Skip to main content

Neuronal desertification after a direct lightning strike: a case report



Lightning strike is a rare but dramatic cause of injury. Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with lightning strike frequently have a high mortality and significant long-term morbidity related to a direct brain injury or induced cardiac arrest (CA).

Case presentation

A 50-year-old Caucasian man was admitted to our hospital after being struck by lightning resulting in immediate CA. Spontaneous circulation was initially restored, and the man was admitted to the ICU, but ultimately died while in hospital due to neurological injury. The computer tomography scan revealed a massive loss of grey-white matter differentiation at the fronto-temporal lobes bilaterally. Somatosensory-evoked potentials demonstrated bilateral absence of the cortical somatosensory N20-potential, and the electroencephalogram recorded minimal cerebral electrical activity. The patient died on day 10 and a post-mortem study revealed a widespread loss of neurons.


This case study illustrates severe brain injury caused by a direct lighting strike, with the patient presenting an extraordinary microscopic pattern of neuronal desertification.

Peer Review reports


Lightning occurs nearly 50 times per second worldwide [1], and although injuries secondary to lightning strike are rare, they are associated to significant long-term morbidity and high mortality. Many lightning strikes result in immediate death due to fatal arrhythmias or respiratory failure due to critical alterations in the cardiovascular, respiratory, and central nervous systems [2]. However, the success of resuscitation attempts may be higher in people struck by lightning compared with other etiologies of cardiac arrest (CA), leading to a return to spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and, in rare cases, good functional outcome. We report here the case of a middle-aged man struck by lightning and review the literature on the pathophysiology of lightning-induced injury. In addition, we describe a pattern of diffuse cerebral neuronal desertification revealed at the post-mortem study that was directly related to the injury.

Case presentation

During a summer rainstorm, a 50-year-old Caucasian man riding a bicycle in the forested area around the city of Trieste, Italy, was struck by lightning, resulting in immediate CA, as reported by bystanders. Basic life support was not initiated by the lay bystanders, but was initiated only a few minutes later by a physician hiking nearby and subsequently continued by the medical emergency system personnel who arrived at the scene 15 min after the event. The presenting rhythm was asystole, with a downtime before return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of 16 minutes. After ROSC, the patient remained unconscious with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 3, non-reactive mydriatic pupils, and stable blood pressure and oxygenation values once intubated. During the secondary examination at hospital admission, a cutaneous lesion in the occipital area was noted, described as singed hair with a dominant burning smell, linear in shape, with a small round black eschar, presumably compatible with the first contact with lightning (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a, b Round black eschar, presumably where the lightning entered the body. b Eschar from a different view

The presence of burnt plastic at the level of the occipital slot of the helmet was consistent with the hypothesis of the eschar being the first contact with lightning. Similar erythematous cutaneous lesions with singed hair were found at the suprapubic level, probably the output area in proximity to the metal core of the bicycle frame through the saddle (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Erythematous cutaneous lesions with singed hair at the suprapubic level likely due to the output area

In addition, the right tympanic membrane was perforated. Ophthalmological assessment was negative. Total body computed tomography (CT) scan showed a modest right apical and temporal subarachnoid hemorrhage, millimeter-sized petechial hemorrhages in the cortical-subcortical junction of the fronto-parietal lobes, and slight signs of initial edema (Fig. 3). An abundant hemoperitoneum associated with a bleeding hepatic angioma, was present.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Axial non-enhanced brain computed tomography scan demonstrates a loss of grey-white matter differentiation at the fronto-temporal lobes bilaterally with gyral effacement. Subtle subarachnoid hemorrhage (white arrows) is also noted

The patient underwent immediate damage control surgery, with abdominal packaging to control the bleeding, and then was admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU). Laboratory tests on blood samples revealed elevated biomarkers of myocardial and hepatic injury (high-sensitivity troponin I, 90,879 ng/L; creatine kinase, 1131 U/L; aspartate and alanine transaminases, 361 and 421 U/L, respectively; blood lactate, 11.36 mmol/L). The electrocardiogram (EKG) showed sinus tachycardia with minimal nonspecific ST elevation in the inferior leads, and cardiac ultrasonography showed normokinetic ventricles; no further cardiology investigations were undertaken at that time. Owing to the prolonged time to admission, target controlled temperature management was not established, and the subsequent appearance of fever (from day 2 after ICU admission, mean central body temperature of 38.2 °C with only one peak at 38.8 °C) was managed with ice packs, a short period of diclofenac infusion, and then acetaminophen on demand. No prophylactic therapy against vasospasm or brain edema was initiated since serum hyperosmolality was persistently elevated (319 mOsm/L). Following surgery, the patient remained in cardiogenic shock with profound hemodynamic instability and lactic metabolic acidosis. Increasingly higher norepinephrine doses were needed to support arterial pressure, peaking 0.95 mcg/kg/min on day 2. On day 3, after adequate goal-direct volume expansion, terlipressin infusion was added to the treatment regimen (peaking at 1.28 mcg/kg/h). Cardiac function was restored to normal, as demonstrated by a further ultrasound assessment. Acute kidney injury due to rhabdomyolysis (noted at admission to the ICU by the elevated levels of serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatine kinase [1131 U]) and oliguria were managed with volume expansion with crystalloids, urine alkalinization with sodium bicarbonate boluses, and diuretics. A brain CT scan was repeated on day 2, revealing a further reduction of the cortico-subcortical differentiation bilaterally in the frontal-parietal and temporo-occipital areas compatible with anoxic edema, a marked flattening of the cortical convolutions, and the obliteration of the supratentorial peri-encephalic liquor spaces, also at the level of basal cisterns. On day 3, sedation was interrupted to allow for neuroprognostication. A neurological clinical assessment revealed a persisting GCS of 3 and the absence of pupillary and corneal reflexes. Somatosensory evoked potentials demonstrated bilateral absence of the cortical somatosensory N20-potential (ERB- and N13-potential were present) and the electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded minimal cerebral electrical activity with very low voltages. On day 4, hemodynamic stability was obtained, allowing for tapering of vasopressor support, and the fever ceased. On day 5, the patient remained unconscious with a GCS of 3 and only a weak cough reflex and respiratory drive. A new EEG revealed an isoelectric trace. A cerebral CT angiography revealed a regular opacification of the arterial circulation with normal venous drainage. Direct scanning highlighted further reduced cortical-subcortical differentiation and marked flattening of brain convolution (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Computed tomography scan performed 4 days after the first scan shows diffuse cortical hypodensity of both cerebral hemispheres, with a more evident loss of grey-white matter differentiation with gyral effacement and compression of lateral ventricles

The patient died on day 10. A post-mortem evaluation revealed signs of multi-organ hypoperfusion, with effects on subendocardial and transmural cardiomyocytes. Cerebral sections confirmed the CT findings of petechiae and subarachnoid hemorrhage previously located along the electrical current and as a result of direct damage to brain vasculature. Brain tissue softening and edema were associated with the direct effects of electrical passage. The cerebral parenchyma sections revealed an abundant, non-selective loss of neurons (Fig. 5). We collected detailed medical information from the patient’s relatives, but nothing in his medical history could be related to any previous neurological or cognitive disturbances.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Cerebral parenchymal sections with an abundant, non-selective loss of neuronal elements

Discussion and conclusion

Lightning strike is responsible for an average of 300 injuries and 100 deaths per year in the USA [3,4,5], although this figure is likely to be an underestimate, with lightning-related fatalities and hospitalizations most likely to be more common than reported in the literature [6]. Approximately 30% of those struck by lightning die, and up to 74% of survivors may have permanent disabilities [4, 7, 8]. Two-thirds of lightning-associated deaths occur within 1 hour of the injury and are generally due to a fatal arrhythmia or respiratory failure [9, 10] as a result of asystole or ventricular fibrillation [11, 12]. Direct strikes are more likely to result in asystole due to sudden depolarization of the heart [2, 11]. Ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia may also be frequently associated with lightning [13], but they are more likely the consequence of indirect strikes [11]. This case report describes the dramatic neurological consequences of a direct lightning strike in a patient who survived the initial strike. Of particular note, we present the pathology findings determined over time by the effects of electrical current passing through the brain, namely, massive neuronal loss leading to cerebral neuronal desertification. Pathologists reported a non-selective depletion of neuronal cells in the brain parenchymal sections studied.

