Skip to main content

Late presentation of congenital type IV esophageal hiatus hernia in a 9-year-old boy: a case report



Congenital diaphragmatic hernia affects 1 in every 2000–5000 live births. The mediastinum shifts to the opposite side, the lungs are hypoplastic, and the arterioles are abnormal, resulting in pulmonary hypertension. Respiratory and cardiovascular functions are severely impaired at birth, resulting in significant mortality and morbidity as a result of the associated malformations.

Case presentation

A 9-year-old persian boy was referred with complaint of intermittent abdominal pain in the left lower quadrant and an episode of vomiting. The patient was tachypneic, and the abdomen was nontender on examination. Lung sounds on the left side were considerably decreased, whereas heart sounds on the right side were louder. There was no history of underlying disease in the patient. Initial laboratory blood tests, chest x-ray, spiral computed tomography scan, and chest sonography were requested. Blood tests were normal, and chest x-ray revealed a round-shaped lesion with relatively clear boundaries containing air–fluid level and shift of the heart and mediastinum to the right. A spiral computed tomography scan of the lungs demonstrated the shift of the heart and mediastinum to the right side was due to dilated stomach and colon pressure, and chest sonography revealed that half of the stomach was inside the thorax. Laparotomy surgery was performed. The patient had no complications following surgery.


Herniation of abdominal contents through the diaphragmatic hiatus should be suspected in patients with tachypnea and mediastinal shift to the right side. Rapid diagnosis and early surgical treatment are necessary to avert any potentially life-threatening complications.

Peer Review reports


Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is defined by a posterolateral muscle defect of the diaphragm, usually (85%) [1, 2] located on the left side, and allows the abdominal viscera to pass into the thoracic cavity.

The Bochdalek hernia accounts for approximately 70% of the cases and occurs in the left posterolateral part of the muscle; the Morgagni hernia accounts for approximately 27% of all cases and involves the anteromedial retrosternal portion of the diaphragm; and the septum transversum-type hernia accounts for approximately 2–3% of the cases. The mediastinum is shifted to the contralateral side in CDH, the lungs are hypoplastic, and the arterioles are anomalous, resulting in pulmonary hypertension. Respiratory and cardiovascular functions are severely compromised at birth, resulting in significant mortality and morbidity due to the associated malformations [3,4,5].

The estimated congenital diaphragmatic hernia incidence is 1 in 2000–5000 live births [6]. It appears to be slightly more prevalent in males than females and less prevalent in blacks [7, 8].

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia etiology is not understood; however, 2% of cases have been familial, and associated chromosomal abnormalities have been detected in 15% of patients [9].

Hiatal hernias are classified into four types: sliding (type I); paraesophageal (type II); combined (type III), which incorporates elements of types I and II; and giant paraesophageal (type IV) [10].

This case report discusses a late presentation of congenital type IV hiatal hernia.

Case presentation

A 9-year-old persian boy was referred to the emergency department of the children’s hospital complaining of abdominal pain, inconstant in the left lower quadrant area, that started 3 days ago with an episode of nonbilious and nonbloody vomiting. The patient was born by cesarean section without any significant problems, and he had no history of underlying disease. He had been hospitalized twice, once at the age of 11 months because of pneumonia, and once when he was 5 years old owing to fever and cervical lymphadenopathy on the left side; after both admissions, he was discharged home in good general condition. In prior admissions, there was no sign of diaphragmatic herniation on chest x-ray (CXR) (Fig. 1A and B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

No sign of diaphragmatic herniation on previous CXRs (at age of 11 months, A) and (at age of 5 years, B)

The patient’s blood pressure (BP) was 135/75 mmHg, pulse rate (PR) was 75 beats per minute, temperature was 36.7 °C, respiratory rate (RR) was 40 breaths per minute, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) was 99%. On examination, there was a marked decrease in lung sounds on the left side, while auscultation on the right lung was normal. The heart sound was typical and louder on the right side. His abdomen was soft and nontender with no palpable masses, and the rest of the systemic examinations were normal. CXR and initial laboratory blood tests were requested. On CXR, a round-shaped lesion with relatively clear boundaries containing air–fluid level, as well as shift of the heart and mediastinum to the right, was seen (Fig. 2). Hydatid cyst and lung abscess were among our early differential diagnosis based on the CXR. The patient was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) immediately because of mild tachypnea and hypotension. The patient was nil per os (NPO) and received oxygen through a nasal cannula; he was continuously monitored by pulse oximetry and cardiac-monitoring device. Intravenous hydration, clindamycin, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin were administered.

Fig. 2
figure 2

CXR showing a round-shaped lesion with relatively clear boundaries containing air–fluid level, as well as shift of the heart and mediastinum to the right

Blood tests revealed a white cell count of 8.8 × 109/L (neutrophils 6.6 × 109/L, lymphocytes 1.4 × 109/L); hemoglobin 11.6 g/dL; platelets 312 × 109/L (normal range 150–450 × 109/L); urea 37 mg/dL (normal range 15–45 mg/dL); creatinine 0.46 mg/dL (normal range 0.6–1.1 mg/dL); sodium 144 mmol/L (normal range 135–145 mmol/L); potassium 4.6 mmol/L (normal range 3.5–5.0 mmol/L); prothrombin time 12.5 s (normal range 9.5–12.7 s); activated partial thromboplastin time 36 s (normal range 25.7–38.8 s); International Normalized Ratio 1.1 (normal range 0.9–1.2); C-reactive protein 3 mg/dL (normal range 0–6 mg/dL); erythrocyte sedimentation rate 10 mm/hour. Surgical consultation was also requested for the patient.

Chest sonography illustrated a dilated stomach containing nutrients in the left hemithorax, indicating that half of the stomach was inside the thorax. On abdominopelvic ultrasound, mild free abdominal and pelvic fluid was seen and the rest of findings were unremarkable.

On spiral computed tomography (CT) scan of the lung with intravenous contrast, shifting of the heart and mediastinum to the right side due to pressure effect of a dilated stomach and colon was reported. Colon loop occupying most of the left hemithorax was seen. The esophagus at the distal third was dilated, too, which suggests esophageal hiatal hernia and gastric volvulus (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Abdominal CT scan (coronal, A; axial, B) revealing mild free fluid at the abdominopelvic cavity. Dilated stomach and colon loop are at the left hemithorax

During diagnostic evaluations, the patient had recurrent vomiting. Insertion of a nasogastric (NG) tube was attempted to decompress the stomach, but it did not pass to the stomach and was coiled in the esophagus. He underwent emergent laparotomy because of tachypnea and hypotension. Subcostal incision in the left side used. The diaphragm on the left posterior part had a wide defect of 3 cm, in which the stomach, colon, and spleen were observed inside the thorax, which was reduced to the abdomen meticulously, and the defect was repaired primarily with nonabsorbable sutures. The shape and the location of the defect (which was in the muscular segment of the diaphragm) and edge of the diaphragm resembled a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Fig. 4). There were no other detectable anomalies such as malrotation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Intraoperation picture. There is a wide defect of 3 cm in the diaphragm in which the stomach, colon, and spleen are inside the thorax

After surgery, the patient was stable, and hydration and antibiotic therapy were continued. Pantoprazole was administered to prevent stress ulcers. Two days after surgery, the NG tube was removed and liquid diet was started. Incentive spirometry and chest physiotherapy were initiated to rehabilitate pulmonary function. The patient was discharged home uneventfully, and follow-up visits after 3 months showed no complications (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

CXR of the patient 1 month after surgery

Discussion and conclusions

The differential diagnosis of intrathoracic cystic mass should include esophageal duplication cyst, hiatal hernia, pericardial cyst, macrocytic adenomatoid malformation, and neurenteric cyst [11]. As for our patient, initially, two differential diagnoses were made, including lung abscess and hydatid cyst (considering the endemic prevalence). Finally, by performing a CT scan, we reached a definite diagnosis.

The right diaphragmatic crus divides into two branches around the esophagus and forms esophageal hiatus [12]. Hiatal hernia is the protrusion of intraabdominal organs into the thorax [13]. In one study, all the patients with EHH had hiatus widening and exhibited a change of the hiatus shape from sagittal foramen to circular foramen [12]. Another study pointed out that increased body mass index and age is associated with increased prevalence and incidence of EHH [14]. However, our patient was a child with an average body mass index.

Type IV hiatal hernia is extremely rare and accounts for less than 5% of other types of EHH [13]. Type II, III, and IV hiatal hernias account for about 5% of all hiatal hernias, of which type IV hiatal hernias account for 2–5% within that 5% [15]. Type IV hiatal hernia involves herniation of the stomach, omentum, small intestine, colon, spleen, and peritoneum into the thorax [16]. This type of hiatal hernia mainly involves peptic ulcer and acidity, and paraesophageal hiatal hernia is associated with perforation into the stomach [16]. The most common symptoms include chest pain, heartburn, progressive dysphagia, regurgitation, and nausea/vomiting [13]. Our patient presented with only abdominal pain and one episode of vomiting, but later developed hypotension and tachypnea due to mass effect in the mediastinum. During acute phases of hiatal hernia, life-threatening symptoms are observed, including intestinal entanglement, esophageal puncture, bowel obstruction, severe gastroesophageal bleeding, incarceration of the stomach into the thorax, perforation, bleeding, and gastric volvulus [16, 17]. Type IV hiatal hernia is mainly an acquired disorder, arising from repeated episodes of increased intraabdominal pressure with an enlarged diaphragmatic hiatus [17]. Anatomical stressors, including heavy weightlifting, can elevate the intraabdominal pressure, potentially leading to the dislocation of movable abdominal organs through the hiatus into the thorax [17]. There was nothing in our patient history indicative of increased intraabdominal pressure that could predispose to hiatal hernia formation.

There are multiple diagnostic investigations for diagnosing hiatal hernias, but the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons recommends that only those diagnostic techniques be performed that will affect the patient’s clinical management [18]. The use of some of these techniques can be challenging because of irregularities in the anatomy of the gastroesophageal junction during respiration, movement, and swallowing [19]. Barium swallow, an important diagnostic test for paraesophageal hernia, shows the position and amount of the stomach within the thoracic cavity [20]. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) also provides real-time evaluation of the stomach, esophagus, and duodenal mucosa [13]. However, EGD is not able to identify large hiatal hernias [21]. Additionally, CT scans can be used to diagnose hiatal hernia and provide essential details about involved organs and the type of hiatal hernia [13]. In our patient, a type IV hiatal hernia was confirmed on CT scan, on the basis of the displacement of stomach and colon loops through the diaphragmatic hernia.

Owing to dangerous complications, emergent surgery is widely recommended. Indications for surgery include symptomatic patients with paraesophageal hiatal hernia, especially patients with gastric volvulus and obstructive symptoms [19]. Different techniques have been proposed, including different laparoscopic methods and open surgery [17]. Our patient underwent open surgery because of deterioration in vital sign and imminent cardiovascular collapse.

In conclusion, we reported on a late presentation of congenital type IV hiatal hernia in which the stomach, colon, and spleen were found inside the thorax. In patients with abdominal pain and tachypnea, herniation of abdominal contents through the diaphragmatic hiatus should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Plain x-rays are usually diagnostic of the condition, but a CT scan and sonography can confirm it. Rapid diagnosis and primitive surgical treatment are required to avoid any potentially fatal complications, as demonstrated in this case.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Congenital diaphragmatic hernia


Computed tomography


Chest x-ray


Esophageal hiatal hernia




Pediatric intensive care unit


Nil per os




  1. Kays DW. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and neonatal lung lesions. Surg Clin. 2006;86(2):329–52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haroon J, Chamberlain RS. An evidence-based review of the current treatment of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Clin Pediatr. 2013;52(2):115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Buys Roessingh AS, Dinh-Xuan AT. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: current status and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168(4):393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kluth D. Embryology of anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010;19(3):201–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tovar JA. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kesieme EB, Kesieme CN. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: review of current concept in surgical management. Int Sch Res Not. 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Torfs CP, Curry CJ, Bateson TF, Honoré LH. A population-based study of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Teratology. 1992;46(6):555–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang W, Carmichael SL, Harris JA, Shaw GM. Epidemiologic characteristics of congenital diaphragmatic hernia among 2.5 million California births, 1989–1997. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76(3):170–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. King H, Booker PD. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the neonate. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2005;5(5):171–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dean C, Etienne D, Carpentier B, Gielecki J, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. Hiatal hernias. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(4):291–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patoulias D, Kalogirou M, Feidantsis T, Kallergis I, Patoulias I. Paraesophageal hernia as a cause of chronic asymptomatic anemia in a 6 years old boy; case report and review of the literature. Acta Medica. 2017;60(2):76–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar D, Zifan A, Ghahremani G, Kunkel DC, Horgan S, Mittal RK. Morphology of the esophageal hiatus: is it different in 3 types of hiatus hernias? J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;26(1):51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel S, Yarra S, Owji S, Benavidez JE, Nguyen QD. Minding the gap: clinical manifestations of a rare type IV hiatal hernia. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9275.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Menon S, Trudgill N. Risk factors in the aetiology of hiatus hernia: a meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23(2):133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krause W, Roberts J, Garcia-Montilla RJ. Bowel in chest: type IV hiatal hernia. Clin Med Res. 2016;14(2):93–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu HX, Han CS, Xue JR, Han ZF, Xin H. Esophageal hiatal hernia: risk, diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;12(4):319–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. George D, Apostolos PV, Athanasios P, Emmanuel LE, Nikolaos KE, Nikolaos P, Charalampos S, George K, Andreas MJ. Struggling with a gastric volvulus secondary to a type IV hiatal hernia. Case Rep Med. 2010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Muensterer OJ, Awad Z, Mittal SK, Richardson WS, Stefanidis D, Fanelli RD. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4409–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sfara A, Dumitrascu DL. The management of hiatal hernia: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Med Pharm Rep. 2019;92(4):321.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lebenthal A, Waterford SD, Fisichella PM. Treatment and controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair. Front Surg. 2015;2:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Collet D, Luc G, Chiche L. Management of large para-esophageal hiatal hernias. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(6):395–402.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We wish to thank our counselors in the Clinical Research Development Center of Children’s Hospital in Bandar Abbas.


The study did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MT and ZG participated in the conception and design of the report. ZG and EK wrote the manuscript. MT evaluated the patient. MT, ZG, and EK reviewed the manuscript. SM performed the surgical management. MR interpreted radiological findings. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Ghaeini Hesarooeyeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences Ethical Committee approved the study under the ethical code IR.HUMS.REC.1400.238, and the study conforms with the statements in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's legal guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tariverdi, M., Hesarooeyeh, Z.G., Khalili, E. et al. Late presentation of congenital type IV esophageal hiatus hernia in a 9-year-old boy: a case report. J Med Case Reports 16, 104 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Congenital
  • Type IV hiatal hernia
  • Children
  • Case report