Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Streptococcus pneumoniae primary peritonitis mimicking acute appendicitis in an immunocompetent patient: a case report and review of the literature

Journal of Medical Case Reports201913:126

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-019-2038-3

  • Received: 23 September 2018
  • Accepted: 28 February 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Introduction

Primary peritonitis without an identifiable intra-abdominal source is extremely rare in healthy individuals; it is commonly seen in cases of nephrotic syndrome, cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease, ascites, immunosuppression, and inflamed peritoneum due to pre-existing autoimmune and oncological conditions.

Case presentation

We present the case of a 68-year-old Caucasian woman operated on due to acute abdomen with a provisional diagnosis of acute appendicitis. During the operation a small amount of free intra-abdominal fluid was found. Her uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes were macroscopically normal. Therefore, with the suspicion of appendicitis, appendectomy was performed. Her blood cultures were negative while peritoneal fluid was positive for capsulated form of Streptococcus pneumoniae. A 30-day follow-up was performed and she was asymptomatic without any sign of infection.

Discussion

Streptococcus pneumoniae commonly causes upper respiratory tract infection and cutaneous infections. It very rarely causes gastrointestinal infection and it is very rarely responsible for primary peritonitis and septic shock syndrome.

Conclusion

Pneumococcal peritonitis has a rare occurrence and represents a clinical challenge because of its subtle and non-specific clinical findings. The interest in our case lays in the relatively rare diagnosis of primary peritonitis mimicking acute appendicitis.

Keywords

  • Primary peritonitis
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae
  • Acute abdomen

Introduction

Primary peritonitis (PP) is a diffuse infective inflammation of the peritoneal cavity in the absence of a localized source [13]. PP is extremely rare (2%) in healthy individuals; it usually occurs in patients with nephrotic syndrome, cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, ascites, immunosuppressive status, or inflamed peritoneum due to pre-existing autoimmune and/or oncological conditions [47]. The physiopathology of PP is not completely understood, but increased translocation of intestinal bacteria, retrograde diffusion from the genitourinary tract in females, or hematogenous infectious pathways have been discussed. Historically, PP has been related to Gram-negative bacteria, while Gram-positive bacteria, excluding Enterococcus species, are rarely involved [810] and, therefore, PP was seldom misdiagnosed. We present the case of a 68-year-old Caucasian woman operated on due to acute abdomen with a provisional diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old Caucasian woman presented to our emergency department complaining of acute onset of severe abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant that began approximately 48 hours earlier; she had a temperature of 39.1 °C and heart rate of 98/minute. She denied any recent fever, chills, hemoptysis, hematochezia, or change in bowel habits. She had no history of trauma or surgery; she did not take any regular medication; she did not use an intrauterine device (IUD) or other local contraceptive. She had normal sex activity with the same partner (last sexual relationship 20 days before surgery). No relevant history of infection in her family was reported. On her presentation to our emergency room, a physical examination revealed a localized peritonism in the right lower quadrant. At rectal examination, a normal sphincter tone was found with no palpable masses and normal stool. Other features were unremarkable. Laboratory values on admission showed an hemoglobin of 13.3 g/dL, 36.4% hematocrit, with 19.00 × 103/uL white blood cells (WBC). C-reactive protein (CRP) value was 5 mg/dl (normal value < 0.5). A computed tomography (CT) scan (Fig. 1) revealed no pathognomonic signs of appendicitis. Due to the diagnosis of acute abdomen, with provisional clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis and secondary peritonitis, antibiotic treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate 2 .2 g three times a day was initiated and she was taken to our operating room. During the operation, a small amount of free intra-abdominal fluid was found with uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes being macroscopically normal. Appendicitis was therefore suspected and appendectomy was performed. Ascitic fluid culture was sent to the Microbiology Laboratory in suitable means of transport. The sample was processed with the classic method by sowing on culture-enriched media, searching for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria [11]. Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated after 24 hours of incubation in CO2. The organism was identified as S. pneumoniae 99.9% with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (bioMérieux Clinical Diagnostics). An antibiotic susceptibility test was performed using E-test method and interpreted using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines 2017 [12]. The organism was susceptible to antibiotics tested with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of benzylpenicillin 0.01 μg/ml, ampicillin 0.02 μg/ml, linezolid 1 μg/ml, ceftriaxone 0.01 μg/ml, meropenem 0.50 μg/ml, levofloxacin 0.5 μg/ml, clindamycin 0.02 μg/ml, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 0.5 μg/ml, and vancomycin 0.1 μg/ml while blood cultures were negative. Our patient’s postoperative course was unremarkable and the antibiotic therapy was stopped after 4 days. She was discharged on the fifth postoperative day asymptomatic with a good performance status. In order to understand the source of this rare form of peritonitis we performed an evaluation of serum oncological markers and immunological status (procalcitonin, interleukin 5, interleukin 10), which were all negative. We also tested markers for HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) that gave negative results. A chest CT scan was also performed without any evidence of an active source of infection. Furthermore, histological examination of her appendix did not show signs of appendicitis but revealed a form of peritonitis (Figs. 2 and 3). A 30-day follow-up was performed. At day 10 an evaluation of our patient’s immunological status was performed and the results were negative; at day 20 a chest CT was done and results were negative for any source of infection.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Computed tomography scan image. No abnormalities in the abdominal organs

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Histopathological examination of the appendix without pathological signs (hematoxylin-eosin, ×10)

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Histopathological report of appendix and mesenteriolum inflammatory peritoneal reaction with deposits of fibrin and granulocytes (red arrows) either over appendicular (a) and mesenteriolum (b) serosa (hematoxylin-eosin, × 10)

Discussion

S. pneumoniae is the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia and the second most common cause of purulent meningitis, while intra-abdominal pneumococcal infection is rarely found [1318].

We conducted a review of the literature by searching the PubMed database for all published series and case reports of PP due to S. pneumoniae in the worldwide literature up to 9 September 2017. We analyzed all cases reported in the literature [1860]. Pediatric cases [1921], secondary peritonitis [21, 22], and cases arising in patients with ongoing predisposing conditions [2325] were excluded. All other papers were reviewed in order to evaluate real cases of PP (Table 1) [26, 31, 32, 3440, 4451, 53, 54, 5660]. While pneumococcal peritonitis in children has been recognized for almost 100 years, our review shows, according with the findings of Dugi et al. [13], that primary pneumococcal peritonitis without pre-existing peritoneal disease is uncommon in healthy adults [6164]. Without predisposing conditions, the virulence of some pneumococcus serotypes may contribute to the onset of this rare infection [44, 54]. The physiopathology of primary pneumococcal peritonitis remains controversial. Pneumococci may gain entry to the peritoneal cavity via the genital tract, the gastrointestinal tract, or by hematogenous spread from the respiratory tract [57]. Hemsley and Eykyn [40] reported an increased prevalence in female adults, with the genital tract being the most common source of pneumococcus. In fact, occasionally, vaginal commensals can presumably cause ascending infection also without predisposing factors such as the presence of an IUD or history of recent delivery. However, all the cases reported in their paper have evidence of a presumptive sepsis focus and therefore are not definable as PP.
Table 1

Review of the literature

Reference (year)

Author

Age/Gender

Presumed source

Computed tomography

Laparotomy

Peritoneal fluid culture

Blood cultures

[26]/1970

Friedland and Harris

20/F

Unidentified

No

Yes

+

+

[31]/1989

Bukovsky et al.

33/F

Unidentified

No

No

+

[32]/1989

Davis et al.

21/F

Unidentified

No

Yes

+

ND

[34]/1990

Christen et al.

50/F

Unidentified

No

Yes

+

+

[34]/1990

Christen et al.

58/F

Unidentified

No

Yes

+

ND

[35]/1990

Casadevall et al.

87/F

Unidentified

No

Yes

+

+

[35]/1990

Casadevall et al.

42/F

Unidentified

Yes

No

+

ND

[36]/1992

Tariq and Joseph

27/F

Unidentified

Yes

No

+

[37]/1992

Kunkler et al.

36/F

Unidentified

No

Yes

+

[37]/1992

Kunkler et al.

38/F

Unidentified

No

No

ND

+

[38]/1993

Bruyn

35/F

Unidentified

No

Yes

+

+

[39]/1995

Graham et al.

39/F

Unidentified

No

Yes

+

[40]/1998

Hemsley and Eykyn

36/F

Unitendified

No

Yes

+

[35]/2001

Fox et al.

39/F

Unidentified

Yes

Yes

+

ND

[36]/2001

Ueyama et al.

52/F

Unidentified

Yes

Yes

+

[37]/2001

Sanchez and Lancaster

34/M

Unidentified

Yes

Laparoscopy

+

+

[38]/2004

Okumura et al.

29/F

Unidentified

Yes

Yes

+

[39]/2004

Kanetake et al.

40/M

Unidentified

Yes

Yes

+

[40]/2005

Brivet et al.

54/F

Unidentified

Yes

Laparoscopy

ND

+

[41]/2005

Brivet et al.

82/F

Unidentified

Yes

No

ND

+

[41]/2006

Jarvis et al.

38/F

Unidentified

Yes

Yes

+

ND

[42]/2006

Saha et al.

23/F

Unidentified

Yes

Yes

ND

+

[44]/2008

Doloy et al.

35/F

Unidentified

No

Laparoscopy

+

ND

[45]/2009

Thomas et al.

36/M

Unidentified

Yes

Yes

+

+

[47]/2010

Haap et al.

27/F

Unidentified

Yes

Yes

ND

+

[48]/2010

Tilanus et al.

39/F

Unidentified

Yes

Yes

ND

+

[49]/2010

Monneuse et al.

35 (23–43)

Unidentified (4 patients)

Yes

Yes

+

+

[50]/2011

Legras et al.

23/F

Unidentified

Yes

Laparoscopy

+

ND

[51]/2013

Malota et al.

Unidentified (3 patients)

Yes

Yes

+

ND

F female, M male, ND no data

Of interest, a peculiarity of this condition is the absence of mixed organisms. In fact, no case reported an association of multiple infective agents.

There is no definite clinical pattern or features which might help in the diagnosis. Usually the clinical picture closely resembles that of appendicitis or secondary peritonitis with or without sepsis which, in most cases, is the presumptive diagnosis [5860].

Management of this condition is strictly linked to the diagnosis. While PP can be suspected in patients with comorbidities in the presence of a negative radiologic investigation, it is hardly recognizable in young and immunocompetent patients with no risk factors, like in our case. This confirms the fact that, based on an erroneous diagnosis, most of these patients are operated on despite negative results from imaging.

The best diagnostic algorithm is, in our opinion, Westwood and Roberts’ [63]. Antibiotic therapy remains the first step in treatment of PP in patients with active comorbidities. The real clinical challenge arises with young, healthy, and immunocompetent patients. How can we suspect PP in those cases? In our opinion, with a negative CT scan, antibiotic therapy seems to be the first approach for 36–48 hours, despite several studies underlining that there seems to be little consensus regarding the antibiotic treatment for pneumococcal peritonitis and only little information has been published about the antibiotic regimens chosen for the treatment [65]. For patients infected by penicillin-susceptible organisms, penicillin remains the preferred treatment, while in areas where the prevalence of resistant pneumococci is high, cefotaxime or ceftriaxone is the empirical therapy of choice, as antibiotic-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae have been identified worldwide, and the prevalence of these resistant strains is as high as 57% in some countries [61, 64]. In non-responders and in patients with sepsis, exploratory laparotomy is a well-accepted treatment [65, 66]. The laparoscopic approach is pivotal, related to its low invasiveness and high diagnostic specificity and sensitivity, with peritoneal lavage or drainage being the diagnostic tool of choice [67]. It remains unclear, however, whether surgical exploration and lavage of the abdominal cavity with or without appendectomy is beneficial or detrimental for patients with primary pneumococcal peritonitis. One could assume that removal of infectious ascites and reduction of intra-abdominal bacterial load would support the healing process, while, in patients with cirrhosis with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, surgery does not improve the course of the disease [68]. Laparotomy with abdominal debridement and visceral resection is a rare choice selected for advanced cases with complex peritoneal involvement [69, 70]. Based on all these findings it can be assumed that the management of pneumococcal peritonitis involves timely surgical intervention and treatment with antibiotics.

Conclusion

Primary pneumococcal peritonitis without pre-existing peritoneal disease is rare and represents a cultural and clinical challenge, especially for surgeons, because of its subtle and non-specific clinical findings. The interest in our case lays in the rare diagnosis of PP mimicking acute appendicitis in a healthy woman, without history of recent acute pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and the isolation of pneumococcus in its capsulated form. This case report reinforces the need for an appropriate clinical algorithm in those patients without medical history and active comorbidities when the diagnosis of acute appendicitis is not clear at the time of operation, especially for female patients. No direct diagnosis is possible. The treatment of choice is the fast initiation of antibiotic therapy. Although surgical therapy is generally not required for the treatment of primary pneumococcal peritonitis, it may be necessary to exclude secondary peritonitis or in non-responders.

Abbreviations

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

CT: 

Computed tomography

EUCAST: 

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

HCV: 

Hepatitis C virus

IUD: 

Intrauterine device

MALDI-TOF: 

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight

MICs: 

Minimum inhibitory concentrations

PID: 

Pelvic inflammatory disease

PP: 

Primary peritonitis

WBC: 

White blood cells

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was provided for this study.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing was not applicable to this article, as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

PF and FC made substantial contributions to the study conception and design and were responsible for acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data. PF and MB were involved in drafting the manuscript. GS and AG critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. GS and RM gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, St. Andrea’s Hospital, Via Di Grottarossa, 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy
(2)
Emergency Surgery and Trauma Care Unit – St Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
(3)
Anatomical Pathology – St Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
(4)
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit – St Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
(5)
UOC Chirurgia d’Urgenza, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

References

  1. Koulaouzidis A, Bhat S, Saeed AA. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1042–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lata J, Stiburek O, Kopacova M. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a severe complication of liver cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5505–10.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Laroche M, Harding G. Primary and secondary peritonitis: An update. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998;17:542–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. van Erpecum KJ. Ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;243Suppl:79–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chuang TF, Kao SC, Tsai CJ, Lee CC, et al. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis as the presenting feature in an adult with nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:181–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheong HS, Joung MK, Kang CI, Ko KS, et al. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Inf Secur. 2009;59:218–9.Google Scholar
  7. Shaw E, Castellote J, Santín M, Xiol X, et al. Clinical features and outcome of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in HIV-infected cirrhotic patients: a case-control study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25:291–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Farthmann EH, Schöffel U. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of intraabdominal infections (IAI). Infection. 1998;26:329–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Holzheimer RG, Muhrer KH, L'Allemand N, Schmidt T, et al. Intraabdominal infections: classification, mortality, scoring and pathophysiology. Infection. 1991;19:447–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nyström PO, Bax R, Dellinger EP, Dominioni L, et al. Proposed definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, stratification, and outcome for trials on intraabdominal infection. Joint Working Party of SIS North America and Europe. World J Surg. 1990;14:148–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 1. 9th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 7.1, 2017. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_7.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf.
  13. Dugi DD 3rd, Musher DM, Clarridge JE 3rd, Kimbrough R. Intraabdominal infection due to Streptococcus pneumoniae. Medicine (Baltimore). 2001;80:236–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Musher DM. Pneumococcal serotypes and virulence. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:477. author reply 477–8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Watson DA, Musher DM, Jacobson JW, Verhoef J. A brief history of the pneumococcus in biomedical research: a panoply of scientific discovery. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17:913–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Austrian R. The pneumococcus at the millennium: not down, not out. J Infect Dis. 1999;179(Suppl 2):S338–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Musher DM. Infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae: clinical spectrum, pathogenesis, immunity, and treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:801–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Litarski A, Janczak D, Cianciara J, Merenda M. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to streptococcus pneumonia--Case report. Pol Przegl Chir. 2011;83:283–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Patel RV, Kumar H, More B, Rajimwale A. Primary group A streptococcal septic shock syndrome simulating perforated appendicitis in a previously healthy girl. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;4:2013.Google Scholar
  20. Bose B, Keir WR, Godberson CV. Primary pneumococcal peritonitis. Can Med Assoc J. 1974;110:305.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. van Steekelenburg M, de Roo RA, Steenvoorde P, Gosen JJ, et al. Pneumococcal peritonitis mimicking acute appendicitis. Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163:505–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Pasticci MB, Donnini A, Mencacci A, Laparolcia MN, Cavazzoni E, Baldelli F. A diagnosis of pneumococcal peritonitis secondary to pyo-salpinx in a young healthy female by culturing peritoneal pus. New Microbiol. 2008;31:295–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Caierão J, Cornely AF, da Cunha GR, Mott M, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae appendicitis in an adult patient. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33:990e1–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim T, Hong SI, Park SY, Jung J, Chong YP, Kim SH, Lee SO, Kim YS, Woo JH, Lim YS, Sung H, Kim MN, Choi SH. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(22):e3796.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Morrill HJ, Caffrey AR, Noh E, LaPlante KL. Epidemiology of Pneumococcal Disease in a National Cohort of Older Adults. Infect Dis Ther. 2014;3:19–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Friedland JA, Harris MN. Primary Pneumococcal peritonitis in a young adult. Am J Surg. 1970;119:737–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Herbert TJ, Mortimer PP. Recurrent pneumococcal peritonitis associated with an intra-uterine contraceptive device. Br J Surg. 1974;61:901–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sodhi HS. Primary pneumococcal peritonitis in an adult. J Maine Med Assoc. 1978;69:290–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gruer LD, Collingham KE, Edwards CW. Pneumococcal peritonitis associated with an IUCD [letter]. Lancet. 1983;2:677.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lucas RE, Brook MG. Pneumococcal peritonitis related to an intra-uterine device. J Inf Secur. 1987;15:280–1.Google Scholar
  31. Bukovsky I, Neuman R, Ron-El R, Langer R, Caspi F. Pneumococcal peritonitis in the presence of intra-uterine contraceptive device. Conservative treatment: a case report. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;33:79–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Davis MG, Halpin DP, O’Byrne P, Stephens RB. Primary pneumococcal peritonitis. A brief report. Ir J Med Sci. 1989;158:307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Gribbin JC, Cox CJ. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in a healthy adult male. Aust N Z J Surg. 1990;60:723–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Christen RD, Moser R, Schlup P, Neftel KA. Fulminant group A streptococcal infections: Report of two cases. Klin Wochenschr. 1990;68:427–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Casadevall A, Pirofski L, Catalano MT. Primary group streptococcal peritonitis in adults. Am J Med. 1990;88:63N–4N.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tariq SM, Joseph TP. Primary pneumococcal peritonitis and bacteremia in an immunocompetent woman [letter]. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:375–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kunkler RB, Grewal HPS, Tomson CRV, O’Brien TS. Primary pneumococcal peritonitis. Br J Hosp Med. 1992;47:262–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bruyn GAW. Spontaneous pneumococcal peritonitis in young women [letter]. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16:728–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Graham JC, Moss PJ, McKendrick MW. Primary group A streptococcal peritonitis. Scand J Infect Dis. 1995;27:171–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Hemsley C, Eykyn SJ. Pneumococcal peritonitis in previously healthy adults: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:376–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Moskovitz M, Ehrenberg E, Grieco R, et al. Primary peritonitis due to group A Streptococcus. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30:325–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Vuilleumier H, Halkic N. Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome revealed by a peritonitis. Swiss Surg. 2001;7:25–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Borgia SM, Low DE, Andrighetti S, Rau NV. Group A streptococcal sepsis secondary to peritonitis and acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001;20:437–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fox KL, Born MW, Cohen MA. Fulminant infection and toxic shock syndrome caused by Streptococcus pyogenes. J Emerg Med. 2002;22:357–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ueyama N, Kuwashima S, Nakayama A, et al. Ileal adenomyoma accompanied by primary peritonitis: Report of a case. Surg Today. 2001;31:826–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanchez NC, Lancaster BA. A rare case of primary group A streptococcal peritonitis. Am Surg. 2001;67:633–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Okumura K, Schroff R, Campbell R, et al. Group A streptococcal puerperal sepsis with retroperitoneal involvement developing in a late postpartum woman: Case report. Am Surg. 2004;70:730–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kanetake K, Hayashi M, Hino A, et al. Primary peritonitis associated with streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome: Report of a case. Surg Today. 2004;34:1053–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Brivet FG, Smadja C, Hilbert U, et al. Usefulness of abdominal CT scan in severe peritoneal sepsis linked to primary peritonitis. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37:76–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Jarvis J, Trivedi S, Sheda S, Frizelle FA. Primary peritonitis in adults: Is it time to look for a better diagnostic classification. ANZJ Surg. 2006;76:127–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Saha P, Morewood T, Naftalin J, Hopkins S. Acute abdomen in a healthy woman: Primary peritonitis due to Group A Streptococcus. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26:700–1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. van Lelyveld-Haas LE, Dekkers AJ, Postma B, Tjan DH. An unusual cause of a spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in a young healthy woman. N Z Med J. 2008;121:82–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Doloy A, Godin C, Decousser JW, et al. Primary peritonitis due to Streptococcus pyogenes with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;62:447–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas D, Perpoint T, Dauwalder O, et al. In vivo and in vitro detection of a superantigenic toxin Vbeta signature in two forms of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:671–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Kinsella A, Kavanagh DO, McGiobuin S, et al. Primary peritonitis from an insect bite. Irish Med J. 2009;102:87–8.Google Scholar
  56. Tilanus AM, de Geus HR, Rijnders BJ, et al. Severe group A streptococcal toxic shock syndrome presenting as primary peritonitis: A case report and brief review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14 Suppl 3:e208–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Monneuse O, Tissot E, Gruner L, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous group A streptococcal peritonitis. Br J Surg. 2010;97:104–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Haap M, Haas CS, Teichmann R, et al. Mystery or misery? Primary group A streptococcal peritonitis in women: Case report. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19:454–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Legras A, LoDico R, Ferre R, et al. Primary peritonitis due to Streptococcus A: Laparoscopic treatment. J Visc Surg. 2011;148:e315–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Malota M, Felbinger TW, Ruppert R, Nüssler NC. Group A Streptococci: A rare and often misdiagnosed cause of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in adults. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;6C:251–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Choi SH, Park HG, Jun JB, Lee SO, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of pneumococcal bacteremia in adult patients with liver cirrhosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;63:160–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Bucher A, Müller F. Spectrum of abdominal and pelvic infections caused by pneumococci in previously healthy adult women. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002;21:474–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Westwood DA, Roberts RH. Management of primary group A streptococcal peritonitis: a systematic review. Surg Infect. 2013;14:171–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Capdevila O, Pallares R, Grau I, Tubau F, et al. Pneumococcal peritonitis in adult patients: report of 64 cases with special reference to emergence of antibiotic resistance. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1742–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Coialbu T, Minervini F, Pittaluga M, Banderali A, et al. Primary pneumococcal peritonitis: description of a case and review of the literature. Clin Ter. 1999;150:449–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Farthmann EH, Schöffel U. Principles and limitations of operative management of intraabdominal infections. World J Surg. 1990;14:210–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Farooq A, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic diagnosis and management of primary bacterial peritonitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;15:36–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Pollock AV. Nonoperative antiinfective treatment of intraabdominal infections. World J Surg. 1990;14:227–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Nielsen KR, Ejlertsen T, El-Batran S, Prag J. A five-year survey of pneumococcal peritonitis in two Danish counties. Incidence, diagnosis and clinical entities. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9:738–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. El-Samad Y, Fuks D, Lepage L, Hamdad F, et al. Treatment in primary Streptococcus pneumoniae peritonitis in adult: a case report and review of the literature. Rev Med Intern. 2006;27:966–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement