Skip to main content

Ventricular tachycardia with epicardial and pericardial fibrosis 6 months after resolution of subclinical COVID-19: a case report 

Abstract

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been shown to have extensive effects on the cardiovascular system. Its long-term cardiac manifestations, however, remain unclear.

Case presentation

We report the case of a Caucasian patient with a mild and self-limited presentation of COVID-19, with subsequent development, months later, of exertional dyspnea and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, long after resolution of his illness and after returning to aerobic exercise. The patient had normal screening tests including electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram 4 months after his illness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated epicardial and pericardial fibrosis of the right ventricle free wall and outflow tract and the pericardium over the anterior wall, 6 months following the initial infection. First abnormal ECG was recorded at month 7 following illness.

Conclusions

This case suggests an insidious and possible long-term cardiac involvement and reflects the challenges in traditional workups and screening modalities in identifying cardiac involvement in COVID-19.

Peer Review reports

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been shown to have a wide variety of clinical manifestations. It typically presents with a spectrum of symptoms ranging from no symptoms to an array of mild symptoms such as cough, headache, fever, or anosmia. Less common is a rapid progression of pneumonia, hypoxemia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome and/or death. Recent emerging evidence suggests a significant impact on the cardiovascular system. Proposed mechanisms involve direct viral- or inflammatory-mediated myocardial damage, endothelial dysfunction or plaque instability, arterial or venous thrombosis, and indirect hypoxic cell injury [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, the long-term cardiac manifestations remain unclear.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an advanced cardiac imaging modality that can directly visualize the cardiovascular system in any dimensional plane. It has excellent spatial and temporal resolution and is used to characterize myocardial tissues. It is considered the gold standard for assessing myocardial function. Clinically, it is utilized to aid in the assessment of various cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, and/or pericardial disease [12, 13]. Furthermore, gadolinium-based contrast agents used to demonstrate late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) have been shown to be an important prognosticator in various disease processes [14,15,16,17].

The following is a case report of a mild and self-limited presentation of COVID-19 with the subsequent development of cardiac symptoms months after its clinical resolution and CMR demonstrating epicardial and pericardial fibrosis.

Case presentation

A 46-year-old athletic and otherwise healthy Caucasian male with a past medical history of mild hyperlipidemia was diagnosed with COVID-19 on March 17, 2020. He had symptoms of malaise, dry cough, anosmia, and a low-grade fever for 2 days prior to his test. His symptoms were self-limited and fully abated on day 5 after onset. He did not require supportive oxygen or hospitalization. Due to his self-limited illness, there were no laboratory data acquired such as cardiac biomarkers. He did not warrant nor was he treated with any pharmacotherapies or antibiotics. His baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) was reported normal including the QT interval. He resumed normal activity after resolution of his illness that month including vigorous aerobic exercise for the following 2–3 months and felt very close to his normal baseline functional status.

Approximately 3 months after resolution of illness (June 2020), he began having frequent palpitations and exertional dyspnea. He attributed his symptoms to anxiety and some deconditioning from prior quarantine. He had COVID-19 antibodies checked at that time, which showed high titers. On month 4 after his diagnosis (July 2020), he had a chest x-ray, electrocardiogram, and echocardiogram which were all unremarkable. He underwent continuous Holter monitoring which showed frequent premature ventricular beats and multiple brief paroxysms of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. His baseline ECG remained normal, as shown (Fig. 1). In September of the same year (month 7 following illness), his repeat ECG showed subtle abnormalities (Fig. 2).

Fig.1
figure1

Electrocardiogram (ECG) 1, August 6, 2020, performed 5 months after illness reveals normal sinus rhythm. Prior ECGs were all normal as well

Fig. 2
figure2

Electrocardiogram, September 8, 2020, reveals sinus rhythm with nonspecific ST changes inferiorly (arrows) and a rightward axis

Fig. 3
figure3

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, fast gradient echo, two-chamber view showing late gadolinium enhancement of the pericardium over the left ventricular anterior wall (arrow) and a trivial pericardial effusion (small arrow). Star denotes left ventricular cavity. Star denotes the left ventricle

Fig. 4
figure4

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, fast gradient echo, short-axis view from basal segment (a) to mid segment (b) showing late gadolinium enhancement of the pericardium over the anterior and anteroseptal walls (arrows). Star denotes left ventricular cavity. Star denotes the left ventricle

Fig. 5
figure5

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, fast gradient echo, short-axis view of the mid to apical segment showing late gadolinium enhancement of the free wall of the right ventricle (a) and pericardium over the anterior wall, lateral wall (b) (arrows). Star denotes left ventricular cavity. Star denotes the left ventricle

At 5 months and 28 days after his illness, he underwent CMR using the General Electric Signa Artist 1.5 Tesla with field of view 36 x 32 mm, slice thickness 8 mm, 0 mm spacing, matrix 200 x 200 pixels mm, number of excitations 1. Gadolinium-enhanced imaging was performed approximately 10 min after administration of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight of gadobutrol (Gadovist; Bayer). Findings showed normal left and right ventricular systolic function with mild left ventricular hypertrophy, with prominent LGE involving epicardial and pericardial fibrosis of the basal to apical anterior wall and at the basal to mid anterior septum and right ventricular free wall with a trivial pericardial effusion (Figs. 3, 4, 5).

Discussion

Emerging evidence has shown myocardial involvement in patients with covid-19. In one prospective, observational cohort study, 100 patients who had COVID-19 underwent CMR which revealed cardiac involvement in 78 percent of patients with the average follow-up time of 71 days. More than half of the patients had ongoing myocardial inflammation, which was independent of preexisting conditions and their severity of illness [18]

In another study, 26 competitive athletes who were diagnosed with the COVID-19 infection, all of which were either asymptomatic or presented with mild symptoms (sore throat, shortness of breath, myalgias, fever underwent CMR. Only four subjects (15%) had CMR findings suggestive of myocarditis. Pericardial effusion was present in only 2 patients [19]. Lui Haung, et al., demonstrated 58% of patients had abnormal CMR findings, 54% with myocardial edema and LGE in 31% of patients in a retrospective study with an average patient age of 38-years-of age and follow-up time from illness to scan of 47 days [20]. Despite emerging data, much remains uncertain about the true prevalence as well as the long-term cardiac effects in covid-19. Many of the patients studied have had their CMR performed within a short window of their covid-19 illness and usually due to evident overlapping cardiac symptoms. Our case shows one of the longer CMR scans done from time of illness documenting covid-19 involvement to date.

Our patient appears to have developed symptoms of palpitations and dyspnea 3 months after his clinical resolution of covid-19, which is markedly unusual in the timing of his presenting cardiac symptoms. It is unclear if he had underlying inflammation or subclinical myocarditis, however, his echocardiogram and ECG were both notably normal, even on month 4 after illness. He also had high covid-19 antibody titers at that time, which suggested immunity. Furthermore, his CMR (6 months after illness) showed LGE with the absence of T2 weighted myocardial edema, which may reflect less of an acute myocardial injury response and more so a chronic process of fibrosis or scar remodeling [21,22,23,24]. It is also unclear if his trivial pericardial effusion seen on CMR at the time of scan was representing a resolving effusion or a dynamic intra-cardiac process (his echocardiogram done 2 months earlier had no effusion). Similarly, his new ECG abnormalities noted on month 7 after illness also correlate in an unusually similar time presentation, as illustrated (Image 1-2).

Our patient may have also had insidious or subclinical cardiac involvement that may have been exacerbated by returning to heavy aerobic exercise once he felt recovered. This may explain the large time gap between his recovery of covid-19 and the development of cardiac symptoms and findings. There is emerging evidence that myocarditis in covid-19 can be detected in athletes via CMR despite a normal ECG, echocardiogram and/or other laboratory or imaging parameters [25]. This may also support a low threshold to pursue advanced imaging modalities such as CMR, if clinically indicated. Lastly, our patient did not have screening cardiac biomarkers, which have been shown as a good utility in a large systemic review by Shafi et al. for cardiac involvement during active covid-19 infection [26]. This was due to his self-limited illness and the need for quarantine, for which he did not seek or warrant medical care and may represent many recovered patients.

Follow-up

The patient is to undergo further ambulatory telemetry monitoring. Pharmacotherapy with beta blockade has been initiated with improvement in his palpitations. Electrophysiological testing with electrical mapping may be considered on his course if persistent ventricular tachycardia is detected or based on the development of other high-risk clinical features, and it may help to correlate electrical or ectopic origins with LGE patterns. Cardiac ablation and/or an implantable defibrillator may also be indicated in the future depending on his clinical course, although not warranted at this time. Finally, a follow-up CMR may also be considered to reassess fibrosis patterns or further myocardial involvement.

Conclusions

This case suggests an insidious and atypical presentation of the cardiac manifestations of COVID-19 and may suggest possible long-term cardiac involvement, with demonstrated LGE on CMR 6 months following illness and new ECG findings at month 7. Furthermore, it illustrates the challenges in traditional workups and screening modalities in identifying patients with potential cardiac involvement and highlights the clinical utility of CMR in such patients. Clinicians should have a high index of clinical suspicion regardless of normal screening tests such as ECG or even echocardiogram and should consider close follow-up or monitoring in patients returning to heavy exercise after COVID-19 recovery. Future long-term and larger studies are recommended to better understand the long-term cardiac manifestations in COVID-19.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

CMR:

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance

LGE:

Late gadolinium enhancement

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

References

  1. 1.

    Shafi AM, Harky A, et al. Cardiac manifestations in COVID-19 patients- a systematic Review. J Cardiac Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fang LK, et al. Clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus cases in tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province China. Med J. 2020;133:1025–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcome of critically ill patients with SARS-coV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:475.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kumar K, Vogt JC, Divanji PH, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection of the left anterior descending artery in a patient with COVID-19. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;146:110410.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fernandez Gasso L, Maneiro Melon NM. Multivessel spontaneous coronary artery dissection presenting in a patient with severe acute SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infection. Eur heart J. 2020;41(32):3100–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associates with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):420–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Inciardi RM, Zaccone G, et al. Cardiac Involvement in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):819–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dhakal BP, et al. SARS-Cov-2 Infection and Cardiovascular Disease: COVID-19 Heart. Heart, lung and Circulation. 2020;29:973–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mitra RL, Greenstein SA. An algorithm for managing QT prolongation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients treated with either chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with azithromycin: possible benefits of intravenous lidocaine. Heart Rhythm Case rep. 2020;6:244–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lal S, Hayward CS, Pasquale CD, et al. COVID-19 and acute heart failure: screening the critically ill. Heart Lung Circ. 2020;29(7):e94-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Lehrke S, Lossnitzer D, et al. Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance for risk stratification in chronic heart failure: prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2011;97(9):727–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tsoumani Z, Miller C, Schmitt M, Nucifora G. 23 Prevalence and correlates of mid-wall late gadolinium enhancement in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2019;105(Suppl 3):A20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Green JJ, Salerno M, et al. Prognostic value of Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Clinical Outcomes for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. JACC. 2012;5:370–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Alba AC, Gaztanaga J, et al. Prognostic vale of late gadolinium enhancement for the prediction of cardiovascular outcomes in dilated cardiomyopathy, an international, multi-institutional study of the MINICOR Group. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wu KC, Weiss RG, et al. Late Gadolinium Enhancement by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Heralds an Adverse Prognosis in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. JACC. 2008;51:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Assomull RG, Prasad SK, Lyne J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1977–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Puntmann VO, Carerj ML, et al. Outcomes of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients recently recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19. JAMA Cardiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rajpal S, Tong MS, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in competitive athletes recovering from COVID-19 infection. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(1):116–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Huang L, Zhao P, Tang D, et al. Cardiac Involvement in recovered COVID-19 patients identified by magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020.

  21. 21.

    Delacretaz E, Stevenson WG, Ellison KE, Maisel WH, Friedman PL. Mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the three types of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic heart disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:11–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Fernandez-Jimenez R, Sanchez-Gonzalez J, Aguero J, et al. Fast T2 gradient-spin (T2-GraSE) mapping for myocardial edema quantification: first in vivo validation in a porcine model of ischemia/reperfusion. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17(1):92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Verhaert D, Thavendiranathan P, Giri S, et al. Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(3):269–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dabir D, Child N, Kalra, et al. Reference values for healthy human myocardium using a T1 mapping methodology: results from the international T1 multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16(1):69.

  25. 25.

    Clark DE, et al. COVID-19 Myocardial pathology evaluated through screening cardiac magnetic resonance (COMPETE CMR), preprints from MedRxiv and bioRxiv

  26. 26.

    Shafi AMA, Shaikh SA, Shrike NM. Cardiac manifestations in COVID-19 patients- a systemic review. J Card Surg. 2020;35:1988–2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the radiology department at Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, NY.

Funding

There is no funding or financial disclosures by the authors of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MRS is the corresponding author and additional primary author, editor and mentor. JS is the primary author. AF is an additional editor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R Sood.

Ethics declarations

Ethics and approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

There are no competing interests reported by authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solaimanzadeh, J., Freilich, A. & Sood, M.R. Ventricular tachycardia with epicardial and pericardial fibrosis 6 months after resolution of subclinical COVID-19: a case report . J Med Case Reports 15, 305 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02782-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • SARS-CoV-2
  • COVID-19
  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  • Late gadolinium enhancement
  • Ventricular tachycardia