Skip to main content

Complete pathological response to olaparib and bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer following chemoradiation in a BRCA1 mutation carrier: a case report

Abstract

Background

Homologous recombination deficiency is a marker of response to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in different cancer types including ovary, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. To date, no report about poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors has been published on cervical cancer.

Case presentation

Here we present the case of a patient with cervical cancer treated in this setting. A 49-year-old woman diagnosed with International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists stage 2018 IIIC2 locally advanced undifferentiated cervical cancer received first-line chemoradiotherapy followed by carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab with partial response. Because of a family history of cancers, the patient was tested and found positive for a pathogenic BRCA1 germline and somatic mutation, which motivated bevacizumab plus olaparib maintenance treatment. A simple hysterectomy was performed after 2 years stable disease; pathological report showed complete pathological response, and 12 months follow-up showed no recurrence.

Conclusion

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors could be an alternative maintenance treatment for patients with persistent advanced cervical cancer previously treated with platinum, especially when familial history of cancers is reported. Clinical trials using poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for advanced cervical cancer are warranted.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide [1]. Squamous cell carcinomas is the most common histological type, and although the difference in survival outcomes with adenocarcinoma remains controversial, there are studies that have shown a significantly greater response to adjuvant treatment in squamous cell subtype compared with adenocarcinomas, as well as difference in immunological microenvironments and tumor escape mechanisms [2].

Thirteen percent of CC cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and even if patients are treated with curative intent, responses are of short duration and prognosis is very poor with recurrent and metastatic disease. Five-year survival rate in advanced stages is about 20–60% [3]. Treatment of locally advanced CC is based on chemoradiation, and recurrent, persistent, or metastatic disease is treated first-line with chemotherapy and bevacizumab [4, 5]. There are currently no clear recommendations for second-line treatment in these cases. A retrospective study showed that 70% of women treated for recurrent or metastatic CC with systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic CC subsequently received second-line therapy with an overall response rate (ORR) of 13.2%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.2 months, and a median overall survival of 9.3 months [6]. Recent advances in molecular biology of cancer have led to the development of targeted therapies in gynecological cancers, including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) [7,8,9]. This novel class of anticancer drug is approved in various indications, such as high-grade serous ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer, and is under investigation in many other types of malignancies [10]. To date, no report about PARPi has been published on CC.

Here, we report the case of a 49-year-old BRCA1 mutated woman diagnosed with advanced CC treated by chemoradiation, followed by the combination olaparib/bevacizumab with complete pathological response.

Case presentation

A Caucasian 49-year-old patient was referred to our center in January 2016 with a uterine mass of 6 cm discovered during an ultrasound examination performed for lumbar pain. Clinical examination showed a friable suspect cervix with bilateral parametrial involvement. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 91-mm cervical and uterine mass, with involvement of the uterine serosa, left distal parametrium, left pelvic wall, and left hydronephrosis. Imaging revealed close contact with the rectal wall and bladder trigone without transmural invasion and a suspicious left external iliac adenomegaly. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) showed no evidence of paraaortic lymph node involvement or distant metastasis. Cervical biopsy found a poorly differentiated cervical carcinoma human papilloma virus (HPV) 16 positive.

A laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed in February 2016. Pathological report showed two nonmetastatic left external iliac nodes (2N-/2) and 23 paraaortic lymph nodes including five metastatic nodes (5N+/23): International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (FIGO) 2018 stage IIIC2.

The patient received two cycles of capecitabine/cisplatin and subsequent concurrent chemoradiation (64,8 Gy in 36 fractions in the pelvic area, 45 Gy in 25 fractions in iliac and paraaortic area, and 8 concurrent cycles of cisplatin). The treatment was completed in June 2016.

At 3 months follow-up (September 2016), MRI showed partial response. The decision of the multidisciplinary meeting was to propose carboplatin, paclitaxel, plus bevacizumab adjuvant chemotherapy with partial response at 3 months.

Patient received genetic counseling because of family history of cancers, and results returned positive in April 2017 showing a deleterious BRCA1 germline mutation (BRCA1 p.His1006Glnfs*17.c.3018_3021delTTCA) that motivated the use of PARPi. Olaparib was started (800 mg twice daily) in maintenance associated with bevacizumab. Somatic tumor testing showed that the BRCA1 germline mutation was associated with loss of heterozygosity and with a TP53 mutation p.Arg248Gln; c.743 G>A validating homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in this tumor. The treatment was well tolerated, despite nausea, grade 1 asthenia, and grade 4 anemia leading to dose reduction (400 mg twice daily).

In January 2019, pelvis MRI showed a decrease of nearly 50% in size of the tumor residue compared with previous examinations, with persistence of a left proximal infiltration of the parametrium and fibrous retraction of the left ureter. A timeline of treatment received and corresponding pelvic magnetic resonance imaging is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Timeline of treatment received and corresponding pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. The Arrow is pointing the cervix tumoral mass

There was no argument on PET/CT for distant disease, and clinical benefit was reported.

The multidisciplinary meeting (multidisciplinary tumor board) discussed the option of surgery at that time. After reevaluation of patient’s medical record, we proposed surgery. A simple hysterectomy was performed in March 2019 without ureteral resection as parametrium appeared normal. No intra- or postoperative complications were noticed. Histological results showed no residual malignancy. After 1 year follow-up, clinical and radiological examinations do not show any recurrence without maintenance therapy.

Discussion and conclusions

We report the first case of a BRCA1 mutated patient with persistent advanced CC following chemoradiation and chemotherapy showing a complete tumor response after olaparib/bevacizumab adjuvant treatment and 12 months disease-free survival after surgery. The understanding of the molecular changes involved in the development of cancer led to the development of a new anticancer therapy known as targeted therapy and to a more personalized management of patients. In CC, therapies targeting different molecular pathways are investigated, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). An analysis of 592 samples of cervical cancer in a tumor library in the US using a combination of sequencing (that is, next-generation sequencing), gene amplification (that is, in situ hybridization), and protein expression (that is, immunohistochemistry) identified mutations in 224 specimens (BRCA1 in 10%). These biomarkers could help guide therapy in clinical trials for patients with PARPi; mitogen-activated protein kinase, cell cycle checkpoint, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors; EGFR- and HER2-directed therapy; immunotherapy; and hormonal therapy, mainly in patients who have progressed with bevacizumab [11].

PARPi are being tested in different cancer trials. PARP are enzymes involved in different DNA repair pathways, most notably in the base excision repair pathway (BER) to repair single DNA strand breaks (SSBs). PARP inhibitors (PARPi) block PARP activity, resulting in increased DNA damage. Cells with HRD depend on PARP-mediated repair for survival. The dual blockade repairs pathways when PARPi are used in a background of HRD, resulting in synthetic lethality and cell death. The BRCA genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) are major players of the HR repair pathway, and mutations in both genes predict response to PARPi in different cancer types [8, 9]. Currently, olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib have been approved by the FDA and/or European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of ovarian cancer, while veliparib is in the late stage of clinical development. Talazoparib has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic germline BRCA1/2 mutated breast cancers in October 2018. The discovery and characterization of talazoparib as a potent, PARP1/2 inhibitor provides an important addition to the field of PARP inhibitors. Its potency in PARP trapping is early evidence that talazoparib could potentially lead to improved clinical outcomes in BRCA mutant malignancies [12].

PARP-1 is overexpressed in cancer cells, and higher expression of PARP-1 has been associated with chemoresistance [13]; other studies suggest that PARPi could sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy [14]. In vitro, PARPi increase apoptosis in the HeLa CC cell line and sensitize cancer cells to cisplatin [15]. Prasad et al. showed that CC cells exhibit high amounts of PARP1 and that expression level is significantly higher in stages IIB and IIIB as compared with IIA (FIGO 2009) [16]. In this study, authors have proven that the replication stress caused by cisplatin induces PARP1 expression in a dose-dependent manner and determined the effect of olaparib on PARP1 activity in a PARP1 cisplatin-induced model. They showed that PARP1 inhibition enhanced cisplatin-induced DNA damage and apoptosis in CC cells and had a suppressive effect on metastasis. Altogether, olaparib increased cisplatin-induced lethality in CC cells. The authors hypothesized that combination of olaparib with cisplatin could enhance the efficacy of cisplatin in CC and improve the results of platinum-based therapy, and we believe that this hypothesis can explain the complete pathological response observed in our report, especially in the case of BRCA mutation.

Bianchi et al. explored the preclinical activity of olaparib in vitro and in vivo against nine primary CC cells [17]. PARP1 enzyme plays a key role in the recruitment of DNA repair factors and is also involved in the PARylation of nuclear proteins, a posttranslational modification process by which polymers of ADP-ribose (poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose)) are covalently attached to proteins by PAR polymerase enzymes [18]. In this study, none of the cell lines demonstrated HRD but 33% showed strong PARylation activity associated with high sensitivity to the PARPi olaparib in vitro. In this subset of CC primary cells, olaparib significantly impaired CC xenograft tumor growth (p = 0.0017) and increased animal overall survival (p = 0.008). Authors suggest the use of the level of PARylation as a biomarker to predict for which patients PARPi would be the most efficient. PARP expression/activity is suggested to be mediated by chronic inflammation and HPV infection through oxidative stress that may result in DNA single-strand breaks [19,20,21]. HPV infection may promote progression by creating a vicious circle of inflammation and PARP activation. Thereby, PARPi may limit the role of PARP and consequently CC progression, whatever the BRCA or HRD status.

At a clinical level, the majority of data on PARPi in gynecological malignancies has been specifically focused on ovarian cancer, but PARPi are also under evaluation in the treatment of cervical and uterine cancers [9]. In CC, data from a phase I/II study assessing veliparib with cisplatin and paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced, recurrent, or persistent CC showed a promising overall response rate [22]. In this trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group including 34 patients, an overall response rate of 34% was observed for all dose levels and 60% for the maximum dose level. These results were not observed in another phase I study using veliparib and topotecan, which reinforces the idea of a synergic effect of PARPi and cisplatin [14]. A phase II randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study started in October 2019 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rucaparib, another PARPi, as adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced CC who are responding to chemoradiation (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03795272).

In conclusion, PARPi could be an alternative maintenance treatment for patients with persistent advanced CC previously treated with platinum. More studies are necessary to confirm the association between HRD in CC and response to PARPi, but it opens the way for personalized treatments in this type of cancer, especially when familial history of cancers is reported.

Availability of data and materials

The patient consent is available upon request.

Abbreviations

CC:

Cervical cancer

PARP:

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase

PARPi:

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors

HRD:

Homologous recombination deficiency

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PET/CT:

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography

HPV:

Human papilloma virus

References

  1. 1.

    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Boussios S, Seraj E, Zarkavelis G, Petrakis D, Kollas A, Kafantari A, et al. Management of patients with recurrent/advanced cervical cancer beyond first line platinum regimens: Where do we stand? A literature review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;108:164–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Quinn M, Benedet J, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman W, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;95:S43-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, McCormack M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N, et al. Cervical cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_4):iv72-83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long HJ, Penson RT, Huang H, Ramondetta LM, et al. Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(8):734–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    McLachlan J, Boussios S, Okines A, Glaessgen D, Bodlar S, Kalaitzaki R, et al. The impact of systemic therapy beyond first-line treatment for advanced cervical cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017;29(3):153–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Basu P, Mukhopadhyay A, Konishi I. Targeted therapy for gynecologic cancers: toward the era of precision medicine. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:131–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Liu FW, Tewari KS. New targeted agents in gynecologic cancers: synthetic lethality, homologous recombination deficiency, and PARP inhibitors. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016;17(3):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lheureux S, Mirza M, Coleman R. The DNA repair pathway as a target for novel drugs in gynecologic cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(27):2449–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sachdev E, Tabatabai R, Roy V, Rimel BJ, Mita MM. PARP inhibition in cancer: an update on clinical development. Targ Oncol. 2019;14(6):657–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Feldman R, Gatalica Z, Reddy SK, Tewari KS. Paving the road to personalized medicine in cervical cancer: theranostic biomarker evaluation in a 592-specimen library. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137:141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Boussios S, Abson C, Moschetta M, Rassy E, Karathanasi A, Bhat T, et al. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: talazoparib in ovarian cancer and beyond. Drugs R D. 2020;20(2):55–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fukushima M, Kuzuya K, Ota K, Ikai K. Poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis in human cervical cancer cell—diagnostic cytological usefulness. Cancer Lett. 1981;14(3):227–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kunos C, Deng W, Dawson D, Lea JS, Zanotti KM, Gray HJ, et al. A phase I-II evaluation of Veliparib (NSC #737664), topotecan, and filgrastim or pegfilgrastim in the treatment of persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25(3):484–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ghosh U, Bhattacharyya NP. Induction of apoptosis by the inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase in HeLa cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2009;320(1–2):15–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Prasad CB, Prasad SB, Yadav SS, Pandey LK, Singh S, Pradhan S, et al. Olaparib modulates DNA repair efficiency, sensitizes cervical cancer cells to cisplatin and exhibits anti-metastatic property. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bianchi A, Lopez S, Altwerger G, Bellone S, Bonazzoli E, Zammataro L, et al. PARP-1 activity (PAR) determines the sensitivity of cervical cancer to olaparib. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;155(1):144–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ba X, Garg NJ. Signaling mechanism of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) in inflammatory diseases. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(3):946–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hegan DC, Lu Y, Stachelek GC, Crosby ME, Bindra RS, Glazer PM. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase down-regulates BRCA1 and RAD51 in a pathway mediated by E2F4 and p130. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(5):2201–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Weaver AN, Cooper TS, Rodriguez M, Trummell HQ, Bonner JA, Rosenthal EL, et al. DNA double strand break repair defect and sensitivity to poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition in human papillomavirus 16-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6(29):26995–7007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hassumi-Fukasawa MK, Miranda-Camargo FA, Zanetti BR, Galano DF, Ribeiro-Silva A, Soares EG. Expression of BAG-1 and PARP-1 in precursor lesions and invasive cervical cancer associated with human papillomavirus (HPV). Pathol Oncol Res. 2012;18(4):929–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Thaker PH, Salani R, Brady WE, Lankes HA, Cohn DE, Mutch DG, et al. A phase I trial of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and veliparib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: an NRG Oncology Study (NCT#01281852). Ann Oncol. 2017;28(3):505–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

None

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ASB designed the paper. RMM and MK wrote the paper. CD performed the chemoradiation. HB and SG performed the molecular research of BRCA mutation. GP performed the genetic counseling. HP performed human papilloma virus research. ASB, HTNX, and VB performed surgery. MF performed radiological examinations. MALFB provided pathological evaluation. All authors are members of our multidisciplinary tumor board and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meriem Koual.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montero-Macias, R., Koual, M., Crespel, C. et al. Complete pathological response to olaparib and bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer following chemoradiation in a BRCA1 mutation carrier: a case report. J Med Case Reports 15, 210 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02767-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Advanced cervical cancer
  • BRCA1
  • PARP inhibitor
  • Olaparib
  • Precision oncology
\