Bronchial artery embolization for management of massive cryptogenic hemoptysis: a case series
© Samara et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 20 April 2010
Accepted: 10 February 2011
Published: 10 February 2011
Hemoptysis constitutes a common and urgent medical problem. Swift and effective management is of crucial importance, especially in severe, life-threatening cases. In cases of idiopathic hemoptysis, in which no underlying pulmonary pathology can be identified, treatment is challenging. We report our experience with bronchial artery embolization in the treatment of massive idiopathic hemoptysis.
We report three consecutive cases of acute severe idiopathic hemoptysis. Our patients (two men aged 51 and 56 years and one woman aged 46 years), were of Caucasian ethnicity. We discuss the results and management of the patients, and review the literature. All three patients were treated safely and successfully with transcatheter embolization of the bronchial arteries using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres. Hemoptysis was controlled. All cases were followed up for 12 months, and there was no recurrence of bleeding.
Bronchial artery embolization is an effective tool for the evaluation and treatment of massive idiopathic hemoptysis.
Hemoptysis is the expectoration of blood originating from the lower respiratory tract. Most cases are minor and treatable or self-limiting. The bleeding may occur from the large or small pulmonary vessels. Bleeding from the small vessels is known as diffuse alveolar hemorrhage . Hemoptysis from the large vessels has multiple known etiologies, including lung neoplasms, bronchiectasis, tuberculosis, pulmonary vasculitis, cardiovascular diseases and aspergilloma. However, in a number of cases, a cause cannot be determined, and these are categorized as idiopathic hemoptysis [2, 3]. The definition of severe or massive hemoptysis varies, but is usually defined as the expectoration of 300-600 ml of blood in 24 hours, or bronchial blood loss that causes hemodynamic or respiratory compromises. Hemoptysis, when severe and untreated, has a mortality rate of more than 50% [2–4]. Bronchoscopy combined with imaging technology usually identifies the bleeding site in the lungs, but in 15-20% of cases the cause of hemoptysis cannot be fully determined [3, 5]. When diagnostic tools fail to identify the source of bleeding, severe hemoptysis becomes an emergency because failure to contain it can lead to death. Bronchial arteriography and bronchial artery embolization (BAE) may provide an effective means of rapid diagnosis and treatment of such medical emergencies [2, 3, 5].
BAE is a well-established, non-surgical procedure in the treatment of hemoptysis [3, 5, 6]. BAE has emerged in recent years as a treatment for severe, life-threatening hemoptysis, and has revolutionized the management of the disease, providing a reliable, minimally invasive tool with excellent diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes [3, 5]. It was first described in 1973 by Remy et al. . Subsequently, the procedure was rapidly and widely used as a treatment for severe hemoptysis, proving to be safe and efficient, and thus reducing the need for emergency thoracic surgery [8, 9]. Embolization may be life-saving; it may postpone or replace surgery, and in some situations it is the treatment of choice.
Three consecutive patients (two men aged 51 and 56 years and one woman aged 46 years), of Caucasian ethnicity, were treated with BAE in a tertiary academic reference center for spontaneous acute massive hemoptysis. All three were active smokers with a mean smoking habit of 50 ± 29 pack years. None had any history of chronic illness, pulmonary or otherwise. All three patients exhibited severe hemoptysis, ranging from 300 to 700 mL/day, with multiple episodes. They also had hypoxemia, anemia and low blood pressure. They were admitted to the intensive care unit for close monitoring and treatment.
Two of our patients received blood transfusions because of a rapid fall in hemoglobin levels (e.g. patient 1 had a hemoglobin level of 15.2% on admission, which had dropped to 8.7% two days later) and fear of severe hemodynamic instability,. All three of our patients were managed according to a standard hemoptysis protocol. They underwent emergency bronchoscopy and computed tomography (CT) of the thorax to identify the site of bleeding. The bronchoscopy did not allow identification of the bleeding lobe or any other significant abnormality in any of our patients. Blood trails and clots were seen in both the left and right bronchial systems, but provided no conclusive evidence as to the origin of bleeding. A tuberculin skin test and Ziehl-Neelsen examination of sputum indicated that our patients were negative for tuberculosis, and bronchial lavage cytology was negative for malignancy. The CT scan of one patient showed some degree of centrilobular emphysema. In all three cases, 'ground glass' attenuation consistent with hemorrhagic debris was found in both lungs, with predominance of one side or the other in each case. At that point, surgical management was not deemed feasible because the exact bleeding lobe could not be identified.
After the embolization treatment, all three patients were stable, and none exhibited recurrent hemoptysis. They expectorated minor amounts of blood-stained sputum, which gradually disappeared within one to three days. No complications developed in any of the cases as a result of this intervention. All three patients were discharged three to four days after embolization. Follow up CT scans at six and 12 months did not show any additional abnormality except for the aforementioned emphysema in one of the cases.
Life-threatening hemoptysis is one of the most serious emergencies in pulmonary medicine. The initial approach is no different than for any other bleeding or hemodynamically unstable patient. According to standard management protocols, the physician's primary goals include stabilizing the patient and securing the airway, identifying the bleeding site and efficiently containing the hemorrhage . Localization of the bleeding site is usually accomplished with imaging studies (chest x-ray, CT) and bronchoscopy. In some cases, however, no underlying pulmonary pathology can be identified. When no associated comorbidity can be confidently identified, a common risk factor is cigarette smoking .
Management of idiopathic hemoptysis is difficult and challenging [2–4]. Surgery was once regarded as the treatment of choice in operable patients with massive hemoptysis. However, inability to localize the bleeding site makes surgery a poor option. BAE is an excellent non-surgical alternative. Indications for BAE include failure of conservative management, massive hemoptysis, recurrent hemoptysis, and elevated surgical risk. It is also done to control bleeding temporarily before surgery. According to a recent report by the Mayo clinic group , immediate control of bleeding is obtained in 94% of patients and 30-day control in 85% of patients. Shigemura et al reported immediate success in controlling hemoptysis in 88% of cases in a series of 55 patients. Of those, 70% had no evidence of recurrence after one year of follow-up. It should be emphasized that after the cessation of bleeding, it is of great importance to treat any underlying pulmonary process. Another indication for BAE is peripheral pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm, which is found in up to 11% of patients undergoing bronchial angiography for hemoptysis . Although the efficacy and safety of BAE has been established in various pathologies causing massive hemoptysis, there is little information for BAE in cryptogenic hemoptysis. A recent retrospective study of cryptogenic hemoptysis in 35 smokers reported cessation of bleeding by BAE in 29 of 34 technically successful procedures (85%), and only three of five patients with recurrence of bleeding required surgical intervention . Savale et al. reported that first-line conservative measures and BAE controlled hemoptysis in 73 (90%) of their patients. Emergency surgery was performed in six patients (7%) because of failure of BAE, and secondary surgery was scheduled in a seventh patient.
BAE is described as the emergency treatment of choice for massive hemoptysis, as the mortality rate ranges from 7.1 to 18.2%, which, although high, is considerably less than the 40% seen in emergency surgery for massive hemoptysis [10, 11]. Should hemoptysis recur in any treated patient, a repeat embolization can safely be performed. If the bleeding recurs one to six months later, the cause is likely to be incomplete embolization of an undetected non-bronchial systemic arterial supply. Late recurrences (6-12 months after the procedure) have been reported in as many as 2-40% of patients, probably due to disease progression . Any patient with the diagnosis of cryptogenic hemoptysis has to be followed up to exclude lung carcinoma. Multidetector row CT may be helpful in this regard [13, 14]. Emergency surgery for idiopathic hemoptysis should only be reserved for cases in which life-threatening bleeding continues to occur despite BAE.
Regarding the optimum embolization material for BAE, tris-acryl gelatine microspheres seem to be effective and well tolerated in patients with life-threatening hemoptysis who are not surgical candidates . As has been shown in several in vivo and in vitro studies, these microspheres are characterized by better sizing and penetration characteristics than the most commonly used polyvinyl alcohol particles [16, 17]. Indeed, to the best of our knowledge this report is the first to describe application of tris-acryl gelatine microspheres in consecutive patients with cryptogenic hemoptysis. The larger size particles (500-700 μm) were selected to avoid passage of the particles through bronchopulmonary shunts. We believe that further clinical and experimental studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of BAE with these particles.
BAE has proved to be very effective and lacks the mortality and morbidity related with surgical alternatives [4, 11, 18]. Regarding the complications of BAE, their rate has diminished gradually over the years, especially when the technique is performed by skilled and experienced radiologists. Complications include spinal cord injury, subintimal dissection of the aorta leading to mediastinal hematoma, arterial perforation by a guide wire, transient thoracic pain, shoulder pain and dysphagia [3, 5]. The potential risk of spinal cord injury is the most serious complication, and must always be considered. Brown-Sequard syndrome has been reported, as has paraparesis with spontaneous regression and complete paraplegia without regression . Finally, shock related to splenic infarction has been described after a successful BAE . In the past few years, to prevent a potential neurologic complication developing, 'superselective' BAE has been used, meaning the embolization of more terminal branches of the arterial tree, beyond the origin of the spinal arteries. Another complication in patients with renal failure is contrast nephropathy, the risk of which must be weighed against the possible consequences, including death, of not performing BAE in a patient who cannot undergo surgery .
We report the successful treatment by BAE of three consecutive patients presenting with cryptogenic hemoptysis. The management of hemoptysis has evolved during the past decade, favouring a least invasive therapeutic approach, as the efficacy and safety of BAE have been established for controlling hemoptysis (i.e. conservative measures and interventional radiology over emergency surgery). Our findings are in accordance with the current literature supporting BAE as a safe, non-invasive tool in the management of idiopathic bronchopulmonary hemoptysis, and advocating the use of embolization as treatment of choice in such cases. Tris-acryl microspheres appear to be a safe and effective embolization material for this application.
Written informed consent was obtained from all three patients for publication of this case series and accompanying images. Copies of the written consents are available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Sirajuddin A, Mohammed TL: A 44-year-old man with hemoptysis: A review of pertinent imaging studies and radiographic interventions. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008, 75 (8): 601-7. 10.3949/ccjm.75.8.601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corder R: Hemoptysis. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003, 21 (2): 421-435. 10.1016/S0733-8627(03)00009-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mal H, Rullon I, Mellot F, Brugière O, Sleiman C, Menu Y, Fournier M: Immediate and long-term results of bronchial artery embolization for life-threatening hemoptysis. Chest. 1999, 115 (4): 996-1001. 10.1378/chest.115.4.996.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jean-Baptiste E: Clinical assessment and management of massive hemoptysis. Crit Care Med. 2000, 28 (5): 1642-1647. 10.1097/00003246-200005000-00066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swanson KL, Johnson CM, Prakash UB, McKusick MA, Andrews JC, Stanton AW: Bronchial artery embolization, experience with 54 patients. Chest. 2002, 121 (3): 789-795. 10.1378/chest.121.3.789.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalva SP: Bronchial artery embolization. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009, 12 (2): 130-8. 10.1053/j.tvir.2009.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Remy J, Voisin C, Dupuis C, Beguery P, Tonnel AB, Denies JL, Douay B: Traitement des hemoptysies par embolization de la circulation systemique. Ann Radiol (Paris). 1974, 17: 5-16.Google Scholar
- Wholey MH, Chamorro HA, Rao G, Ford WB, Miller WH: Bronchial artery embolization for massive hemoptysis. JAMA. 1976, 236: 2501-2504. 10.1001/jama.236.22.2501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Remy J, Arnaud A, Fardou H, Giraud R, Voisin C: Treatment of hemoptysis by embolization of bronchial arteries. Radiology. 1977, 122: 33-37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menchini L, Remy-Jardin M, Faivre JB, Copin MC, Ramon P, Matran R, Deken V, Duhamel A, Remy J: Cryptogenic hemoptysis in smokers: angiography and results of embolization in 35 patients. Eur Respir J. 2009, 34 (5): 1031-9. 10.1183/09031936.00018709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shigemura N, Wan IY, Yu SC, Wong RH, Hsin MK, Thung HK, Lee TW, Wan S, Underwood MJ, Yim AP: Multidisciplinary management of life-threatening massive hemoptysis: A 10 year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009, 87: 849-853. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haponik EF, Fein A, Chin R: Managing life-threatening hemoptysis: has anything really changed?. Chest. 2000, 118: 1431-1435. 10.1378/chest.118.5.1431.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Savale L, Parrot A, Khalil A, Antoine M, Théodore J, Carette MF, Mayaud C, Fartoukh M: Cryptogenic hemoptysis: from a benign to a life-threatening pathologic vascular condition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007, 175 (11): 1181-5. 10.1164/rccm.200609-1362OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mori H, Ohno Y, Tsuge Y, Kawasaki M, Ito F, Endo J, Funaguchi N, La BL, Kanematsu M, Minatoguchi S: Use of Multidetector Row CT to Evaluate the Need for Bronchial Arterial Embolization in Hemoptysis Patients. Respiration. 2010, 80 (1): 24-31. 10.1159/000253882.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corr PD: Bronchial artery embolization for life-threatening hemoptysis using tris-acryl microspheres: Short-term results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005, 28: 439-441. 10.1007/s00270-004-0227-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laurent A, Beaujeux R, Wassef M, Ru" fenacht D, Boschetti E, Merland JJ: Trisacryl gelatin microspheres for therapeutic embolization, I: development and in vitro evaluation. Am J Neuroradiol. 1996, 17: 533-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Derdeyn CP, Graves VB, Salamant MS, Rappe A: Collagencoated acrylic microspheres for embolotherapy: in vivo and in vitro characteristics. Am J Neuroradiol. 1997, 18: 647-53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knott-Craig CJ, Oostuizen JG, Rossouw G, Joubert JR, Barnard PM: Management and prognosis of massive hemoptysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993, 105: 394-397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Labbe V, Roques S, Boughdène F, Razazi K, Khalil A, Parrot A, Fartoukh M: Shock complicating successful bronchial artery embolization for severe hemoptysis. Chest. 2009, 135 (1): 215-7. 10.1378/chest.08-0491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.