Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Robotic renal cyst decortication with calyceal diverticulectomy in a toddler – technical practicalities: a case report

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Medical Case Reports201812:284

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1830-9

  • Received: 19 March 2018
  • Accepted: 3 September 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Incidence of simultaneous renal cyst with calyceal diverticula in contralateral kidney is rare in children. A minimally invasive procedure in different sittings is often recommended.

Case presentation

A Chinese 15-month-old boy presented to the Urology department of a tertiary care center with right flank pain. He was subjected to magnetic resonance urography and was diagnosed as having right renal cyst and contralateral calyceal diverticula. He underwent robotic cyst decortication and calyceal diverticulectomy using da Vinci robot. His postoperative period was uneventful. He was discharged on fifth postoperative day. Histopathology was consistent with simple renal cyst.

Conclusions

Robotic combined cyst decortication and contralateral diverticulectomy is feasible in selected small children. However, it demands adequate technical skill and experience.

Keywords

  • Robot assisted
  • Renal cyst
  • Calyceal diverticula
  • Pediatric

Background

A calyceal diverticulum is an outpouching of the renal collecting system lying within the renal parenchyma [1]. It is lined by transitional cell epithelium and connects with the collecting system via a narrow channel, which results in passive filling of urine. In the long term, it can lead to the formation of stone, infection, and other symptoms including pain and increasing size, which need surgical intervention. The exact etiology of calyceal diverticulum is still unknown. However, the hypothesis about congenital origins is highly regarded [2].

A simple renal cyst (SRC) is defined as a solitary discrete lesion outside the kidney parenchyma [3]. It has been reported that the prevalence of SRC ranges from 5 to 41% in adults; the rate in children is low but it increases with age from 0.22 to 0.55% [4]. Most SRCs are asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. However, some large SRCs can occasionally cause some symptoms like flank pain.

Robot-assisted surgery with the da Vinci Surgical System is increasingly being applied in a wide range of surgical specialties, especially in urology [5]. It overcomes the limitations of the standard laparoscopic approach and allows for precise dissection in a confined space. However, there are few articles reporting the procedure of robot-assisted one-stage surgery for bilateral renal lesions, especially in toddlers. To show the feasibility of this technique and critically evaluate it, we reported this case of robot-assisted simultaneous cyst decortication and calyceal diverticulectomy.

Case presentation

A Chinese 15-month-old boy presented to the Urology department of a tertiary care center with right flank pain. He had no hypertension or fever. In addition, there were no urinary symptoms such as crying or straining during micturition, frequent urination, or hematuria for the child. According to the history taken from his parents, the pregnancy was uneventful, with no significant antenatal and postnatal history. His birth weight was 2.9 kg, height 51 cm, and head circumference 36 cm. Past medical, environmental, and family history were also not significant. There were no congenital anomalies in the family. He had no siblings. On examination, his pulse rate was 115 beats per minute, body temperature 36.7 °C, respiration rate 28 breaths per minute, and blood pressure 95/46 mmHg. There was no tenderness and no mass palpable in his flank.

The abdominal ultrasound from the local hospital revealed multiple cystic lesions in both kidneys. Magnetic resonance urography (MRU) indicated the possibility of a renal cyst (right; Fig. 1) and calyceal diverticula (left); a parapelvic cyst was not excluded. For further evaluation, retrograde pyelography was done during an operation (Fig. 2). At last, the child was reliably diagnosed as having right renal cyst and calyceal diverticula on the other side. No significant abnormality was found in the results of laboratory findings, including complete blood count (CBC), liver and renal functions, urine analysis, serology, and microbiology. (Table 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Magnetic resonance urography shows: a thin-wall renal cyst measuring 60 mm (maximum diameter) in the upper part of right kidney and a multilocular cystic lesion (approximately 40 mm) in the bottom of left kidney

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Retrograde pyelography shows: a the cyst not communicating with the collecting system; b the cystic area communicating with the collecting system via a narrow infundibulum

Table 1

Results of laboratory findings

 

Result(s)

Unit(s)

Range(s) of normal value

WBC

9.40

109/L

3.50–9.50

RBC

4.54

1012/L

4.30–5.80

PLT

121↓

109/L

125–350

Hb

126↓

g/L

130–175

ALT

15.3

U/L

9–50

AST

29.5

U/L

15–40

TBIL

11.3

umol/L

5.1–19.0

DBIL

3.3

umol/L

0.0–6.8

IBIL

8.0

umol/L

0.0–20.0

TC

5.21

mmol/L

0.00–6.20

TG

0.81

mmol/L

0.00–2.25

ALB

47.8

g/L

40.0–55.0

GLU

5.50

mmol/L

3.90–6.10

Urea

4.20

mmol/L

2.90–8.20

Cr

26.5↓

umol/L

44.0–133.0

UA

276.9

umol/L

208–428

PT

12.20

second

11 ± 3

APTT

25.00

second

24.5 ± 10

ALB albumin, ALT alanine aminotransferase, APTT activated partial thromboplastin time, AST aspartate aminotransferase, Cr creatinine, DBIL direct bilirubin, GLU glucose, Hb hemoglobin, IBIL indirect bilirubin, PLT platelets, PT prothrombin time, RBC red blood cells, TBIL total bilirubin, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride level, UA uric acid, WBC white blood cells

A robotic-assisted procedure was planned. On September 1, 2016, the procedure was performed using a three-arm da Vinci Robot, standard version, starting from the right side. Our patient was secured in a flank position with the table slightly bent. Regarding the port placement, five ports in the abdomen region were placed for the procedure, with a 12.0 mm camera port, two 8.0 mm robotic ports, and a 12.0 mm and 5.0 mm assistant port (Fig. 3). Subsequently, the robot was docked over the shoulder with the camera oriented in accordance with the kidney. The robotic grasper in Arm 1 for retraction and monopolar scissors in Arm 2 were used under the camera guidance with 30-degree down-scope. The ascending colon was mobilized and reflected medially to expose the kidney. After carefully clearing away the perinephric fat to expose the cyst, it was incised and fluid was carefully aspirated. Most of the cyst wall was excised and sent for histopathological examination (Fig. 4). This was followed by contralateral procedure on right side in same sitting. The calyceal diverticula was found using the same previously reported procedures and unroofed completely without renal arterial clamping. Renorrhaphy was performed in two layers using sliding-clip technique. Surgical drains were placed on both sides. Operating time was 90 minutes. Postoperative drainage from two drains was approximately 50 cc. No prophylactic antibiotics were given before surgery. Intravenously administered cefodizime (1 g, twice a day) was given 48 hours after surgery for prophylactic purpose. His postoperative period was uneventful and he was discharged on day five postoperatively. With 1-year follow up after the surgery, the child did not have any complaints, and postoperative ultrasound images showed no hydrops or diverticulum associated with either kidney.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Port placement

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Microscopic picture shows simple renal cyst

Discussion

In this case, robotic renal cyst decortication with calyceal diverticulectomy was performed successfully in a toddler. As we know, few similar cases were reported due to low incidence rate in children and immature technology. Therefore, this case report helped to show the feasibility and safety of this technique for children.

Calyceal diverticula are rarely diagnosed in children [610]. They are most often congenital; they are rarely acquired after urinary tract infection, trauma, or urolithiasis. They constitute a diagnostic challenge in children due to the ultrasonographic resemblance to solitary renal cysts, which are also rare in this age group [11]. In this case, we took retrograde urography to distinguish calyceal diverticula from renal cyst during the operation, which is effective and reliable. Although the diverticulum of the left kidney was asymptomatic, it is necessary to deal with the lesions on both kidneys simultaneously. In the long term, calyceal diverticulum can lead to the formation of stone, infection, and other symptoms, which need surgical intervention. Previous research has established that stones can be found in up to 50% of calyceal diverticula, although, over the combined reported series, 96% of patients presented with stones [12]. So we performed calyceal diverticulectomy to reduce the risk of more aggressive operations in the future, which is more beneficial to the patient.

Compared with staging operation, the risk of one-stage surgery for bilateral renal lesions is much higher. Soylu Boy et al. [13] reported two cases of bilateral synchronous sporadic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which were successfully treated by laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. It is further indicated that simultaneous bilateral renal surgery is safe and feasible, and the advantages are obvious: it avoids the pain of secondary surgery, shortens the hospital stay, and saves medical expenses. However, not all patients are suitable for the treatment of bilateral lesions at the same time. It is a demanding job to select appropriate patients and analyze the examination results: (1) To avoid unnecessary excessive separation and damage, it is important to determine the location, size, number, and neighboring relationship of the lesions via imaging examination. (2) For bilateral kidney diseases, the surgical procedure should give priority to the easy-to-operate side, and then do the other side, so that at least one side of the surgery can be guaranteed. If there are some difficulties or accidents, the latter operation can be terminated or changed to open surgery at any time depending on the situation. In this case, the right renal cyst is easier to treat than the left renal diverticulum, so the right-side surgery is performed first. (3) Some easily overlooked surgical contraindications should be removed when selecting patients, such as history of abdominal surgery, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients with hypercapnia, and poor physical condition (old, poor liver and kidney function). (4) Compared to unilateral surgery, the risk of anesthesia, hypercapnia, subcutaneous emphysema, and other laparoscopic-related complications could increase due to extended operation time.

