Skip to main content

When a rare simultaneous infection simulates a local extension of a rectal cancer: a case report

Abstract

Background

Actinomycosis is a rare chronic infection caused by Actinomyces. The abdominopelvic localization of this pathology makes preoperative diagnosis extremely exceptional. The following report is the case of a patient treated for adenocarcinoma of the middle rectum associated with mesorectal actinomycosis. The diagnosis of actinomycosis was made postoperatively.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old Caucasian male patient was admitted for rectal bleeding. Clinical and paraclinical assessment revealed a middle rectum adenocarcinoma with local extension in the mesorectum. The patient underwent an anterior resection of the rectum by laparotomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative follow-up was simple. Pathological study of the specimen noted complete sterilization of the rectal adenocarcinoma and the presence of large foci of suppurative necrosis containing actinomycotic grains in the mesorectum.

Conclusion

Abdominopelvic actinomycosis is a rare pathology and has therefore rarely been dealt with. This issue can lead to unnecessary and mutilating surgery. We report an exceptional coincidence of rectal adenocarcinoma and mesorectal actinomycosis mistaken for mesorectal extension of the cancer.

Peer Review reports

Background

Actinomycosis is a rare chronic granulomatous infection caused by Actinomyces, which are saprophytic bacteria in the oral cavity and the digestive tract. The abdominopelvic localization of actinomycosis, often overlooked because of its rarity, poses problems of differential diagnosis especially with neoplastic pathology. The rarity of this pathology is why its diagnosis has often been established on surgical resection pieces. These resections are often mutilating and unnecessary since the treatment is simply based on antibiotics [1].

The following report is the case of a patient with “locally advanced” adenocarcinoma of the middle rectum through which the final histologic examination of the surgical specimen revealed a complete response of the adenocarcinoma to the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy associated with mesorectal actinomycosis. The local extension of the cancer in the mesorectum, suspected preoperatively, was nothing other than this synchronous mesorectal actinomycosis.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old Caucasian male patient with well-balanced type 2 diabetes consulted for rectal bleeding and rectal syndrome. Rectal examination revealed a budding and circumferential tumor at 7 cm of the anal margin; the rest of the clinical examination was normal.

Colonoscopy revealed ulcerative budding tumor 7 cm from the anal verge; exploration of the rest of the colon showed no other anomalies. Pathological examination of the biopsy revealed a well-differentiated and infiltrating lieberkuhnien adenocarcinoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a circumferential and irregular parietal thickness of the middle rectum, associated with a heterogeneous mass with exophytic development, infiltrating the mesorectum and arriving at the contact of the mesorectal fascia on the right (Figs. 1,2). Thoracoabdominopelvic CT scan did not show secondary locations. Blood tests noted anemia at 10.8 g/dl without any other abnormality.

Fig. 1
figure1

MRI showing the rectal tumor (red arrow) with its “extension” in the mesorectum (yellow arrow)

Fig. 2
figure2

The actinomycotic pseudotumor (yellow arrow)

Due to the low location of the cancer and its “local extension,” chemoradiotherapy (CR) administered over a period of 5 weeks was established. An anterior resection of the rectum with low mechanical colorectal anastomosis protected by an ileostomy was performed 10 weeks after the end of the CR. The operation was carried out by laparotomy to minimize the risk of intrusion of the mesorectum. Postoperative follow-up was simple. Pathological study of the specimen noted the complete sterilization of the tumor after CR with the presence of large foci of suppurative necrosis containing actinomycotic grains in the mesorectum; lymph node dissection revealed ten negative nodes (Figure 3). No adjuvant treatment was recommended. However, antibiotic therapy by protected amoxicillin has been established.

Fig. 3
figure3

Resection specimen showing tumor stenosis (blue arrow) and actinomycotic pseudotumor (red arrow)

Discussion

Actinomycosis is a slow and misleading granulomatous infection caused by Actinomyces, which is Gram-positive, strict anaerobic bacteria. Actinomyces israelii is the principal pathogenic species isolated in human infections [1].

These bacteria are saprophytes of humans’ natural cavities, particularly the oral cavity, the digestive tract, and the genital mucosa [2,3,4]. These bacteria become pathogenic after breaking of the gastrointestinal mucosa following abdominopelvic surgery, infection, or appendicular and diverticular perforation, or during immunosuppression due to diabetes, steroids, or cancer [5, 6]. Once the mucosa is affected, the infection spreads by contiguity, explaining the damage to organs nearby. Hematogenous or lymphatic spread is rare [1, 7]. The abdominal location of actinomycosis represents 20–24% and ranks second after the cervicofacial location (60%); the thoracic location does not exceed 15%. In the abdominal form, the ileocecal region is affected in more than half of cases (65%) [1, 2]. Pelvic actinomycosis can arise from an anal crypt causing anal or rectal fistulas, and can also be caused by intrauterine device or intravaginal foreign body [2, 8].

Actinomycosis evolves insidiously over months or years. It typically gives abscesses that evolve in the long term to the formation of pseudotumors that invade organs close by. The clinical presentation varies depending on the stage of the evolution of the disease; in the acute phase, it can take on the appearance of peritonitis or pelviperitonitis with an infectious syndrome. Later, in the pseudotumor phase, the tumor syndrome is in the foreground with a palpable, ill-defined, and sensitive mass, more or less indurated with a tendency to invade the abdominal wall and to fistulate on the skin [1, 9].

Biology is not very contributory, and hyperleukocytosis with elevation of inflammatory markers can be noted in suppurative forms [10, 11].

Imaging examinations are not specific. Ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) scan can show a solid or cystic mass, with thick walls, multilocular or not, frequently evoking a neoplastic process [1, 12]. In addition to specifying locoregional extension of the disease, these examinations can guide a percutaneous biopsy for histologic study that confirms the diagnosis when it reveals actinomycotic grains [2, 12, 13].

Bacteriological diagnosis is difficult and must meet a couple of requirements: sampling and seeding done in rigorous aseptic conditions, and anaerobic culture (7–20 days) in special environments [1].

Differential diagnosis arises mainly with cancer, tuberculosis, Crohn’s disease, and amoebiasis or appendicitis [5].

The treatment of actinomycosis is based on antibiotic therapy by high doses of penicillin G administered intravenously (10–20 MIU) for 4–6 weeks followed by oral relay with amoxicillin + clavulanic acid associated to metronidazole for 6–12 months. In the case of an allergy to penicillin, other antibiotics can be used: tetracyclines, macrolides, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, or rifampicin [1, 14].

The particularity of our observation is that the diagnosis of actinomycosis was a fortuitous discovery. Indeed, the extension of the rectal adenocarcinoma in the mesorectum, objectified on imaging tests, and which did not regress after the neoadjuvant CR, was only a mesorectal actinomycotic pseudotumor. This has often been mistaken as a locally advanced cancer with a bad prognosis and risk of incomplete resection. It also was why we opted straight away for a median laparotomy instead of a laparoscopy to minimize the risk of mesorectal break-in.

Conclusion

The abdominopelvic actinomycosis is a rare pathology, with misleading clinical manifestations, which can often be the cause of differential diagnosis with several diseases including cancer. In our case, the occurrence of mesorectal actinomycosis is probably due to the development of the adenocarcinoma in the rectum and mistaken for a local extension of this cancer.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Ketata S, Ben Mabrouk M, Derbel F, Fodha I, Sabri Y, Trabelsi A, et al. Actinomycoses abdominales à forme tumorale: une série rétrospective de sept observations. Rev Médecine Interne. 2010;31:735–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Benkhraba K, Benkabbou A, El Malki HO, Amahzoune M, Mohsine R, Ifrine L, et al. Actinomycose digestive: trois cas et revue de la litérature. Gastroentérologie Clin Biol. 2006;30:775–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Noomene F, Zouari K, Kallel W, Nasr M, Ketata M, Hamdi A. Abdominal actinomycosis. Three cases. Presse Medicale Paris Fr. 1983;2003(32):698–700.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bedoui R, Nouira R, Zribi R, Guesmi F, Ben Achour J, Daghfous M, et al. Abdomino-pelvic actinomycosis: a case report. Tunis Med. 2002;80:645–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Louzi A, Rifki SE, Benamar Y, Attari M, Kafih M, Zerouali NO. Actinomycose colique: à propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature. Ann Chir. 2005;130:101–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sergent F, Marpeau L. Actinomycose abdominopelvienne: un syndrome tumoral lié à une bactérie. J Chir (Paris). 2004;141:150–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Michel P. Actinomycose pelvienne révélée par une pelvipéritonite. Ann Chir. 2004;129:96–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Atallah D, Lizee DS, Van den Akker M, Gadonneix P, Tranbaloc P, Villet R. Genital actinomycosis. Diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Report of three cases. Ann Chir. 1999;53:291–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sumer Y, Yilmaz B, Emre B, Ugur C. Abdominal mass secondary to actinomyces infection: an unusual presentation and its treatment. J Postgrad Med. 2004;50:115–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Znati K, Nabih N, Hamouch A, Mahassini N, Bemoussi Z, Jahid A, et al. Actinomycose abdominale: À propos de 3 cas. Rev Francoph Lab. 2006;2006:73–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hsiao H-L, Shen J-T, Yeh H-C, Wu W-J, Wang C-J, Huang C-H. Intra- and extra-abdominal actinomycosis mimicking urachal tumor in an intrauterine device carrier: a case report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008;24:35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tlili-Graiess K, Arifa-Achour N, Dali KM, Sriha B, Dahmen Y. Actinomycose abdominale. À propos de 4 observations radiocliniques. J Radiol Paris. 2001;82:67–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guinier D, Mathieu P, Baulard R, Viennet G, Mantion G. Une pseudocarcinose péritonéale. Ann Chir. 2005;393:141.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Choi M-M, Beak JH, Lee JN, Park S, Lee W-S. Clinical features of abdominopelvic actinomycosis: report of twenty cases and literature review. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50:555–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HB participated in the conception and design of the report and wrote the manuscript. JF, MR, AE, and AZ evaluated the patient and were major contributors in writing the manuscript. HB, ML, AE, and RE performed the surgical management. AA and RE reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hicham Baba.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baba, H., Fassi Fihri, J., Ramraoui, M.E. et al. When a rare simultaneous infection simulates a local extension of a rectal cancer: a case report. J Med Case Reports 15, 401 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02989-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Actinomycosis
  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Mesorectum