Skip to main content

Tocilizumab for relapsing and remitting giant cell arteritis: a case series

Abstract

Background

Giant cell arteritis is a large vessel vasculitis of the arteries in the head and neck. The mainstay of management is with high-dose corticosteroids, and patients often face difficulties stopping or reducing steroids without recurrence of symptoms. Corticosteroids are well established to have numerous associated side effects, including osteoporosis, weight gain, and diabetes. Therefore, when tocilizumab was approved for up to 1 year for cases of relapsing or refractory giant cell arteritis by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in April 2018, this offered an opportunity to benefit from new funding and to reduce steroid burden.

Case presentation

This case series describes the impact of the establishment of a new hub and spoke referral pathway for the use of tocilizumab in refractory or relapsing giant cell arteritis, with case examples from consecutive patients who accessed the funding between August 2018 and April 2021. A total of 16 patients were identified: 11 female and 5 male, with an average age of 72.4 (range 61–82) years, with a majority of 11 ethnically white. The central assessing hub is St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, serving a population of 1.3 million in the south of England. This is the first large case series looking into the impact of the establishment of a regional clinical pathway for the new tocilizumab funding.

Conclusions

The case series demonstrates that the use of tocilizumab has reduced both the duration and the dose of corticosteroids in these 16 cases (mean prednisolone reduction 20.4 mg: 95% CI 13.0–27.8 mg), with 50% of patients continuing on tocilizumab after the initial 12 month funding period. The disease course, patterns of response, and maintenance of remission are discussed, and we describe the benefits of replicating this hub and spoke tocilizumab pathway in other centers.

Peer Review reports

Background

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a rapidly progressive large vessel vasculitis, where patients present with headache, visual loss, jaw pain, fatigue, and myalgia [1]. It is the most common vasculitis, and is often encountered initially in the emergency department or by general practitioners, where it constitutes a medical emergency on presentation. Demographically the average age of onset for GCA is 70 years of age, and it is seven times more common in Caucasians, three times more common in women than men [2], and has an incidence of 19 per 100,000 people above the age of 50 years [3].

The current criteria for diagnosing GCA has remained very similar to those of “The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria[4]” that confer a high sensitivity and specificity, with 3 out of the following 5 criteria being required for diagnosis:

  1. 1.

    Age at onset > 50 years

  2. 2.

    New headache

  3. 3.

    Temporal artery abnormality

  4. 4.

    Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation ratio (ESR) of at least 50

  5. 5.

    An abnormal artery biopsy—with temporal artery biopsy (TAB) as the current gold standard test

The pathology of GCA stems from granulomatous inflammation of the walls of medium and large sized arteries, and particularly those of the external carotid arteries [5]. The vessel wall inflammation results in tissue ischemia in the distribution of the vessel’s blood supply, with the most dangerous consequences therefore being permanent loss of vision and large artery complications such as aortic aneurysms and dissections. Total or partial loss of vision is reported in up to 20% of people with GCA [6] but is rare once steroids have been started, whilst studies have shown 27% of GCA patients develop the aforementioned large artery complications [7]. In the long term, there is also a significant increased risk of associated cardiovascular disease [8] (including strokes and myocardial infarctions) and other complications including peripheral neuropathy, depression, deafness, and the side effects of the corticosteroid treatment itself.

The updated GCA guidelines from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in September 2020 [9], highlight that the mainstay of treatment remains glucocorticoids. They state the following:

  • If new visual loss or double vision are found, urgent ophthalmology review and treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone is required to prevent visual complications

  • In the absence of new visual symptoms, immediate treatment with 40–60 mg prednisolone per day is recommended.

The subsequent overall duration of steroid treatment is variable, with a proportion noted by the guideline with chronic relapsing disease requiring “low doses of corticosteroids for several years” [9]. The side effects of steroids are well known and categorized in a variety of different diseases, and include weight gain, dyspepsia, muscle weakness, skin thinning, easy bruising, steroid-related diabetes, hypertension, bone loss, and increased risk of infection, as outlined in the NICE Clinical Knowledge Summary on corticosteroids [10].

Tocilizumab was approved by NICE in April 2018, for up to a year in relapsing or refractory GCA in combination with a tapering course of steroids; the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had authorized this 1 year prior in America in 2017. The main clinical evidence considered by the guidelines were from the GiACTA trial [11], a randomized control trial that identified a significant reduction in sustained glucocorticoid-free remission in GCA with a prednisolone taper, in those randomized to tocilizumab rather than a placebo. The NICE Technology appraisal guidance [TA518] from 2018 [12], specifically provides funding for use of tocilizumab in GCA in the UK when patients have relapsing or refractory GCA disease, have not already had tocilizumab, and if it is provided at the agreed cost with healthcare providers.

Tocilizumab itself is a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor (both membrane bound and soluble forms). It is already licensed as an immunosuppressant in other rheumatological diseases such as moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) since the late 2000s, with data supporting its usage as safe and steroid sparing capabilities [13], with additional use in the Coronavirus-19 pandemic. Tocilizumab’s use in GCA therefore now offers an opportunity for broadened use of this already established drug, many years later.

Case presentation

Methods

This case series discusses 16 consecutive patients started on tocilizumab for relapsed or refractory GCA between August 2018 and April 2021, after the establishment of a new hub and spoke model. The central assessing hub was St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, a large tertiary rheumatology center in the south of England.

A new referral form for tocilizumab was utilized and all cases were discussed in a fortnightly multidisciplinary team meeting. Information was gathered for this analysis retrospectively through these referral forms and electronic patient records, with additional correspondence from referring clinicians and corroboration with patients themselves. The central dispensing pharmacy was at St George’s Hospital, who validated patient numbers and details.

A total of 16 patients were identified (Table 1): 11 female and 5 male, with an average age of 72.4 (range 61–82) years. Seven patients were internal referrals from clinicians at the tertiary center, with the remainder from local district general hospitals.

Table 1 Data collection from 16 patients with giant cell arteries started on tocilizumab

Tocilizumab and steroid dosing

The difference between daily prednisolone dosing before starting tocilizumab and the latest steroid dosing after treatment with tocilizumab for the 15 cases with this data, demonstrates a range of dose reduction from 0 to 57 mg, with a mean of 20.4 mg [95% CI 13.0–27.8 mg]. Three of the 15 cases were weaned from steroids completely.

Tocilizumab continuation and side effects

Five of the 16 cases stopped tocilizumab after the NICE guidance-funded 12 months, and an additional eight cases have continued the medication for longer by seeking access to additional funding.

Two cases (cases J and O) stopped tocilizumab completely—the former due to multifold side effects including epistaxis, deranged liver function tests, and a facial rash, and the latter due to the unusual circumstance of ocular syphilis manifesting. The causes for pausing or skipping doses of tocilizumab dosing are summarized below in Table 2, with 9 of the 16 cases affected.

Table 2 Summary of causes of pausing/stopping tocilizumab

Blood results and tocilizumab

Erythrocyte sedimentation ratio (ESR) (Fig. 1)

  • The mean difference between ESR at presentation and before start of tocilizumab was 22.3 [95% CI 8.2–36.5].

  • The mean difference between ESR before and after the start of tocilizumab was 10.3 [95% CI 5.8–14.7].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Trend in erythrocyte sedimentation ratio (ESR) level

C-reactive protein (CRP)—Fig. 2

  • The mean difference between CRP at presentation and before start of tocilizumab was 68.2 [95% CI 12.5–123.8].

  • The mean difference between CRP before and after the start of tocilizumab was 7.7 [95% CI 2.5–12.8].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Trend in C-reactive protein level

Additional information about the cases are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 Summary of additional data from 16 patients with giant cell arteries started on tocilizumab

Discussions

Referral pathway

The new hub and spoke clinical pathway established at this regional London center for the use of tocilizumab in relapsed and refractory GCA, facilitated the increased uptake of the newly licensed drug. This model has been already been well established at the hospital-level in the UK, with district general hospitals linked to centralized tertiary hospitals for treatment and specialist clinics [14], and here we have incorporated this organizational structure for the referral pathway. The referral pathway was simple to establish with the resources present, as it utilizes existing national health system (NHS) frameworks and systems, and the majority of patients referred to the pathway were accepted for tocilizumab therapy.

The efficacy of the pathway, however, relies on familiarity that the pathway itself exists by both registrars and consultants, knowledge of how to refer with the referral form required, and the administrative responsibilities of the centralized coordinating hub and pharmacy. The fortnightly multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) upon which the pathway hinged allowed for the additional opportunity for senior clinicians to discuss complex cases, and their experiences with and side effects of a relatively new treatment.

Reduction in steroid burden

Analysis of 15 cases in this series demonstrates an average daily dose reduction of 20.4 mg prednisolone [95% CI 13.0–27.8 mg], and three cases were weaned from steroid treatment completely. This represents a considerable reduction in daily dosing and therefore overall steroid burden for those initiated on tocilizumab treatment. Current studies suggest that the average duration of treatment with steroids in GCA is 3 years, with a long steroid tapering period between 1 and 9 years [5]; while another study identified that only 24% of GCA patients were able to stop steroids within 2 years [15]. Studies in steroid use in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), GCA’s counterpart disease, have also highlighted that it is duration of steroid treatment rather than the initial prednisolone dose or maintenance dose, that contributes to greater side effects [16], signifying the impact of protracted courses of steroids and the danger of continuing courses for longer than necessary. This series therefore supports that a reduction and/or complete cessation of steroids is more possible with the addition of tocilizumab.

Consideration of the balancing measures mean it remains important however to highlight that glucocorticoids are and do remain the mainstay of acute management of GCA, as outlined in the introduction. Qualitative work has demonstrated that rheumatology clinicians are “often under pressure from patients and their primary care physicians to taper corticosteroids” and that this may not always be what is appropriate [17].

  • If a patient has visual loss at any stage (that is both at presentation or whilst on steroid therapy as was the case for case G), intravenous methylprednisolone treatment must be instigated.

  • Furthermore for patients who are on tocilizumab and concurrent steroids, steroid dosing should be increased to the previous higher dose if the patient is experiencing a relapse—as per EULAR guidelines [18]. This was commonplace in the series, with 13 of the 16 cases experiencing a relapse. However, this is not to say that a relapse precludes an eventual steroid wean whilst on tocilizumab—and case D demonstrates a scenario where a case who had two relapses was able to wean off steroids completely.

Medications and steroid side effects

Both clinic letters and personal correspondence with referring clinicians highlighted that side effects from steroids were common and present in 11 of 16 cases, with weight gain in five cases and the serious osteoporotic complication of avascular necrosis in two cases. Existing larger prospective studies of steroid use in GCA and PMR have identified the most common side effects to be fractures, peptic ulcer perforations, and diabetes mellitus in this population cohort [19], and it is therefore important to try to rationalize steroids as much as is possible in an ageing population with existing comorbidities. Women are particularly affected by steroid side effects due to their hormonal and genetic predisposition to poorer bone health [20], and with GCA more common in women this is also pertinent to consider.

The concurrent prescription of gastroprotective medication with steroid use is well established, and the majority of our cases (15 out of 16) were on such an agent—13 on a proton pump inhibitor and a further 2 on ranitidine. This contrasted however to the medications for the reduction of cardiovascular risk, which were prescribed to a lesser extent—9 of 16 cases were on the recommended daily aspirin (with one additional case on warfarin), and only 25% were on a statin. This highlights room for improvement and a need for greater focus on the significant association of GCA with cardiovascular disease.

Blood results

The inflammatory markers monitored were erythrocyte sedimentation ratio (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), both relevant markers monitored in GCA [21], with ESR also forming part of the diagnostic criteria as outlined previously. All the cases showed a biochemical response with ESR and CRP, with differences in both markers after treatment with tocilizumab (respective means of 10.3 and 7.7). The greater difference, however, was the change in these markers at presentation and with treatment with steroids, with a mean ESR drop of 22.3 and CRP of 68.2.

The pathology of vasculitis is one of inflammation, and it is noted in the spectrum of patients suffering from GCA that those with a greater inflammatory response at diagnosis (looking at parameters of fever, weight loss, ESR) were more likely to have greater and longer steroid requirements [22]. Therefore, these markers may be more important at the stage of diagnosis of GCA and impact of initial steroid therapy, rather than with monitoring the disease due to the impact of tocilizumab, which itself blunts a CRP/ESR response.

Tocilizumab side effects

Fourteen of the 16 cases completed 12 months treatment with tocilizumab, and out of the two who did not, case O had ocular syphilis and case J had multifold side effects. The longest duration of treatment break was 3 months (case G), due to a routine hip operation.

As the use of tocilizumab becomes more common, its side effects have been better characterized in literature. They are summarised below as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) on the Electronic Medicines Compendium (EMC) [23], and we relate them to our case series in Table 4. The most commonly reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the SmPC data are upper respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis, headache, and hypertension.

Table 4 Summary of side effects of tocilizumab from summary of product characteristics in relation to patients in our case series

These scenarios highlight the importance of close biochemical and clinical monitoring in those on this potent biologic. The consultant clinicians in the series approached tocilizumab prescribing with caution and care, and regular review and blood tests meant that dosing was very closely monitored. However, in the context of the new reliance of virtual care during the coronavirus pandemic, this level of monitoring is not always possible at present. The use of tocilizumab should therefore continue to be considered at a case-by-case level.

Further contraindications to tocilizumab include latent tuberculosis (TB) and hepatitis B and C, and all patients must be screened before starting tocilizumab [23]. If latent TB were to be identified, this must be fully treated before tocilizumab is started. Analysis of documentation in this case series identified avoidable delay between authorization of tocilizumab and initiation of treatment, due to the completion required for screening blood tests and chest radiographs for TB. Although not explicitly outlined in the guidance, other diseases can manifest upon initiation of tocilizumab, and case O was an unusual example of ocular syphilis being revealed and where treatment had to be stopped.

Of note, intravenous tocilizumab is to be stopped at least 4 weeks before any surgery, and subcutaneous tocilizumab at least 2 weeks before any surgery—as was the case for case G (hip replacement surgery) and N (operation for trapped nerve).

Limitations

This case series is bound by the same limitations of any case series, including being retrospective and descriptive in nature. By having no control arm for the experiences of patients not taking tocilizumab, the conclusions formulated only suggest association and not causation. Selection bias was limited, however, by inclusion of all accepted MDT discussed cases within the specified time frame, and by corroborating cases with the pharmacy.

In regards to our data specifically, due to the nature of the hub and spoke referral pathway, it is perhaps understandable that a large proportion cases were referred from the hub hospital itself (7 of 16). Data from the spoke hospitals and referring district general hospitals were sometimes more limited due to not being electronic.

What next?

Half of cases in this series continue tocilizumab treatment beyond the initial NICE guidelines limit of 12 months. Studies are currently being carried out to investigate this, including an extension to the original GiACTA trial—where patients not in full remission after a year were randomized to tocilizumab and/or glucocorticoids again [26]. This trial extension identified that re-treatment with tocilizumab was more associated with complete remission, and that overall glucocorticoid dosing over 3 years was lower in those who received tocilizumab rather than placebo in the first part of the trial. The NICE guidelines on tocilizumab in GCA are to be reviewed shortly, and we anticipate that the extension of the use of tocilizumab to be discussed.

Conclusion

Our case series is the first published experience of the development and delivery of an effective hub and spoke referral pathway for tocilizumab treatment in GCA. We show that steroid dosing and duration can be reduced with tocilizumab, and that all subjects received full funding for treatment. Our referral pathway has encouraged the uptake of the IL-6 monoclonal antibody treatment for GCA and compliance with NICE guidelines. The drug offered improved disease control, and as more patients utilize the drug, seeks evidence to support ongoing funding for longer courses of tocilizumab.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Institute for Infection & Immunity, St George’s University of London but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of St George’s University of London.

Abbreviations

GCA:

Giant cell arteritis

NICE:

National Institute of Health and Care Excellence

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

TAB:

Temporal artery biopsy

TOC:

Tocilizumab

DMARDs:

Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs

MTX:

Methotrexate

qw:

Once weekly

JIA:

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation ratio

CRP:

C-reactive protein

PMR:

Polymyalgia rheumatica

IHD:

Ischemic heart disease

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

HTN:

Hypertension

HypoT:

Hypothyroidism

CVA:

Cerebrovascular accident

PVD:

Peripheral vascular disease

Neg:

Negative

Pos:

Positive

Lef:

Leflunomide

ALT:

Aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

ULN:

Upper limit of normal

References

  1. Gonzalez-Gay MA, Barros S, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Garcia-Porrua C, Sanchez-Andrade A, Llorca J. Giant cell arteritis: disease patterns of clinical presentation in a series of 240 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2005;84(5):269–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. NICE Guidelines Giant cell arteritis 2014. https://cks.nice.org.uk/giant-cell-arteritis#!topicSummary

  3. Salvarani C, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE. Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty-year period. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(2):264–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Stevens MB, Arend WP, Calabrese LH, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33(8):1122–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Warrington KJ, Matteson EL. Management guidelines and outcome measures in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(6 Suppl 47):137–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salvarani C, Cimino L, Macchioni P, Consonni D, Cantini F, Bajocchi G, et al. Risk factors for visual loss in an Italian population-based cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(2):293–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nuenninghoff DM, Hunder GG, Christianson TJH, McClelland RL, Matteson EL. Incidence and predictors of large-artery complication (aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, and/or large-artery stenosis) in patients with giant cell arteritis: a population-based study over 50 years. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(12):3522–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ray JG, Mamdani MM, Geerts WH. Giant cell arteritis and cardiovascular disease in older adults. Heart. 2005;91(3):324–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Giant Cell Arteritis Clinical Knowledge Summary.

  10. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Scenario: Corticosteroids.

  11. Stone JH, Tuckwell K, Dimonaco S, Klearman M, Aringer M, Blockmans D, et al. Trial of tocilizumab in giant-cell arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(4):317–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Tocilizumab for treating giant cell arteritis. Technology appraisal guidance [TA518].

  13. Jones G, Panova E. New insights and long-term safety of tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Therap Adv Musculoskelet. 2018;10(10):195–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Elrod JK, Fortenberry JL. The hub-and-spoke organization design: an avenue for serving patients well. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(S1):457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kyle V, Hazleman BL. The clinical and laboratory course of polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis after the first two months of treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993;52(12):847–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ayoub WT, Franklin CM, Torretti D. Polymyalgia rheumatic. Duration of therapy and long-term outcome. Am J Med. 1985;79(3):309–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fraser JA, Weyand CM, Newman NJ, Biousse V. The treatment of giant cell arteritis. Rev Neurol Dis. 2008;5(3):140–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hellmich B, Agueda A, Monti S, Buttgereit F, de Boysson H, Brouwer E, et al. 2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(1):19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kyle V, Hazleman BL. Treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. II. Relation between steroid dose and steroid associated side effects. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;48(8):662–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Briot K, Roux C. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. RMD Open. 2015;1(1): e000014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chan FLY, Lester S, Whittle SL, Hill CL. The utility of ESR, CRP and platelets in the diagnosis of GCA. BMC Rheumatol. 2019;3(1):14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernández-Rodríguez J, García-Martínez A, Casademont J, Filella X, Esteban M-J, López-Soto A, et al. A strong initial systemic inflammatory response is associated with higher corticosteroid requirements and longer duration of therapy in patients with giant-cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;47(1):29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Electronic Medicines Compendium. RoActemra 162 mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe summary of product characteristics. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/5357/smpc#gref

  24. Rutherford AI, Subesinghe S, Hyrich KL, Galloway JB. Serious infection across biologic-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(6):905.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones G, Ding C. Tocilizumab: a review of its safety and efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;3:64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stone JH, Bao M, Han J, Aringer M, Blockmans D, Brouwer E, et al. OP0140 long-term outcome of tocilizumab for patients with giant cell arteritis: results from part 2 of the giacta trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(Suppl 2):145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgement to Robbie Ramsden, Virinderjit Sandhu, Helena Robinson, Amara Ezeonyeji, Israa Al-Shakarchi, Sumeet Chander, and Resmy Suresh

Funding

This work was funded by an Academic Foundation Year Fellowship to PS funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AK and NS developed the pathway for tocilizumab referrals and NS conceived the study. PS analyzed and interpreted patient data, with DS collating additional information. PS wrote the manuscript, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pratyasha Saha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

St George’s University Hospital is a teaching hospital, with consent obtained as outlined below.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saha, P., Srikantharajah, D., Kaul, A. et al. Tocilizumab for relapsing and remitting giant cell arteritis: a case series. J Med Case Reports 16, 389 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03625-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03625-y

Keywords

  • Giant cell arteritis
  • Pathway
  • Tocilizumab
  • Corticosteroids
  • Vasculitis
  • Case series