Skip to main content

A novel CD74-ROS1 gene fusion in a patient with inflammatory breast cancer: a case report



CD74-ROS1 fusion genes have been detected in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC), but not in inflammatory breast cancer.

Case presentation

Herein, we report a CD74-ROS1 fusion gene identified in a 64-year-old Chinese woman with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). The patient initially presented with a rapidly growing mass in the left breast with diffuse erythema developing over a period of 2 months. Diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma was made by core needle biopsy. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) demonstrated multiple organ metastases. Genomic DNA was extracted from tumor tissue and analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). The CD74-ROS1 fusion gene was detected in the genomic DNA. The patient refused crizotinib treatment, and could not tolerate the side effects of palliative chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the patient died 4 months after diagnosis.


We report the case of a CD74-ROS1 fusion gene in a patient with IBC. This may reveal, for the first time, a possible association between CD74-ROS1 gene fusion and rapid progression of inflammatory breast cancer. Multigene panel testing can be performed when rapidly progressive breast cancer occurs and could reveal potential therapeutic strategies.

Peer Review reports


Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive disease that accounts for ~ 2.5% of all invasive breast cancer and is characterized by rapid progression and worse prognosis [1]. The overall survival of IBC patients is shorter than that of non-IBC patients; several studies show 5-year and 15-year overall survival of approximately 40% and 20%, respectively [1,2,3]. The identification of oncogenic drivers and subsequent targeting of these proteins could be a promising treatment strategy for IBC. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology provides a highly efficient method to obtain vast genomic information which could be useful for treatment selection. In this study, we report a CD74-ROS1 fusion gene detected by NGS in a patient with IBC. Based on a literature search, chromosomal rearrangements involving the ROS1 gene were first described in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and CD74-ROS1 fusion transcripts were also detected in NSCLC [3, 4]. A CD74-ROS1 fusion gene in breast cancer has never been reported in the literature.

Case presentation

A 64-year-old Chinese woman presented to the clinic with a painless mass on the left breast. The mass had been present for approximately 1 year, with relatively slow progression, and had only rapidly increased in size in the past 2 months. She had no remarkable family history. A physical examination revealed diffuse erythema, skin ridging and peau d’orange appearance of the skin (Fig. 1). Breast mass size was 7.0 cm×6.5 cm. There were multiple enlarged and fused lymph nodes in the axilla and supraclavicular region. Ultrasound showed a hypoechoic area with irregular shape and unclear border (Fig. 1). Internally, the hypoechoic area was asymmetrical, and a strong increase in blood flow was detected within the lesion. Ultrasound also showed enlarged lymph nodes in the axilla and supraclavicular region. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a heterogeneously distributed lesion of high signal intensity in the left breast on T1-weighted images. The breast mass was rapidly enhanced following the injection of gadolinium diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (Fig. 2). Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) indicated increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the left breast, in the nodes of the chest wall and the nodes of the left posterior basal lung. PET/CT also demonstrated additional uptake in the internal mammary, mediastinum (4R, 4L, 5 and 7 groups) and hilum of the lung (10 and 11 groups), and bilateral cervical, retroperitoneal and bilateral iliac blood vessel lymph nodes. Increased uptake in the liver was observed as well (Fig. 3). Core needle aspiration was performed for the diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast in July 2017. Diagnosis of breast carcinoma was made by both hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and immunostaining. This breast carcinoma was immunohistochemically negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The carcinoma was immunohistochemically positive for P53, E-cadherin and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (Fig. 4). Based on these pathological results, combined with the clinical characteristics, this patient was diagnosed with IBC (cT4N3M1). The patient was enrolled in a clinical study analyzing IBC genomic mutation status using NGS. Following verbal and written informed consent, genomic DNA was extracted from tumor tissue. Tumor tissue DNA was sequenced by target region capture sequencing using a previously described NGS technique [5]. TP53BP1 and ARID1A nonsense mutations and a CD74-ROS1 fusion gene were detected in the genomic DNA. The CD74-ROS1 fusion gene combined an exon 7 of CD74 and an exon 34 of ROS1, and the ROS1 protein was overexpressed, driven by this fusion oncogene in breast tumor tissues (Fig. 5).

Fig. 1.
figure 1

Gross finding and ultrasound (US) examination. Diffuse erythema, skin ridging and peau d’orange appearance of the left breast skin. a US showed a hypoechoic area with irregular shape and unclear border. b Color Doppler US showed increased blood flow within the lesion.

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI showed the heterogeneously distributed lesion in an area of high signal intensity in the left breast on T1-weighted images. The breast mass was rapidly enhanced following the injection of gadolinium diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid at an early phase (2 minutes after agent injection).

Fig. 3.
figure 3

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging. PET/CT indicated increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the left breast (a), in liver (b) and bilateral iliac blood vessels lymph nodes and bones (c). The arrow indicated the point that had increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. Showed the 310 increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the whole body (d).

Fig. 4.
figure 4

Immunohistochemical staining imaging. The breast carcinoma was immunohistochemically positive for E-cadherin, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and P53, and negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2.

Fig. 5.
figure 5

CD74-ROS1 fusion gene examination. a The reads map sequenced on ROS1. Each line represents a read. Pink or purple color represents sequenced reads in different directions. b The reads map of CD74. The neat truncation position of the frames indicates the breakpoint of the fusion of two genes. c The table shows the fusion position of CD74-ROS1. d The immunohistochemistry image for the ROS1 protein. The overexpression of the ROS1 protein was detected specifically in the cytoplasm of cancerous cells.

Chemotherapy (paclitaxel, 120mg) was given every week for a period of 3 weeks. Oral administration of capecitabine tablets (1.5 g twice daily, days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle) was given for three cycles due to unacceptable anorexia with paclitaxel. The patient refused crizotinib treatment for economic reasons and was confirmed dead in November 2017.

Discussion and conclusion

A CD74-ROS1 fusion gene, which has yet to be reported in a breast cancer patient, was detected in a 64-year-old Chinese woman diagnosed with IBC. This patient did not have any family history of cancer. The detected gene fusion occurred between exon 7 of CD74 and exon 34 of ROS1. ROS1 proteins were overexpressed in tumor tissue. The ROS1 gene, located on chromosome 6q22.1, encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), and is related to cell differentiation located in specific organs. In a mouse model, transient ROS1 expression during development in the kidney, intestine and lung coincided with major morphogenetic and differentiation events in these organs [6]. Furthermore, ROS1 transcripts were directly involved in inductive interactions between epithelial and mesenchymal cells in kidney and intestine development [6, 7]. In mice, ROS1 deficiency induced inappropriate regionalization and terminal differentiation of epithelial cells in the epididymis, whereas female ROS1-deficient mice developed normally with no affects on fertility [8]. Human ligand of ROS1 has not yet been identified, and the function of ROS1 needs further investigation [9].

A literature review revealed only one abstract reporting the occurrence of ROS1 fusion in breast cancer [10], and showed the alteration of GOPC-ROS1 fusion and response to crizotinib. In this study, we reported a novel ROS1 fusion in breast cancer. CD74-ROS1 fusion transcripts have been detected in 0.7–1.9% of patients with NSCLC [11,12,13,14]. In studies of NSCLC patients, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PT-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and NGS were the most commonly used methods to confirm the fusion gene. However, there are no approved companion assays for the diagnosis of CD74-ROS1 fusion. In this study, NGS and IHC were used for the analysis of the CD74-ROS1 fusion gene in the patient with IBC. We confirmed the CD74-ROS1 fusion gene for the first time in an IBC patient by NGS. In the IHC analysis, overexpression of the ROS1 protein in breast tumor tissue was confirmed. This is in line with results from other studies which showed overexpression of the ROS1 protein in primary lung tumor tissue and lymph node metastases when the CD74-ROS1 fusion gene was present in these tissues [3]. Crizotinib, a small-molecule inhibitor against anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS1 kinase, showed an objective response rate of 72% in a patient with NSCLC and ROS1 fusion [15]. For our patient harboring the CD74-ROS1 fusion gene, ROS1 fusion might be a viable drug target. Unfortunately, this IBC patient refused to undergo crizotinib treatment for financial reasons.

Other than the fusion gene, high mutation frequency of TP53BP1 and ARID1A was detected in this IBC patient. The TP53BP1 and ARID1A nonsense mutation frequency was 21% and 19.9%, respectively. As tumor suppressor genes, TP53BP1 and ARID1A have different roles in gene repair and stability. 53BP1 functions in two major double-strand break repair pathways, promoting nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and inhibiting homology-directed repair (HDR), and integrates cellular input to ensure their timely execution in the proper cellular contexts [16]. ARID1A plays a role in targeting SWI/SNF complexes to tissue-specific enhancers and in maintaining their chromatin accessibility, controlling the cell cycle and DNA damage checkpoint, and regulating P53 and telomerase activation [17]. The CD74-ROS1 fusion gene, in conjunction with the TP53BP1 and ARID1A nonsense mutations, may have contributed to the rapid progression of IBC disease in this patient, with only 18 months from discovery of breast lump to death.

In conclusion, this is the first report of a CD74-ROS1 fusion gene in a patient with IBC. Although the effect of crizotinib in patients with IBC harboring the CD74-ROS1 fusion gene remains unclear, genetic sequencing may help us in designing individualized treatment.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Matro JM, Li T, Cristofanilli M, Hughes ME, Ottesen RA, Weeks JC, Wong YN. Inflammatory breast cancer management in the national comprehensive cancer network: the disease, recurrence pattern, and outcome. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takeuchi K, Soda M, Togashi Y, Suzuki R, Sakata S, Hatano S, Asaka R, Hamanaka W, Ninomiya H, Uehara H, et al. RET, ROS1 and ALK fusions in lung cancer. Nat Med. 2012;18:378–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsuura S, Shinmura K, Kamo T, Igarashi H, Maruyama K, Tajima M, Ogawa H, Tanahashi M, Niwa H, Funai K, et al. CD74-ROS1 fusion transcripts in resected non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:1675–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roskoski R Jr. ROS1 protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of ROS1 fusion protein-driven non-small cell lung cancers. Pharmacol Res. 2017;121:202–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Li J, Wang H, Wang Y, He Q, Xia X, Hu ZY, Ouyang Q. Clinical and genetic risk factors for Fulvestrant treatment in post-menopause ER-positive advanced breast cancer patients. J Transl Med. 2019;17:27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sonnenberg E, Godecke A, Walter B, Bladt F, Birchmeier C. Transient and locally restricted expression of the ros1 protooncogene during mouse development. EMBO J. 1991;10:3693–702.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tessarollo L, Nagarajan L, Parada LF. c-ros: the vertebrate homolog of the sevenless tyrosine kinase receptor is tightly regulated during organogenesis in mouse embryonic development. Development. 1992;115:11–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sonnenberg-Riethmacher E, Walter B, Riethmacher D, Godecke S, Birchmeier C. The c-ros tyrosine kinase receptor controls regionalization and differentiation of epithelial cells in the epididymis. Genes Dev. 1996;10:1184–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin JJ, Shaw AT. Recent advances in targeting ROS1 in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:1611–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liao L, Song M, Li X, Tang L, Zhang T, Zhang L, Pan Y, Chouchane L, Ma X. E3 ubiquitin ligase UBR5 drives the growth and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2090–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergethon K, Shaw AT, Ou SH, Katayama R, Lovly CM, McDonald NT, Massion PP, Siwak-Tapp C, Gonzalez A, Fang R, et al. ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:863–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rimkunas VM, Crosby KE, Li D, Hu Y, Kelly ME, Gu TL, Mack JS, Silver MR, Zhou X, Haack H. Analysis of receptor tyrosine kinase ROS1-positive tumors in non-small cell lung cancer: identification of a FIG-ROS1 fusion. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:4449–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Davies KD, Le AT, Theodoro MF, Skokan MC, Aisner DL, Berge EM, Terracciano LM, Cappuzzo F, Incarbone M, Roncalli M, et al. Identifying and targeting ROS1 gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:4570–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshida A, Kohno T, Tsuta K, Wakai S, Arai Y, Shimada Y, Asamura H, Furuta K, Shibata T, Tsuda H. ROS1-rearranged lung cancer: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 15 surgical cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:554–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw AT, Ou SH, Bang YJ, Camidge DR, Solomon BJ, Salgia R, Riely GJ, Varella-Garcia M, Shapiro GI, Costa DB, et al. Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1963–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmermann M, de Lange T. 53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24:108–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mathur R. ARID1A loss in cancer: towards a mechanistic understanding. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;190:15–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Thanks to Geneplus Co., Ltd., for the technical support.


Hunan Natural Science Foundation (2020JJ4916), Foundation of Clinical Research Center For Breast Cancer Control and Prevention in Hunan Province (2010-66).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



HH, JY and SW collected and analyzed and interpreted the patient data. ND performed the histological examination of the breast. HZ collected and analyzed the pathology data. LT and ZX were major contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lili Tang or Zhi Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from the Xiangya Hospital ethics committee (reference number 201609606).

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, H., Ding, N., Zhou, H. et al. A novel CD74-ROS1 gene fusion in a patient with inflammatory breast cancer: a case report. J Med Case Reports 15, 277 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: