Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Septic shock from descending necrotizing mediastinitis – combined treatment with IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation and direct polymyxin B hemoperfusion: a case report

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Journal of Medical Case Reports201812:55

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1611-5

  • Received: 13 April 2017
  • Accepted: 8 February 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Descending necrotizing mediastinitis is a common and progressive polymicrobial infection involving the neck and chest with a high death rate (10 to 40%). From a microbiological point of view, descending necrotizing mediastinitis is sustained by Gram-positive bacteria (43–62%), anaerobes (46–78%), and, rarely, Gram-negative bacteria. Data collected during the Antibiotic Resistance-Istituto Superiore di Sanità project confirmed that Italy is positioned among the countries with the highest levels of resistance in most pathogenic species under surveillance. In particular, 32.9% of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were resistant to carbapenem, 33.6% of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin, and 28.7% and 43.9% of Escherichia coli isolates to third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, respectively.

Case presentation

We describe the case of a 38-year-old white man with septic shock due to descending necrotizing mediastinitis sustained by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria treated after surgery with an IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation and polymyxin B hemoperfusion therapy.

Conclusion

Despite the contrasting data on the use of immunoglobulins and polymyxin B hemoperfusion in septic shock and the lack of literature in cases of acute mediastinitis caused by both Gram-negative and Gram-positive multidrug-resistant bacteria, we obtained an improvement in clinical conditions and the survival of our patient, against all odds.

Keywords

  • Septic shock
  • IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation
  • Polymyxin B hemoperfusion
  • Mediastinitis

Background

Acute mediastinitis (AM), because of its high mortality rate, is one of the most dangerous forms of infection in the human organism. It is a severe acute inflammation of the connective tissues located in the middle thoracic cavity. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) represents 20% of cases of AM [1, 2]. DNM is a common and progressive polymicrobial infection involving the neck and chest and it is associated with a high death rate (10 to 40%).

There are no guidelines or published articles with high level of evidence (above level III) on the treatment of DNM. Currently, the best evidence is available from four meta-analyses [36] of published case series of DNM, covering the period from 1960 to 2008, and a review of cervical necrotizing fasciitis and DNM [7]. The primary treatment of DNM is surgical eradication of the pharyngeal or odontogenic focus and a concomitant extensive drainage of the neck and the mediastinum. The thoracic surgical treatment could be a median sternotomy, or standard right posterolateral thoracotomy, or anterolateral thoracotomy, or subxiphoid approach, or clamshell incision, or video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) drainage, and/or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) drainage. Unfortunately, the literature did not offer a consensus on the optimal treatment modalities [6]. Surely, the surgical treatment has to be combined with an intravenously administered wide-spectrum antibiotic therapy and other intensive care treatment. From a microbiological point of view, DMD is sustained by Gram-positive bacteria (43–62%), anaerobes (46–78%), and, rarely, Gram-negative bacteria.

We describe a case of AM caused by an odontogenic infection due to methicillin-resistant Enterococcus raffinosus, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp) unresponsive to conventional surgical and medical therapy complicated with high levels of procalcitonin (PCT), endotoxin, and septic shock.

Case presentation

A 38-year-old white man, 100 kg weight, with a diagnosis of DNM, was transferred to the intensive care of University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli” because of the necessity of a chest surgery-dedicated intensive care unit (ICU). He came from an ICU of a peripheral hospital with the incorrect diagnosis of pneumonia, based on a chest X-ray. He was treated with tazobactam (2 g/day)/piperacillin (16 g/day) and meropenem (6 g/day) for approximately 10 days and percutaneous tracheostomy. When he arrived at our ICU he presented respiratory failure with the necessity of mechanical ventilation with partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) < 90. He was in septic shock with severe hypotension with necessity of norepinephrine > 0.3 μg/kg per minute. His mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 50 mmHg, heart rate 130 beats per minute (bpm), and body temperature 40 °C.

His medical history was: amoxycillin (2 g/day) had been used to treat his severe toothache for 2 weeks and then he presented to the emergency room of a peripheral hospital with dyspnea. He was obese (body mass index > 39) but was not affected by any other comorbidities. He was single and he worked as a truck driver. He did not smoke tobacco or drink alcohol and he did not have any other risk factor for mediastinitis.

All his skin was pallid except for the left side of his neck. He had a large warm mass on the left side of his neck, which extended from his mouth to his left supraclavicular region. At thoracic auscultation there were no lung sounds at the left side and some wheezes at the right side. He also presented peripheral edema. A neurological examination was not done because he was deeply sedated (Ramsay Sedation Scale 6 and Glasgow Coma Scale 3). Chest and neck computed tomography with contrast medium showed: a wide abscess in left parotid-masseter region that extended from the floor of his mouth up to the ipsilateral inferior parapharyngeal compartment, this lesion appeared to be liquefied with areas of air pockets; severe bilateral pleural effusion; and an abscess in his anterior mediastinum that extended from median to left paramedian area (Figs. 1 and 2). He immediately underwent bilateral thoracotomy and left cervicotomy with abscess drainage and left superior and inferior third molars (2.8 and 3.8 tooth), whose dental roots were necrotic, and then he was admitted to our ICU because of septic shock: qSequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) 3; SOFA score 12. All cultural examinations were done (chest drain samples, blood cultures, bronchial aspirate culture, and urine sample); in particular, the blood sample culture (VersaTREK REDOX® 1 and 2) revealed the presence of methicillin-resistant Enterococcus raffinosus, CRAB, and CR-Kp. In addition, the culture from the abscess drainage also revealed CRAB and CR-Kp. The cultures were identified with standard methods (we did not have rapid test) and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) susceptibility test. The stains of pus collected were both Gram positive and Gram negative. The blood samples also revealed: white blood cells (WBC) 17,500/mL (neutrophils 85%, lymphocytes 8%), red blood cell (RBC) 2.79 × 106/ml, hemoglobin 7.2 g/dl, hematocrit 22.8%, platelet 118 × 103/ml, C-reactive protein (CRP) 12.3 mg/L (normal range 0–10 mg/L), PCT 12 ng/mL (normal 0.15 ng/mL), endotoxin activity assay (EAA) 0.72 (EAA in the low range < 0.4) with a negative predictive value of 95.1% from risk of culture-proven Gram-negative infection, aspartate transaminase 21 U/L, alanine transaminase 24 U/L, total bilirubin 0.46 mg/dl, unconjugated bilirubin 0.11 mg/dl, conjugated bilirubin 0.35 mg/dl, serum creatinine 1.4 mg/dl, urea 53 mg/dl, and body temperature 40 °C. Hemodynamic parameters monitored with Vigileo (specific monitor that analyzes arterial blood pressure waveform and its changes) were: cardiac output (CO) 2.1 L/minute (normal range 4.0–8.0 L/minute), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) 400 dynes · second/cm5 (normal range 800–1200 dynes · second/cm5), MAP 50 mmHg (with dobutamine 8 μg/kg per minute and norepinephrine 0.3 μg/kg per minute), and urinary output > 0.5 mL/kg per hour with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) scale 1. The blood gases showed PaO2/FiO2 171 and lactate 2.5 mMol/L (normal range up to 1.9 mMol/L). He started an antibiotic therapy with: linezolid 1200 mg/day, colistin 9,000,000 UI/day, rifampicin 600 mg/day, and tigecycline 100 mg/day. At 36 hours after the surgical and antibiotics therapy we did not notice a significant improvement so we decided to start a combined therapy with 250 ml/kg per day IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation for 3 consecutive days, together with direct hemoperfusion therapy with immobilized polymyxin B cartridges for 2 hours a day for 2 consecutive days (blood flow 100 ml/minute). Toraymyxin (PMX 20-R; Toray Industries, Tokyo, Japan) is a selective blood endotoxin removal cartridge. PMX 20-R is a cartridge composed of polymyxin B covalently bonded to polystyrene-derivative fibers. Blood flow direction is well controlled by adopting a radial flow system. PMX 20-R treatment occurs by hemoperfusion at a blood flow rate of approximately 80–120 mL/minute. Heparin is preferably used as an anticoagulant. Pentaglobin (IgM-enriched immunoglobulin; Biotest) is a plasma-derived solution with the sequent composition: 12% IgM – 76% IgG – 12% IgA. Several mechanisms of action have been postulated for Pentaglobin: direct activity of antibodies, neutralization of endotoxin, enhanced clearance of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and reduction of classical complement pathway. Approximately 3 days after the beginning of this multimodal intensive and progressive treatment, gradual improvements in hemodynamics (MAP 85 mmHg without norepinephrine, CO 5.2 L/minute, urinary output > 0.5 ml/kg per hour), blood gases, and inflammatory markers (CRP 2.3 mg/dl, PCT 1 ng/ml, EAA < 0.6, body temperature 36.5 °C, and lactate 0.3 mMol/L) were achieved (Table 1). We noted a fluid overload of our patient during the first 36 hours before starting the therapy with Toraymyxin and Pentaglobin but there was a rapid and immediate recovery of a normal urine output after the beginning of that therapy, following on from increasing MAP.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Cervical computed tomography scan

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Thoracic computed tomography scan

Table 1

Hemodynamic and septic parameters

 

T0

T1

T2

CRP (mg/dl)

12.3

12

2.3

PCT (ng/ml)

3.2

3

1

EAA

0.71

0.6

0.5

FEVER (°C)

40

38

36.5

SVR (dynes second/cm5)

400

600

1200

CO

2.1

3.0

5.2

MAP

50

70

85

T0: Before the beginning of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation (Pentaglobin) and direct hemoperfusion therapy with polymyxin B immobilized fiber cartridges

T1: 24 hours after the beginning of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation (Pentaglobin) and direct hemoperfusion therapy with polymyxin B immobilized fiber cartridge

T2: 72 hours after the beginning of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation (Pentaglobin) and direct hemoperfusion therapy with polymyxin B immobilized fiber cartridge

CO cardiac output, CRP C-reactive protein, EAA endotoxin activity assay, MAP mean arterial pressure, PCT procalcitonin, SVR systemic vascular resistance

So the weaning from mechanical ventilation started. Approximately 3 weeks after his admission to ICU, he was successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation. His ICU course was complicated also by polyneuropathy, myopathy, and hyperthyroidism. Finally, after 5 weeks, he was transferred to a rehabilitation institute. He was discharged home 3 weeks later (Fig. 3). At 6 months follow-up he was discharged to home without tracheostomy and was starting to work again.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Case report timeline. ICU intensive care unit

Discussion

In this case report we describe a rare case of DNM due to Gram-negative and Gram-positive multidrug-resistant bacteria. We obtained the resolution of DNM by assembling conventional surgical therapy and a novel treatment with IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation and direct hemoperfusion therapy with immobilized polymyxin B cartridges, even though there was no recommendation for this treatment in this case and there was a lack of literature.

AM is a severe, life-threatening infection of the mediastinal connective tissues, interpleural spaces, and surrounding thoracic organs. DNM is a rare complication of odontogenic infection [8] arising generally from the second or third molar. Other less common infections include acute tonsillitis, and retropharyngeal and peritonsillar abscess. This abscess can rupture into the submandibular and parapharyngeal spaces and reach the mediastinum mainly along the retropharyngeal space or along the perivascular and pretracheal spaces [9, 10]. The effect of gravity and the negative intrathoracic and pleural pressure during inspiration, and the absence of barriers in the facial planes are important pathophysiological factors in the extension of deep neck infections of the mediastinum [10]. In a systematic review published in April 2016 by Prado-Callero et al., the authors analyzed 26 studies with a total of 480 patients. DNM was reported to be limited to the upper mediastinum in 189 patients (39%) and extended to the inferior mediastinum in 249 patients (51%) [1]. The origin of DNM was pharyngeal (acute tonsillitis, retropharyngeal and peritonsillar abscess) in 204 patients (45%), odontogenic abscess in 163 patients (36%), from other causes in 83 patients (18%), and not reported in 30 patients [1].

In addition the presence of coexisting morbidities, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), alcoholism, tobacco smoking, chronic renal failure, and liver cirrhosis, can facilitate this rapid extension and increase the occurrence of complications including bilateral empyema, purulent pericarditis, AKI requiring hemodialysis, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and septic shock. Endo et al. [11] classified DNM according to the anatomic extent: type I infection above the carina (localized form); and type II infection below the tracheal bifurcation (diffuse form), which is subdivided into type IIA (lower anterior mediastinum) and type IIB (lower posterior mediastinum).

The mortality under current “standard treatment” is reported to be between 20 and 40% [12, 13] mostly as a consequence of multiorgan failure (MOF).

The etiological organisms of DNM are mostly mixed, aerobic and anaerobic [5, 14]. Although the main microorganisms implicated are Gram-positive bacteria (e.g. staphylococci), Gram-negative pathogens can also be a relevant cause of DNM [15].

A European network of national surveillance systems on antimicrobial resistance (EARS-Net), coordinated and financed by European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), has been created to collect data from 29 European countries to analyze temporal and spatial trends of the phenomenon. European data confirm an increase in resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides especially in Escherichia coli and in K. pneumoniae, responsible for urinary tract infections, sepsis, and other health care-related infections. These resistances are often combined, generating multi-resistant bacteria. In recent years, resistance to carbapenem has appeared, making some infections untreatable. Data collected during the Antibiotic Resistance-Istituto Superiore di Sanità (AR-ISS) project have confirmed that Italy is among the countries with the highest levels of resistance in most pathogenic species under surveillance, namely 32.9% of K. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to carbapenem, 33.6% of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin, and 28.7% and 43.9% of E. coli isolates to third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, respectively [16].

Compared with other microorganisms, DNM associated with Gram-negative pathogens has higher rates of in-hospital death [16]. Invasive infections associated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose a serious challenge to clinicians. CRAB has increasingly emerged as an important nosocomial pathogen [17, 18], and the postoperative mediastinitis caused by CRAB is rare. It has severe complications associated with high morbidity and mortality. Treatments with polymyxin (polymyxin b or colistin), carbapenem, or their combinations are basically supported by observational studies [19, 20].

The significance of interplay between immune system-related substances and bacterial toxins in the pathogenesis of sepsis and the subsequent deleterious effects on organ function is well known. Apparently, endotoxins/LPS and lipoteichoic acid are the key toxins produced by Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively, playing an important role in inducing a systemic inflammatory response [21, 22] and it was found that removing them from circulation can have beneficial effects. Polymyxin B is a well-known antibiotic with high affinity for endotoxin and it is able to neutralize it, although it is associated with neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, which precludes its systemic use. In 1994, the Japanese company Toray (Tokyo, Japan) designed Toraymyxin (PMX-20R device) in order to adsorb and neutralize endotoxins from the circulation by using polymyxin B in extracorporeal modality, fixing it covalently on polystyrene fiber matrix. It has been shown in meta-analyses and many experimental studies [24, 25] that extracorporeal endotoxin adsorption using this method is beneficial in the management of patients with sepsis [23], especially in managing the septic shock and in the reversal of organ dysfunction. Some researchers [24, 25] reported that selective removal of endotoxins/LPS can specifically improve hemodynamic and respiratory functions, and this was explored in a systematic review by Cruz et al. [26] concluding that it is associated with an improved MAP, inotrope use, levels of PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and decreased mortality.

Several studies reported improvement in SVR [2731], CO, or cardiac index [29, 31]. However, pooled data seem to indicate that polymyxin B hemoperfusion should be able to increase blood pressure with the reduction of vasoactive agents [29, 3235] compared with conventional treatments [36, 37]. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion might improve the oxygenation index and oxygenating lung functions [33, 34] possibly because of a reduction in pulmonary epithelium injury, permeability, and endothelial damage. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion improves gas exchange (PaO2/FiO2 ratio), but there was only a single randomized controlled trial (RCT) that reported this outcome and it showed only a non-significant positive trend [37]. After polymyxin B hemoperfusion, reduced levels of other mediators, such as interleukin (IL)-6 [38, 39], IL-10 [38, 39], IL-18 [40], tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [39, 41], metalloproteinase-9 [27], plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [39, 41], neutrophil elastase [42, 43], platelet factor-4 [40], β-thromboglobulin [40], soluble P selectin [40], and endogenous cannabinoids, were also observed [44].

However, there are currently no recommendations supporting (nor against) the routine use of blood purification techniques in sepsis in International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock [45]. Moreover, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated a favorable effect on overall mortality with this technique [46]. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution because of the suboptimal quality of studies. The other treatment used in these patients was IgM-enriched polyclonal immunoglobulin (IVIgGM). Immunoglobulins constitute an innovative product with a wide range of clinical use.

In the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign, there is a weak recommendation with low quality of evidence concerning the use of immunoglobulins [45]. One larger multicenter RCT [47] in adult patients found no benefit for intravenously administered immunoglobulin (IVIg). The Cochrane meta-analysis [48] differentiates between standard polyclonal intravenously administered immunoglobulins (IVIgG) and IVIgGM. In ten studies with IVIgG, mortality between 28 and 180 days was 29.6% in the IVIgG group and 36.5% in the placebo-group, and for the seven studies with IVIgGM, mortality between 28 and 60 days was 24.7% in the IVIgGM group and 37.5% in the placebo-group. The certainty of the studies was rated as low for the IVIgG trials, based on the risk of bias and heterogeneity, and as moderate for the IVIgGM trials, based on risk of bias. However, the recent Cochrane analysis revealed no survival benefits. These findings are similar to those of an older meta-analysis [49] from other Cochrane authors. One systematic review [50] showed a reduction in death with immunoglobulin treatment; however, the results of only high quality trials did not show a statistically significant difference. Finally, Laupland et al. [49] found a significant reduction in mortality with the use of IVIg treatment.

Recently, two meta-analyses, using less strict criteria to identify sources of bias found significant improvement in patient mortality with IVIg treatment [51, 52]. Finally, there are no cut-offs for plasma IVIg levels in patients with sepsis, for which substitution with IVIg improves outcome data [52]. Subgroup effects between IgM-enriched and non-enriched formulations reveal significant heterogeneity. The low certainty of evidence led to the grading as a weak recommendation. The statistical information that comes from the high quality trials does not support a beneficial effect of polyclonal IVIg.

Conclusions

In our case we decided to start the treatment with immunoglobulins and polymyxin B hemoperfusion after the failure of conventional surgical and medical therapy and in light of elevated endotoxin level. This case of DNM was difficult to treat because of the presence of multidrug-resistant bacteria probably related to the delay in diagnosis and the use of first-line antibiotics for treatment of incorrectly assumed pneumonia. After the surgical source control, only with the combined use of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation and polymyxin B hemoperfusion as integration antibiotic therapy, did we obtain an improvement of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. CO, cardiac index, SVRs, central venous saturation of oxygen (ScVO2), and oxygen delivery (DO2I) improved. PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved, endotoxemia and PCT decreased, and vasoactive agents were interrupted. Despite the contrasting data on the use of immunoglobulins and polymyxin B hemoperfusion in septic shock and AM caused by either Gram-negative or Gram-positive multidrug-resistant bacteria, we obtained an improvement of clinical conditions and the survival of our patient against all odds.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

There is no funding to declare.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

VP pooled the data, analyzed the literature about mediastinitis and septic shock, and wrote the manuscript. MBP analyzed the literature about mediastinitis and septic shock. PS analyzed the literature about mediastinitis and septic shock. MCP analyzed the literature about mediastinitis and septic shock. FP analyzed the literature about mediastinitis and septic shock. AF analyzed the literature about mediastinitis and septic shock. CA pooled the data, analyzed the literature about mediastinitis and septic shock, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors obtained ethics approval and written informed consent. We obtained Ethical Approval for the data publication from ethical Committee (EC).

The authors obtained consent for publication from the patient.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Women, Infant and Surgical and Specialist Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy
(2)
Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy

References

  1. Prado-Calleros HM, Jiménez-Fuentes E, Jiménez-Escobar. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: Systematic review on its treatment in the last 6 years, 75 years after its description. Head Neck. 2016;38(1):E2275–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24183. Epub 2016 Feb 1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kocher GJ, Hoksch B, Caversaccio M, Wiegand J, Schmid RA. Diffuse descending necrotizing mediastinitis: surgical therapy and outcome in a single-centre series. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:e66–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wheatley MJ, Stirling MC, Kirsh MM, Gago O, Orringer MB. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: transcervical drainage is not enough. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:780–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Corsten MJ, Shamji FM, Odell PF, et al. Optimal treatment of descending necrotising mediastinitis. Thorax. 1997;52:702–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Ridder GJ, Maier W, Kinzer S, Teszler CB, Boedeker CC, Pfeiffer J. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: contemporary trends in etiology, diagnosis, management, and outcome. Ann Surg. 2010;251:528–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sandner A, Borgermann J. Update on necrotizing mediastinitis: causes, approaches to management, and outcomes. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011;13:278–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sarna T, Sengupta T, Miloro M, Kolokythas A. Cervical necrotizing fasciitis with descending mediastinitis: literature review and case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(6):1342–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ho MW, Dhariwal DK, Chandrasekhar J, et al. Use of interventional radiology in the management of mediastinitis of odontogenic origin. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;44:538–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Scaglione M, Pinto A, Giovine S, Di Nuzzo L, Giuliano V, Romano L. CT features of descending necrotizing mediastinitis—a pictorial essay. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14:77–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kang SK, Lee S, Oh HK, Kang MW, Na MH, Yu JH, et al. Clinical features of deep neck infections and predisposing factors for mediastinal extension. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;45:171–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Endo S, Murayama F, Hasegawa T, et al. Guideline of surgical management based on diffusion of descending necrotizing mediastinitis. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;47:14–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Sternal wound complications after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: early and late mortality, morbidity and cost of care. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:179–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Scarr MG, Gott VL, Townsend TR. Mediastinal infection after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1984;38:415–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Weaver E, Nguyen X, Brooks MA. Descending necrotising mediastinitis: two case reports and review of the literature. Eur Respir Rev. 2010;19:141–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Charbonneau H, Maillet JM, Faron M, Mangin O, Puymirat E, Le Besnerais P, et al. Mediastinitis due to Gram-negative bacteria is associated with increate mortality. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O197–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Prigitano A, Romanò L, Auxilia F, Castaldi S, Tortorano AM. Antibiotic resistance: Italian awareness survey 2016. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11(1):30–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Leu HS, Ye JJ, Lee MH, Su LH, Huang PY, Wu TL, et al. Synergy of imipenem/colistin methanesulfonate combinations against imipenem-nonsusceptible multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2014;47:406–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Teng SO, Yen MY, Ou TY, Chen FL, Yu FL, Lee WS. Comparison of pneumonia- and non-pneumonia-related Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia: impact on empiric therapy and antibiotic resistance. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015;48:525–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Daikos GL, Tsaousi S, Tzouvelekis LS, Anyfantis I, Psichogiou M, Argyropoulou A, et al. Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae blood-stream infections: lowering mortality by antibiotic combination schemes and the role of carbapenems. Antimcrob Agents Chemoter. 2014;58:2322–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tumbarello M, Trecarichi EM, De Rosa FG, Giannella M, Giacobbe DR, Bassetti M, et al. Infection caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: differences in therapy and mortality in a multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:2133–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Marshall J, Foster D, Vincent J, Cook D, Cohen J, Dellinger R, Opal S, Abraham E, Brett S, Smith T, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of endotoxemia in critical illness: results of the MEDIC study. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:527–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Manocha S, Feinstein D, Kumar A, Kumar A. Novel therapies for sepsis: antiendotoxin therapies. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2002;11:1795–812.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cutuli SL, Artigas A, Fumagalli R, Monti G, Ranieri VM, Ronco C, Antonelli M. The EUPHAS 2 Collaborative Group. Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in septic patients: analysis of a multicenter registry. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6:77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Shoji H, Tani T, Hanasawa K, Kodama M. Extracorporeal endotoxin removal by polymyxin B immobilized fiber cartridge: designing and antiendotoxin efficacy in the clinical application. Ther Apher. 1998;2(1):3–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Aoki H, Kodama M, Tani T, Hanasawa K. Treatment of sepsis by extracorporeal elimination of endotoxin using polymyxin B-immobilized fiber. Am J Surg. 1994;167(4):412–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cruz DN, Perazella MA, Bellomo R, et al. Effectiveness of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column in sepsis: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakamura T, Kawagoe Y, Matsuda T, Shoji H, Ueda Y, Tamura N, Ebihara I, Koide H. Effect of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber on blood metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 levels in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Blood Purif. 2004;22:256–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tani T, Hanasawa K, Endo Y, Yoshioka T, Kodama M, Kaneko M, Uchiyama Y, Akizawa T, Takahashi K, Sugai T. Therapeutic apheresis for septic patients with organ dysfunction: hemoperfusion using a polymyxin-B immobilized column. Artif Organs. 1998;22:1038–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Uriu K, Osajima A, Kamochi M, Watanabe H, Aibara K, Kaizu K. Endotoxin removal by direct hemoperfusion with an adsorbent column using polymyxin B-immobilized fiber ameliorates systemic circulatory disturbance in patients with septic shock. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:937–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kodama M, Tani T, Hanasawa K, Hirata K, Hirasawa H, Oda S, Otsuka T, Yamamoto Y, Kanesaka S, Takahashi Y, et al. Treatment of sepsis by plasma endotoxin removal: Hemoperfusion using a polymyxin-B immobilized column. J Endotoxin Res. 1997;4:293–300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Uriu K, Osajima A, Kamochi M, Watanabe H, Aibara K, Kaizu K. The severity of hyperdynamic circulation may predict the effects of direct hemoperfusion with the absorbent column using polymyxin B-immobilized fiber in patients with gram-negative septic shock. Ther Apher. 2001;5:25–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Suzuki H, Nemoto H, Nakamoto H, Okada H, Sugahara S, Kanno Y, Moriwaki K. Continuous hemodiafiltration with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber is effective in patients with sepsis syndrome and acute renal failure. Ther Apher. 2002;6:234–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tojimbara T, Sato S, Nakajima I, Fuchinoue S, Akiba T, Teraoka S. Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber hemoperfusion after emergency surgery in patients with chronic renal failure. Ther Apher Dial. 2004;8:286–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Novelli G, Ferretti G, Poli L, et al. Clinical results of treatment of postsurgical endotoxin-mediated sepsis with polymyxin-B direct hemoperfusion. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(4):1021–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Murakami M, Miyauchi Y, Nishida M, Okada H, Hamano K. Direct hemoperfusion using polymyxin-B immobilized fiber for septic shock after cardiac surgery. Circ J. 2009;73(4):658–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cruz DN, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, et al. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301(23):2445–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Vincent JL, Laterre PF, Cohen J, et al. A pilot-controlled study of a polymyxin B-immobilized hemoperfusion cartridge in patients with severe sepsis secondary to intra-abdominal infection. Shock. 2005;23(5):400–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ono S, Tsujinomoto H, Matsumoto A, Ikuta S, Kinoshita M, Michizuki H. Modulation of human leukocyte antigen-DR on monocytes and CD16 on granulocytes in patients with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber. Am J Surg. 2004;188:150–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tani T, Hanasawa K, Kodama M, Imaizumi H, Yonekawa M, Saito M, Ikeda T, Yagi Y, Takayama K, Amano I, et al. Correlation between plasma endotoxin, plasma cytokines, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in septic patients. World J Surg. 2001;25:660–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nakamura T, Ebihara I, Shoji H, Ushiyama C, Suzuki S, Koide H. Treatment with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber reduces platelet activation in septic shock patients: decrease in plasma levels of soluble P-selectin, platelet factor-4 and beta-thromboglobulin. Inflamm Res. 1999;48:171–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ikeda T, Ikeda K, Nagura M, Taniuchi H, Matsushita M, Kiuchi S, Kuroki Y, Suzuki K, Matsuno N. Clinical evaluation of PMX-DHP for hypercytokinemia caused by septic multiple organ failure. Ther Apher Dial. 2004;8:293–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kushi H, Miki T, Okamoto K, Nakahara J, Saito T, Tanjoh K. Early haemoperfusion with an immobilized polymyxin B fiber column eliminates humoral mediators and improves pulmonary oxygenation. Crit Care. 2005;9:R653–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Kushi H, Miki T, Nakahara J, Okamoto K, Saito T, Tanjoh K. Hemoperfusion with an immobilized polymyxin B column reduces the blood level of neutrophil elastase. Blood Purif. 2006;24:212–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kohro S, Imaizumi H, Yamakage M, Masuda Y, Namiki A, Asai Y, Maruyama I. Anandamide absorption by direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber improves the prognosis and organ failure assessment score in patients with sepsis. J Anesth. 2006;20:11–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhou F, Peng Z, Murugan R, et al. Blood purification and mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2209–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Werdan K, Pilz G, Bujdoso O, et al. Score-Based Immunoglobulin Therapy of Sepsis (SBITS) Study Group: Score-based immunoglobulin G therapy of patients with sepsis: the SBITS study. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2693–701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Alejandria MM, Lansang MA, Dans LF, Mantaring JB 3rd. Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD001090.Google Scholar
  49. Laupland KB, Kirkpatrick AW, Delaney A. Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2686–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Pildal J, Gøtzsche PC. Polyclonal immunoglobulin for treatment of bacterial sepsis: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:38–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kreymann KG, de Heer G, Nierhaus A, et al. Use of polyclonal immunoglobulins as adjunctive therapy for sepsis or septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2677–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shankar-Hari M, Culshaw N, Post B, et al. Endogenous IgG hypogammaglobulinaemia in critically ill adults with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1393–140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement