Prosthetic knee joint infection caused by α-hemolytic Streptococcus species: a case report
Journal of Medical Case Reports volume 17, Article number: 339 (2023)
Knee arthroplasty is an orthopedic surgical procedure in which a damaged joint is replaced with an artificial one. It is estimated that 1–2% of knee arthroplasties will encounter infection over their lifetime. Although α-hemolytic Streptococcus species play an important role in prosthetic joint infection, they are less common than staphylococcal species.
In this report, a 50-year-old Iranian woman was diagnosed with prosthetic knee joint infection based on clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings. She was diabetic and had undergone a left total knee arthroplasty, which, 18 months after the surgery, presented pain, erythema, and edema in that knee. The primary culture of knee aspirate was positive for α-hemolytic Streptococcus species, but following antibiotic medication, culture was negative. The primary antibiotic regime was vancomycin and meropenem, which was changed to cefepime for the management of the infection based on the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
This report indicated the clinical presentation and management of the patient with prosthetic joint infection in which the patient recovered without any severe complications or surgical intervention.
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an infection of the joint prosthesis and adjacent tissue. It is estimated that about 1–2% of people with prosthetic hip or knee replacement encounter an infection. In this regard, early diagnosis and appropriate management are essential to ease pain, restore joint function, and prevent more complications . Epidemiological studies over the past decades have indicated that, with the increasing number of hip and knee arthroplasties, the rate of PJI has been increasing in parallel . Obesity, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, malnutrition, smoking, immunosuppression, and age over 50 years are the most common risk factors for developing PJI [3, 4]. Several factors, including the virulence of the organism, host immune responses, the structure of soft tissue surrounding the joint, and the route of primary infection, can affect the clinical presentation of PJI. In general, local pain, fever, joint swelling, and erythema or tenderness are the most common clinical symptoms. For laboratory investigations, peripheral blood for verifying blood index and synovial fluid for culture should be taken from the patient. Leukocytosis, the elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in a blood sample as well as the positive synovial fluid culture in the presence of a high white blood cell (WBC) count in the synovial fluid examination are the main laboratory findings in primary PJI diagnosis. Based on the recommendation from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), if the isolated bacterium is Staphylococcus, intravenous antibiotic therapy and then an oral antibiotic medication should be prescribed for 2–6 weeks and 3 months, respectively, for complete eradication of the microorganism; for other bacteria, 4–6 weeks of antimicrobial therapy should be indicated . The present study aimed to report a rare prosthetic knee joint infection caused by α-hemolytic Streptococcus and demonstrate the successful management of the infection.
A 50-year-old Iranian housewife with a total replacement of the left knee joint (Fig. 1) presented to our department. On the primary examination, fever (38 °C), blood pressure (BP) of 125/75 mmHg, pulse rate (PR) of 75 beats per minute, and respiratory rate (RR) of 15 breaths per minute, along with chilling, nausea, swelling, and pain in the left knee that had started 3 days ago, were recorded. Except for decreased ability to move the joint, other predominant physical and neurological symptoms were not observed.
In the past medical history (PMH), the patient had a history of diabetes mellitus with insulin therapy and a left knee joint replacement 1.5 years ago. Except for these cases, she had no other significant past medical history or notable family or hereditary history of specific disease and medication use. She had given birth to three children and denied alcohol consumption and smoking. For controlling diabetes, she used neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin [20 units every 12 hours, subcutaneous injection (SQ)] and regular insulin (12 units in the morning and 8 units at night, SQ).
For diagnosis, a peripheral blood sample and aspirated synovial fluid were taken and were subjected to biochemical, hematological, and microbiological testing.
A peripheral blood sample of 10 ml was obtained and inoculated into a blood culture bottle aseptically; it was negative after a 72-hour period of incubation at 37 °C. A synovial aspiration sample of 2 ml was taken from the patient and was dropped into collection tubes containing liquid ethylenediaminetertraacetic acid (EDTA) aseptically. The specimen was cultured into selective media including blood agar (for isolating aerobic bacteria), chocolate agar (incubated in a candle jar for isolating aerobic capnophilic bacteria), thioglycollate broth (for recovering anaerobic bacteria), eosin methylene blue agar (EMB; for recovering gram-negative bacteria), and subro dextrose agar (for isolating fungi). Also, two sets of slides were prepared and stained with gram and acid-fast staining. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and acid-fast staining were employed for identification of acid-fast bacilli, which were negative. Susceptibility to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT), neomycin, and bacitracin discs was used for the differentiation of α-hemolytic Streptococcus species (spp.) from other Streptococcus spp.
Lab biomarkers of blood and synovial specimens at the time of admission are presented in Table 1. In synovial cell counting examination, many WBC in which neutrophils accounted for 80% of whole cells were reported.
At the time of admission, since the causative agent was unknown, on the first day, empirical therapy including vancomycin (1 g every 12 hours, intravenous injection for 2 days) and meropenem (1 g every 8 hours, intravenous injection for 2 days) were initiated to target suspicious invasive agents like Staphylococcus spp. and gram-negative bacilli. On the second day, edema, warmness, and redness declined but fever remained. The results of the blood and synovial culture were revealed on the third day. Only the α-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. was isolated from the synovial specimen, which was subjected to antibiogram testing. Based on the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing on the third day, antibiotic medication was changed to cefepime (2 g every 8 hours, intravenous injection) for 14 days. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) tests were recommended by an infectious disease (ID) specialist and were performed by an echocardiography cardiologist, who indicated that there was no sign of endocarditis. In orthopedic consultation, according to radiographic results, the exchange of removable components of the implant was not recommended; the antibiotic therapy was continued. The patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics for 14 days and was discharged after partial recovery. At the time of discharge, the patient's symptoms were entirely resolved, there was no movement disorder, and there was only slight swelling in her left knee. Oral medication with cephalexin was prescribed for her for 2 weeks. One month after discharge, the patient did not have any specific complaints and joint restrictions, and the test results of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 25 and C-reactive protein (CRP) of 8 were in normal range.
Discussion and conclusions
Arthroplasty is an orthopedic surgical procedure in which a musculoskeletal joint damaged due to trauma or arthritis is replaced to relieve pain and restore the joint's function. The incidence rate of postoperative knee joint replacement is meager and is approximately 0.01–3.4% . The onset of PJI is divided into three stages: early, delayed, or late, which initiate at 3 months, 12 months, and > 12–24 months after surgery, respectively. Generally, the virulence of the microorganism and the mode of infection determine the onset time of the disease. Late-onset PJI is usually related to a less virulent microorganism and hematogenous spread of infection in comparison to early and delayed PJI, which are mostly due to hypervirulent microorganisms and intraoperative contamination. In most cases, PJI occurs due to contamination during operation. Colonization of microorganisms on the implant's surface can occur through the direct contamination or hematogenous spread of infection from distant sites. Previous studies have shown that Staphylococcus spp. account for 50–60% of total PJI infections, while only 10% of cases were attributed to Streptococcus spp. . For diagnosis of PJI, a combination of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and pathological results should be noted. However, none of them has 100% accuracy for diagnosis of PJI. According to different studies, imaging and synovial fluid analysis have the highest sensitivity and specificity [7,8,9,10]. In the case of clinical findings, the presence of a sinus tract is a major criterion for PJI diagnosis , but our patient had no sinus tract. Based on previous reports, the mortality rate of PJI is about 2–4%; however, in some cases, such as involvement with Staphylococcus aureus, mortality rate can reach 7%, which reflects the high virulence of this microorganism [12, 13].
In the management of PJI, elimination of the infection, restoring the function of the infected joint, and minimizing PJI-related morbidity and mortality should be considered. In general, for these patients, surgical intervention and antibiotic therapy should be noticed [14, 15]. In this study, surgical intervention and implementation exchange were not done, and the patient only received intravenous antibiotics.
This case report presented the clinical manifestation and pharmacological management of a prosthetic joint infection due to α-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. Compared with staphylococci spp., PJIs due to α-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. are less common.
α-Hemolytic streptococci spp. are a group of 50 species found to be a part of the human saliva microbiome. They can invade the blood following dental manipulation and trauma and cause a wide range of infections, so they are one of the most important causes of endocarditis and brain abscesses. PJIs can occur due to hematogenous spread of bacteria or surgical site infections by commensals. Most hematogenous PJIs arising with α-hemolytic streptococci occur months or years after arthroplasty .
In a retrospective multicenter cohort study, prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) with Streptococcus spp. were investigated from 2001 to 2009. Most of the conditions (57.9%) were treated using surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy. In this study rifampicin and levofloxacin in combination were found to be the most effective antibiotics against Streptococcus spp. The highest rate of comorbidities was related to diabetes mellitus (35.6%) and malnutrition (28.7), respectively. This study concluded that the outcomes of streptococcal PJIs may not be as good as reported in previous studies . In line with this study, our case was a diabetic patient, but her response to antibiotic therapy was satisfactory.
Marongiu reported a case in which a 72-year-old male had a late onset of PJIs due to Streptococcus anginosus. The infection was treated through two-stage revision arthroplasty and postoperative antibiotic therapy (vancomycin and levofloxacin) . Several previous studies regarding streptococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are reviewed and summarized in Table 2. According to these reports, the antibiotic regimen used in our study differs from previous similar studies, which could be due to the difference in regional antibiotic resistance patterns and the virulence of the involved streptococcal strains.
Also, according to previous the studies, anaerobic bacteria play an important role in causing delayed and late PJIs. Isolation of these bacteria from clinical samples is difficult and requires enriched medium- and long-term incubation of cultures (4–6 days), so the probability of false negative results in their identification is high. The use of molecular methods and enriched culture media will facilitate their isolation and identification. In this case, due to the limitation in the detection of anaerobic bacteria, the role of anaerobes in causing infection cannot be completely ignored [19, 20].
