- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Aqueductal developmental venous anomaly as an unusual cause of congenital hydrocephalus: a case report and review of the literature
© Paulson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 19 July 2011
- Accepted: 11 January 2012
- Published: 11 January 2012
Aqueductal stenosis may be caused by a number of etiologies including congenital stenosis, tumor, inflammation, and, very rarely, vascular malformation. However, aqueductal stenosis caused by a developmental venous anomaly presenting as congenital hydrocephalus is even more rare, and, to the best of our knowledge, has not yet been reported in the literature. In this study, we review the literature and report the first case of congenital hydrocephalus associated with aqueductal stenosis from a developmental venous anomaly.
The patient is a three-day-old, African-American baby girl with a prenatal diagnosis of hydrocephalus. She presented with a full fontanelle, splayed sutures, and macrocephaly. Postnatal magnetic resonance imaging showed triventricular hydrocephalus, suggesting aqueductal stenosis. Examination of the T1-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging enhanced with gadolinium revealed a developmental venous anomaly passing through the orifice of the aqueduct. We treated the patient with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt.
Ten cases of aqueductal stenosis due to venous lesions have been reported and, although these venous angiomas and developmental venous anomalies are usually considered congenital lesions, all 10 cases became symptomatic as older children and adults. Our case is the first in which aqueductal stenosis caused by a developmental venous anomaly presents as congenital hydrocephalus. We hope adding to the literature will improve understanding of this very uncommon cause of hydrocephalus and, therefore, will aid in treatment.
- Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy
- Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
- Obstructive Hydrocephalus
- Aqueductal Stenosis
It is common for intraventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow to become obstructed at the aqueduct of Sylvius . The obstruction may be caused by a tumor, congenital etiology, or post-inflammatory gliotic atresia, among other conditions [1–3]. Obstruction by a vascular malformation at the aqueduct is a very rare cause [2, 4–7], and aqueductal stenosis attributable to a developmental venous anomaly (DVA) is perhaps the most uncommon .
Although DVAs are thought of as congenital findings, all 10 previously reported cases became symptomatic as older children or adults. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first case of symptomatic congenital hydrocephalus from aqueductal obstruction due to a DVA.
The baby was born healthy with no obviously anomalous anatomy aside from macrocephaly, splaying of her cranial sutures, and a full anterior fontanelle. She opened her eyes spontaneously and cried to stimulation. Her pupils were equal and reactive to light; she had normal muscle tone and was moving all extremities symmetrically. Her head circumference was 35.5 cm, which correlated to the 50th percentile.
The baby's head circumference gradually increased over several days, and serial ultrasound examination showed she had progressively worsening ventriculomegaly, so she underwent placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt on her fifth day of life.
She was positioned supine with the head turned left, exposing the right occipital scalp. A curvilinear skin incision over the occipital scalp centered on the lambdoid suture was made for ventricular access. A linear skin incision in the midline periumbilical area was made to access the peritoneum for the distal end of the shunt catheter. A PS Medical low-pressure valve and distal catheter was then tunneled and passed in a typical fashion.
Ultrasound was used to define the trajectory of the ventricular catheter . Xanthochromic CSF was visualized from the ventricular catheter corroborating old blood that was identified on the preoperative MRI. The shunt was then connected and placed in the peritoneum. The baby tolerated the procedure without incident.
She recovered well from the surgery and did not experience any post-operative complications. Routine post-operative imaging identified proper positioning of the shunt components and interval improvement of the hydrocephalus. Clinically, the patient recovered from the procedure and was subsequently discharged home in good condition.
A number of congenital and acquired factors are known to cause aqueductal stenosis and subsequent obstructive hydrocephalus [1–3]. Vascular lesions causing aqueductal stenosis are rare but, when present, can be attributed to a DVA (or venous angioma), vein of Galen malformation, abnormal draining vein, ectatic basilar artery, dural arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous malformation, or cavernoma [2, 3, 5–8, 10–15].
Patients with hydrocephalus from aqueductal stenosis from venous lesions (modified from Giannetti et al.)
Rosenheck, 1937 
Mental deterioration (5 years)
Avman and Dincer, 1980 
Headache (7 years)
Ventriculography, CT, and angiography
Watanabe et al., 1991 
Headache (1 year)
CT, MRI, and angiography
Oka et al., 1993 
Seizures (2 months)
CT, MRI, and angiography
Blackmore and Mamourian, 1996 
Headache, behavior changes (2 months)
Bannur et al., 2002 
Headache (5 months)
CT and MRI
Sato et al., 2004 
Headache, diplopia (N/A)
CT, MRI, and angiography
Yagmurlu et al., 2005 
Headache (1 month)
Giannetti et al., 2008 
Headache, behavior changes (1 year)
CT and MRI
Headache (6 years)
CT and MRI
Full fontanelle, splayed sutures, increased head circumference
In our case and a recent report of two other cases, an MRI based on a gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequence revealed the aqueductal obstruction and its causes . Aqueductal stenosis may be confirmed during endoscopic surgery , but direct visualization is not necessary. Likewise, invasive angiography is not necessary for the diagnosis of these venous lesions [4, 8, 18, 19]. Unfortunately, we do not have an magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or magnetic resonance ventriculography (MRV) to add to our case report. We did not initially suspect a venous anomaly as a possible cause for hydrocephalus, so we did not order an MRA or MRV upfront. Moreover, we do not feel that the risks justify putting the baby through general anesthesia again to obtain an imaging study that would confirm what is already seen on her MRI of the brain with contrast - a DVA causing obstructive hydrocephalus at the level of the origin of the cerebral aqueduct.
DVAs are usually benign lesions and considered normal variants that drain healthy brain tissue and do not need treatment because there is no risk of rupture and bleeding. Attempts to remove or occlude them may cause venous infarction or edema of normal parenchyma [4, 5, 15]. Therefore, primary treatment should be targeted towards addressing hydrocephalus, if the DVAs are symptomatic. Treatment options in these cases include close observation, aqueductal stenting, shunt placement, and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (Table 1).
A discussion of the pros and cons of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) to address hydrocephalus is beyond the scope of this report. In brief, we chose to treat our patient with a VPS because of ETV's high rate of failure in the infant age group .
Aqueductal stenosis and consequent obstructive hydrocephalus by a DVA is extremely rare. Congenital hydrocephalus can present in this way. Enhanced T1-weighted sagittal MRI sequences may be informative for examination of the aqueductal region. No treatment is recommended for the DVA; however, CSF diversion may be necessary for the treatment of hydrocephalus. ETV should be considered in older children with this pathology or later shunt malfunction in this population.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's next of kin for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
The authors would like to recognize Lily Chun for her editorial assistance in the production of this manuscript.
- Jellinger G: Anatomopathology of non-tumoral aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg Sci. 1986, 30: 1-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato S, Sonoda Y, Kuroki R, Kayama T: [A rare case of aqueductal stenosis due to venous angioma]. No To Shinkei. 2004, 56: 1042-1046.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe A, Ishii R, Kamada M, Suzuki Y, Hirano K, Okamura H: Obstructive hydrocephalus caused by an abnormal vein in the aqueduct. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1991, 75: 960-962. 10.3171/jns.1991.75.6.0960.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bannur U, Korah I, Chandy MJ: Midbrain venous angioma with obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurol India. 2002, 50: 207-209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blackmore CC, Mamourian AC: Aqueduct compression from venous angioma: MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996, 17: 458-460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brugieres P, Combes C, el-Khoury C, Decq P, Heine P, Meyrignac C, Gaston A: Aqueduct stenosis due to venous ectasia with a dural arteriovenous fistula. Neuroradiology. 2000, 42: 267-271. 10.1007/s002340050883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oka K, Kumate S, Kibe M, Tomonaga M, Maehara F, Higashi Y: Aqueductal stenosis due to mesencephalic venous malformation: case report. Surg Neurol. 1993, 40: 230-235. 10.1016/0090-3019(93)90072-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giannetti AV, Rodrigues RB, Trivelato FP: Venous lesions as a cause of sylvian aqueductal obstruction: case report. Neurosurgery. 2008, 62: E1167-1168. 10.1227/01.neu.0000325882.21118.7d. discussion E1168View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitehead WE, Jea A, Vachhrajani S, Kulkarni AV, Drake JM: Accurate placement of cerebrospinal fluid shunt ventricular catheters with real-time ultrasound guidance in older children without patent fontanelles. J Neurosurg. 2007, 107: 406-410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Avman N, Dincer C: Venous malformation of the aqueduct of Sylvius treated by interventriculostomy: 15 years follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1980, 52: 219-224. 10.1007/BF01402077.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Branco G, Goulao A, Ferro JM: MRI in aqueduct compression and obstructive hydrocephalus due to an ecstatic basilar artery. Neuroradiology. 1993, 35: 447-448. 10.1007/BF00602826.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esparza J, Lobato RD, Munoz MJ, Chillon D, Portillo JM, Lamas E: Giant cerebral arteriovenous malformation producing a noncommunicating hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol. 1981, 15: 76-80. 10.1016/S0090-3019(81)80096-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoi SU, Kerber C: Ventricular obstruction secondary to vascular malformations. Neurosurgery. 1983, 12: 572-575. 10.1227/00006123-198305000-00018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pribil S, Boone SC, Waley R: Obstructive hydrocephalus at the anterior third ventricle caused by dilated veins from an arteriovenous malformation. Surg Neurol. 1983, 20: 487-492. 10.1016/0090-3019(83)90032-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yagmurlu B, Fitoz S, Atasoy C, Erden I, Deda G, Unal O: An unusual cause of hydrocephalus: aqueductal developmental venous anomaly. Eur Radiol. 2005, 15: 1159-1162. 10.1007/s00330-004-2356-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenheck C: Venous angioma of the sylvian aqueduct and the fourth ventricle associated with internal hydrocephalus and mental deterioration. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1937, 38: 428-438.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tien R, Harsh GRt, Dillon WP, Wilson CB: Unilateral hydrocephalus caused by an intraventricular venous malformation obstructing the foramen of Monro. Neurosurgery. 1990, 26: 664-666. 10.1227/00006123-199004000-00017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee C, Pennington MA, Kenney CM: MR evaluation of developmental venous anomalies: medullary venous anatomy of venous angiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996, 17: 61-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ostertun B, Solymosi L: Magnetic resonance angiography of cerebral developmental venous anomalies: its role in differential diagnosis. Neuroradiology. 1993, 35: 97-104. 10.1007/BF00593962.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drake JM, Kulkarni AV, Kestle J: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric patients: a decision analysis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009, 25: 467-472. 10.1007/s00381-008-0761-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.