Skip to main content

Abnormal Schwannoma-like Growth of multiple, multifocal BRAF V600E-positive Glioblastoma in the Interior Acoustic Canal with Leptomeningeal Infiltration: a case report



Glioblastoma belongs to the most common and most aggressive tumor entity of the central nervous system with a poor prognosis of only few months. Once manifested, it grows fast and diffusely by infiltrating the surrounding brain parenchyma. Despite its aggressive behavior, glioblastoma rarely presents with multiple lesions and metastasis to intra- and extracranial tissues. Therefore, metastasized, multiple glioblastoma is limited to case reports. Our case describes an atypical primary bilateral manifestation of BRAF V600E-positive epithelioid glioblastoma with rapid metastasis and meningeosis glioblastoma while under adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old Caucasian male patient presented with a seizure and numbness in his left arm. He was diagnosed with an abnormal primary bilateral manifestation of multiple, multifocal BRAF V600E-positive and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type intracranial epithelioid glioblastoma with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation (MGMT) at 12%. While being under the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide, the patient developed left-sided facial nerve weakness and hearing loss, dysarthria, and severe gait instability. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging showed that glioblastoma lesions advanced rapidly with a schwannoma-like growth pattern by invading the left internal acoustic meatus, adjacent cranial nerves, and leptomeninges. A lumbar puncture confirmed meningeosis glioblastoma. Four months after the initial diagnosis of glioblastoma, the patient died from the complications of the fast and diffuse metastasis.


Glioblastoma rarely presents with metastases despite its aggressive and rapidly growing nature. Our case should increase awareness of symptom tracking in patients with glioblastoma to intervene early and efficiently. Moreover, refractory therapies for glioblastoma should underline the importance of personalized medicine.

Peer Review reports


Glioblastoma (GB) is among the most common as well as most aggressive tumors of the central nervous system, and has a poor prognosis [1,2,3,4]. The incidence in the European Union and North America is 2–3/100,000 per year with slightly higher incidence in men. The highest rate of new diagnosis occurs in late adulthood at a median age of 64 years but it can also occur in children at any age [5,6,7]. Predominantly, GB appears as a unilateral, solitary lesion, whereas primary multiple, especially bilateral, lesions are rare [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Likewise, cases of GB with schwannoma-like growth are exceptional [14,15,16]. The spreading of GB presumably occurs via the cerebrospinal fluid to the ventricular cavity with successive dissemination throughout the ventricular system and cerebrospinal leptomeninges [13]. Interestingly, intracranial GB infiltrating leptomeninges and causing meningeosis glioblastoma per se is rare [8, 17,18,19]. Metastasis of GB to the surrounding and contralateral brain parenchyma and to the extracranial tissue, with common sites being lungs, pleura, bones, bone marrow, skin, and cervical lymph nodes, has been observed [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The prevalence of extracranial metastasis is around 0.5%. However, metastases are more common in patients with recurrent disease than in patients at initial diagnosis [10, 13, 29,30,31,32]. Although recent research has introduced promising molecularly targeted compounds, one of the standard treatments utilizes temozolomide with simultaneous radiotherapy [33,34,35,36,37,38,39].

