Skip to main content

Correction to: Locked twins—remote from term: a case report

The Original Article was published on 12 March 2021

Correction to: J Med Case Rep (2021) 15:115 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02725-5

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors would like to correct the approximate number of locked twins pregnancies in the Abstract under the heading Section "Background" and in the main article under the heading Section "Discussion".

The sentence currently reads:

Locked twins is a rare and hazardous obstetric complication, which occurs in approximately 1:100 twin pregnancies.

The sentence should read:

Locked twins is a rare and hazardous obstetric complication, which occurs in approximately 1:1000 twin pregnancies.

The sentence currenty reads:

Locked twins is a rare, hazardous obstetric complication, which occurs in approximately 1:100 twin pregnancies [2, 3].

The sentence should read:

Locked twins is a rare, hazardous obstetric complication, which occurs in approximately 1:1000 twin pregnancies [2, 3].

The original article [1] has been corrected.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Fessehaye A, Abubeker FA, Daba M. Locked twins—remote from term: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2021;15:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02725-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Borah T, Das A. Locked twins: a rarity. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2012;2(2):204.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sevitz H, Merrell DA. The use of a beta-sympathomimetic drug in locked twins: case report. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;88(1):76–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abraham Fessehaye.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fessehaye, A., Abubeker, F.A. & Daba, M. Correction to: Locked twins—remote from term: a case report. J Med Case Reports 15, 502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-03130-8

Download citation