- Case report
- Open Access
Simultaneous sleep study and nasoendoscopic investigation in a patient with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome refractory to continuous positive airway pressure: a case report
© Loureiro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 12 November 2009
- Accepted: 2 December 2009
- Published: 2 December 2009
The standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome is nasal continuous positive airway pressure. In most cases the obstruction is located at the oropharyngeal level, and nasal continuous positive airway pressure is usually effective. In cases of non-response to nasal continuous positive airway pressure other treatments like mandibular advancement devices or upper airway surgery (especially bi-maxillary advancement) may also be considered.
We report the case of a 38-year-old Caucasian man with severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, initially refractory to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (and subsequently also to a mandibular advancement devices), in which the visualization of the upper airway with sleep endoscopy and the concomitant titration of positive pressure were useful in the investigation and resolution of sleep disordered breathing. In fact, there was a marked reduction in the size of his nasopharynx, and a paresis of his left aryepiglotic fold with hypertrophy of the right aryepiglotic fold. The application of bi-level positive airway pressure and an oral interface successfully managed his obstructive sleep apnoea.
This is a rare case of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome refractory to treatment with nocturnal ventilatory support. Visualization of the endoscopic changes, during sleep and under positive pressure, was of great value to understanding the mechanisms of refractoriness. It also oriented the therapeutic option. Refractoriness to obstructive sleep apnoea therapy with continuous positive airway pressure is rare, and each case should be approached individually.
- Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
- Excessive Daytime Sleepiness
- Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
- Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome
- Mandibular Advancement Device
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is characterized by a recurrent collapse of all or some parts of the upper airway during sleep. Despite being sub-diagnosed, it affects 2% to 4% of the world's population  and has a higher prevalence in obese people . This syndrome is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. It is also an independent risk factor for hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke .
The method for its initial evaluation using a cardio-respiratory study is simple and easy to use on an outpatient basis.
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) during sleep, which allows airway patency, is the current standard treatment . It significantly improves patients' excessive daytime sleepiness, states of wakefulness, cognitive abilities , and quality of life . This treatment also decreases cardiovascular risk, especially when it is used for more than 4 hours daily .
Alternative treatments include a mandibular advancement device (MAD) that increases the lumen of the airway by inducing jaw and tongue protrusion during sleep, improves the tone of the muscles of the airway, and reduces the passive compliance of the pharyngeal wall . It is especially effective in non-obese patients with moderate OSAS.
Upper airway surgery, specifically bi-maxillary surgery, is also effective in severe cases of OSAS. It may be considered for patients who are unwilling to use, or are refractory to, nCPAP therapy and whose anatomical changes are prone to surgical resolution . This approach must be made and addressed specifically.
We report a 38-year-old Caucasian man who was referred to our department for suspected OSAS with complaints of severe snoring, respiratory pauses that were witnessed by his wife, morning headaches, and adynamia, but without acknowledgement of excessive daytime sleepiness.
He had a history of dyslipidemia treated with diet and statin, without the existence of other cardiovascular risk factors. He had low alcohol consumption (10 gr/day) and no history of smoking. A physical exam revealed macroglossia, a bulky soft palate and uvula. He was overweight with a body mass index (BMI) of 29.1 and had a cervical perimeter of 42 cm. As an initial diagnostic approach, a spirometry and chest X-ray were performed, which revealed no changes. A diagnostic cardiorespiratory study showed that in addition to extended periods of snoring, he also had severe OSAS with an apnoea and hypopnoea index (AHI) of 72.1/h, a desaturation index of 67.1/h, and a minimum O2 saturation of 69%.
With the diagnosis of severe OSAS, despite the lack of excessive daytime sleepiness, a trial of positive airway pressure (automatic mode) was proposed, with the minimal pressure of 4 cmH20 and maximum pressure of 15 cmH2O. General measures of sleep hygiene and weight reduction were also recommended. As an alternative, the use of MAD was considered, and the patient was referred to our hospital's orthodontics department.
The patient was evaluated after 3 months and there was no adherence to treatment, with only 3 minutes of use per night, with a total number of 6 days of use. The patient attributed this to his difficulty in adapting to the masks and to the pressure itself.
Since the nocturnal titration was ineffective, a retitration of pressures was conducted during the day to confirm this refractoriness and optimize the interface. At that moment the patient was prescribed bilevel-positive air pressure (VIVO 30, Breas) with 20 cmH2O of IPAP and 12 cmH2O of EPAP and a gel face mask (Mojo).
Refractoriness of OSAS therapy is rare and its approach should be targeted to specific individuals.
The conventional method for administering CPAP is using a nasal or oronasal interface  based on increasing intramural pressure above a critical point of oropharynx collapse (PCrit) . Patients' compliance to treatment is somewhat constrained by the side effects associated with the use of these interfaces, such as nasal congestion, dryness of the oronasal mucosa, epistaxis, and claustrophobia. The oral route is an alternative that can be used in cases where the patient is intolerant to conventional approaches .
According to recent literature , the air acts as a resistor to the physiological nasal obstruction which produces collapsing forces that manifest at the most collapsible point, the pharynx. Positive pressure applied through the nose has to overcome the PCrit that results from the composition of pressure at the point of collapse of the airway and the surrounding soft tissue. Because the soft palate is complacent, the PCrit to be overcome is similar to the positive pressure that is applied through the mouth. The Oracle mask (Fisher and Paykel) has shown to be effective in the treatment of OSAS , as it applies a pressure-flow relationship to the oropharynx similar to that of the nasal way and imposes no obvious changes in the superior airway . It also has the advantage of fewer side effects.
In this particular case, the visualization, during sleep and under positive pressure, of the endoscopic changes, was of great value to the understanding of the mechanisms of refractoriness.
The application of a positive pressure in an airway with anatomical changes (such as occurred in the case described) could perhaps have caused valve mechanisms that led to the unrolling of the epiglottis, with consequent obstruction to the passage of air. This phenomenon has become more evident with pressure levels greater than 16 cmH2O. At the same time, with lower pressures, the patency of the airway was not established.
Based on these findings, the clinical decision to administer bilevel positive pressure during sleep through an oral mask, which is not usually used in patients with OSAS, overcame the major collapse of our patient's nasopharynx.
We describe a rare case of OSAS with refractoriness to treatment with nocturnal ventilatory support and emphasize the importance of endoscopic visualization of the upper airway during sleep in order to clarify the origin of refractoriness and concomitantly orient the treatment.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S: The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med. 1993, 328: 1230-1235. 10.1056/NEJM199304293281704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Boxem TJM, de Groot GH: Prevalence and severity of sleep-disordered breathing in a group of morbidly obese patients. Neth J Med. 1999, 54 (5): 202-206. 10.1016/S0300-2977(98)00139-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nieto FJ, Young TB, Lind BK, Shahar E, Samet JM, Redline S, Dágostino RB, Newman AB, Lebowitz MD, Pickering TG: Association of sleep-disordered breathing, sleep Apnoea, and hypertension in a large community-based study: sleep heart health study. JAMA. 2000, 283 (14): 1829-1836. 10.1001/jama.283.14.1829.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parish JM, Somers VK: Obstructive sleep apnoea and cardiovascular disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004, 79 (8): 1036-1046. 10.4065/79.8.1036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chisholm E, Kotecha B: Oropharyngeal surgery for obstrucive sleep apnoea in CPAP failures. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007, 264: 51-55. 10.1007/s00405-006-0139-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baish A, Hein G, Gobler J, Maurer T, Hormann K: Finding the appropriate therapy with the help of sleep endoscopy. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 2005, 84: 833-837. 10.1055/s-2005-861255.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lojander J, Räsänen P, Sintonen H, Roine RP, HUS QoL Study Group: Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy on health related quality of life in sleep apnoea patients treated in the routine clinical setting of a university hospital. J Int Med Res. 2008, 36 (4): 760-770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santamaria J, Iranzo A, Ma Montserrat J, de Pablo J: Persistent sleepiness in CPAP treated obstructive sleep apnoea patients: evaluation and treatment. Sleep Med Rev. 2007, 11 (3): 195-207. 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.02.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baptista PM: Surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2007, 30 (Suppl 1): 75-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maurer JT, Stuck BA, Hein G, Hormann K: Videoendoscopic assessment of uncommon sites of upper airway obstruction during sleep. Sleep Breath. 2000, 4 (3): 131-136. 10.1055/s-2000-11565.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petri N, Svanholt P, Solow B, Winkel P: Mandibular advancement appliance for obstructive sleep apnoea: results of randomised placebo controlled trial using parallel group design. J Sleep Res. 2008, 17 (2): 221-229. 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00645.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rama NA, Tekwani SH, Kushida CA: Sites of obstruction in obstructive sleep apnoea. Chest. 2002, 122: 1139-1147. 10.1378/chest.122.4.1139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith LP, O'Donnell CP, Allan L, Schwartz AR: A physiologic comparison of nasal and oral positive airway pressure. Chest. 2003, 123: 689-694. 10.1378/chest.123.3.689.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McNicholas WT: The nose and OSA: variable nasal obstruction may be more important in pathophysiology than fixed obstruction. Eur Respir J. 2008, 32: 3-8. 10.1183/09031936.00050208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khanna R, Kline LR: A prospective eight-week trial of nasal interfaces versus a novel oral interface (Oracle) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome. Sleep Med. 2003, 4 (4): 333-338. 10.1016/S1389-9457(03)00063-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.