Open Access

Community-acquired bacteremia and acute cholecystitis due to Enterobacter cloacae: a case report

  • Guillermo Isasti1,
  • Laura Mora2,
  • Victoria García2,
  • Jesus Santos3 and
  • Rosario Palacios1Email author
Journal of Medical Case Reports20093:7417

https://doi.org/10.4076/1752-1947-3-7417

Received: 5 November 2008

Accepted: 12 March 2009

Published: 11 September 2009

Abstract

Introduction

Enterobacter cloacae is responsible for 65-75% of all Enterobacter infections, bacteremia being the most common syndrome. The majority of infections are nosocomially acquired and in patients with predisposing factors.

Case presentation

We present a case of E. cloacae bacteremia secondary to acute cholecystitis in a 60-year-old man with recent diagnosis of cholelithiasis. The diagnosis was established with abdominal echography and positive blood and biliary cultures. The patient was managed successfully with cholecystectomy and antibiotic therapy.

Conclusion

The peculiarity of our case is the development of community-acquired bacteremia due to E. cloacae with a clear infectious focus, as a single agent isolated in several blood cultures, in a patient without severe underlying diseases, prior antimicrobial use or previous hospital admission. Although the majority of Enterobacter spp. infections are nosocomially acquired, primary bacteremia being the most common syndrome, these pathogens may also be responsible for community-acquired cases. Patients without predisposing factors may also be affected.

Introduction

Enterobacter spp. have been recognized as increasingly important pathogens in recent years, and have been implicated in a broad range of clinical syndromes, the majority of which are nosocomially acquired and in patients with predisposing factors [1]. Enterobacter cloacae is responsible for 65-75% of all Enterobacter infections, bacteremia being the most common syndrome [1]-[5]. A patient with bacteremic acute cholecystitis is presented.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old previously healthy man, with a recent diagnosis of cholelithiasis, was admitted to our hospital with a 24-hour history of high fever, nausea and severe pain in the right hypochondrium. On clinical examination, mild jaundice, abdominal tenderness in the right upper quadrant and a positive Murphy sign were noted. His blood pressure was 110/70 mmHg, his pulse was 130 beats per minute and his temperature was 39.5ºC. He had no leukocytosis but had significant neutrophilia, an elevated C reactive protein level, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and elevated total bilirubin with an elevated direct fraction. An abdominal ultrasound revealed a relaxed gallbladder, with a thickened wall with multiple biliary calculi and biliary mud. Empirical treatment for acute cholecystitis was initiated with piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g every 8 hours, which is one of the options in our hospital's protocol for the treatment of biliary tract and gallbladder infections, mainly in very ill patients, and patients turned down for emergency surgery. Three days later, all sets of the blood cultures grew E. cloacae, which was sensitive to empirical antibiotics. In imaging techniques, such as computed tomography and magnetic cholangioresonance, a collection was observed in the anterior subhepatic space, suggesting an abscess. A cholecystectomy was therefore performed, obtaining biliary abscess exudate in which E. cloacae also grew, with the same susceptibility as E. cloacae isolated from blood cultures. The patient's condition had improved after starting antibiotic treatment, even before surgery, and no further bacteremia was detected. Piperacillin-tazobactam was maintained up to 4 weeks in addition to support treatment. The patient had a favorable outcome, leaving hospital 10 days later.

Discussion

The genus Enterobacter belongs to the family Enterobacteriaceae; 14 species of this genus have been described, and E. cloacae and E. aerogenes are by far the most frequently encountered human pathogens among them [1]. Although community-acquired infections with Enterobacter spp. do occur, the majority of infections are nosocomial [1]-[6]. Patients at increased risk of acquiring an Enterobacter infection include those with a prolonged hospital stay, especially if a portion of it is spent in an intensive care unit [1, 3]-[5]. The incidence of bacteremia has increased gradually accounting for nearly 11% of nosocomial infections in some series [6, 7]. The condition for development of bacteremia due to Enterobacter spp. is severe underlying illness, and the most commonly cited factors associated with the acquisition of bacteremia due to Enterobacter spp. are neoplastic disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, and gastrointestinal diseases [1, 3]-[6]. Prior antimicrobial exposure, in particular, to penicillins, has also been identified as a risk factor for this entity [6]. Compared with bacteremias due to other enteric bacilli, Enterobacter spp. are acquired significantly more often in hospitals, are more likely to be a component of a polymicrobial bacteremia, and the portal of entry is usually unknown [1]-[5]. When the source of infection can be identified, the major portals of entry are the genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts, followed by others such as intravascular catheters, the respiratory tract and surgical wounds [1, 6]. The gastrointestinal tract is a common endogenous reservoir for E. cloacae and spread of infection from the gastrointestinal tract is difficult to ascertain, which can explain why the portal of entry often cannot be identified [6, 7].

In our patient, bacteremia was associated with an acute cholecystitis complicated by the development of a subhepatic abscess that required surgery, and the same E. cloacae was isolated in both blood and abscess exudates. As far as we know, there has been no other reported case of acute bacteremic cholecystitis due to E. cloacae as a single etiologic agent. With regard to antimicrobial susceptibility, E. cloacae is resistant to ampicillin, cefalothin and other older cephalosporins, and cefoxitin. The carbapenems, cefepime, aminoglycosides, and ciprofloxacin are active against the majority of strains of E. cloacae[8]-[10].

Conclusion

The peculiarity of our case is the development of community-acquired bacteremia due to E. cloacae with a clear infectious focus, an acute cholecystitis, as a single agent isolated in several blood cultures, in a patient without severe underlying diseases, prior antimicrobial use or previous hospital admission. As far as we know, there is no other reported similar case in patients without comorbidity.

Although the description of this case has little implication for conventional clinical practice, as blood cultures, antibiotherapy and surgery are usually included in cases similar to ours, it does highlight the possibility of a community-acquired bacteremia due to traditional nosocomial microorganisms in patients without severe underlying diseases, prior antimicrobial use or previous hospital admission.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria
(2)
Microbiology Department, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria
(3)
Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria

References

  1. Sanders WE, Sanders CC: Enterobacter spp.: Pathogens poised to flourish at the turn of the century. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997, 10: 220-241.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Weischer M, Kolmos HJ: Retrospective 6-year study of Enterobacter bacteremia in a Danish university hospital. J Hosp Infect. 1992, 20: 15-24. 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90057-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouza E, de la Torre MG, Erice A, Diaz-Borrego JM, Buzón L: Enterobacter bacteremia. An analysis of 50 episodes. Arch Intern Med. 1985, 145: 1024-1027. 10.1001/archinte.145.6.1024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Juanjuan D, Zhiyong Z, Xiajou L, Yali X, Zhenzhen L: Retrospective analysis of bacteremia because of Enterobacter cloacae compared with Escherichia coli bacteremia. Int J Clin Pract. 2007, 61: 583-588. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01163.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ye Y, Li JB, Ye DQ, Jiang ZJ: Enterobacter bacteremia: Clinical features, risk factors for multiresistance and mortality in a Chinese University Hospital. Infection. 2006, 34: 252-257. 10.1007/s15010-006-5038-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lin YC, Chen TL, Ju HL, Chen HS, Wang FD, Yu KW, Liu CY: Clinical characteristics and risk factors for attributable mortality in Enterobacter cloacae bacteremia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2006, 39: 67-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kanemitsu K, Endo S, Oda K, Saito K, Kunishima H, Hatta M, Inden K, Kaku M: An increased incidence of Enterobacter cloacae in a cardiovascular ward. J Hosp Infect. 2007, 66: 130-134. 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.03.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Flynn DM, Weinstein RA, Nathan C, GAton MA, Kabins SA: Patients' endogenous flora as the source of 'nosocomial' Enterobacter in cardiac surgery. J Infect Dis. 1987, 156: 363-368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chamberland S, L'Ecuyer J, Lessard C, Bernier M, Provencher P, Bergeron MG, C.S. Group: Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of 941 gram-negative bacteria isolated from septicemia patients throughout Canada. Clin Infect Dis. 1992, 19: 673-674.Google Scholar
  10. Forsgren A, Walder M: Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates in South Sweden including a 13-year follow-up study of some respiratory tract pathogens. APMIS. 1994, 102: 227-235. 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1994.tb04869.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Isasti et al.; licensee Cases Network Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.