Case presentation

A 60-year-old Caucasian male was admitted to the emergency unit upon having a seizure, with no significant medical history. He reported a 2-month history of numbness in the left hand and intermittent dysarthria. Physical examination showed impaired fine motor skills and hypoesthesia in the left arm. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) revealed a multifocal 38 × 42 × 38 mm lesion in the right temporal lobe (Fig. 1a) and a singular lesion in the left internal auditory canal (IAC) with a discreet hyperintense signal and abnormal enhancement (Fig. 1b). Gross resection of the lesion in the right temporal lobe was performed. Immunohistopathological analyses identified the lesion as an isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type epithelioid glioblastoma with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation at 12% and BRAF V600E mutation (Fig. 3). The patient was started on adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy that included temozolomide [75 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA), d1–d42] and stereotactic radiotherapy (60 Gy split in 30 units) of the tumor cavity in the right temporal lobe and its marginalizing solid components [33]. The enhancement in the left IAC (Fig 1c) was not irradiated as the signal alteration was not interpreted as a metastasis [33]. To assess the therapy outcome, a cMRI was done on therapy day 42. The cMRI showed that the right-sided tumor cavity, including its solid components, remained unchanged in size but with a larger perifocal edema that was presumably a postradiogenic effect. However, the lesion in the left IAC excluded in the irradiation field was progressive (Fig. 2a). The oligoprogression prompted us to continue with temozolomide treatment at 100 mg/m2 BSA as maintenance therapy. Within 2 weeks, the patient was seen in the outpatient oncology clinic with a marked imbalance, as well as a new, rapidly advancing left-sided facial nerve weakness, dysphagia, dysarthria, and left-sided deafness albeit without lower central nervous dysfunction. The Romberg test was positive, and his gait was wide and ataxic, with assistance required to prevent falling during tandem walking trials. These symptoms were consistent with the lesion in the left IAC. Due to the fast deterioration and a fall leading to a nose bone fracture, we admitted the patient to our clinic. Owing to the persistent dysphagia, we decided to implant a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube to avoid aspiration and malnutrition. Four weeks following the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the cMRI demonstrated a rapid growth of the lesion in the left IAC. This lesion measured 31 × 24 × 33 mm and infiltrated the adjacent structure, that is, the cranial nerves (II, V, VII–XII), the leptomeninges, and the left parotid gland (Figs. 2b, 3). In addition, the meninges of the Sylvian fissure showed an enhanced contrast uptake that breached the left orbit and cerebellum with suspicious infiltrations into the medulla oblongata. Moreover, the tumor cavity with its solid residues in the right temporal lobe was accompanied by an expanding edema (figure not shown). A lumbar puncture was performed and confirmed meningeosis glioblastoma on cytopathological analysis. Laboratory tests showed that hematological and organ functions were not impaired. To control the impact of the expanding intracranial mass, we initiated radiotherapy of the whole brain. As the patient deteriorated fast, we could neither start the patient on second-line therapy, such as antiangiogenic drugs or BRAF V600E inhibitors, nor recruit him in a clinical trial. The approval of BRAF inhibitors for treating V600E-mutated epithelioid GB was pending at the time (Swissmedic National Authorization for Drugs, cited September 2020); it would therefore have been an experimental approach. We decided to dispense further diagnostics and did not perform a biopsy of the left intrameatal lesion. At the request of the family and the patient, we focused on palliative care. The patient died 4 months after the initial diagnosis owing to the rapid tumor progression that led to paralyses of multiple cranial nerves. The family did not wish for an autopsy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Brain magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis and after resection of the tumor in the right temporoparietal lobe. a T1-weighted black-blood cMRI with contrast in transverse plane showing a tumor in the temporoparietal lobe at diagnosis (baseline). b T1-weighted cMRI after contrast showing a singular hyperintensity in the left internal acoustic channel at diagnosis (baseline). c Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image after contrast showing the lesion in the left internal acoustic channel after surgical resection of the right temporoparietal tumor

Fig. 2
figure 2

Brain magnetic resonance imaging of lesions in the left internal acoustic channel advancing with schwannoma-like growth 2 and 4 months after diagnosis. a T1-weighted cranial magnetic resonance imaging after contrast showing the tumor in the left internal acoustic channel at 2 months post-surgical follow-up. b T1-weighted cranial magnetic resonance imaging after contrast revealing infiltrative tumor growth with suspicious leptomeningeal involvement in the cerebellopontine angle within 4 months after diagnosis. Right nasal fracture upon fall is shown

Fig. 3
figure 3

Histopathological analyses of the resected glioblastoma. a Histopathological specimen showing nuclear pseudopalisading, which is defined as the aggregation of tumor cells around the periphery of the necrotic areas, increased mitotic activity, and vascular proliferation. Pseudopalisading necrosis and vascular proliferation are the two important hallmarks of glioblastoma [55]. Magnification, 20×. b Histopathological specimen depicting an accumulation of viable tumor cells encircling the blood vessels in a large necrotic focus. The image also shows endothelial multilayering as a result of endothelial hyperplasia. These changes are mostly driven by vascular endothelial growth factor secreted by the tumor in response to hypoxia. Magnification, 20×


Multifocal GB is a highly aggressive and fast-growing tumor entity known for its poor prognosis and fatal complications. Typically, GB manifests as a single lesion, whereas multiple and particularly contralateral lesions are limited to only a few case reports [9, 10, 12]. One might suspect the short prognosis does not allow sufficient time for metastases to become clinically evident. In addition to the intracranial metastases of GB, intramedullary spinal metastasis, leptomeningeosis glioblastoma, and extracranial metastases are also very uncommon [8, 28, 31, 40,41,42,43]. Several mechanisms for metastasis have been postulated, including vascular invasion, perineural spreading, and direct invasion via the lymphatics [13].

In our case report, we describe a rare, abnormal primary bilateral manifestation of multiple, multifocal BRAF V600E-positive intracranial epithelioid GB lesions in both hemispheres that subsequently advanced rapidly and invaded the left internal acoustic meatus with perineural infiltration of the adjacent cranial nerves and leptomeninges while the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was ongoing. In the continuous clinical assessments, the patient developed symptoms that resembled those of a benign schwannoma, which is a slow-growing and noninvasive tumor of the peripheral nervous system. To date, only a handful of clinical reports of primary glioma lesions mimicking a schwannoma have been reported [15]. However, the patient’s poor performance did not permit a biopsy of the intrameatal lesion to examine its etiology. As the baseline cMRI disclosed abnormal signal alterations in the left meatus, we cannot exclude metastatic growth. Therefore, we might assume that the intrameatal lesion was a metastasis of epithelioid GB. Moreover, its fast growth over a few weeks attests to the typical tumor biology of GB.

Moreover, the radiological findings implied an infiltration of the leptomeninges that might have caused a meningeosis GB. Recent literature describes the occurrence of meningeosis GB in patients with spinal metastases [41, 44,45,46,47,48,49]. In our patient, we cannot exclude spinal metastases since we did not obtain a scan of the spinal cord owing to the rapid deterioration of the patient. However, the patient did not experience neurological symptoms that were typical of spinal metastases such as paralyses, radicular pain, or peripheral sensory impairment. Clinical signs of meningitis were too vague to draw any conclusions.

Recommendations for the clinical management of highly progressive and metastasized GB are scarce, making palliative care the remaining option [1]. Radiotherapy is the preferred choice to control intracranial mass effect and to improve neurological symptoms, while second-line chemotherapy shows no survival benefit. Surgical intervention is necessary if compression increases the intracranial pressure [30, 41, 48]. With precision medicine becoming the state of the art, several promising molecular targeting therapeutics are under investigation. For example, the role of driver mutations, such as BRAF and its effect on pathogenesis of CNS tumors, has recently gained special interest [39]. In classic GB, BRAF mutations are rare, while the prevalence is higher in epithelioid GB (prevalence 1–2% versus 50%, n = 1320 samples) [50].

With the evolving era of personalized medicine, Kaley et al. identified the BRAF mutation as a promising druggable molecular target in CNS tumors by conducting the basket trial VE-BASKET [51]. BRAF mutation is known to negatively influence the overall prognosis in several tumor indications, for example, malignant melanoma, papillary thyroid cancer, and so on [52]. Hence, GB harboring a BRAF V600E mutation might exhibit a different, more invasive tumor biology than that of a BRAF wild-type GB. In our case, the V600E-positive epithelioid GB was also refractory to therapy as tumor progression occurred during combined chemoradiotherapy [33]. Here, the intratumoral heterogeneity might explain the treatment resistance of GB [53]. Certainly, cases of resistance to therapy should also encourage precision medicine research to establish novel algorithms for the treatment of GB [39, 50, 51, 54].

Currently, the data on the effect of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) on BRAF V600E-positive brain tumors are limited to a few experimental studies and case reports; thus, there is a high demand for further investigation. So far, the treatment of different types of brain tumors with BRAFi prolonged survival by several months to several years [37, 54]. Undoubtedly, response rates depend on the type of CNS tumor and tumor load [34,35,36, 38].


Though our case is a rare observation, multiple metastases can lead to lethal tumor progression within days to weeks. Our study highlights several take-home messages: firstly, the clinician should focus on symptom tracking in patients with GB, so that symptoms that cannot be explained by the primary GB manifestation are recognized earlier. With these basic clinical assessments, an intervention can be planned efficiently. Symptom tracking might be extended with selected disciplines such as otolaryngology, neurology, and ophthalmology. Secondly, the future development of personalized cancer medicine should focus on molecular signatures, thereby introducing potential druggable targets. Besides molecular targeting compounds, immunotherapies are highly promising options, that is, T-cell therapies [chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILS) and bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs)]. In particular, cases of refractory therapies necessitate the development of novel therapeutic algorithms. Finally, yet importantly, our case alludes to rare cases and their radiological presentation, thus improving the diagnostic workup overall. Should the left-sided lesion be regarded as a potential metastasis, a different therapy approach should be planned, for example, whole-brain rather than stereotactic radiotherapy.

Availability of data and materials








Internal acoustic channel


BRAF inhibitor


Body surface area


Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma isoform B


Bispecific T-cell engagers


Chimeric antigen receptor T cells


Cranial magnetic resonance imaging


Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy


Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery


Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes


  1. Bauchet L, Mathieu-Daudé H, Fabbro-Peray P, Rigau V, Fabbro M, Chinot O, et al. Oncological patterns of care and outcome for 952 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma in 2004. Neuro Oncol. 2010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stark AM, van de Bergh J, Hedderich J, Mehdorn HM, Nabavi A. Glioblastoma: clinical characteristics, prognostic factors and survival in 492 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:840–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sacher A, Wollmann R, Kalokhe U, Munoz D, Guiot MC, MacDonald RL. Long-term survival of a patient with glioblastoma. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Urbanska K, Sokolowska J, Szmidt M, Sysa P. Glioblastoma multiforme—an overview. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, The JA, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Krebs in Deutschland, zentrales Nervensystem.

  7. Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H, Patil N, Waite K, Kruchko C, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016. Neuro Oncol. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Shakur SF, Bit-Ivan E, Watkin WG, Merrell RT, Farhat HI. Multifocal and multicentric glioblastoma with leptomeningeal gliomatosis: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Med. 2013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehrotra A, Das K, Jamdar J, Jaiswal A, Behari S, Singh G, et al. Multiple glioblastomas: are they different from their solitary counterparts? Asian J Neurosurg. 2015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferraresi S, Brognaro E, Pavanato G, Ballotta MR. Contralateral crossrecurrence of a malignant glioma: a case with long-term survival. Ann Clin Case Rep 2017.

  11. Köhlmeier W. Zur Frage der Metastasierung der Gliome. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapoor A, Mohindra S, Singla N, Sodhi HBS, Chatterjee D, Gupta SK. Multiple glioblastoma: a diagnostic challenge and controversies in management. Neurol India. 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton JD, Rapp M, Schneiderhan TM, Sabel M, Hayman A, Scherer A, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme metastasis outside the CNS: three case reports and possible mechanisms of escape. J Clin Oncol. 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Takami H, Prummer CM, Graffeo CS, Peris-Celda M, Giannini C, Driscoll CL, et al. Glioblastoma of the cerebellopontine angle and internal auditory canal mimicking a peripheral nerve sheath tumor: case report. J Neurosurg. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dutta G, Singh D, Saran RK, Singh H, Srivastava AK, Jagetia A. Cerebellopontine angle anaplastic ganglioglioma masquerading as vestibular schwannoma: unusual entity. World Neurosurg. 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dziurzynski K, Blas-Boria D, Suki D, Cahill DP, Prabhu SS, Puduvalli V, et al. Butterfly glioblastomas: a retrospective review and qualitative assessment of outcomes. J Neurooncol. 2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Houston P, Olar A, Cachia D. Glioblastoma with leptomeningeal dissemination. Malta Med J. 2019.

  18. Simonati A, Mazza C, Rizzuto N. An unusual case of meningeal gliomatosis. Acta Neuropathol Suppl. 1981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Albanna W. Epithelioid glioblastoma with leptomeningeal gliomatosis—case report and review of the literature. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arrangoiz R, Papavasiliou P, Dushkin H, Farma JM. Case report and literature review: metastatic lobular carcinoma of the breast an unusual presentation. Int J Surg Case Rep 2011.

  21. Senetta R, Cassoni P. Skin metastases of glioblastoma. Tumors Central Nerv Syst. 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Beauchesne P. Extra-neural metastases of malignant gliomas: myth or reality? Cancers. 2011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsu E, Keene D, Ventureyra E, Matzinger MA, Jimenez C, Wang HS et al. Bone marrow metastasis in astrocytic gliomata. J Neuro-Oncol 1998.

  24. Laraqui L, Amarti A, Zouaidia F, Maher M, Kettani F, Saidi A. Lung metastasis from a glioblastoma: a case report. Revue de Pneumologie Clinique 2001.

  25. Lun M, Lok E, Gautam S, Wu E, Wong ET. The natural history of extracranial metastasis from glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol. 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalokhe G, Grimm SA, Chandler JP, Helenowski I, Rademaker A, Raizer JJ. Metastatic glioblastoma: case presentations and a review of the literature. J Neurooncol. 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bathla G, Gupta S, Moritani T. Primary leptomeningeal glioblastoma with systemic metastases—case report and review of literature. Clin Imaging. 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. di Vita Carvalho JA, de Lima Barbosa CC, Feher O, Maldaun MVC, de Camargo VP, Moraes FY, et al. Systemic dissemination of glioblastoma: literature review. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Georgescu MM, Olar A. Genetic and histologic spatiotemporal evolution of recurrent, multifocal, multicentric and metastatic glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen BM, Miranda C, Hatzoglou V, Deangelis LM, Miller AM. Leptomeningeal metastases in glioma: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience. Neurology. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Grah JJ, Katalinic D, Stern-Padovan R, Paladino J, Santek F, Juretic A, et al. Leptomeningeal and intramedullary metastases of glioblastoma multiforme in a patient reoperated during adjuvant radiochemotherapy. World J Surg Oncol. 2013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharma D, Gupta A, Dhillon GS, Chhabra SS. Late onset leptomeningeal and whole spine metastasis from supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: an uncommon manifestation of a common tumor. J Craniovertebral Junction Spine. 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. Oncol Times. 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Woo PYM, Lam TC, Pu JKS, Li LF, Leung RCY, Ho JMK, et al. Regression of BRAFV600E mutant adult glioblastoma after primary combined BRAF-MEK inhibitor targeted therapy: a report of two cases. Oncotarget. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kushnirsky M, Feun LG, Gultekin SH, de la Fuente MI. Prolonged complete response with combined dabrafenib and trametinib after BRAF inhibitor failure in BRAF-mutant glioblastoma. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kanemaru Y, Natsumeda M, Okada M, Saito R, Kobayashi D, Eda T, et al. Dramatic response of BRAF V600E-mutant epithelioid glioblastoma to combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitor: establishment and xenograft of a cell line to predict clinical efficacy. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Schreck KC, Grossman SA, Pratilas CA. BRAF mutations and the utility of RAF and MEK inhibitors in primary brain tumors. Cancers. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith-Cohn M, Davidson C, Colman H, Cohen AL. Challenges of targeting BRAF V600E mutations in adult primary brain tumor patients: a report of two cases. CNS Oncol. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kowalewski A, Durślewicz J, Zdrenka M, Grzanka D, Szylberg Ł. Clinical relevance of BRAF V600E mutation status in brain tumors with a focus on a novel management algorithm. Target Oncol. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Scoccianti S, Detti B, Meattini I, Iannalfi A, Sardaro A, Leonulli BG, et al. Symptomatic leptomeningeal and intramedullary metastases from intracranial glioblastoma multiforme: a case report. Tumori. 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yerneni K, Fatemi P, Vogel H, Li G, Zygourakis CC. Leptomeningeal spread with spinal involvement of pineal glioblastoma at initial presentation: a case report. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pohar S, Taylor W, Chandan VS, Shah H, Sagerman RH. Primary presentation of glioblastoma multiforme with leptomeningeal metastasis in the absence of previous craniotomy: a case report. Am J Clin Oncol. 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sibanda Z, Farahani N, Ogbonnaya E, Albanese E. Glioblastoma multiforme: a rare case of spinal drop metastasis. World Neurosurg. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vincent FM. Spinal leptomeningeal invasion from intracranial glioblastoma multiforme. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983.

  45. Lin L, Innerfield CE, Cuccurullo SJ. Symptomatic spinal leptomeningeal metastasis from intracranial glioblastoma multiforme. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Karaca M, Andrieu MN, Hicsonmez A, Guney Y, Kurtman C. Cases of glioblastoma multiforme metastasizing to spinal cord. Neurol India. 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shuangshoti S, Shuangshoti S. Primary diffuse leptomeningeal glioblastoma multiforme of brainstem and spinal cord clinically mimicking meningitis: case report and review of literature. J Med Assoc Thailand. 1996.

  48. Kong X, Wang Y, Liu S, Chen K, Zhou Q, Yan C, et al. Brain stem and entire spinal leptomeningeal dissemination of supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme in a patient during postoperative radiochemotherapy: case report and review of the literatures. Medicine. 2015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Witoonpanich P, Bamrungrak K, Jinawath A, Wongwaisayawan S, Phudhichareonrat S, Witoonpanich R. Glioblastoma multiforme at the corpus callosum with spinal leptomeningeal metastasis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Behling F, Schittenhelm J. Oncogenic BRAF alterations and their role in brain tumors. Cancers. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Kaley T, Touat M, Subbiah V, Hollebecque A, Rodon J, Lockhart AC, et al. BRAF inhibition in BRAFV600-mutant gliomas: results from the VE-BASKET study. J Clin Oncol. 2018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zaman A, Wu W, Bivona TG. Targeting oncogenic BRAF: past, present, and future. Cancers. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Qazi MA, Vora P, Venugopal C, Sidhu SS, Moffat J, Swanton C, et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity: pathways to treatment resistance and relapse in human glioblastoma. Ann Oncol. 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sugiura Y, Nagaishi M. Clinical relevance of BRAF status in glial and glioneuronal tumors: a systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Aum DJ, Kim DH, Beaumont TL, Leuthardt EC, Dunn GP, Kim AH. Molecular and cellular heterogeneity: the hallmark of glioblastoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr. rer. nat. Martin Rao, Jeffrey Naef, and Dr. med. Adriano Curti for proofreading our manuscript. Especially, we thank Dr. Bart Vrugt (Department of Pathology) for supporting our publication with histopathologic specimens.


The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by RJN and EG. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RJN, and both authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roopa Jayarama-Naidu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent was collected when tumor extirpation for pathological analyses was done.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or any disclosures. The authors have not published, posted, or submitted any papers related to this case report.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayarama-Naidu, R., Gallus, E. Abnormal Schwannoma-like Growth of multiple, multifocal BRAF V600E-positive Glioblastoma in the Interior Acoustic Canal with Leptomeningeal Infiltration: a case report. J Med Case Reports 16, 50 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: