2400 patients. Head Neck. 2014;36(2):158–63.
Magno Guimaraes D, et al. DNA methyltransferase expression is associated with cell proliferation in salivary mucoepidermoid carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2020;49(10):1053–60.
Nguyen LH, et al. HER2/neu and Ki-67 as prognostic indicators in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands. J Otolaryngol. 2003;32(5):328–31.
Guo XL, et al. Alterations of p16INK4a tumour suppressor gene in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(4):350–3.
Bai S, et al. Salivary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a multi-institutional review of 76 patients. Head Neck Pathol. 2013;7(2):105–12.
Wang YQ, et al. Low-grade and high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lung: CT findings and clinical features of 17 cases. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(6):1160–6.
Chen Z, et al. CRTC1-MAML2 fusion-induced lncRNA LINC00473 expression maintains the growth and survival of human mucoepidermoid carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2018;37(14):1885–95.
Komiya T, et al. Primary lung mucoepidermoid carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors using surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Clin Respir J. 2017;11(6):847–53.
Moller E, et al. POU5F1, encoding a key regulator of stem cell pluripotency, is fused to EWSR1 in hidradenoma of the skin and mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands. J Pathol. 2008;215(1):78–86.
Kalhor N, Moran CA. Pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2018;12(3):249–55.
Yamamoto T, et al. Surgical treatment of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lung: 20 years’ experience. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2016;24(3):257–61.
Sonobe S, et al. A case of pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma responding to carboplatin and paclitaxel. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44(5):493–6.
Cipriani NA, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a comparison of histologic grading systems and relationship to MAML2 rearrangement and prognosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43(7):885–97.
Chen AM, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland treated by surgery and postoperative radiation therapy: clinicopathologic correlates of outcome. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(12):3049–55.
Byrd SA, et al. Predictors of recurrence and survival for head and neck mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(3):402–8.
Zenga J, et al. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid: very close margins and adjuvant radiotherapy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2019;81(1):55–62.
Jiang L, et al. Prognostic factors of primary pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a clinical and pathological analysis of 34 cases. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(10):6792–9.
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s next of kin for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Mashiana, S., Duarte, E.M. Metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma to the pleura: a case report. J Med Case Reports 16, 69 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03285-y