The alterations described in our patient are common findings in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, which is a neurodegenerative disease that occurs over years due to the progressive formation, diffusion and thickening of diffuse and senile plaques. Spongiosis in neurons results in the death of the affected neurons, visible as an empty halo on brain tissue sections. Gliosis is the reactive proliferation of the common glia in situations of deneuronization. Perivascular hali are observed, resulting from receding brain tissue and the neuropil, as well as from gas bubbles due to electrolytic processes. What we observed in our patient usually happens over months in those with severe cerebral ischemia and over years in those with dementia. The neurodegeneneration observed in our patient was condensed into a few days and can be explained only by an external event that exerted a dramatic influence on cell tropism and, consequently, cell death. The combination of both CA and direct electrical damage might have resulted in an extremely rapid and complete cerebral crushing in this specific case.

Our patient suffered damage due to the global cerebral ischemia that developed during the no-flow and low-flow phases after the CA, but he also suffered significant injuries that may have been due to the direct lightning strike. A sudden and extremely high warming-up of the brain due to the route of the lightning through the head indubitably contributed to immediate neuronal death and subsequent increased injury in the re-perfused “warm” brain. Indeed, neurons transmit physiologically to each other through chemical and electrical synapses. The strength of the electrical discharge of the lightning strike may have immediately altered both processes, in particular the electrical inter-neuronal communication pathway [14].

Lightning strikes cause injuries through different mechanisms [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. A direct strike is a lightning bolt that directly hits a person, and it this was the main mechanism of injury in the patient reported here. Survival of persons after a direct lightning strike who suffer CA is a rare event. The severity of an electric injury is directly correlated to the intensity of the current that crosses through the person's tissue [16], which is dependent on the electrical resistance of the different tissues. Bone offers the highest resistance, while muscles, vessels, and nerves provide the lowest. The skin is the main barrier against penetration of the electrical current in the body, but its resistance is significantly impaired by the presence of moisture, such as sweat or water, on its surface [2].

Injuries due to electricity occur by four mechanisms: (1) light; (2) direct effect of electrical current on body tissues; (3) conversion of electrical energy to thermal energy, resulting in deep and superficial burns; and (4) blunt mechanical injury from lightning strike, muscle contraction, or as a complication of a fall after electrocution [17]. The light component of electricity can injury the eye, causing delayed damage such as cataracts (the most common finding) but also more serious and acute conditions such as macular holes or edema, optic nerve neuropathy, and retinal detachment. In contrast, the temperature component, with temperatures that can be as high as 8000 °C for a few milliseconds, is responsible for skin and hair burns. The electrical component accounts for damage to the nervous system and heart, and for the Lichtenberg figures and tip-toe signs. Neuron and cardiomyocyte death is believed to occur through the cellular mechanism of electroporation: light can cause the reorganization of the lipid layer with the generation of pores due to modification of the membrane potential. As a result, cells die from the progressive depletion of energy spent to maintain the ion gradient [8]. In the case of a direct strike, tissues are severely damaged by the consistent amount of electric charge absorbed by the individual who has been struck [18, 19]. Similar to the presentation of our case, people hit by lightning may present with pupils that are fixed and dilated or asymmetric due to autonomic dysfunction. Consequently, fixed, dilated, or asymmetric pupils should not be used as the rationale to stop resuscitation [9]. Motor system diseases and movement disorders are part of this delayed syndrome. The last pattern is secondary to other mechanisms and includes subdural and epidural hematomas and subarachnoid hemorrhage originating from trauma [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Brain lesions are the most common finding at autopsy, whereas cerebellar injuries and injury to peripheral nerves are rare [21]. Different types of hemorrhages and ischemic encephalopathy are widely described [22]. Huan-Jui et al. [23] reported a right frontotemporal infarction also involving the basal ganglia in a person who suffered a low alternating voltage shock, and Eriksson et al. [24] reported pons infarction in a person injured by lightning; nevertheless, cerebral infarction is a rare finding, and is commonly linked to vascular damage. Gliomas and cerebral atrophy could also be permanent consequences of lightning shock [21]. Only a small number of cerebellar syndromes are reported in the literature [21], all with a notable form of acute atrophy [25] secondary to extensive brain damage; abrupt cerebral salt wasting syndrome has also been reported [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].

The clinical manifestations of electrical injuries range from mild superficial skin burns to severe multiorgan dysfunction and death. The case we present is an example of severe multiorgan involvement, with the patient presenting with CA with first monitored rhythm asystole, either due to massive myocardial depolarization or as a degradation of ventricular fibrillation due to several minutes of no-flow downtime. Fixed dilated pupils, as exhibited in our case, are also a possible manifestation of electrical injury. The underlying mechanism has been attributed to autonomic dysfunction and may represent an important confounder of prognostication following central nervous injury or cardiac arrest, and should not be used as a reason to stop resuscitation [26]. A thorough examination of the patient showed tympanic perforation, which should be sought as it has been reported in 50–80% of patients struck by lightning [27]. Ruptured tympanic membranes are secondary to barotrauma determined by the peak temperature within a bolt of lightning, which rises within milliseconds to 30,000 K, generating a shock wave of up to 20 atmospheres induced by the rapid heating of the surrounding air [9]. This shock wave then can be transmitted through the body and result in mechanical trauma. Thus, damage to internal organs, albeit uncommon, is possible as reported in this case and should be excluded.

We also observed rhabdomyolysis that may result from massive tissue necrosis and which was complicated by pigment-induced acute kidney injury. We observed superficial thermal burns that were limited in extension and that went unnoticed at the primary survey. Burns are most common at the site of electrical contact and at parts of the body in contact with the ground at the time of injury. The degree of external injury cannot be used to determine the extent of internal damage. Indeed, seemingly minor surface burns may coexist with massive muscle coagulation and necrosis, as well as internal organ injury. Neurological injury was the cause of death of our patient. Vascular and parenchymal injuries of the central nervous system are often associated with peripheral and autonomic nervous system dysfunction. In our case report we describe the consequence of a direct lightning strike on the neural cells. Cerebral multicentric necrosis, particularly of the basal ganglia, was associated with massive cerebral edema and large areas of absolute neuronal absence, described as desertification. The latter describes a major reduction in the number of neuronal elements, not selective by type of neuron, that closely resembles the rarefaction commonly seen in persons with chronic vascular dementia [28]. These conditions would be secondary to the dramatic acute insult that the patient suffered both directly by the lightning strike and secondary by edema due to the prolonged CA. To date, acute atrophy has been reported in only a small number of cerebellar syndromes secondary to lightning shock [24].


We present a fatal case caused by a direct lightning strike, with the patient presenting with CA followed by initial resuscitation and death due to severe direct neurological injury, with an impressive microscopic pattern of neuronal desertification. Possible mechanisms of neuronal injury in this case include the direct high warm-up of the brain caused by the lightning and a subsequent increased injury due to the re-perfused “warm” brain after the CA.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article



Cardiac arrest


Computer tomography






Glasgow Coma Scale


Intensive care unit


Return on sustained circulation


  1. Davis C, Engeln A, Johnson EL, et al. Wilderness Medical Society practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of lightning injuries: 2014 update. Wilderness Environ Med. 2014;25:S86-95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koumbourlis A. Electrical injuries. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:424–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spies C, Trohman RG. Narrative review: electrocution and life-threatening electrical injuries. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:531–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zafren K, Durrer B, Herry JP, Brugger H. Lightning injuries: prevention and on-site treatment in mountains and remote areas. Official guidelines of the International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine and the Medical Commission of the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation (ICAR and UIAA MEDCOM). Resuscitation. 2005;65:369–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Lightning-associated injuries and deaths among military personnel—United States, 1998–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:859–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. López RE, Holle RL, Heitkamp TA, Boyson M, Cherington M, Langford K. The underreporting of lightning injuries and deaths in Colorado. Bull Am Meteor Soc. 1993;74:2171–8.;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Browne BJ, Gaasch WR. Electrical injuries and lightning. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1992;10:211–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ritenour AE, Morton MJ, McManus JG, Barillo DJ, Cancio LC. Lightning injury: a review. Burns. 2008;34:585–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Lightning-associated deaths–United States, 1980–1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47:391–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berko J, Ingram DD, Saha S, Parker JD. Deaths attributed to heat, cold, and other weather events in the United States, 2006–2010. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2014;76:1-15.

  11. McIntyre WF, Simpson CS, Redfearn DP, Abdollah H, Baranchuk A. The lightning heart: a case report and brief review of the cardiovascular complications of lightning injury. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010;10:429–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Blumenthal R. The explosive effects of lightning: what are the risks? Acad Forensic Pathol. 2016;6:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper MA. Lightning injuries: prognostic signs for death. Ann Emerg Med. 1980;9:134–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pereda AE. Electrical synapses and their functional interactions with chemical synapses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(4):250–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper MA, Holle RL, Andrews CJ. Distribution of lightning injury mechanisms. In: 30th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), 13-17 Sep 2010, Cagliari, Italy.

  16. Cooper MA. A fifth mechanism of lightning injury. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:172–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blumenthal R. Lightning and the forensic pathologist. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2018;8:98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fontanarosa PB. Electrical shock and lightning strike. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:378–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lichtenberg R, Dries D, Ward K, Marshall W, Scanlon P. Cardiovascular effects of lightning strikes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:531–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cherington M, Wachtel H, Yarnell PR. Could lightning injury be magnetically induced? Lancet. 1998;351:1788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Andrews CJ, Reisner AD. Neurological and neuropsychological consequences of electrical and lightning shock: review and theories of causation. Neural Regen Res. 2017;12:677–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cherington M, Yarnell PR, London SF. Neurologic complications of lightning injuries. West J Med. 1995;162:413–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Huan-Jui Y, Chih-Yang L, Huei-Yu L, Po-Chih C. Acute ischemic stroke in low-voltage electrical injury: a case report. Surg Neurol Int. 2010;1:83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eriksson A, Ornehult L. Death by lightning. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1988;9:295–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McAleese KE, Alafuzoff I, Charidimou A, et al. Post-mortem assessment in vascular dementia: advances and aspirations. BMC Med. 2016;14:129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jain S, Bandi V. Electrical and lightning injuries. Crit Care Clin. 1999;15:319–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gluncić I, Roje Z, Gluncić V, Poljak K. Ear injuries caused by lightning: report of 18 cases. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115:4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cherington M, Yarnell P, Hallmark D. MRI in lightning encephalopathy. Neurology. 1993;43:1437–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


There was no funding for the research

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ER-P: conceived the concept, and contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript. EM: contributed to research data. EDP: contributed to research data. KP: contributed to research data. UL: involved in the planning and supervised the work. RB contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results, and to the writing of the manuscript. EB contributed to the analysis of the results. TP contributed to the analysis of the results. GR aided in interpreting the results and worked on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Roman-Pognuz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent partecipate

The request for approval was submitted to the local ethics committee: Nucleo di ricerca clinica- Azienda sanitaria universitaria Giuliano isontina - statement n. 2-25.01.2022. The need for approval was waived due to minimal risk.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s next of kin for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roman-Pognuz, E., Moro, E., Macchini, E. et al. Neuronal desertification after a direct lightning strike: a case report. J Med Case Reports 16, 391 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: