Skip to content


Journal of Medical Case Reports

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Pregnancy outcome in a pregnant patient with idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: a case report and review of the literature

Journal of Medical Case Reports201812:31

Received: 14 August 2017

Accepted: 18 December 2017

Published: 13 February 2018



Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare and progressive condition which is aggravated by the physiologic changes during pregnancy. Because of high mortality rate, most physicians recommend early termination of pregnancy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Case presentation

Here we describe a case of a 30-year-old primigravida Caucasian housewife with functional class 1 idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and a positive vasoreactive response to adenosine who had a full-term non-complicated delivery.

Right-sided heart catheterization before the pregnancy showed severe pulmonary hypertension with mean pulmonary arterial pressure of 60 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance of 12.2 WU. Vasoreactivity was positive after infusion of 200 μg/kg per minute adenosine. During pregnancy, she did not receive medication other than prophylactic enoxaparin. She had an elective cesarean section under general anesthesia at 39 weeks of gestation without complication and delivered a healthy baby. After delivery, her hemodynamic status was stable. One month postpartum, she was in a stable clinical condition in functional class 1.


In pregnant patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, decreased mortality has been observed over recent years particularly in patients with well-controlled pulmonary pressure and a positive vasoreactivity test.


Pulmonary hypertensionPregnancy


Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease that may affect women of childbearing age. This disease often leads to right ventricular failure and death during pregnancy or after delivery [1, 2]. Some physiological changes during pregnancy can increase pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and precipitate right ventricular failure. For these reasons, the mortality rate of PAH during pregnancy is high [3, 4]. However, in recent years, the availability of better care and a multidisciplinary approach have decreased mortality [1, 5, 6]. In this report we describe a 30-year-old pregnant woman with PAH who successfully delivered a healthy baby at 39 weeks of gestation without receiving treatment for pulmonary hypertension during her pregnancy.

Case presentation

Our patient is a 30-year-old primigravida Caucasian housewife who was referred to a cardiologist because of palpitations. Her medical history was unremarkable. She was not taking any medication and had negative history for tobacco smoking and drinking. Her family history was negative for pulmonary hypertension, systemic hypertension, and diabetes. After getting an echocardiogram, she was diagnosed as having severe pulmonary hypertension. A physical examination revealed that she had a loud pulmonic valve closure (P2) and grade 2/6 systolic murmur on the left sternal border. There was no pitting edema in lower extremities and no clubbing. She had normal pulses in all four extremities. Her oxygen saturation (O2 sat) was 91% in room air, and heart rate (HR) was 85 beats per minute at rest. Her blood tests for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-centromere antibodies (Ab), anti-topoisomerase Ab, and human immunodeficiency virus Ab (HIVAb) were all negative. Thyroid function tests—thyroxin (T4), triiodothyronine (T3), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)—were normal. She had a normal kidney function test: creatinine (Cr) of 0.7 Mg/dL. Her liver enzymes were normal: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) of 26 U/L and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 28 U/L. She had normal urinalysis. In a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) she was able to walk 450 meters without a drop in her O2 sat.

She underwent right ventricle catheterization (Table 1). Her vasoreactivity testing with adenosine was positive at 200 ug/minute. She was put on warfarin and amlodipine. In spite of strong advice against pregnancy, she became pregnant 6 months later and stopped taking her medications. In the first prenatal care visit, during the second trimester, she was in good general condition and did not have any complaints including dyspnea. On physical examination, P2 was loud, HR was 89/minute, O2 sat was 95%, and there was no edema of lower extremities. In 23rd week of pregnancy she was started on enoxaparin at 40 mg/day subcutaneously. In subsequent visits, her general condition stayed acceptable. She stayed symptom free except for some palpitations during activity. In the third trimester (month 8), she had another echocardiography (Table 2).
Table 1

Right-side heart catheterization 6 months before pregnancy

Systemic BP 100/60 (73) mmHg

100/60 (73) mmHg

Heart rate



6 mmHg

Right atrium

8 mmHg

Right ventricular pressure

72/10 (36) mmHg

Pulmonary artery pressure

72/45 (60) mmHg


11 mmHg

Cardiac output (thermodilution)

4 liter/minute

Cardiac index

2.31 liter/minute per m2

PVR (dyne × second/cm5)

980 (12.2 WU)

SVR (dyne × second/cm5)

1346 (16.8 WU)

Vasoreactive test (200 μg/kg per minute adenosine)

Mean. PAP = 38 mmHg, cardiac output = 4.2 liter/minute

BP blood pressure, CVP central venous pressure, PAP pulmonary arterial pressure, PAWP pulmonary artery wedge pressure, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, SVR systemic vascular resistance

Table 2

Echocardiography during pregnancy


26 weeks

37 weeks


21 mm

22 mm


18 mm

18 mm


103 mmHg

80 mmHg

RV free wall thickness

10 mm

11 mm


113 mmHg

100 mmHg


41 mm

39 mm


20 mm

23 mm

Main PA

32 mm

39 mm

IVC inferior vena cava, LVEDD left ventricular end diastolic diameter, LVESD left ventricular end systolic diameter, PA pulmonary artery, RV right ventricular, RVSP right ventricular systolic pressure, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, TRG tricuspid regurgitation gradient

In 37th gestational week, enoxaparin was discontinued and our patient was put on subcutaneously administered heparin. She was admitted for elective delivery. On physical examination, her cranial nerves were intact, P2 was loud, blood pressure (BP) was 135/85, HR was 98, and temperature was 37.3 °C. Heparin was stopped 6 hours prior to delivery. She had her third echocardiogram during hospitalization and in the 37th week of gestation (Table 2), which did not show any new findings.

During pregnancy, fetus growth and placenta were normal based on ultrasonography.

She had an elective cesarean section under general anesthesia in her 39th week of gestation. A live, healthy baby boy was delivered. His Apgar score was 9. The baby was 48 cm tall and weighed 2700 gram with head circumference of 32 cm. The baby continued to be healthy 1 year after delivery.

After successful delivery her hemodynamics stayed stable. Heparin infusion was continued and eventually she was bridged to warfarin. After a week, she was transferred to our general ward. She was discharged home 2 weeks after delivery in good condition. One month later, she was seen again. Her general condition was satisfactory, and dyspnea was observed as functional class (FC) 1. At 1-year follow up she was in FC 2. On physical examination, P2 was loud, HR was 78/minute, O2 sat was 93%, and there was no edema of lower extremities.


In this case report we presented a 30-year-old primigravida woman with idiopathic PAH (iPAH) who had a successful full-term pregnancy. She did not take medication for pulmonary hypertension during pregnancy and delivered a healthy baby.

Pulmonary hypertension secondary to congenital heart disease or iPAH are important problems among women of childbearing age. Elevated PVR often leads to right ventricular failure and death if left untreated [1, 2]. Pregnancy makes many changes in the maternal cardiovascular system, beginning in the first trimester [7, 8]. These changes increase mortality and morbidity in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Since maternal cardiac output and blood volume can increase by 30 to 50% during the third trimester [7, 8], pregnancy is strongly discouraged in patients with PAH and, if pregnancy occurs, early termination is recommended [9].

Hormonal changes during pregnancy can lead to accumulation of a significant amount of fluid in the interstitial space. Following delivery, this fluid is shifted to the maternal circulation system, causing an increase in preload and hypertension [10]. Furthermore, during labor, uterine contractions could effectively add 500 cc of blood to pulmonary circulation [11]. Also, during vaginal delivery, the Valsalva maneuver and pain can increase HR and vascular resistance. These physiological changes in the presence of pulmonary vascular disease may not be tolerated, and can lead to cardiorespiratory failure [12, 13].

In pregnant women, because of increased prostacyclin production during pregnancy, PVR is approximately 30% less compared to non-pregnant women [1]. This helps better tolerance of large volume load in pulmonary circulation without significant elevation of pulmonary pressure in pregnant women [14]. However, in women with pulmonary hypertension, this normal physiology is impaired. This leads to a further rise in pulmonary artery pressure because of increased cardiac output [15]. Blood volume peaks between the 20th and the 32nd week of gestation [14]. So, the deterioration of pulmonary hypertension during pregnancy occurs after the 20th week of gestation [16, 17]. Usually, delivery is planned between the 32nd and 34th week of the pregnancy [4].

Data suggest that early termination of pregnancy is associated with lower maternal complications and hospital mortality [18]. The mode of delivery and anesthetic management are a matter of debate. In general, increased PVR, marked decrease in venous retention, and myocardial depression should be avoided.

Some of the medication used for anesthesia may influence hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary hypertension [19, 20]. Many physicians do not suggest cesarean section as a delivery method in these patients [21]. Vaginal delivery is usually associated with reduced risk of bleeding and infection, but cesarean section precludes prolonged labor and allows for the careful consideration of optimal anesthesia and its administration. Regional anesthesia is generally preferred over general anesthesia because regional anesthesia has less effect on systemic vascular tone and cardiac function [22]. Maternal mortality may increase with general anesthesia [21]. Approximately 70 to 75% of the patients are delivered under epidural anesthesia [23]. Since our patient had stable hemodynamics at her 37th week of pregnancy, we decided to delay the delivery until week 39. The decision regarding time and delivery method depends on maternal hemodynamics and fetal health. An elective cesarean section under general anesthetic was planned and delivery took place without any complications. This is a rare case of iPAH with successful delivery after 38 weeks of pregnancy. Until the past decade, pregnant patients with PAH had a very high mortality rate and patients with PAH were strongly advised against pregnancy. In recent years, these patients experienced less mortality. A retrospective review study showed a 30% mortality rate in pregnant patients with iPAH, 36% in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome, and 56% in patients with PAH associated with other conditions [23]. Another study which was published later, showed less mortality [21]. In the later study many patients were treated with pulmonary vasodilators. A more recent study involving 26 women with PAH who were treated at 13 pulmonary hypertension centers from 2007 to 2010 showed high mortality but the mortality was lower than that found in former studies [24]. It seems one of the major reasons for less mortality in the most recent study was PAH targeted therapy. In this study, the patients who died had very high PVR: from 1560 to 1928−5. Patients with vasoreactive pulmonary hypertension had a better prognosis during pregnancy [25].

Our patient had pulmonary hypertension with positive vasoreactivity. Also, she was in FC I with PVR around 980−5. During pregnancy, she was well in FC I without any hemodynamic instability. She underwent cesarean section under general anesthesia in her 39th week of pregnancy and delivered a healthy baby. In previous studies, most patients delivered after 34 weeks [26].


Based on studies during the past three decades, the risk of mortality in pregnant patients with PAH remains high. There is recent evidence showing reduced mortality, particularly in patients with well-controlled pulmonary pressure, low PVR, and positive vasoreactivity test results.

Nonetheless, because of limited data, there is no general agreement about the safety of pregnancy even in patients with well-controlled pulmonary hypertension. Overall, pregnancy should be discouraged in this population. Early termination of pregnancy should be considered in patients with severe PAH.



The authors would like to thank Dr Mehrnoush Toufan and Dr Eisa Bilejani at Shahid Madani Heart Center for their help in the care of the patient during anesthesia and recovery.


The authors declare that they have no funding source.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript. First author: made primary contributions to the diagnosis and treated the patient, data collecting, and care of the patient during pregnancy. Second author: contributed to performing echocardiography before and during pregnancy.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza General Hospital, Tabriz, Iran
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran


  1. Rubin LJ. Primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:111–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Frost AE, Badesch DB, Barst RJ. The changing picture of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States: how REVEAL differs from historic and non-US Contemporary Registries. Chest. 2011;139:128–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Roberts NV, Keast PJ. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy – a lethal combination. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1990;18:366–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Elkayam U. Pregnancy and cardiovascular disease. In: Braunwald E, editor. Heart disease – a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992. p. 1790–809.Google Scholar
  5. Smedstad KG, Cramb R, Morison DH. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy: A series of eight cases. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:502–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yentis SM, Steer PJ, Plaat F. Eisenmenger’s syndrome in pregnancy: Maternal and fetal mortality in the 1990s. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:921–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clapp III JF, Capeless E. Cardiovascular function before, during, and after the first and subsequent pregnancies. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1469–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Thorne SA. Pregnancy in heart disease. Heart. 2004;90:450–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Badesch DB, Abman SH, Ahearn GS, et al. Medical therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2004;126 suppl 1:35S–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kiss H, Egarte AE, et al. Primary Pulmonary Hypertension in pregnancy – A case report. J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1052–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonnin M, Mercier FJ, Sitbon O, et al. Severe pulmonary hypertension during pregnancy: mode of delivery and anesthetic management of 15 consecutive cases. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:1133–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Geohas C, McLaughlin VV. Successful management of pregnancy in a patient with Eisenmenger syndrome with epoprostenol. Chest. 2003;124:1170–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bendayan D, Hod M, Oron G, et al. Pregnancy outcome in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension receiving prostacyclin therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1206–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunter S, Robson SC. Adaptation of the maternal heart in pregnancy. Br Heart J. 1992;68:540–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Madden BP. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:156–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Carvalho J. In: Birnbach DJ, Gatt SP, Datta S, editors. Cardiovascular disease in the pregnant patient, Textbook of Obstetric Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 553–64.Google Scholar
  17. Cheek TG, Gutsche BB. In: Hugues SC, Levinson G, Rosen MA, editors. Maternal physiologic alteration during pregnancy, Shnider and Levinson’s Anesthesia for Obstetrics. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 3–18.Google Scholar
  18. Duarte AG, Thomas S, et al. Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension During Pregnancy. Chest. 2013;143:1330–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gan CT, Lankhaar J-W, Marcus JT. Impaired left ventricular filling due to right-to-left ventricular interaction in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290:H1528–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Louie EK, Rich S, Brundage BH. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of impaired left ventricular filling in patients with right ventricular pressure overload due to primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8:1298–306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bédard E, Dimopoulos K, Gatzoulis MA. Has there been any progress made on pregnancy outcomes among women with pulmonary arterial hypertension? Eur Heart J. 2009;30:256–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Thorne S, MacGregor A, Nelson-Piercy C. Risks of contraception and pregnancy in heart disease. Heart. 2006;92:1520–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Weiss BM, Zemp L, Seifert B, et al. Outcome of pulmonary vascular disease in pregnancy: a systematic overview from 1978 through 1996. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1650–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaïs X, Olsson KM, Barbera JA, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:881–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sitbon O, Humbert M, Jais X, et al. Long-term response to calcium channel blockers in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. 2005;111:3105–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Galie N, Manes A, Negro L, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:394–403.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2018