The management of calyceal diverticula has been debated. Laparoscopy is an alternative approach that has been used with favorable results [14]. Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery is featured with a wrist function at the tip, movement downgrading, tremor elimination, a stable three-dimensional vision, greater precision in dissection, easier suturing and knot tying, shorter learning curve, and favorable surgical ergonomics. It may help the surgeon overcome some of difficulties encountered with traditional laparoscopic surgery and have the potential to reduce intraoperative blood loss, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stay [15, 16]. In 2007, Driscoll and Kim [17] reported a robot-assisted laparoscopic calyceal diverticulectomy in a 14-year-old girl, which was performed successfully. Considering the age and narrow operation space, we also decided to perform robot-assisted cyst decortication and calyceal diverticulectomy simultaneously, which has been rarely reported before. Although the robot-assisted intervention was not less cost effective than laparoscopic surgery, our patient’s posture had to be switched to fit the need of different kidney surgeries. In fact, the two surgeries were performed without shutting the robot down and using the same surgical instruments. These aspects helped strongly to decrease the costs of a robotic-assisted operation. Overall, the entire operation lasted approximately 90 minutes including anesthesiological procedures, patient positioning, and trocar placement. We think that this is acceptable for a bilateral procedure as confirmed by the regular observations made in the postoperative period.

However, some limitations of our technique exist. As mentioned above, it is a demanding job to select suitable patients. Some easily overlooked surgical contraindications should also be removed. Moreover, laparoscopic experience is indispensable for surgeons to shorten the operation time and reduce the risk of laparoscopic-related complications as much as possible.

Conclusions

Our experience was encouraging and confirmed the feasibility and the safety of this procedure for children. Robot-assisted laparoscopy is a useful tool with excellent visualization and precise maneuvering. However, an appropriate selection of the patients and a skill in robot-assisted renal surgery are mandatory before approaching this type of surgery.

Notes

Declarations

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

YCW, JDX, and QJZ drafted the manuscript and revised it. CC, JXX, and JY participated in the acquisition of data. NHS and ZJW collected cases and did the check. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. And informed participation consent was obtained from the patient(s) included in this study.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian(s) for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, China

References

  1. Waingankar N, Hayek S, Smith AD, et al. Calyceal diverticula: a comprehensive review. Rev Urol. 2014;16(1):29–43.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Timmons JW Jr, Malek RS, Hattery RR, Deweerd JH. Caliceal diverticulum. J Urol. 1975;114(1):6–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Waterman J. Diagnosis and evaluation of renal cysts. Prim Care. 2014;41(4):823–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. McHugh K, Stringer DA, Hebert D, et al. Simple renal cysts in children: diagnosis and follow-up with US. Radiology. 1991;178(2):383–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ng ATL, Tam PC. Current status of robot-assisted surgery. Hong Kong Med J. 2014;20:241–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Karmazyn B, Kaefer M, Jennings SG, et al. Caliceal diverticulum in pediatric patients: the spectrum of imaging findings. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41:1369–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Siegel MJ, McAlister WH. Calyceal diverticula in children: unusual features and complications. Radiology. 1979;131:79–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kavukcu S, Cakmakci H, Babayigit A. Diagnosis of caliceal diverticulum in two pediatric patients: a comparison of sonography, CT, and urography. J Clin Ultrasound. 2003;31:218–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Estrada CR, Datta S, Schneck FX, et al. Caliceal diverticula in children: natural history and management. J Urol. 2009;181:1306–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Casale P, Grady RW, Feng WC, et al. The pediatric caliceal diverticulum: diagnosis and laparoscopic management. J Endourol. 2004;18:668–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Biejat A, Marcinski A, Brzewski M, et al. Simple renal cysts in children. Pol J Radiol. 2002;67(1):64–7.Google Scholar
  12. Middleton AW Jr, Pfister RC. Stone-containing pyelocaliceal diverticulum: embryogenic, anatomic, radiologic and clinical characteristics. J Urol. 1974;111(1):2–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Soylu Boy FN, Yuksel OH, Verit A. Bilateral sporadic synchronous renal clear-cell carcinoma treated by bilateral partial laparoscopic nephrectomy: report of two cases. Arch Esp Urol. 2015;68(9):718–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Waxman SW, Winfield HN. Laparoscopic management of caliceal diverticulum. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1731–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Cho E, Nezhat FR. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(6):669–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu H, Lawrie TA, Lu D, et al. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD011422.Google Scholar
  17. Driscoll KE, Kim C. A novel approach to the treatment of a calyceal diverticulum. J Robot Surg. 2007;1(3):203–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement