Skip to main content

Orbital myeloid sarcoma misdiagnosed for subperiostal hematoma: a case report

Abstract

Background

Myeloid sarcoma is a solid tumor that consists of immature myeloid cells occurring at an extramedullary site. It can present before, concurrent with, or after the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia or other myeloproliferative diseases, and a proportion of patients never develop bone marrow infiltration. Only a few isolated cases of pediatric orbital myeloid sarcoma have been reported, and they are often associated with a high misdiagnosis rate.

Case report

We report a rare case of pediatric orbital myeloid sarcoma associated with blunt trauma in a 3-year-old Caucasian male patient, which was clinically and radiologically misdiagnosed for orbital subperiostal hematoma. The patient underwent a surgical intervention to drain the hematoma when an orbital mass was found. The microscopic, immunologic, and genetic features of the tumor and the myelogram were in favor of LAM2, and the patient was started with chemotherapy with a favorable evolution within 18 months follow-up.

Conclusion

Orbital myeloid sarcoma usually exhibits clinical and radiological features that can be easily misleading, especially if it happens de novo or as the first manifestation of acute myeloid leukemia. Only a few isolated cases have reported and proposed trauma as a trigger event of the onset of this type of tumor proliferation, but further investigations and evidence are needed to support this hypothesis.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Myeloid sarcoma (MS), also known as granulocytic sarcoma (GS) or chloroma, is a solid tumor lesion that consists of cells of the myeloid lineage in varying stages of maturation, occurring at an extramedullary site [1]. MS can represent a complication of different myelodysplastic syndromes. It is commonly associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is hence known as extramedullary manifestation of AML. MS occurs in approximately 4–5% of children with acute myeloid leukemia and may develop before, during, or after the occurrence of AML [2, 3]. Only a few isolated cases of pediatric orbital MS have been reported, and they are often associated with a high misdiagnosis rate.

Orbital MS usually exhibits clinical and radiological features that can be easily misleading, especially if it happens de novo or as the first manifestation of AML. Trauma as a cause of MS is unusual, and it is a controversial predisposing factor in the initiation of tumor proliferation. Hence, patient’s history, clinical findings, and conventional radiological investigations may not be sufficient to list MS as a possible diagnosis in front of orbital blunt trauma. This case is reported here for its rarity and its unusual misleading presentation that could delay diagnosis and treatment.

Case report

A 3-year-old Caucasian male patient presented to us with a swelling of 2 weeks duration in the left eye. The onset was gradual and was preceded by blunt eye trauma in a traffic accident. The patient was initially admitted to another hospital, where the initial examination revealed a left periorbital ecchymosis with subconjunctival hemorrhage and proptosis without any vision loss. After 2 weeks of surveillance, the patient presented a persistent proptosis for which he was addressed to our structure. The admission examination found a slight proptosis of the left eye with a tender swelling palpable at the inferior orbital region that was pushing the globe upwards (Fig. 1). Movements of the globe as well as pupillary function were normal. No abnormalities were found in the examination of the anterior and posterior segments. His intraocular pressure in both eyes was in the average range. Neurological examination found no signs of intracranial hypertension, of sensory or motor deficiency. The rest of the physical examination found no signs of distant lesions such as osteoarticular pain, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, enlarged lymph nodes, or dullness of the flanks. No notable history of hematopathy or weight loss were presented, and the patient’s parents are not related. A craniofacial computed tomography (CT) was performed showing a spontaneously hyperdense, oval-shaped, extraconal mass measuring 29 × 19 mm without significant enhancement after contrast injection. This mass repressed the inferior and external rectus muscles and was not associated with any bone abnormalities (Fig. 2). In front of these clinical and radiological findings, the first diagnosis proposed was an inferolateral subperiostal hematoma. An inferior mediopalpebral incision was performed to drain the hematoma when a pale yellowish tumor was found against the orbital floor (Fig. 3). An excision of the mass was done. Microscopy showed the features of a round-cell tumor infiltrating the fibrocollagenous tissue. On immunohistochemistry, cells expressed positivity for anti-Myeloperoxydase (anti-MPO) and CD-45, and were negative for S-100 and myogenin. Complete blood count revealed: hemoglobin (Hb) 11.9 g/dl, total leucocyte count (TLC) 19540/mm3 with 20% blasts. Liver and renal functions were within normal limits [alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 23 UI/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 17 UI/L, total bilirubin 11.7 mg/L, urea 0.27 g/L, creatinine 6.8 mg/L]. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis, and syphilis serology was negative. Blood culture and cytobacteriological examination of urine revealed no pathogens. White blood cells in the cerebrospinal fluid were < 5 elements/mm3. Bone marrow aspirate smears revealed the presence of 24% blasts, and the diagnosis of orbital myeloid sarcoma with acute myeloid leukemia was made. The patient was t (8;21) (q22;q22) positive, and the subtype was AML M2. Thus, the patient was started on induction therapy, with intravenous cytarabine (Ara-C: 15 mg/12 hours the first, second, and third day of chemotherapy) and daunorubicin (10 mg/day, the third and fourth day), followed by consolidation with both molecules plus intrathecal administration of methotrexate, Ara-C for two doses. On the 18th month follow-up, the patient was disease free.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Photograph of the patient showing the upward displacement of the left globe

Fig. 2
figure 2

Craniofacial computed tomography showing a spontaneously hyperdense, oval-shaped, extraconal mass repressing the inferior rectus muscle of the left orbit (arrows)

Fig. 3
figure 3

A photograph of the intraorbital tumor above the orbital floor (arrow)

Discussion

Our paper is a case report of an exceptional pediatric orbital myeloid sarcoma appearing after a blunt trauma and initially misdiagnosed as a subperiostal hematoma, which has never been reported in the literature. The first description of chloroma was reported in 1811 by Allen Burns, who described a green tumor involving the orbit. The green color is due to the exposure of the enzyme myeloperoxidase to ultraviolet light [4,5,6]. Rappaport renamed it granulocytic sarcoma in 1966, because up to 30% of granulocytic sarcomas do not display a green color [4, 6]. The term extramedullary myeloid tumor (EMMT) was proposed by Davey et al. [7], and it was not until 2002 when the name “myeloid sarcoma” was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) [8].

Myeloid sarcoma may occur as a separate entity, then called primary MS or de novo [2, 9], or secondarily associated with AML, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), polycythemia vera (PV), myelofibrosis, and essential thrombocytosis [2]. MS is a rare condition occurring in only 2.5–9.1% of patients with AML [4, 10]. Of these cases, 15–35% are concomitant with AML, 25% precede AML, and up to 50% of the cases occur after the diagnosis of AML. It might as well be the initial manifestation of relapse [1]. It affects mostly children, since 60% of MS patients are younger than 15 years old [11], with a median age at diagnosis of 2.8 years (range, 1 month to 18 years) [9]. The most common sites of MS include skin, bone, gum, soft tissues, orbit, lymph nodes, mediastinum, peritoneum, small intestine, paranasal sinuses, epidural sites, lung, heart, bladder, uterus, and ovaries [2, 9, 10, 12, 13]. The orbit appears to be a favored site for MS in the pediatric population [9, 14].

Proptosis is the most common presenting clinical sign of orbital MS. Some of the various other presentations described include lacrimal gland swelling, chemosis, epiphora, eyelid tumor, iris tumor, uveitis, conjunctival mass, ophthalmoplegia, vision loss, optic neuropathy, exotropia, and scleral mass [4,5,6, 15, 16]. It has been reported that orbital MS on CT appears as a well-defined mass, which may arise intraconally or extraconally. It molds to the bone and contiguous structures, including the sclera and the orbital bones. The mass is usually homogeneous, isodense, or hyperdense to brain tissue, with homogeneous enhancement after contrast media injection. However, in some cases, it can exhibit some nonenhancing areas corresponding to the inner necrotic areas, which is considered as a sign of rapid growth [4, 11].

In the absence of a known history of myelodysplastic syndromes, MS can be easily misdiagnosed as a number of other neoplastic diseases depending on the site of involvement. the rate of misdiagnosis has been reported to be in the range of 25–47% [12]. Orbital MS is often considered a diagnostic dilemma, and the differential diagnosis includes malignant lymphoproliferative disorder, primitive neuroectodermal tumor, Ewing’s sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, small round-cell tumors, retinoblastoma (especially in pediatric patients), and metastasis [1, 2, 8]. Other more challenging mimickers to be considered include vascular lesion, orbital cellulitis, and hematoma [4, 5, 11, 14]. In our case, due to the clinical and radiological features and to the patient’s history of blunt trauma, subperiostal hematoma (SPH) was the diagnosis to evoke. SPH is due to relatively loose attachment between the periosteum and the orbital bones, except at the suture, thus creating a potential space for the hematomas to develop. With age, this attachment becomes firmer, which accounts for the decreased incidence in adults [17, 18]. Traumatic SPH occurs either immediately or within days following orbital trauma. The characteristic findings include proptosis, displacement of the globe, chemosis, motility impairment, and varying degrees of visual impairment [18]. The hematoma is recognizable by its morphology reminiscent of the lentiform shape of an intracranial epidural hematoma, with a broad base, displacement of the orbital content, and optic nerve stretching. As with hematomas in other locations, SPH is spontaneously hyperdense with respect to skeletal muscles and does not enhance, and is therefore hypodense relative to the extraocular muscles on contrast-enhanced CT [17,18,19]. The differential diagnosis includes neoplasms and inflammation [19]

MS is thought to occur in bone marrow and then spread via Haversian canals to penetrate periosteum and then form a soft-tissue mass. This would account for the typical location near bony structures, which is the case of orbits. The exact mechanism of extramedullary spread is not fully understood. However, some studies found that deregulation of core-binding factor transcription factors, which are involved in cellular adhesion and recognition, may be part of the pathogenesis of MS. The blast neural adhesion molecule (CD56) may have a role in the pathogenesis as well; it has been supported by the fact that a high incidence of MS has been associated with CD56 blast expression, common with t (8; 21). Chemokine receptor–ligand interaction that orchestrates the migration of cells to peripheral tissues has also been incriminated, since AML blasts were found to express some chemokine receptors not seen in blasts of bone marrow and peripheral blood [8, 14, 20].

Blunt trauma can cause local tissue degeneration, and necrosis, and finally, result in cell atypia during the healing process. Only a few isolated cases had history of orbital trauma preceding the onset of MS and proposed trauma to be a possible trigger event for the onset of this type of malignancy [5, 15, 21]; however, it remains a controversial risk factor in the onset of MS, and further evidence is needed to verify this hypothesis. Most of the reported cases that had a hematologic tumor after trauma usually developed to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [15].

White blood cell (WBC) count at diagnosis, French–American–British (FAB) immunologic subtypes, and cytogenetics are the main important prognostic factors and, thus, must be performed for all patients [3, 22]. Studies have demonstrated that monosomal karyotypes are independent risk factors for poor prognosis, that MS patients with chromosome 8 abnormalities had a worse prognosis, and that intensive chemotherapies were needed in these groups [23, 24]. Overall, an extramedullary leukemic infiltration is a bad prognostic sign, because it might act as a reservoir for proliferation of leukemic cells and an eventual relapse [6, 25]. For this reason, primary myeloid sarcoma should be treated as AML even in the absence of clinically detectable AML. The treatment modalities include induction and consolidation therapy with regiments containing citarabin similar to those with AML [1, 12, 15]. Radiotherapy and debulking surgery could be used in conjunction with systemic therapies, primarily in patients who need rapid symptomatic relief. In the case of orbital involvement, radiation could be used to obtain relief from compressive symptoms and to reduce visual deterioration, and it may also be useful to avoid enucleation [2, 10, 12]. Bone marrow transplantation or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCST) and targeted therapy based on agents such as FLT3 inhibitors, farnesyltransferase inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors could also be considered as therapeutic options for MS patients.

Conclusion

Orbital myeloid sarcoma is a rare form of extramedullary leukemic infiltration. Blunt trauma is rarely associated with such tumor proliferation and needs more investigation before being accepted as an actual risk factor, though it still deserves more attention for early diagnosis and timely and proper treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis is vital for the early diagnosis of this kind of disease, which is usually misdiagnosed. Systemic chemotherapy is more effective than radiotherapy or surgery alone, even in the absence of bone marrow infiltration.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials supporting this work are available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

References

  1. Siraj F, Kaur M, Dalal V, Khanna A, Khan AA. Myeloid sarcoma: a report of four cases at unusual sites. Ger Med Sci. 2021;9:15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pathy S, Venkatesulu BP, Mallick S, Chander S. Radiation therapy in paediatric orbital granulocytic sarcomas: experience from a tertiary cancer center. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(10):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gözdaşoğlu S. Remarks on myeloid sarcoma in children. Turk J Haematol. 2019;36(2):122–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. AlSemari MA, Perrotta M, Russo C, Alkatan HM, Maktabi A, Elkhamary S, et al. Orbital myeloid sarcoma (chloroma): report of 2 cases and literature review. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020;19:100806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhat VK, Naseeruddin K, Narayanaswamy GN. Sino-orbital chloroma presenting as unilateral proptosis in a boy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(11):1595–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balyen L, Deniz Balyen LS, Pasa S. A case of orbital granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma) well responded to the treatment. Adv Ophthalmol Vis Syst. 2016;5(1):00139.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menasce B, Beckett H. Extra-medullary myeloid tumour (granulocytic sarcoma) is often misdiagnosed: a study of 26 cases. Histopathology. 1999;34(5):391–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Magdy M, Abdel Karim N, Eldessouki I, Gaber O, Rahouma M, Ghareeb M. Myeloid sarcoma. ORT. 2019;42(4):219–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou T, Bloomquist MS, Ferguson LS, Reuther J, Marcogliese AN, Elghetany MT, et al. Pediatric myeloid sarcoma: a single institution clinicopathologic and molecular analysis. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2020;37(1):76–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta AJ, Mandal S, Gupta R, Khurana N, Gulati A. Myeloid sarcoma presenting as nasal and orbital mass: an initial manifestation of an acute myeloid leukaemia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(7):24–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guermazi A, Feger C, Rousselot P, Merad M, Benchaib N, Bourrier P, et al. Granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma). Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(2):319–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yilmaz AF, Saydam G, Sahin F, Baran Y. Granulocytic sarcoma: a systematic review. Am J Blood Res. 2013;3(4):265–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Alkatan H, Chaudhry I. Myeloid sarcoma of the orbit. Ann Saudi Med. 2008;28(6):461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stein-Wexler R, Wootton-Gorges SL, West DC. Orbital granulocytic sarcoma: an unusual presentation of acute myelocytic leukemia. Ped Radiol. 2003;33(2):136–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng Y, Yu C, Zhu S, Guo L, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Nonleukemic granulocytic sarcoma of orbit after blunt trauma. Medicine. 13;97:15

  16. O’Neill JP, Harrison AR, Cameron JD, Mokhtarzadeh A. Granulocytic sarcoma of the orbit presenting as a fulminant orbitopathy in an adult with acute myeloid leukemia. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;33(3):S118–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meltzer DE, Mirbagheri S, Aygun N. Subperiosteal hematoma of the orbit: a variety of presentations. J Radiol Case Rep. 2019;13(6):13–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ganesan K, Fabbroni G, Loukota R, Craggs L. Traumatic subperiosteal hematoma of the orbit: a report of 2 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(6):1266–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Seigel RS, Williams AG, Hutchison JW, Wolter JR, Carlow TJ, Rogers DE. Subperiosteal hematomas of the orbit: angiographic and computed tomographic diagnosis. Radiology. 1982;143(3):711–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Faaij CM, Willemze AJ, Révész T, Balzarolo M, Tensen CP, Hoogeboom M, et al. Chemokine/chemokine receptor interactions in extramedullary leukaemia of the skin in childhood AML: differential roles for CCR2, CCR5, CXCR4 and CXCR7. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55(2):344–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nishimura S, Kyuma Y, Kamijo A, Maruta A. Isolated recurrence of granulocytic sarcoma manifesting as extra-and intracranial masses—case report. Neurol Med Chir. 2004;44(6):311–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chaudhry IA, Alaraj AM, Alkatan HM. Unilateral eyelid swelling, proptosis and diplopia as initial manifestation of acute myeloid leukemia. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012;26(2):241–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu J, Huang B, Liu X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Chen L, et al. Poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia patients with monosomal karyotypes. Turk J Hematol. 2017;34(2):126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsimberidou AM, Kantarjian HM, Estey E, Cortes JE, Verstovsek S, Faderl S, et al. Outcome in patients with nonleukemic granulocytic sarcoma treated with chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Leukemia. 2003;17(6):1100–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thakur B, Varma K, Misra V, Chauhan S. Granulocytic sarcoma presenting as an orbital mass: report of two cases. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(8):1704–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BR: study concept, data collection, writing the paper, and revising the the manuscript following the reviewer’s instructions. MR: study concept, data collection, and revising the manuscript. SEM: study concept and revising the manuscript. FS: reviewing and validating the manuscript’s credibility. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahaa Razem.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study is exempt from ethical approval.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Razem, B., Raiteb, M., El Mrini, S. et al. Orbital myeloid sarcoma misdiagnosed for subperiostal hematoma: a case report. J Med Case Reports 15, 501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-03025-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-03025-8

Keywords