In conclusion, joint arthroplasty has enhanced the lives of millions of people worldwide. Postoperative infection occurs rarely, but appropriate management of such a condition would significantly decrease the mortality rate and severe complications. Here, we report a rare case of PJI in a older woman with diabetes without any other predisposing factors for joint infection. Among the different types of bacterial agents that are involved in PJI, α-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. are less frequent; despite this, α-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. are an important part of commensal oral flora and can easily spread to the blood and seed at the surgical site. Diagnosis based on culture examination of aspirated synovial fluid and administration of effective antibiotics based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing plays an important role in the management of such infection. Some previous reports indicated that antibiotic treatment outcomes were comparable to the open surgery procedure [21, 22]. As presented in this case, our patient recovered from infection without surgical intervention following effective antibiotics medication.
Availability of data and materials
Prosthetic joint infection
White blood cell
Infectious Diseases Society of America
Past medical history
Neutral protamine Hagedorn
Eosin methylene blue agar
Polymerase chain reaction
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Red blood cell
Ahmed SS, Haddad FS. Prosthetic joint infection. Bone Jt Res. 2019;8(11):570–2.
Kurtz SM, et al. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(8):61-65. e1.
Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(2):302–45.
Berbari EF, et al. Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case–control study. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27(5):1247–54.
Ometti M, Delmastro E, Salini V. Management of prosthetic joint infections: a guidelines comparison. Musculoskelet Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-021-00734-7.
Balato G, et al. Knee septic arthritis caused by α-hemolytic Streptococcus in a patient with a recent history of knee arthroscopy: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):1–5.
Cyteval C, et al. Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis: CT imaging. Radiology. 2002;224(2):477–83.
Ghanem E, et al. Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. JBJS. 2008;90(8):1637–43.
Qu X, et al. Preoperative aspiration culture for preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(11):3830–4.
Teller RE, et al. Sequential indium-labeled leukocyte and bone scans to diagnose prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res (1976–2007). 2000;373:241–7.
Schwarz EM, et al. 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: research priorities from the general assembly questions. J Orthopaed Res. 2019;37(5):997–1006.
Lora-Tamayo J, et al. A large multicenter study of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections managed with implant retention. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(2):182–94.
Krause R, et al. Debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention in Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(12):1842–3.
Bejon P, et al. Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(3):569–75.
Matthews PC, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection. BMJ. 2009. 338.b1773. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1773.
Renz N, et al. Outcome and failure analysis of 132 episodes of hematogenous periprosthetic joint infections—a cohort study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac094.
Fiaux E, et al. Outcome of patients with streptococcal prosthetic joint infections with special reference to rifampicin combinations. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):1–9.
Marongiu G, et al. Late onset periprosthetic joint infection of the knee caused by Streptococcus anginosus. Case presentation and literature review. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2021;15(03):436–41.
Rieber H, et al. Periprosthetic joint infection caused by anaerobes. Retrospective analysis reveals no need for prolonged cultivation time if sensitive supplemented growth media are used. Anaerobe. 2018;50:12–8.
Shah NB, et al. Anaerobic prosthetic joint infection. Anaerobe. 2015;36:1–8.
Ascione T, et al. Post-arthroscopic septic arthritis of the knee. Analysis of the outcome after treatment in a case series and systematic literature review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(2 Suppl):76–85.
Johns BP, Loewenthal MR, Dewar DC. Open compared with arthroscopic treatment of acute septic arthritis of the native knee. JBJS. 2017;99(6):499–505.
Huotari K, Vuorinen M, Rantasalo M. High cure rate for acute streptococcal prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement, antimicrobials, and implant retention in a specialized tertiary care center. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(8):1288–90.
Lora-Tamayo J, et al. The not-so-good prognosis of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection managed by implant retention: the results of a large multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(12):1742–52.
Mahieu R, et al. The prognosis of streptococcal prosthetic bone and joint infections depends on surgical management—a multicenter retrospective study. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;85:175–81.
Akgün D, et al. High failure rates in treatment of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection: results from a seven-year retrospective cohort study. Bone Jt J. 2017;99(5):653–9.
Lam A, Rasmussen M, Thompson O. Successful outcome for patients with streptococcal prosthetic joint infections—a retrospective population-based study. Infect Dis. 2018;50(8):593–600.
Olson LB, et al. Streptococcus salivarius prosthetic joint infection following dental cleaning despite antibiotic prophylaxis. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2019;2019:8109280. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8109280.
We thank Dr. Mardani for his support.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from patient.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Mardani, M., Mohammadshahi, J. & Teimourpour, R. Prosthetic knee joint infection caused by α-hemolytic Streptococcus species: a case report. J Med Case Reports 17, 339 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-023-03905-1