- Case report
- Open Access
Complete response to nivolumab in Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene KRAS-G12C mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: a case report
Journal of Medical Case Reports volume 16, Article number: 420 (2022)
The advent of immunotherapies has ushered in a new era in the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Although immunotherapies are associated with improved clinical outcomes, studies report a median overall survival of 11 months with progression-free survival of 2.5 months with the use of nivolumab for pretreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Herein, we describe a case of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma that has shown exceptional response to immunotherapy, with the patient being in complete response for the past 6 years since commencement of nivolumab.
We report the case of a 58-year-old female Caucasian, an ex-smoker with 40-pack-year history of smoking, who presented with cough and chest pain and was subsequently diagnosed with metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma. The tumor was positive for Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene KRAS-G12C mutation and had high programmed death-1 ligand expression. She was commenced on first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and gemcitabine with disease response, then continued on maintenance pemetrexed. She was then commenced on immunotherapy with nivolumab, with complete response for a total of 6 years. She does not report any adverse events. Currently, she shows no evidence of recurrence of non-small cell lung carcinoma.
The exceptional response to immunotherapy seen in this case may be explained by the presence of Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene mutation, which is associated with enhanced clinical response to programmed death-1 ligand inhibitors. This report emphasizes the urgent need for further studies evaluating the role of Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene mutation in determining the clinical efficacy of immunotherapies. This would enable us to make effective evidence-based clinical interventions in the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% of all lung cancer cases worldwide . The emergence of immunotherapy has transformed the therapeutic landscape of NSCLC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) directed against programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1), programmed death-1 (PD-1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated 4 (CTLA-4) proteins are associated with decreased mortality as well as longer progression-free survival in NSCLC patients [2, 3]. Since their introduction in 2015, the role of PD-1 inhibitors has shown tremendous growth, from ancillary treatment to first-line therapies in NSCLC. Pembrolizumab, an antibody against PD-1 receptor, is currently indicated in both first- and second-line therapy in advanced cases of NSCLC without driver mutation, with greater benefit for those with high PD-L1 expression . Nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) are two other immune-modulating agents recommended as second-line therapy in NSCLC, irrespective of PD-L1 levels [5, 6]. Mutations in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral (KRAS) oncogene are one of the most common genetic alterations seen in patients with NSCLC. The KRAS gene normally encodes a guanosine triphosphate binding protein that is involved in regulating the activity of the RAS gene, which is required for proper growth and development of cells . Mutated KRAS results in constitutive activation of the RAS gene, leading to unregulated cell growth and development of carcinoma. Patients with KRAS mutations generally show decreased response to systemic chemotherapies and were previously associated with poor prognosis . However, there is currently evidence showing increased survival and improved clinical response to ICIs in metastatic NSCLC patients harboring KRAS G12C mutation . Sotorasib, which was recently approved for the treatment of NSCLC, is the first agent available against KRAS G12C mutation. This calls for further research into the development of novel agents against therapeutic targets in the KRAS gene. We report herein a case of advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutation and high PD-L1 expression with complete response to immunotherapy after chemotherapy.
A 58-year-old Caucasian female with significant history of smoking and no past medical history presented to the emergency department with chest pain and cough at T = 0 in January 2015. Computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiogram revealed a large pericardial effusion measuring 40 mm in diameter along with moderate right pleural effusion (Fig. 1).
There was a spiculated anterior subpleural lesion measuring 28 mm extending to the anterolateral pleural surface of the right upper lobe (Fig. 2) and significant enlargement of the mediastinal with right paratracheal lymph node measuring 15 mm and subcarinal lymph node measuring 18 mm and left axillary lymph nodes measuring 12.5 mm. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pleurodesis was carried out.
The pericardial and pleural fluid cytology contained small numbers of malignant cells, presenting predominately singly in a bloodstained background. These cells have enlarged pleomorphic nuclei with granular to coarse chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and irregular nuclear contours. Immunohistochemical studies showed positive staining of tumor cells for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), napsin A, and Cytokeratin 7 (CK7). Staining for Estrogen receptor (ER), Cytokeratin 20 (CK20), Caudal Type Homeobox 2 (CDX2), and calretinin were all negative. These findings are in support of adenocarcinoma of lung origin.
