Skip to main content

Brucellosis with rare complications and review of diagnostic tests: a case report

Abstract

Background

Brucellosis is one of the most common zoonotic diseases in the world. Osteoarticular complications, especially vertebral system involvement, are most commonly reported. However, reports and coreports of pulmonary complications and thoracal spondylodiscitis and epidural abscess are rare.

Case presentation

Spondylodiscitis was detected at the T11–12 vertebral level, followed by epidural and paravertebral abscess, and then empyema was detected in a 17-year-old Asian female patient without any additional disease. The patient had used various antibiotics and the disease could not be proven bacteriologically. Also, the Rose Bengal test was negative. However, serologically high titer Brucella positivity was detected in the blood and pleural fluid sample. Drainage was required for bilateral empyema. Disease duration prolonged due to multiple complications. The patient was cured with combined long-term treatment for brucellosis.

Conclusions

Although some are rare, brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that can cause many complications. The gold standard for diagnosis is the growth of bacteria in blood culture or tissue culture. However, isolation of the microorganism can be very difficult. Clinical suspicion and serological tests are important guides.

Peer Review reports

Background

Brucellosis is a common global zoonotic disease caused by bacteria of the genus Brucella and can progress with various clinical manifestations. It may result in long-term illness and various complications due to being undiagnosed and having inadequate treatments when it is not considered as a diagnosis. The disease is an important public health problem worldwide and is common in many developing countries, especially in the Mediterranean Basin, Northern and Eastern Africa, the Middle East, and the Arabian Peninsula. According to World Health Organization reports, more than 500,000 cases of brucellosis are reported annually, especially from developing countries, and it is estimated that there are four undetected cases for every diagnosed case [1]. Our country is endemic in terms of the disease, and the continuation of traditional farming practices, lifestyle, and consumption of fresh dairy products contribute to the high incidence of brucellosis. There are reports between rates of 1.3–26.7% in seroprevalence studies, and the highest rates are found mainly in the Southeastern Anatolian provinces [2].

Brucellosis, which has a clinical variety, can present with many system-related complications. Osteoarticular complications (10–85%), especially vertebral system involvement, are most commonly reported [3]. Brucellar spondylitis and spondylodiscitis mostly affect the lumbar region (60%), less frequently the thoracic (19%), and rarely the cervical segments (12%). Spinal epidural abscess is a more severe clinical form that develops secondary to spondylodiscitis. Its frequency has been reported as 1/10,000, and few cases exist in the literature [4]. The spread of epidural abscesses to the paravertebral area is much less common [5].

Pulmonary brucellosis, on the other hand, is a very rare complication due to improved diagnostic tests and treatment availability. Its incidence is 1–10% in the literature [6]. Parenchymal nodules, lobar pneumonia, or pleural effusion are among the pulmonary pathologies detected. Empyema reporting is limited to a few cases [7].

In our case report, we present a case of a 17-year-old patient with spondylodiscitis and paravertebral abscess affecting the lower thoracic vertebrae as well as brucellosis with bilateral empyema secondary to abscess without pneumonic involvement, and we share the serological tests used in the diagnosis of the case and the difficulties we experienced with these tests.

Case presentation

A 17-year-old Asian female patient living in a rural area and whose family is engaged in animal husbandry had abdominal pain, lower back pain, and increased fever, especially at night, which started approximately 1 month before the admission to our emergency department. She had no history of disease and drug use. There was no chronic disease in her family. She went to different polyclinic branches in many hospitals with these complaints. During this time, in these sections, after receiving various diagnoses and treatments such as urinary infection and lumbar discopathy, she was diagnosed at another center with brucellosis after her standard tube agglutination test (STA) was positive at 1/320 titer, and her treatment was arranged in the form of a combination of doxycycline (100 mg; twice a day) and rifampicin (600 mg; once a day). Although the treatment was given to the patient, her complaints continued, and her lower back pain worsened, so she came to our emergency department and was consulted by the department of infectious diseases. On admission, her fever was 37.8 °C, and other vital signs were stable. On physical examination, diffuse tenderness was detected on palpation in the thoracolumbar vertebrae. Other physical examination findings were normal. In the examinations performed, hemoglobin (Hb) level was 10.4 g/dL, white blood cell count was 10,900 (53% neutrophils, 35% lymphocytes), C-reactive protein (CRP) was 92.9 mg/L (0–5 mg/L), erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 71 mm/hour, Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) was negative, and posteroanterior (PA) chest X-ray was found normal. The brucellosis treatment the patient was taking was continued. Blood cultures were taken after admission. Although the lumbar magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was normal, on contrast-enhanced thoracic vertebra MR examination, bone marrow edema in T11 and T12 vertebrae in this disc space, mild hyperintense signal change in T2W disc space on contrast-enhanced examination, and intense enhancement of the described vertebrae were observed. Spondylodiscitis was considered. At the same time, a T1W hypointense, T2W hyperintense intense peripheral enhanced signal area was detected at this level, reaching a thickness of approximately 2 mm, which may be compatible with epidural abscess and paravertebral abscess in the anterior paravertebral area (Figs. 1, 2). Ceftriaxone (1000 mg; twice a day) was added to the treatment that the patient was taking and continued. She needed serious analgesics due to severe pain. Surgical intervention was not considered for the patient by the department of neurosurgery since there was no neurological finding on physical examination. Our request for interventional sampling was not accepted. The Brucella agglutination test with Coombs performed in our microbiology laboratory was positive at a titer of > 1/1280. There was no contact history regarding tuberculosis, and the purified protein derivative (PPD) test was negative. No growth was detected in blood cultures during and after this period. The patient, who did not have a fever after hospitalization, complained of a fever reaching 39 °C on the fourth day. On the days following the development of fever, the control white blood cell value was 21,000, and CRP was 420 mg/L; the possibilities for another focus of infection, progression of the current complication, or another complication were evaluated. As a result of the examinations, empyema was detected in the left lung, transferred to the department of thoracic surgery, and tube thoracostomy (closed underwater drainage) was performed. An exudate-like fluid was detected with drainage and a hemopurulent appearance. On gram examination, there were plenty of leukocytes, and no microorganisms were seen. There was no growth in the pleural fluid culture. The data obtained during this intervention were limited due to insufficient examination requests. The patient’s treatment was continued during this period by changing with doxycycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SXT) (10 mg TMP/kg/day intravenously divided every 6–12 hours). After the necessity of tube thoracostomy disappeared, the patient was taken back to our service to continue the treatment. On the eighth day following the drainage, the patient developed a fever again, and the acute phase values increased. Thoracic computed tomography (CT) was performed by taking a blood culture. Pleural fluid appearance with dense content, reaching a thickness of 3 cm in the thickest part on the right and 25 mm in the thickest part on the left, and containing air values on the left; pleural fluid with a thickness of approximately 1 cm between the leaves of the mediastinal pleura in the right paracardiac area, the largest in the paracardiac and prevascular areas in the mediastinum; and a few lymph nodes with a short diameter of 7 mm were detected (Figs. 3, 4). Before thoracic surgery, a thoracentesis was performed, and we planned microbiological tests. In the pleural fluid examination taken by thoracentesis, the appearance was hemorrhagic, leukocyte count was 15,000/mm3, pH was 7.0, protein was 3.5 g/dL, pleural fluid/serum protein was 0.61 (3.5/5.7), pleural fluid/serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 8.61 (2534/256), and glucose was 50 mg/dL. In Gram staining, 75% of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL) and bacteria were not seen. Acid Resistant Bacillus (ARB) was negative, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was negative. No growth in culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (result learned later). Pathology result reported “mixed inflammatory cell infiltration, mesothelial cell groups; it was reported as pleural effusion fluid; no neoplastic cells were found.” When the Brucella agglutination test with Coombs was found to be positive > 1/1280 in the pleural fluid, it was understood that the present empyema was also due to brucellosis. Despite the long incubation period, no growth was detected in blood cultures and pleural fluid samples. The patient, whose medical treatment was continued by providing drainage of the existing empyema, was discharged in a stable condition after approximately 1 month of clinical follow-up. The brucellosis treatment of the patient was completed after 6 months with the triple combination of TMP/SXT, rifampicin, and doxycycline. No additional problems were encountered in the outpatient clinic controls (Fig. 5).

Fig. 1
figure 1

T11-12 spondylodiscitis (affected vertebrae are shown in red box)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Epidural abscess and paravertebral abscess

Fig. 3
figure 3

Thoracic computed tomography, mediastinal window: pleural fluid with dense content

Fig. 4
figure 4

Thoracic computed tomography, lung window: pleural fluid with dense content

Fig. 5
figure 5

End-of-treatment lung X-ray

Discussion and conclusions

Vertebral osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, and epidural abscess are clinical pictures with an incidence of 2.4/100,000/year, which increases with age. Many patients have at least one of the risk factors, such as diabetes, immunosuppression, malignancy, or spinal surgery history. Vertebral infection should be suspected clinically with insidious back pain that increases significantly at night, accompanying fever with a rate of 35–60% and focal neurological symptoms [8]. Bacteria are generally responsible for the etiology, and Staphylococcus aureus (32–67%) is the most frequent finding [9]. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, E. coli, and Pseudomonas species may also be responsible, especially in those with a history of injecting drug use. In countries where tuberculosis and brucellosis are endemic, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Brucella species should be considered causative agents [10]. Microbiological methods should prove diagnosis supported by imaging methods, and microbiological diagnosis of the samples taken by interventional procedures in patients without surgical indication is essential in the correct diagnosis and management of the patient. Thanks to the serological test results, a connection was established with the vertebral complication in our case. However, the development of paravertebral abscesses and bilateral empyema, which are rare complications, necessitated the differential diagnosis of other diseases, especially tuberculosis. A definitive diagnosis could only be made due to the evaluation of pleural fluid samples with microbiological examinations. The diagnosis can be made when Brucella species are isolated from vertebral, paravertebral, or epidural tissue samples, abscess material, or blood cultures or when RBPT positivity and a Brucella standard tube agglutination titer above 1/160 are detected in addition to clinical findings. Owing to the specificity of laboratory evaluation, only 5% of patients with suspected vertebral brucellosis require a biopsy [11].

RBPT is often used as a rapid screening test to diagnose brucellosis. Although the sensitivity of RBPT has been reported to be very high, its specificity may be low, especially in endemic areas and chronic cases [12]. The test’s positive predictive value is low and positive results must be confirmed by a more specific test. In the presence of a high antibody titer, false negativity may result due to the prozone phenomenon [13]. Therefore, RBPT or STA negativity does not exclude Brucella infection. Negative results can be detected in the early stages of the disease and in the presence of blocking antibodies. In clinically compatible patients, dilution of patient serum at high titers increases the sensitivity of the SAT-Coombs combination [14]. Coombs test (antihuman globulin test), which is necessary for complicated and chronic cases, eliminates the effects of blocking antibodies. Evidence obtained in a limited number of these cases reports that the Coombs test is the best indicator of relapses and seroconversion in parallel with treatment [13, 15].

BrucellaCapt test is also an immuno-agglutination technique. It is a modification of the Coombs test to detect incomplete or blocking IgG and IgA antibodies. It has similar sensitivity and specificity to classical tests in diagnosing brucellosis, and its ease of application is an important advantage [16,17,18].

The gold standard for diagnosis is the growth of bacteria in blood cultures or tissue cultures (for example, joint fluid or bone marrow). However, the isolation of the microorganism is complicated. Bone marrow aspirate culture is invasive and clinically impractical. The sensitivity of blood cultures is reported to be between 17% and 85% [19].

In our case, although STA was positive at a titer of 1/320 and RBPT was negative, Brucella agglutination test with Coombs was found to be > 1/1280 positive. Ordu province is endemic to brucellosis, and the interpretation of serological test results can be difficult. Therefore, it may be necessary to confirm negative results in both positive and suspicious patients.

It should be taken into account that negative RBPT results may be observed, especially in cases with high clinical suspicion, and may need to be supported by other serological diagnostic tests when necessary. We think that using the BrucellaCapt test is valuable in faster diagnosis in endemic areas and effective patient management. Despite the confusing clinical and laboratory results in this case, in which more than one rare complication developed, it was possible to reach the diagnosis by applying adequate and correct microbiological examinations.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the findings of this study are not publicly available but available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

STA:

Standard tube agglutination test

Hb:

Hemoglobin

CRP:

C-reactive protein

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

RBPT:

Rose Bengal plate test

PA:

Posteroanterior

MR:

Magnetic resonance

TMP/SXT:

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole

CT:

Computed tomography

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. Mirnejad R, Jazi FM, Mostafaei S, Sedighi M. Epidemiology of brucellosis in Iran: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study. Microb Pathog. 2017;109:239–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yumuk Z, O’Callaghan D. Brucellosis in Turkey an overview. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16(4):228–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Korkmaz P, Ataizi Z, Çevik F, Aykın N, Güldüren H, Alpay Y, Şimşek G. Brucella spondylodiscitis: multifocal involvement in thoracic and lumbar areas; a rare case. J Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;5(3):129–32. https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.02.2015.03.0191).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyaci A, Boyaci N, Tutoglu A, DokumaciSen D. Spinal epidural abscess in brucellosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-200946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozgocmen S, Ardicoglu A, Kocakoc E, Kiris A, Ardicoglu O. Paravertebral abscess formation due to brucellosis in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis. Joint Bone Spine. 2001;68(6):521–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hatipoglu CA, Bilgin G, Tulek N, Kosar U. Pulmonary involvement in brucellosis. J Infect. 2005;51:116–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Rodriguez JA, Garcia-Sanchez JE, Munoz Bellido JL, Ortiz de la Tabla V, BellidoBarbero J. Review of pulmonary brucellosis: a case report on brucellar pulmonary empyema. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989;11:53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chenoweth CE, Bassin BS, Mack MR, Oppenlander ME, Quint DJ, Seagull FJ. Vertebral osteomyelitis, discitis, and spinal epidural abscess in adults. UMHS Vertebral osteomyelitis inpatient guideline. Ann Arbor (MI). 2018.

  9. Mete B, Kurt C, Yilmaz MH, Ertan G, Ozaras R, Mert A, et al. Vertebral osteomyelitis: eight years’ experience of 100 cases. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(11):3591–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nickerson EK, Sinha R. Vertebral osteomyelitis in adults: an update. Br Med Bull. 2016;117(1):121–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldw003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray MR, Schroeder GD, Hsu WK. Granulomatous vertebral osteomyelitis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(9):529–38. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-13-00213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chothe SK, Saxena HM. Innovative modifications to Rose Bengal plate test enhance its specificity, sensitivity and predictive value in the diagnosis of brucellosis. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;97:25–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.12.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Díaz R, Casanova A, Ariza J, Moriyón I. The Rose Bengal test in human brucellosis: a neglected test for the diagnosis of a neglected disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(4):e950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Casanova A, Ariza J, Rubio M, Masuet C, Díaz R. Brucellacapt vs classical tests in the serological diagnosis and management of human brucellosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:844–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pappas G, Bosilkovski M, Akritidis N, Mastora M, Krteva L, Tsianos E. Brucellosis and the respiratory system. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:95–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Colmenero JD, Jiménez-Mejías ME, Sánchez-Lora FJ, Reguera JM, Palomina Nicas J, Martos F, et al. Pyogenic, tuberculous, and brucellar vertebral osteomyelitis: a descriptive and comparative study of 219 cases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(12):709–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bosilkovski M, Katerina S, Zaklina S, Ivan V. The role of Brucellacapt test for follow-up patients with brucellosis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;33:435–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alışkan H. The value of culture and serological methods in the diagnosis of human brucellosis. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2008;42(1):185–95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Memish ZA, Almuneef M, Mah MW, Qassem LA, Osoba AO. Comparison of the Brucella Standard Agglutination Test with the ELISA IgG and IgM in patients with Brucella bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002;44(2):129–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to everyone who contributed to the article that did not meet the authorship criteria, including those who provided professional writing services or materials.

Funding

The authors declare that there are no funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made a substantial contribution to the case report. AAY, CK carried out the case monitoring and documentation of data. AAY reported the case. YÇ carried out the microbiological analysis. All authors reviewed, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arzu Altunçekiç Yildirim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The patient completed an informed written consent form.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian to publish this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altunçekiç Yildirim, A., Kurt, C. & Çetinkol, Y. Brucellosis with rare complications and review of diagnostic tests: a case report. J Med Case Reports 16, 492 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03702-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03702-2

Keywords

  • Brucellosis
  • Spondylodiscitis
  • Paravertebral abscess
  • Empyema