Skip to main content

Ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate were useful for steroid-refractory, immune-related hepatitis: a case report



Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown clinically significant antitumor efficacy and have been approved for the treatment of various kinds of advanced malignancies. On the other hand, these immunotherapies show unique adverse events, termed “immune-related adverse events,” which are distinctly associated with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Hepatotoxicity is recognized as an immune-related adverse event; prompt treatment with corticosteroids is recommended. However, some cases are refractory to steroids. Here, we report the first case (to our knowledge) of steroid-refractory immune-related hepatitis that was successfully treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old Asian man, came to our hospital for the treatment of malignant melanoma involving the gingiva and presenting with multiple lymph node and bone metastases was administered nivolumab as a first-line treatment. Two months into treatment, the patient developed diarrhea as a result of immune-related colitis; the colitis was treated successfully with prednisolone 60 mg/ day, resulting in improvement in the patient’s symptoms. However, when steroids were being tapered, acute elevation of liver enzymes was observed. Autoimmune hepatitis was suspected as an immune-related adverse event, and treatment with intravenous prednisolone 60 mg/ day was reinitiated. However, restoration of the steroid treatment failed to improve the patient’s liver enzymes. On the basis of histological findings from liver biopsy and exclusion of other etiologies such as viral infection and other drug-induced hepatitis, steroid-refractory hepatic immune-related adverse event was deemed the most likely cause of the patient’s acute hepatitis. In general, mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus is known to provide benefits in cases of steroid-refractory hepatitis. We therefore decided to add oral ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate in consideration of the patient’s background of repeated aspiration pneumonia. Administration of this regimen resulted in an improvement in liver function, which remained normal even after tapering of prednisolone.


Ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate may be useful for treatment of steroid-refractory immune-related adverse event hepatitis.

Peer Review reports


Tumors resist immune attack by inducing tolerance among tumor-specific T cells and by expressing ligands that engage inhibitory receptors and dampen T-cell functions within the tumor microenvironment [1]. Antibody blockade of these immune checkpoints can significantly enhance antitumor immunity [2]. Major immune checkpoint inhibitors include anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody and anti–programmed cell death 1 (anti–PD-1) [3,4,5] antibody. PD-1 is a key immune checkpoint receptor expressed by activated T cells, and this membrane protein mediates immunosuppression. Inhibition of the interaction between PD-1 and its ligand, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), can enhance T-cell responses and mediate antitumor activity [6,7,8]. Nivolumab, an anti–PD-1 antibody, is currently approved for the treatment of malignant melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, head and neck cancer, gastric cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma, microsatellite instability–high colon cancer, and esophageal cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab have completely different mechanisms from conventional antitumor and molecularly targeted drugs, expanding clinical options for cancer treatment. On the other hand, immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that are distinct in both mechanism and management from the adverse effects commonly associated with chemotherapy. irAEs such as pneumonitis, hypothyroidism, arthralgia, and vitiligo are more common with anti–PD-1 antibody [9]. The incidence of the all-grade hepatic irAEs in cases being treated with anti–PD-1 antibodies accounts for 1–3% of adverse events in these patients [10, 11]. In general, corticosteroids are recommended as first-line treatment for hepatic irAEs. However, in steroid-refractory cases, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or tacrolimus may provide benefit [10]. Treatment of steroid-refractory hepatic irAE is controversial. However, prolongation of treatment for irAE may lead to interruption of treatment for the primary disease. We report a case of steroid-refractory hepatic irAE after administration of nivolumab. The irAE was confirmed by histological findings, and improvement was obtained by treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and bezafibrate in combination with corticosteroids.

Case presentation

Our patient was a 68-year-old Asian man. His past medical, social, environmental, family, and employment histories were unremarkable. He had a history of surgery for duodenal ulcer when he was 20 years old. He had been both smoking and drinking for almost 50 years. Upon admission to our institute, the patient was conscious and well oriented to time, place, and person. His general examination revealed that he was thin. His blood pressure was 157/88 mmHg, and his pulse rate was 82 beats/minute. His systemic examination did not reveal any abnormality. He had multiple lymph node metastases and bone metastases of malignant melanoma involving the gingiva. The patient was administered nivolumab as a first-line treatment. Two months after the first treatment with four courses of nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks), the patient was hospitalized with severe diarrhea (> 10 episodes/day) without abdominal pain, despite not having taken any medications that might be expected to cause diarrhea. Routine stool cultures, tests for Clostridium difficile toxin, and tests for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection yielded negative results. Colonoscopy showed mucosal ulceration throughout the entire colon, and histopathologic analysis showed focal active colitis with crypt destruction and inflammatory cell infiltration in the crypt epithelium, conditions most consistent with nivolumab-associated enterocolitis. Therefore, our diagnosis was grade 3 diarrhea due to irAE enterocolitis. The patient was not administered further nivolumab. To manage the irAE enterocolitis, dosing with intravenous prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day (60 mg/day) was started. The patient’s diarrhea improved rapidly after the initiation of prednisolone treatment. We subsequently switched to oral prednisolone and eventually tapered the dose to 20 mg/day. However, laboratory tests revealed a sudden elevation of liver enzymes halfway through tapering (Fig. 1), although the patient did not exhibit any abdominal pain or abdominal tenderness. The interval between the initiation of corticosteroid treatment and the onset of liver dysfunction was 142 days. Whole-body computed tomography and abdominal ultrasonography showed only a fatty liver; no sign of biliary tract disease was apparent (Fig. 2). Laboratory testing for liver disease was performed. Dyslipidemia was found to be slightly higher than baseline values. The patient had no jaundice or renal dysfunction (total bilirubin 0.3 mg/dl, blood urea nitrogen 18 mg/dl, creatinine 0.83 mg/dl). Abnormalities in albumin (2.9 mg/dl), C-reactive protein (6.79/μl), white blood cell count (11,740/μl), red blood cell count (419 × 104/μl), and platelet count (42.6 × 104/μl) were also present. The patient had a negative test result for antinuclear antibody and anti–smooth muscle antibody. Active viral hepatitis A, B, C, and E were excluded. Although the patient had a previous positive test result for CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG), subsequent immunoglobulin M (IgM) testing was equivocal. The finding of testing for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) anti–virus capsid antigen (anti-VCA) IgM was negative, whereas the findings for anti-EBV nuclear antigen and EBV anti-VCA IgG were positive. The clinical findings were consistent with grade 3 hepatic irAE secondary to nivolumab.

Fig. 1

Chronological changes of the patient’s liver function tests. The first nivolumab dose was administered on day 1. The patient’s serum AST, ALT, g-GTP, and ALP levels did not decrease appreciably after the amount of prednisolone was increased. We then initiated administration of UDCA 600 mg/day and bezafibrate 400 mg/day. After the start of UDCA and bezafibrate administration, the serum levels of AST, ALT, g-GTP, and ALP decreased, even with a restart of prednisolone tapering. ALP Alkaline phosphatase, ALT Alanine aminotransferase, AST Aspartate aminotransferase, g-GTP Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, UDCA Ursodeoxycholic acid

Fig. 2

Abdominal computed tomography at the time of liver dysfunction. There were no occupational lesions in the hepatics and no dilation of either the intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts

We decided to reinitiate administration of intravenous prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day (60 mg/day). However, the patient’s transaminase levels subsequently rose rather than fell (Fig. 1). Further increasing the dose of prednisolone was not considered feasible, given the repeated occurrence of aspiration pneumonia under the influence of underlying malignant melanoma of the gingiva. To clarify the etiology of the patient’s liver dysfunction, a liver biopsy was performed. Histological examination of the specimen showed inflammatory cell infiltrates, mostly comprising CD8-positive lymphocytes. Plasma cell infiltration was not conspicuous, suggesting autoimmune hepatitis was not involved. No evidence of biliary disorder (such as shedding of biliary epithelium) was seen, suggesting a finding of hepatocellular hepatitis (Fig. 3). By exclusion of other etiologies and because of occurrence of the event despite previously having been on corticosteroid treatment, steroid-refractory hepatic irAE was deemed to be the most likely cause of the patient’s abnormal liver biochemistry results. Therefore, we considered additional immunosuppressive therapies such as MMF or tacrolimus. However, we were hesitant to implement these treatments in consideration of this patient’s background of repeated aspiration pneumonia. The liver biopsy did not show peribiliary inflammation, but the laboratory data showed a marked elevation of serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase. Given the possible presence of bile congestion with dyslipidemia, we added UDCA 600 mg and bezafibrate 400 mg to the patient’s medication, a combination that has been reported to improve bile congestion, as in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) [12]. These medications were administered with the patient’s informed consent. After the start of this new oral pharmacotherapy, the patient’s serum levels of liver enzymes improved rapidly (Fig. 1). The prednisolone dose was subsequently tapered to 35 mg/day, and the patient was finally discharged. Despite this reduction in prednisolone dose, his transaminase levels normalized after an additional 35 days of oral prednisolone administration. Prednisolone was still being tapered without recurrence of diarrhea or elevation of transaminases in serum. Because of the observed severe adverse events, nivolumab was not restarted. The patient’s general condition was not good, and he accepted palliative care and was transferred to a hospital in order to receive palliative care about 1 year after the first visit.

Fig. 3

Histological findings of the liver. a and b Photomicrographs of a representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) section from the liver biopsy (a: H&E, original magnification × 100; b: H&E, original magnification × 200). Moderate inflammation and focal necrosis were observed. The liver parenchyma was mainly damaged with moderate infiltration of lymphocytes. c Photomicrograph shows CD8 immunohistochemistry of a f3:4 representative section from the liver biopsy. Most of the infiltrating lymphocytes were positive for CD8 staining (brown)


We report a case of steroid-refractory hepatic irAE after administration of nivolumab, and improvement was obtained by treatment with UDCA and bezafibrate in combination with corticosteroids. Nivolumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1. Agents against PD-1 may be associated with serious irAEs, which arise as a consequence of impaired self-tolerance from loss of T-cell inhibition [13]. Hepatic irAEs occur less frequently than those in other systems. Hepatic irAEs most often become clinically evident between 8 and 12 weeks after initiation of therapy but may occur as late as 1 year after the first dose [14]. The mechanism of these adverse events is not fully understood. Hepatic irAEs have been classified into three types: hepatocellular, cholestatic, and mixed. Cholestatic or mixed-type liver injury has been seen more frequently in patients receiving anti-PD-1 and/or anti-PD-L1 antibodies than in those receiving anti-CTLA-4 antibodies [15]. For any type of hepatic irAE, prompt treatment with corticosteroids is recommended. Literature suggests that the median time to resolution is approximately 8 weeks [16]. In cases of steroid-refractory immune-related hepatitis, MMF or tacrolimus may prove beneficial [16]. However, steroids and other immunosuppressants may have a limited utility in severe injury with biliary involvement [17]. The resolution of hepatic irAE may require prolonged treatment, and long-term administration of immunosuppressants can result in significant complications. The histopathology of hepatic irAE is thought to be distinct from the characteristic features of classical autoimmune hepatitis, which typically is marked by plasma cell infiltration, rosette formation, and interface hepatitis. A previous study reported that hepatic irAEs were characterized predominantly by lobular hepatitis with infiltration by CD3+ or CD8+ lymphocytes, but not by CD20+ lymphocytes [18]. In our case, liver biopsy demonstrated moderate hepatitis, but fibrosis was not seen with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Despite the long interval of prednisolone administration, lymphocyte infiltration was recognized in our patient. Immunostaining revealed predominantly CD8+ lymphocytes, whereas few CD4+ lymphocytes were detected. These findings suggested that this hepatic irAE was an acute response. To our knowledge, this patient’s case is the first of steroid-refractory hepatic irAE that was successfully treated with UDCA and bezafibrate, although it has been reported that patients with grade 1 or 2 hepatic irAEs involving bile duct disorders improved with administration of UDCA [15].

In general, UDCA is expected to improve cholestasis by biliary secretion and to alleviate the hepatocellular injury by replacing cytotoxic hydrophobic bile acids. Moreover, UDCA has recently been shown to be effective for PBC, a condition mediated (in part) by immunosuppression [19]. On the other hand, bezafibrate is a fibric acid derivative commonly used in the management of lipid disorders. The combination of UDCA and bezafibrate is thought to be effective in patients with PBC [12]. The proposed mechanism of action of fibric acid derivatives in PBC involves regulating the production of various kinds of lipids and proteins through the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα). Activated PPARα in turn can inhibit nuclear factor-κB activation, decreasing the immune response [20]. In Japan, there are no indications for bezafibrate other than hyperlipidemia, so sufficient informed consent is required for use of this medication. It is possible that these two drugs (UDCA and bezafibrate) synergize, leading to the results seen in our patient’s case.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are widely used to treat various types of cancer. Careful use of irAEs thus is important because subsequent cancer therapy may be markedly impacted.


In cases of steroid-refractory immune-related hepatitis, the combination of UDCA and bezafibrate should be considered before using conventional strong immunosuppressants.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Alkaline phosphatase


Alanine aminotransferase


Aspartate aminotransferase




Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4


Epstein-Barr virus




Immunoglobulin G


Immunoglobulin M


Immune-related adverse events


Mycophenolate mofetil


Primary biliary cirrhosis


Programmed cell death 1


Programmed death ligand 1


Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorα


Ursodeoxycholic acid


Virus capsid antigen


  1. 1.

    Mellman I, Coukos G, Dranoff G. Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature. 2011;480:480–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:252–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Brahmer JR, Tykodi SS, Chow LQ, Hwu WJ, Topalian SL, Hwu P, Drake CG, Camacho LH, Kauh J, Odunsi K, Pitot HC, Hamid O, Bhatia S, Martins R, Eaton K, Chen S, Salay TM, Alaparthy S, Grosso JF, Korman AJ, Parker SM, Agrawal S, Goldberg SM, Pardoll DM, Gupta A, Wigginton JM. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2455–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, Powderly JD, Carvajal RD, Sosman JA, Atkins MB, Leming PD, Spigel DR, Antonia SJ, Horn L, Drake CG, Pardoll DM, Chen L, Sharfman WH, Anders RA, Taube JM, McMiller TL, Xu H, Korman AJ, Jure-Kunkel M, Agrawal S, McDonald D, Kollia GD, Gupta A, Wigginton JM, Sznol M. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2443–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Targeting the PD-1/B7-H1(PD-L1) pathway to activate antitumor immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24:207–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dong H, Strome SE, Salomao DR, Tamura H, Hirano F, Flies DB, Roche PC, Lu J, Zhu G, Tamada K, Lennon VA, Celis E, Chen L. Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: a potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med. 2002;8:793–800.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Iwai Y, Ishida M, Tanaka Y, Okazaki T, Honjo T, Minato N. Involvement of PD-L1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by PD-L1 blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:12293–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fife BT, Pauken KE, Eagar TN, Obu T, Wu J, Tang Q, Azuma M, Krummel MF, Bluestone JA. Interactions between PD-1 and PD-L1 promote tolerance by blocking the TCR-induced stop signal. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:1185–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Khoja L, Day D, Wei-Wu Chen T, Siu LL, Hansen AR. Tumour- and class-specific patterns of immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2377–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, McNeil C, Kalinka-Warzocha E, Savage KJ, Hernberg MM, Lebbé C, Charles J, Mihalcioiu C, Chiarion-Sileni V, Mauch C, Cognetti F, Arance A, Schmidt H, Schadendorf D, Gogas H, Lundgren-Eriksson L, Horak C, Sharkey B, Waxman IM, Atkinson V, Ascierto PA. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:320–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Robert C, Ribas A, Wolchok JD, Hodi FS, Hamid O, Kefford R, Weber JS, Joshua AM, Hwu WJ, Gangadhar TC, Patnaik A, Dronca R, Zarour H, Joseph RW, Boasberg P, Chmielowski B, Mateus C, Postow MA, Gergich K, Elassaiss-Schaap J, Li XN, Iannone R, Ebbinghaus SW, Kang SP, Daud A. Anti-programmed death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2014;384:1109–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Reig A, Sesé P, Parés A. Effects of bezafibrate on outcome and pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis with suboptimal ursodeoxycholic acid response. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:49–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Belli C, Zuin M, Mazzarella L, Trapani D, D’Amico P, Guerini-Rocco E, Achutti Duso B, Curigliano G. Liver toxicity in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a practical approach. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018;132:125–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Villadolid J, Amin A. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice: update on management of immune-related toxicities. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4:560–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Imoto K, Kohjima M, Hioki T, Kurashige T, Kurokawa M, Tashiro S, Suzuki H, Kuwano A, Tanaka M, Okada S, Kato M, Ogawa Y. Clinical features of liver injury induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors in Japanese patients. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;2019:6391712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Friedman CF, Proverbs-Singh TA, Postow MA. Treatment of the immune-related adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1346–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Doherty GJ, Duckworth AM, Davies SE, Mells GF, Brais R, Harden SV, Parkinson CA, Corrie PG. Severe steroid-resistant anti-PD1 T-cell checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity driven by biliary injury. ESMO Open. 2017;2:e000268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zen Y, Yeh MM. Hepatotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a histology study of seven cases in comparison with autoimmune hepatitis and idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:965–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yoshikawa M, Tsujii T, Matsumura K, Yamao J, Matsumura Y, Kubo R, Fukui H, Ishizaka S. Immunomodulatory effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on immune responses. Hepatology. 1992;16:358–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Levy C, Peter JA, Nelson DR, Keach J, Petz J, Cabrera R, Clark V, Firpi RJ, Morelli G, Soldevila-Pico C, Lindor K. Pilot study: fenofibrate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33:235–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


There was no funding for this case report.

Author information




SO and MT were major contributors to the writing of the manuscript. HB, YM, WH, and KM performed several examinations of the patient and performed follow-up with the patient. MT and YN conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachiyo Onishi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the fundamental principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient and his family for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

KM has received research grants from Parexel International, Merck Serono, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Shionogi, Pfizer, Mediscience Planning, and Solasia Pharma (in the role of principal investigator) and has received lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Chugai, Takeda, Ono, Taiho, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Bayer (honoraria). HB has received lecture fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical. SO, MT, YM, WH, and YN declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onishi, S., Tajika, M., Bando, H. et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate were useful for steroid-refractory, immune-related hepatitis: a case report. J Med Case Reports 14, 230 (2020).

Download citation


  • Nivolumab
  • Hepatic immune-related adverse events
  • Ursodeoxycholic acid
  • Bezafibrate