In 2015, the fluid sample sent was not sufficient to undergo further testing to determine PD-L1 expression, immunohistochemistry testing for c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) / anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation, or molecular testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).
With the imaging and histology findings, she was diagnosed with stage IV (T3N2M1a) according to the TNM classification of the Union of International Cancer Control (UICC), 7th edition lung adenocarcinoma . She had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 after VATS pleurodesis. The patient quit smoking at the time of diagnosis. She was then commenced on first-line chemotherapy, carboplatin (AUC 5), and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) 3 weekly at T = 1 month in February 2015. She completed four cycles with no dose reduction. Follow-up CT imaging was done 3 months later (T = 4 months) demonstrated good clinical and radiological response. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 , complete response was achieved with disappearance of the pleural based right upper lobe lesion. There is complete response to the mediastinal, hilar, and axillary lymph nodes. She was clinically well with maintenance of her performance status.
Given the excellent response after first-line chemotherapy, she was then commenced on maintenance chemotherapy with pemetrexed at a dose of 500 mg/m2 every 21 days. This is based on evidence that it prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival . The patient completed eight cycles of pemetrexed without significant toxicities.
In December 2015, there was single lesion progression with a new right upper lobe lesion (18 × 15 mm2) (Fig. 3). The patient declined biopsy of this lesion. Given disease progression as per RECIST version 1.1, she was commenced on nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks at around T = 12 months in February 2016 owing to emerging evidence of immunotherapy in this setting for previously treated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
After the commencement of immunotherapy, her follow-up scan done in May 2016 showed complete response of single lung lesion as per RECIST version 1.1. Further imaging subsequently every 3 months with CT of brain, chest, abdomen and pelvis continues to show no evidence of recurrence or new metastatic disease.
At T = 59 months in November 2019, she had an elective cholecystectomy for chronic cholecystitis secondary to multiple cholelithiases. Her nivolumab was not withheld during the surgery, and she did not develop any complications during the perioperative period.
At T = 63 months in March 2020, somatic gene mutation analysis was requested on her previous pericardial fluid and tissue sample done early in the diagnosis as the patient was not keen for rebiopsy. Reanalysis of the sample could be done using molecular testing. A mutation was detected in the KRAS gene p.(Gly12Cys): G12C (16%). No clinically relevant mutation was found in the tested regions of EGFR, BRAF, MET, RET, or ERBB2. It was negative for rearrangements in ALK and ROS1 genes. There was high level PD-L1 expression with a tumor proportion score (TPS) of 80%.
18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan at T = 83 months in November 2021 showed no suspicious fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake within lungs. The foci of intense FDG uptake surrounding right lung pleura is consistent with a previous talc pleurodesis (Fig. 4). The patient is currently continuing her immunotherapy and has no evidence of lung malignancy.
Discussion and conclusions
The advent of immunotherapies has brought about a monumental change in the prognosis as well as management of NSCLC. Therapies with ICIs are associated with improved patient survival, better tolerance, and reduced adverse effects. Although immunotherapies have tremendously enhanced patient outcomes in NSCLC, little is known about its predictive biomarkers and their efficacy in cancers with driver gene mutations. In this report, we describe a case of advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutation which has shown outstanding response to immunomodulators and in which the patient has been in complete response since she was started on nivolumab 6 years back.
Although ICIs are associated with improved clinical outcomes, studies assessing the efficacy of nivolumab in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC reported a median overall survival of 11 months and progression-free survival of 2.5 months as per the 5-year outcome of the Checkmate 017 and Checkmate 057 landmark trials . While ICIs are associated with long-term clinical benefits, most patients develop resistance to these agents within 1–2 years . However, we report a rare case in which the patient has shown excellent response to nivolumab with complete and durable response for the past 6 years, with no signs of resistance. This may be partly explained by the presence of KRAS mutation. KRAS mutation is seen in 25–30% of patients with NSCLC in the Western world, with the majority of them occurring in codon 12. The common KRAS mutations include G12C (43%), G12V (18%), and G12D (11%) . KRAS mutation is also strongly associated with smoking history, and only 5% of KRAS mutations are seen in nonsmokers . Moreover, G12C and G12V are more common among smokers, compared with G12D in nonsmokers . KRAS mutation is associated with enhanced expression of PD-L1 ligand in NSCLC owing to stimulation of downstream pathways [14, 15]. PD-L1 expression also depends on environmental factors. KRAS mutant lung cancers in smokers are reported to have greater PD-L1 expression compared with those in nonsmokers . There is compelling evidence to suggest that KRAS mutation can result in longer progression-free survival, greater clinical benefits, and improved survival with anti-PD-1 treatment compared with wild-type patients [15, 17]. Liu et al. also reported that the clinical benefit of monotherapy with anti-PD-1 agents is comparable to that of combination therapy with docetaxel in KRAS mutated individuals . In May 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of sotorasib, the first-ever KRAS inhibitor to be used in targeted therapy. It was approved as a first-line agent in NSCLC patients with G12C mutation who have received at least one line of previous systemic therapy based on phase II data from the CodeBreaK100 study .
It is hypothesized that mitochondrial function can play a role in determining the clinical response of anti-PD-1 agents . Factors such as smoking, advanced age, and obesity are associated with impaired mitochondrial function and greater expression of PD-1, resulting in improved clinical response . This can explain the impressive response to immunotherapy for this patient, who was a heavy smoker.
Although immunotherapy has ushered in a new era in cancer therapy, it is not without its limitations. It has been proven that many patients derive significant clinical benefit from immunomodulators, but a large section of patients show no or dismal response to immunotherapies (primary resistance). Low tumor mutational burden (TMB) and expression of heterogeneous antigens leading to decreased tumor immunogenicity, alternate immune checkpoints, and release of immunosuppressive cells such as myeloid-derived suppressive cells and M2 macrophages into the tumor environment are some mechanisms that could contribute to immunotherapy resistance . Host factors such as diet, microbiome, and autoimmunity also contribute to the development of resistance . Aberrations in the interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) signaling pathway leading to defective antigen presentation are now understood as a mechanism of acquired resistance . Even in large clinical trials, the overall response rate was between 47% and 63% . Moreover, the development of acquired resistance after 1–2 years of treatment is also seen. ICIs are also associated with adverse effects, though to a much lesser extent compared withto conventional chemotherapies. Grade 3 or higher adverse effects are seen in 7–13% of total patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors . Serious side effects associated with PD-1 inhibitors include myocarditis, pneumonitis, autoimmune hepatitis, encephalitis, and hypothyroidism [1, 21,22,23,24,25]. PD-L1 assay, though FDA approved, has reduced sensitivity and specificity compared with other diagnostic assays and has limited utility in predicting the clinical benefits of ICI . Hyperprogression of disease is another uncommon adverse effect of anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 therapies, which is characterized by rapid tumor growth or accelerated disease progression once the patient is started on ICI. A meta-analysis by Park et al. evaluated the incidence of hyperprogression among patients receiving ICIs and reported a pooled incidence of 13.4% .
Herein we present the case of a 58-year-old female with advanced NSCLC who has shown exceptional response to nivolumab therapy after chemotherapy. Given her good response, we plan to continue her treatment until she has disease progression or develops significant toxicities. This decision is supported by the conclusion from the Checkmate 153 trial that overall survival was significantly longer in the continuous treatment with nivolumab arm versus the 1-year fixed-duration arm with retreatment on progression .
ICIs are no doubt a landmark development in oncology with the potential to revolutionize the management of lung cancer in the coming years. However, further studies assessing their efficacy should be carried out before reaching definitive conclusions regarding their clinical utility. Targeted therapies against KRAS must be given special emphasis because of the tremendous benefit shown in patients with NSCLC. Future research should also focus on the discovery of novel therapeutic targets, newer immunomodulators, and better biomarkers for predicting the clinical benefits of immunotherapies.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Non-small cell lung cancer
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Programmed death-1 ligand
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated 4
- KRAS :
Kirsten rat sarcoma virus
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Positron emission tomography
Tumor proportion score
Tumor mutational burden
Duma N, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(8):1623–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.013.
Lim SM, et al. Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current landscape and future perspectives. Immune Netw. 2020;20(1):e10. https://doi.org/10.4110/in.2020.20.e10.
Zhou L, et al. The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32020. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32020.
Herbst RS, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2016;387(10027):1540–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7.
Borghaei H, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1627–39. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1507643.
Rittmeyer A, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2017;389(10066):255–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X.
Xie M, Xu X, Fan Y. KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: an emerging promisingly treatable subgroup. Front Oncol. 2021;11:672612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.672612.
Kuang S, Lau SCM, Sharma K, et al. Impact of KRAS mutational variant on response to immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. J Clin Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e21127.
Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2009.
Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (Oxford, Engl: 1990). 2009;45(2):228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Ciuleanu T, et al. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2009;374(9699):1432–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61497-5.
Borghaei H, Gettinger S, Vokes EE, et al. Five-year outcomes from the randomized, phase III trials CheckMate 017 and 057: nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer [published correction appears in J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;39(10):1190]. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(7):723–33. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01605.
Ricciuti B, Leonardi GC, Metro G, et al. Targeting the KRAS variant for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: potential therapeutic applications. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(1):53–68. https://doi.org/10.1586/17476348.2016.1115349.
Chen N, et al. KRAS mutation-induced upregulation of PD-L1 mediates immune escape in human lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother: CII. 2017;66(9):1175–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-017-2005-z.
Liu C, et al. The superior efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer that correlates with an inflammatory phenotype and increased immunogenicity. Cancer Lett. 2020;470:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.10.027.
Calles A, Liao X, Sholl LM, et al. Expression of PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, in smokers and never smokers with KRAS-mutant lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(12):1726–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000687.
Dong Z-Y, et al. Potential predictive value of TP53 and KRAS mutation status for response to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(12):3012–24. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2554.
FDA News and Events. FDA approves first targeted therapy for lung cancer mutation previously considered resistant to drug therapy. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-targeted-therapy-lung-cancer-mutation-previously-considered-resistant-drug. Accessed 14 Nov 2021.
Wang F, Wang S, Zhou Q. The resistance mechanisms of lung cancer immunotherapy. Front Oncol. 2020;10:568059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.568059.
Zaretsky JM, Garcia-Diaz A, Shin DS, et al. Mutations associated with acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(9):819–29. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1604958.
Doroshow DB, et al. Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: facts and hopes. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(15):4592–602. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1538.
Wang F, Liu Y, Xu W, et al. Fulminant myocarditis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2021;15:336. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02934-y.
Kopecký J, Kubeček O, Geryk T, et al. Nivolumab induced encephalopathy in a man with metastatic renal cell cancer: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2018;12:262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1786-9.
Picard S, Goh D, Tan A, et al. Patterns of immunotherapy-induced pneumonitis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a case series. J Med Case Rep. 2021;15:332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02926-y.
Miyauchi Y, Naito H, Tsunemori H, et al. Myocarditis as an immune-related adverse event following treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2021;15:508. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-03097-6.
Rimm DL, et al. A prospective, multi-institutional, pathologist-based assessment of 4 immunohistochemistry assays for PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(8):1051–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0013.
Park HJ, et al. Definition, incidence, and challenges for assessment of hyperprogressive disease during cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e211136. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1136.
Waterhouse DM, et al. Continuous versus 1-year fixed-duration nivolumab in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 153. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(33):3863–73. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00131.
No funding source to report.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
There is no need for ethics approval as the patient is able to consent for the case report to be published.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest to disclose
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Boby, J.M., Mohd Ghazali, N.N., Mani, A. et al. Complete response to nivolumab in Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene KRAS-G12C mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: a case report. J Med Case Reports 16, 420 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03593-3
- Non-small cell lung cancer
- KRAS G12C mutant
- Complete response