Skip to main content

Chance diagnosis of mixed gonadal dysgenesis in an adult case of malignant gonadal germ cell tumor: a case report



Mixed gonadal dysgenesis (MGD) is a subtype of the disorders of sex development (DSD) associated with sex chromosome abnormalities characterized by abnormal external genitalia, short stature, and primary amenorrhea. This disease is generally diagnosed from the neonatal stage to early childhood, and by puberty at the latest. Cases that are phenotypically female or those with ambiguous genitalia experience a high risk of gonadal tumor formation. As tumor risk is known to increase with age, prophylactic bilateral gonadectomy is recommended following early diagnosis.

Case presentation

Here we report a case of an adult Japanese woman diagnosed with MGD during treatment for a giant pelvic tumor. The patient initially visited a gynecology clinic during puberty for primary amenorrhea, at which time an abnormality was found with the external genitalia. However, a diagnosis of MGD was not made at this time, resulting in the development of a malignant gonadal germ cell tumor in adulthood.


For early diagnosis of MGD and the prevention of gonadal tumor formation, it is essential that gynecologists fully understand MGD and other DSD.

Peer Review reports


Mixed gonadal dysgenesis (MGD) is a subtype of the disorders of sex development (DSD) associated with sex chromosome abnormalities. The incidence of this rare disease is less than 1 per 15,000 births [1]. The most common form of the disease is a karyotype displaying 45,X/46,XY mosaicism, which accounts for 35% of patients [2]. Patients have unilateral dysgenetic testis and contralateral streak gonads, as well as abnormal differentiation of related internal and external sex organs. Phenotypes range from normal male form, to ambiguous genitalia, to forms that closely resemble a normal female.

MGD is commonly diagnosed from as early as the neonatal to infant stage based on abnormal external genitalia, or is otherwise diagnosed as late as puberty based on reduced stature and primary amenorrhea.

Among DSD, MGD carries a high risk of gonadal tumor development. Patients who are phenotypically female or possess ambiguous genitalia are at increased risk compared to male-type patients. The risk of gonadal tumor onset rises with age, as does the risk that malignant germ cell tumors such as dysgerminomas and seminomas will develop. For this reason, it is recommended that phenotypic females or those with ambiguous genitalia undergo prophylactic bilateral gonadectomy at an early stage following a diagnosis of MGD [1, 3].

We experienced a rare case where a phenotypically female MGD patient experienced primary amenorrhea yet reached adulthood without undergoing more careful examination. This resulted in a chance diagnosis of MGD during treatment for a giant pelvic tumor at the age of 25 years. MGD is a disease often diagnosed by a pediatrician, but when a general gynecologist encounters a female patient with primary amenorrhea, MGD must be considered as a differential diagnosis, as this disease requires the correct diagnosis and prophylactic bilateral gonadectomy before a gonadal tumor develops. Here we describe a rare case in which a patient reached adulthood before being diagnosed with MGD, which was discovered by chance during medical treatment of a malignant gonadal germ cell tumor.

Case presentation

This case involves an unmarried 25-year-old phenotypic Japanese female, 154.1 cm in height and 48.5 kg in weight, and without a notable medical, family, or psychosocial history. She did not consume alcohol, tobacco, or any drugs. The patient was examined at the age of 18 at a gynecology clinic for primary amenorrhea where, given the patient’s active involvement in competitive track and field, she was diagnosed with athletic amenorrhea without further tests being conducted. Afterwards, the patient underwent no treatment and did not experience menstruation. Moreover, the patient had not engaged in sexual intercourse up to this point.

Upon examination by a local physician with the main complaint of abdominal distention, the patient was referred to our hospital with a suspected ovarian tumor, as a giant 17 cm tumor was found in the pelvis. The inspection of the external genitalia revealed clitoral hypertrophy and narrowing of the vaginal opening (Fig. 1). Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a tumorous lesion in the pelvis measuring 218 × 115 × 178 mm, containing a mixture of cystic and solid components. The uterus could not be found. The cystic components contained blood, and the solid portion had a contrast effect (Fig. 2). Examination by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography revealed FDG accumulation in the tumor and in enlarged abdominal para-aortic lymph nodes. Blood tests revealed the following levels: white blood cells (WBC): 10.7/μL × 103; hemoglobin: 10.1 g/dL; platelets: 412/μL × 104; C-reactive protein (CRP): 18.1 mg/dL; total protein: 7.7 g/dL; albumin: 3.8 g/dL; urea nitrogen: 8 mg/dL; creatinine: 0.53 mg/dL; total bilirubin: 0.6 mg/dL; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): 30 IU/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): 8 IU/L; follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH): 52.4 mU/mL; luteinizing hormone (LH): 34.4 mU/mL; estradiol (E2): < 10 pg/mL; progesterone (P4): 0.66 ng/mL; and testosterone: 0.25 ng/mL. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (2.4 ng/mL) was within the normal range, but serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (5.86 ng/mL), lactate dehydrogenase (4574 µg/L), and CA125 (165 µg/mL) were elevated. Urinalysis was normal. As DSD was suspected because of the appearance of the pelvic tumor, chromosome testing was performed. The karyotype was found to exhibit 45,X/46,XY mosaicism, and the patient was diagnosed with MGD. Since the pelvic tumor was considered to be a gonadal tumor, a resulting complication of MGD, an exploratory laparotomy was performed in order to arrive at a definitive pathologic diagnosis of the tumor.

Fig. 1

External genital abnormalities: clitoral hypertrophy and narrowing of the vaginal opening

Fig. 2

Magnetic resonance imaging findings (T2-weighted image): pelvic tumor with a mixture of solid and cystic components (arrow)

A physical examination revealed a patient who looked unwell, with blood pressure of 119/77 mmHg, heart rate of 117 beats per minute, and body temperature of 38.7 °C. Neurological examination was unremarkable and did not offer any substantial information. Surgical findings revealed marked adhesions between the tumor and the surrounding organs, making excision difficult. Therefore, only a biopsy of the tumor was performed (Fig. 3a, b). The final pathological diagnosis was “seminoma” (Fig. 4). Consequently, the patient was diagnosed with clinical stage IIB testicular cancer (seminoma) with MGD.

Fig. 3

a, b Intraoperative findings (initial surgery): pelvic tumor, fallopian tube infiltration, and atrophy of the uterus

Fig. 4

Tumor pathology findings (initial surgery): recognized "two-cell pattern" with tumor cells and lymphocyte infiltration (arrow)

Postoperative systemic chemotherapy was started promptly, consisting of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP). At the time of the fourth course of BEP, tumor markers had normalized (Fig. 5). Marked tumor reduction was confirmed with imaging, and subsequently the patient underwent interval debulking surgery. Surgery involved bilateral gonadectomy and resection of disseminated peritoneal lesions (Figs. 6a, b, 7). Pathological examination of the excised specimens was consistent with necrosis of the seminoma due to the effect of chemotherapy. No viable tumor remains were found. No further chemotherapy was administered, and the initial course of treatment was completed. We notified the patient regarding MGD, and she decided her future sex as female. Therefore, we proposed some surgical options for clitoromegaly or vaginal stenosis. However, she did not wish to pursue those at that time.

Fig. 5

Clinical course table: elevated lactate dehydrogenase and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin rapidly declined after the start of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) therapy

Fig. 6

a, b Intraoperative findings (second surgery): pelvic tumor reduced by chemotherapy, and atrophy of the uterus, fallopian tubes, and streak gonad

Fig. 7

Macroscopic image of excised specimen (second surgery): tumor exhibiting uniform yellowish-white color and conspicuous necrosis inside the tumor

Currently, 4 years and 11 months after the initial treatment, there has been no recurrence of the tumor. In addition, the patient has been on postoperative hormone replacement therapy in the form of an estradiol/norethindrone acetate patch and psychotherapy continuously.


Of note in this case is the delay in diagnosis despite the presence of clinical features such as external genital abnormality and primary amenorrhea. Indeed, diagnosis was delayed until the patient was 25 years old and was only discovered by chance during treatment for a malignant gonadal germ cell tumor.

MGD is a disease that may be diagnosed based on short stature, abnormal external genitalia, or primary amenorrhea. Moreover, it is normally a disease that can be diagnosed by puberty at the latest. Berberoglu et al. studied 12 cases of 45X/46,XY GD, and found that the average age of diagnosis was 5.14 years. They further reported that 50% of cases involved short stature [4]. A study by Huang et al. of 19 MGD cases reported that the median age at diagnosis was 11 years 5 months (age range: 1 month–15 years 9 months), and indicated short stature (74%), abnormal external genitalia (37%), and primary amenorrhea (5%) as the three triggers for diagnosis. Three of the 19 cases (16%) were ultimately diagnosed with gonadoblastoma through preventive gonadectomy, but there were no cases that were clinically diagnosed as a result of a pelvic tumor [5].

One of the key clinical issues associated with DSD is gonadal tumor onset, and MGD is reported to be the DSD with the highest risk of gonadal tumor development [6]. This is thought to be due to the presence of Y chromosome sequences in GD patients, which increases the risk of gonadal tumor formation [7]. Studies indicate that the risk of tumor onset is 3-4% at age 10, increasing with age to 10–20% at age 15, and to as high as 46% at age 40 [3]. The most common gonadal tumors are benign gonadoblastomas, but malignant germ cell tumors such as dysgerminomas and seminomas also frequently occur [8]. The risk of developing gonadal tumors is higher among phenotypic female and ambiguous genitalia MGD cases than in male-type cases. Moreover, while resection of streak gonads is recommended at an early stage in male-type cases, while sparing the contralateral dysgenetic gonad and carefully monitoring the patient, early prophylactic bilateral gonadectomy in infancy is recommended for female or ambiguous genitalia cases [1, 3].

In the case described here, abnormality of the external genitalia (clitoral hypertrophy and narrowing of the vaginal opening) were indeed present. If the initial gynecologist had been better acquainted with DSD so as to recognize its signs when the patient was examined at 18 years of age, further testing could have led to a correct diagnosis. However, there is a general lack of understanding among gynecologists with respect to DSD. In this case, that lack of awareness resulted in a malignant gonadal germ cell tumor in adulthood, at which time MGD was finally diagnosed. The MGD cases that a gynecologist is likely to encounter are phenotypic females with an increased risk of gonadal tumor formation. In order to prevent the formation of malignant gonadal germ cell tumors, diagnosis as early as possible followed by prophylactic bilateral gonadectomy is necessary. Therefore, it is essential for gynecologists to understand the concept of DSD, as they will have many opportunities to treat adolescent women for primary amenorrhea.


MGD is generally a disease that can be diagnosed by puberty at the latest. The delayed diagnosis in this case resulted in development of a malignant gonadal germ cell tumor. Gynecologists must be sufficiently aware of the disease concept of DSD, including MGD, in order to diagnose MGD early and prevent the onset of gonadal tumor formation.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


  1. 1.

    Kubota M, Terada N, Ito K, et al. A 45, X/46, XY male with orchidopexy diagnosed with mixed germ cell tumor after 21-year follow-up. Urol Case Rep. 2017;13:120–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Makhija D, Shah H, Tiwari C, et al. Mixed gonadal dysgenesis with an unusual “inverted” Y chromosome. Dev Period Med. 2016;20(3):178–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Abaci A, Catli G, Berberoglu M. Gonadal malignancy risk and prophylactic gonadectomy in disorders of sexual development. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015;28(9–10):1019–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Berberoglu M, Siklar Z. Ankara University Dsd ethic committee, the evaluation of cases with Y-chromosome gonadal dysgenesis: clinical experience over 18 years. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2018;10(1):30–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Huang YC, Lee CT, Wu MZ, et al. The spectrum of 45, X/46, XY mosaicism in Taiwanese children: the experience of a single center. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118(1 Pt 3):450–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hughes IA, Houk C, Ahmed SF, Lee PA, Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society/European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology Consensus Group. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. J Pediatr Urol. 2006;2(3):148–62.

  7. 7.

    Cunha SC, Andrade JGR, Angelis CM, et al. Early development of a gonadal tumor in a patient with mixed gonadal dysgenesis. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(6):644–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Haddad NG, Walvoord EC, Cain MP, et al. Seminoma and a gonadoblastoma in an infant with mixed gonadal dysgenesis. J Pediatr. 2003;143(1):136.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to show my greatest appreciation to Shuji Momose, Morihiro Higashi, and Junichi Tamaru, whose comments and suggestions were of innumerable value throughout the course of my study. And we would like to thank Editage ( for English language editing.


Not applicable.

Author information




Conception and design of study: TA. Acquisition of data: KS, TU. Critical revision of the manuscript= for important intellectual content: TN, YT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiko Kurose.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurose, Y., Nagai, T., Shigematsu, K. et al. Chance diagnosis of mixed gonadal dysgenesis in an adult case of malignant gonadal germ cell tumor: a case report. J Med Case Reports 15, 165 (2021).

Download citation


  • Mixed gonadal dysgenesis
  • Primary amenorrhea
  • Gonadal tumor
  • 45,X/46,XY mosaicism
  • Disorders of sex development
  • Case report