Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Usefulness of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detection of a neuroblastic nodule in a ganglioneuroblastoma: a case report

  • 1, 2,
  • 1Email author,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Journal of Medical Case Reports201812:119

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1640-0

  • Received: 6 September 2017
  • Accepted: 2 March 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular is defined as a composite tumor of biologically distinct clones. The peripheral neuroblastic tumors in this category are characterized by the presence of grossly visible neuroblastoma nodules coexisting with ganglioneuroblastoma, intermixed, or with ganglioneuroma. Making a correct diagnosis of ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular is often difficult by biopsy or partial tumor resection, because the neuroblastic nodule could be hidden and not sampled for pathological examination.

Case presentation

We report a case of a Japanese boy aged 3 years, 8 months, with an unresectable abdominal tumor and elevated vanillylmandelic acid and homovanillic acid levels. The initial biopsy was ganglioneuroma. However, after the second biopsy from a hidden neuroblastoma nodule that was clearly highlighted by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, we reached the diagnosis of ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular. Because the nodule demonstrated neuroblastoma, differentiating subtype, with a low mitosis-karyorrhexis index (favorable histology) and nonamplified MYCN, the boy was treated according to the intermediate-risk protocol and is now alive and well 4 years after the diagnosis.

Conclusions

This case illustrates the critical role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting a neuroblastoma nodule in a ganglioneuroblastoma.

Keywords

  • FDG PET/CT
  • Ganglioneuroblastoma
  • nodular
  • Ganglioneuroma
  • Neuroblastoma

Background

Peripheral neuroblastic tumor (pNT), derived from sympathoadrenal lineage of the neural crest, is one of the most common extracranial solid tumors in children. The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC) distinguishes four categories of pNTs as follows: neuroblastoma (NB; Schwannian stroma-poor); ganglioneuroblastoma, intermixed (GNBi; Schwannian stroma-rich); ganglioneuroma (GN; Schwannian stroma-dominant); and ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular (GNBn; composite, Schwannian stroma-dominant/stroma-rich, and stroma-poor) [1, 2]. INPC classifies pNTs into either the favorable or unfavorable histology group, and this classification plays a critical role in patient risk stratification for the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) neuroblastoma clinical trials.

Among these tumor categories, GNBn is defined as a composite tumor of biologically distinct clones. pNTs in this category are characterized by the presence of a grossly visible NB nodule coexisting with GNBi or GN. Making a correct diagnosis of GNBn is often difficult by biopsy or partial tumor resection, because the NB nodule could be hidden and not sampled for pathological examination. Although the nodule is frequently hemorrhagic and/or necrotic, it may not be easily detectable by conventional imaging analyses and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) scintigraphy. However, detecting/sampling the NB nodule for molecular testing and histopathological classification is essential for appropriate clinical management of patients with GNBn.

We report a case of a pediatric patient with a huge and unresectable stage 3 pNT. After the initial biopsy diagnosis of GN, the final diagnosis of GNBn was made on the basis of the result of the second biopsy from the NB nodule, which was clearly identified/located by fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Successful clinical management of the patient was accomplished on the basis of the molecular and histopathological characteristics of the NB nodule of this case.

Case presentation

A Japanese boy aged 3 years, 8 months was presented to our institution with marked abdominal distention. CT revealed a huge mass with calcification, measuring 13 cm in diameter, in the median abdominal region. The tumor, encasing bilateral common iliac arteries, was stage 3 according to the International Neuroblastoma Staging System [3] (Fig. 1a, b), and it was unresectable. Whole-body 123I-MIBG scintigraphy revealed no metastatic spread. The patient’s urinary catecholamine metabolites were markedly elevated; his vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) level was 48.7 μg/mg creatinine (normal range 4.3–12.1 μg/mg); and his homovanillic acid (HVA) level was 221 μg/mg creatinine (normal range 5.8–18.7 μg/mg).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a A coronal computed tomographic image showing a huge abdominal tumor extending from the retroperitoneum to the pelvis. b Axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen showing heterogeneous enhancement. The tumor shows bilateral encasement by the common iliac artery. c and d Axial fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography showing abnormal accumulation with a maximum standardized uptake value of 4.20 (arrows)

The pathological diagnosis based on the initial biopsy was GN (Fig. 2a). Although the highly elevated urinary VMA/HVA levels prompted us to search for a hidden NB clone, imaging analyses, including contrast-enhanced CT, failed to show any nodular formation. The tumor demonstrated a partial uptake of 123I-MIBG, but the neuroblastic nodule was difficult to locate (Fig. 3). Further examination using FDG PET/CT, however, revealed the nodular lesion of the NB growth with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 4.20 in the primary tumor mass (Fig. 1c, d).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

a Histopathological study of the initial biopsy revealing ganglioneuroma (Schwannian stroma-dominant), maturing subtype, and favorable histology (FH). Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) stain, original magnification ×100. b Histopathological study of the second biopsy revealing neuroblastoma (Schwannian stroma-poor), differentiating subtype, low mitosis-karyorrhexis index, and FH. H&E stain, original magnification ×100

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Whole-body 123iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) scintigraphy at diagnosis showing partial uptake of 123I-MIBG (arrows)

The patient subsequently underwent a second biopsy of the nodular lesion, with increased FDG uptake. The biopsy tissue showed an appearance characteristic of NB, differentiating subtype, with a low mitosis-karyorrhexis index (MKI) (< 100/5000 cells) and favorable histology according to the INPC (Fig. 2b). Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis indicated that the MYNC oncogene was not amplified in the NB nodule.

According to the COG criteria, the patient was in the intermediate-risk group, and he was treated with one cycle of cyclophosphamide/vincristine/pirarubicin, two cycles of cyclophosphamide/vincristine/carboplatin, and six cycles of cyclophosphamide/vincristine/pirarubicin/cisplatin, in accordance with the protocol of the Japan Neuroblastoma Study Group. At the time of chemotherapy completion, the tumor had not shrunk, and the patient’s urinary VMA/HVA levels remained elevated. Because the GNBn in this case was biologically favorable, we opted for clinical observation without further therapy. Four years after the diagnosis, the patient was doing well with no detectable 123I-MIBG avid foci and normalized VMA/HVA levels, whereas the tumor size had slightly increased.

Discussion

In 1947, Stout et al. first described a composite tumor that contained a malignant NB nodule coexisting with ganglioneuromatous tissue [4]. In 1984, Shimada et al. clearly defined the morphological characteristics of this category as pNT and named it “stroma-rich (ganglioneuroblastoma), nodular” [5]. In 1999, the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee changed the name of this category to “Ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular (GNBn)” [1, 2]. In 2000, Umehara et al. identified two prognostic groups in this category, and the results were confirmed by the committee in 2003 [6]. Briefly, the “favorable versus unfavorable” histology classification according to the INPC, based on the age-linked morphological evaluation (grade of neuroblastic differentiation and MKI), that was applied to the NB nodule significantly distinguishes better and worse prognoses, respectively, of patients with GNBn. In 2012, Angelini et al. reported the results of the study of the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group, and the event-free and overall survival rates of GNBn tumors in the favorable histology group were 87 ± 8% and 91 ± 6%, respectively, whereas those in the unfavorable histology group were 45 ± 6% and 61 ± 5%, respectively [7].

For clinical management of patients with pNT, detection/sampling of the NB nodule is critical when present and coexisting with GNBi or GN. However, in our routine practice, we could miss the nodule by biopsy or partial resection of the tumors that show only GN or GNBi histology. Currently, the COG Neuroblastoma Pathology Reference Laboratory recommends a disclaimer of “based on review of limited material” in the diagnosis line after “GN or GNBi, favorable histology” in the surgical pathology report. In this clinical situation, the COG Neuroblastoma Pathology Reference Laboratory also recommends measuring VMA/HVA levels, because hidden NB nodules can often be the source of high elevation of these markers. By contrast, GN and GNBi tumors, predominantly or mainly composed of Schwannian stroma, usually do not produce higher levels of VMA/HVA.

In our patient’s case, we conducted imaging analyses for detection of the NB nodule. Conventional CT and magnetic resonance imaging were not useful for this purpose. Although 123I-MIBG scintigraphy has been widely used for the diagnosis of pNTs, it was also not helpful for identifying the NB nodule in the otherwise GN background of our patient. As reported by Decarolis et al., 24.5% of GN tumors and 61.1% of GNBi tumors showed MIBG uptake, so that any NB nodule, when present, may not be highlighted by this scintigraphy method [8]. However, we detected/highlighted the NB nodule in our patient by using FDG PET/CT, on the basis of the difference in FDG accumulation as follows: midlevel FDG accumulation (SUVmax 4.10) in the NB nodule [9] in contrast to the lower FDG accumulation (SUVmax 2.02) in GN tissue [10].

Management of residual tumors after completion of chemotherapy has been controversial. Marachelian et al. [11] and Iehara et al. [12] demonstrated that residual tumors in patients with intermediate-risk pNTs were not associated with tumor progression, regardless of 123I-MIBG avidity and/or elevated catecholamines. Considering the characteristics of the NB nodule (favorable histology and nonamplified MYCN) in our patient, we adopted an observational approach to wait for age-linked tumor maturation, regardless of persistently high levels of catecholamines. As clarified by Decrarolis et al., the large GN portion of this tumor, which is composed of abundant Schwannian stromal cells, would not shrink after chemotherapy [8]. As suggested by Nishihira et al., incremental increase in tumor volume may result from the proliferation of Schwannian stroma cells in the course of the maturational step of a biologically favorable NB nodule to GN [13]. After 4 years of follow-up, our patient was still alive and well with normalized catecholamine levels.

Conclusions

In summary, we report a case of a pediatric patient with unresectable stage 3 GNBn. Biopsy of the NB nodule, which was clearly highlighted by FDG PET/CT, led us to successful clinical management of the patient. Our report suggests the potential usefulness of FDG PET/CT rather than 123I-MIBG scintigraphy for detection of NB nodules in GNBn.

Abbreviations

COG: 

Children’s Oncology Group

CT: 

Computed tomography

FDG: 

Fluorodeoxyglucose

FH: 

Favorable histology

GN: 

Ganglioneuroma

GNBi: 

Ganglioneuroblastoma, intermixed

GNBn: 

Ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular

HVA: 

Homovanillic acid

123I-MIBG: 

123Iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine

INPC: 

International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification

MKI: 

Mitosis-karyorrhexis index

NB: 

Neuroblastoma

PET: 

Positron emission tomography

pNT: 

Peripheral neuroblastic tumor

SUVmax

Maximum standardized uptake value

VMA: 

Vanillylmandelic acid

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Hiroyuki Shimada of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA) for his support and editorial supervision of this work.

Funding

No financial support was received for this case report.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

YT, being the first author, drafted the initial manuscript. KM, SK, YO, NT, and MH were involved in the care of the patient. AKa edited and approved the final manuscript. KT made the pathological diagnosis and provided the figures for the manuscript. AKi reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. HS, being the corresponding author, supervised each step of the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval of the institutional ethics committee was not required, because this is a case report without any experimental trial.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatric Oncology, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima City Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan
(2)
Department of Pediatrics, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima City Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan
(3)
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA
(4)
Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima City, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan

References

  1. Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, Hata J, Joshi VV, Roald B, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada System). Cancer. 1999;86:364–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, Hata J, Joshi VV, Roald B. Terminology and morphologic criteria of neuroblastic tumors: recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee. Cancer. 1999;86:349–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, Brisse HJ, Cecchetto G, Holmes K, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:298–303.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Stout AP. Ganglioneuroma of the sympathetic nervous system. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1947;84:101–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Shimada H, Chatten J, Newton WA Jr, Sachs N, Hamoudi AB, Chiba T, et al. Histopathologic prognostic factors in neuroblastic tumors: definition of subtypes of ganglioneuroblastoma and an age-linked classification of neuroblastomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984;73:405–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Umehara S, Nakagawa A, Matthay KK, Lukens JN, Seeger RC, Stram DO, et al. Histopathology defines prognostic subsets of ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular. Cancer. 2000;89:1150–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Angelini P, London WB, Cohn SL, Pearson AD, Matthay KK, Monclair T, et al. Characteristics and outcome of patients with ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular subtype: a report from the INRG project. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1185–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Decarolis B, Simon T, Krug B, Leuschner I, Vokuhl C, Kaatsch P, von Schweinitz D, Klingebiel T, Mueller I, Schweigerer L, Berthold F, Hero B. Treatment and outcome of ganglioneuroma and ganglioneuroblastoma intermixed. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:542.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu YL, Lu MY, Chang HH, Lu CC, Lin DT, Jou ST, et al. Diagnostic FDG and FDOPA positron emission tomography scans distinguish the genomic type and treatment outcome of neuroblastoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(14):18774–86.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Miyake M, Tateishi U, Maeda T, Arai Y, Seki K, Hasegawa T, et al. A case of ganglioneuroma presenting abnormal FDG uptake. Ann Nucl Med. 2006;20(5):357–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Marachelian A, Shimada H, Sano H, Jackson H, Stein J, Sposto R, et al. The significance of serial histopathology in a residual mass for outcome of intermediate risk stage 3 neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58:675–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Iehara T, Yagyu S, Tsuchiya K, Kuwahara Y, Miyachi M, Tajiri T, et al. Residual tumor in cases of intermediate-risk neuroblastoma did not influence the prognosis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:661–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nishihira H, Toyoda Y, Tanaka Y, Ijiri R, Aida N, Takeuchi M, et al. Natural course of neuroblastoma detected by mass screening: a 5-year prospective study at a single institution. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3012–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement