Skip to main content


  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Late-onset benefit in progressive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with continued sorafenib therapy: a case report

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20126:38

  • Received: 13 September 2011
  • Accepted: 26 January 2012
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



In the past, no effective systemic therapy has existed for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has recently been shown to improve overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials. This drug has been approved as the first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. We report an intriguing case of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in which the patient achieved late- onset partial response by prolonged administration of sorafenib in spite of progressive disease.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old Japanese man was treated with sorafenib for multiple lung metastases after surgical resection for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma accompanied by vascular invasion of the left branch of the portal vein. Although the effective diagnosis was progressive disease, almost all sites began to reduce or disappear eight months after the diagnosis of progressive disease. A dramatic reduction in alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels was observed. The patient finally achieved partial response and his status remains unchanged.


If tolerated, prolonged sorafenib treatment may be beneficial.


  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Sorafenib
  • Late-onset response
  • Progressive disease
  • Molecular targeted drug


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cause of malignancies worldwide and represents the third most common cause of cancer-related death [1]. HCC frequently recurs despite curative local control such as surgical resection or local ablation therapy and the prognosis of patients with advanced HCC including invasion to intrahepatic large vessels remains dismal [25]. No systemic therapies in a meta-analysis were shown to confer a survival advantage over best-supportive care [6]. Recently, sorafenib (Nexavar®, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals), an oral multikinase inhibitor that mainly targets Raf kinases, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta, has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with advanced HCC in two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials [7, 8]. This drug has been approved as the first-line therapy for these patients.

The tumor response and its clinical course observed under treatment with sorafenib are rather different from the other conventional cytotoxic agents. In fact, most of the patients who responded to sorafenib had stable disease (SD) in both of these studies [7, 8], and sorafenib seldom induces the dimensional tumor shrinking usually observed with conventional cytotoxic agents. Therefore, it has been suggested that sorafenib prolongs survival by delaying disease progression.

We report the case of a patient with advanced HCC who showed an intriguing clinical course. The patient achieved late- onset partial response (PR) by continuing sorafenib in spite of the progressive disease (PD).

Case presentation

At the end of 2008, a 54-year-old Japanese man was referred to our hospital because a liver mass had been discovered by ultrasonographic examination. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a large liver tumor 15 cm in diameter extending from the left lobe to the anterior segment of the right lobe, which was enhanced in the arterial phase and washed out in the equilibrium phase, which is typical of HCC (Figure 1). The left branch of the portal vein was not identified as being involved in the tumor. Extrahepatic metastasis was not observed. The patient was in good health, and his Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0. He had never smoked cigarettes, drunk alcohol, or been diagnosed as obese or diabetic. Laboratory data demonstrated normal liver function and he had no evidence of past or persistent hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infection. Elevations of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) levels were observed: AFP level 119 ng/ml (normal range < 10); DCP level 158,000 mAU/ml (normal range < 40). His Child-Pugh score was A 5, and the tumor stage was Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C. According to the clinical practice guidelines for HCC [9], surgical resection was considered because of normal underlying liver, although it was accompanied by vascular invasion. Subsequently, an extended left lobectomy was performed, and complete resection of the tumorous area was achieved. The pathological examination confirmed a moderate differentiated HCC with portal vein invasion of the left branch, and the underlying liver tissues were normal.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans before surgical resection. (A) Arterial phase showed a large hypervascular lesion extending from the left lobe to the anterior segment of the right lobe. (B) The left branch of the portal vein was not identified as being involved in the tumor, invasion of the portal vein was suspicious (white arrow).

Eight months after the resection, recurrence of multiple lung metastases was detected on a follow-up periodical CT scan. Intrahepatic recurrence was not observed. The patient was initially treated with sorafenib at 800 mg per day. Two weeks later, a grade-2, hand-foot skin reaction occurred and a dose reduction of 400 mg per day was made. After two months, follow-up CT scans showed a growth and new metastatic lesions in the lung and liver, and PD was diagnosed according to the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Guidelines (RECIST 1.1) and modified RECIST [10, 11].

After the diagnosis of PD, the patient participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study of S-1 (TS-1, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) of an oral cytotoxic anti-cancer agent. Response evaluation after the first cycle was PD, and the treatment was discontinued. Sorafenib 400 mg per day was started again based on a consensus for the retreatment. Metastatic lesions continued to worsen over six months despite the retreatment with sorafenib (Figure 2 A1-3, B1-3); however, almost all lesions began to shrink or disappear eight months after restarting sorafenib. Dramatic reductions in AFP and DCP levels (AFP decreased from 3640 ng/ml to 263 ng/ml, and DCP from 3080 mAU/ml to 272 mAU/ml) were observed. PR was observed on the CT scan (Figure 2C1-3), and the patient remains stable on sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg per day. Currently, he is working full time and is in excellent general health.
Figure 2
Figure 2

(A1-3) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans before restarting sorafenib. (A1, 2) Multiple metastatic lesions were observed in the lung (black arrows). (A3) Local tumor progressions were also observed in the cut surface of the liver (white arrows). (B1-3) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans six months after restarting sorafenib. (B1) The growth and new metastatic lesions were observed in the lung (black arrows). (B2) In addition, mediastinal lymph node metastases were observed anew (white arrows). (B3) Local tumor progressions were unequivocally observed (white arrows). (C1-3) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans 10 months after restarting sorafenib. (C1) Metastatic lesions in the lung shrunk or disappeared (black arrows). (C2-3) Mediastinal lymph node metastases and local tumor progressions completely disappeared (white arrows).


Our patient achieved PR after 10 months beyond PD during long-term treatment with sorafenib. Generally, the withdrawal of molecular targeted agents including sorafenib, for a diagnosis of PD, is followed by a conventional criterion of cytotoxic anti-cancer agents. However, in the present case, treatment with sorafenib was continued based on the patient's tolerability and strong desire to continue it, and because no other second-line therapy option was available. This case showed that the manner of treatment with sorafenib, differing from the standard treatment criterion, could induce the treatment response to PR. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature of late-onset response of sorafenib beyond PD in patients with advanced HCC. The underlying mechanism of late-onset tumor shrinkage beyond PD is unclear. One could hypothesize that the mainstream signaling pathway of the tumor involved in cell proliferation or angiogenesis might change to become more sensitive by mutation or some other alteration by prolonged administration. Retreatment with sorafenib after the first PD might be related to the late-onset response of our patient. It has been reported that tumor cell necrosis was enhanced by re-exposure to sorafenib in a study of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) xenograft models [12].

The anti-tumor response of molecular targeted agents including sorafenib seems to be different from that of the conventional cytotoxic agents because a specific response manner has been observed. For instance, approximately 70% of patients showed SD with a lower response rate (2%) in initial phase III studies of sorafenib [7]. On the other hand, rapid regression after a short period of only one or two weeks of treatment with sorafenib has been reported [13]. Several patients achieved PR after approximately 10 months of SD in patients with sorafenib for metastatic RCC [14]. These findings suggest that sorafenib could induce efficacy and clinical benefit by various methods of treatment and that molecular-targeted agents have a more complicated responsiveness than do cytotoxic agents. Therefore, we suggest that there might occasionally be responders, on long-term administration of sorafenib, among the PD cases. Further studies are required to determine factors underlying clinical outcome.


If tolerated, prolonged sorafenib treatment may be beneficial. The efficacy of sorafenib on a long-term basis warrants further investigation because molecular targeted agents deliver a potent impact of various cellular signal transductions.



Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, 2-1-1 Asamizodai, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0380, Japan


  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005, 55: 74-108. 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nakazawa T, Kokubu S, Shibuya A, Ono K, Watanabe M, Hidaka H, Tsuchihashi T, Saigenji K: Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between local tumor progression after ablation and ablative margin. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007, 188: 480-488. 10.2214/AJR.05.2079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nakazawa T, Adachi S, Kitano M, Isobe Y, Kokubu S, Hidaka H, Ono K, Okuwaki Y, Watanabe M, Shibuya A, Saigenji K: Potential prognostic benefits of radiotherapy as an initial treatment for patients with unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with invasion to intrahepatic large vessels. Oncology. 2007, 73: 90-97. 10.1159/000120996.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Okuwaki Y, Nakazawa T, Shibuya A, Ono K, Hidaka H, Watanabe M, Kokubu S, Saigenji K: Intrahepatic distant recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for a single small hepatocellular carcinoma: risk factors and patterns. J Gastroenterol. 2008, 43: 71-78. 10.1007/s00535-007-2123-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Okuwaki Y, Nakazawa T, Kokubu S, Hidaka H, Tanaka Y, Takada J, Watanabe M, Shibuya A, Minamino T, Saigenji K: Repeat radiofrequency ablation provides survival benefit in patients with intrahepatic distant recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009, 104: 2747-2753. 10.1038/ajg.2009.414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lopez PM, Villanueva A, Llovet JM: Systematic review: evidence-based management of hepatocellular carcinoma--an updated analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006, 23: 1535-1547. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02932.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, Schwartz M, Porta C, Zeuzem S, Bolondi L, Greten TF, Galle PR, Seitz JF, Borbath I, Häussinger D, Giannaris T, Shan M, Moscovici M, Voliotis D, Bruix J, SHARP Investigators Study Group: Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 378-390. 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, Luo R, Feng J, Ye S, Yang TS, Xu J, Sun Y, Liang H, Liu J, Wang J, Tak WY, Pan H, Burock K, Zou J, Voliotis D, Guan Z: Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10: 25-34. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Makuuchi M, Kokudo N, Arii S, Futagawa S, Kaneko S, Kawasaki S, Matsuyama Y, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, Saida Y, Takayama T, Yamaoka Y: Development of evidence-based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2008, 38: 37-51. 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00216.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45: 228-247. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lencioni R, Llovet JM: Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2010, 30: 52-60. 10.1055/s-0030-1247132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang L, Bhasin M, Schor-Bardach R, Wang X, Collins MP, Panka D, Putheti P, Signoretti S, Alsop DC, Libermann T, Atkins MB, Mier JW, Goldberg SN, Bhatt RS: Resistance of renal cell carcinoma to sorafenib is mediated by potentially reversible gene expression. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19144-10.1371/journal.pone.0019144.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakazawa T, Hidaka H, Shibuya A, Koizumi W: Rapid regression of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma associated with elevation of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin after short-term treatment with sorafenib - a report of two cases. Case Rep Oncol. 2010, 3: 298-303. 10.1159/000319831.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Naito S, Tsukamoto T, Murai M, Fukino K, Akaza H: Overall survival and good tolerability of long-term use of sorafenib after cytokine treatment: final results of a phase II trial of sorafenib in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2011, 108: 1813-1819. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10281.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Okuwaki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.