Skip to content

Advertisement

Journal of Medical Case Reports

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Orthodontic management by functional activator treatment: a case report

  • Giuseppe Aprile2,
  • Eleonora Ortu1Email author,
  • Ruggero Cattaneo1,
  • Davide Pietropaoli1,
  • Mario Giannoni1 and
  • Annalisa Monaco1
Journal of Medical Case Reports201711:336

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1505-y

Received: 20 April 2017

Accepted: 3 November 2017

Published: 2 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Managing orthodontic treatment is often very difficult for the orthodontist. Many devices are used during the orthopedic phase of orthodontic treatment, always with different functions. We describe a case of orthodontic management treated with the Equilibrator O.S.A. device (equilibrator designed by Ovidi, Santi, and Aprile for Eptamed SRL; Cesena, Italy; www.eptamed.com).

Case presentation

A healthy 10-year-old white boy presented with a skeletal class II, division 1 malocclusion, molar class II, exhibiting an overjet of 7 mm prior to treatment. For treatment, we only used the Equilibrator O.S.A. device.

Conclusions

We successfully treated an orthopedic/orthodontic case with a particular device that we describe here.

Keywords

OverjetMalocclusionTeethIOTNActivator

Background

Functional activators were created for orthodontic purposes in the 1950s by Soulet and Besombes, two French orthodontists. These functional orthopedic devices were designed to reinstate the craniofacial architecture. The first Soulet-Besombes appliances were made of natural rubber because its elasticity was able to produce a well-controlled orthopedic effect. This technique was defined by the French orthodontic inventors as a way to free, stimulate, and lead the growth of jaws [14]. In subsequent years, pursuant to the Soulet and Besombes orthodontic philosophy, many functional activators were developed, with several shapes, different materials, and various orthodontic purposes. Activators balance the skeletal bases through two double matched planes, upper and lower, where teeth are positioned with effects of propulsion, retropulsion, and expansion. After employing the positioners, the orthodontist will require minor tooth movement after functional treatment because of the elastomeric material [5, 6]. In fact, this device improves the chewing function, aligns the teeth, re-educates the tongue due to stimulation toward the retroincisal papilla spot, and modulates the muscular tone in occlusal-postural syndrome; moreover, it is ideal for treating obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. The employed materials are suitable because they are soft enough to allow patient compliance without traumatizing the oral mucosa and jaws and at the same time are tough enough to resist chewing loads. There is a complete array of activators for every type of mouth, according to the skull conformation, body features, and dental arch shape. Proper employment of this activator in association with physical exercises will allow patients to obtain benefits in the entire neuromyofascial system [711]. The aim of this report is to describe a patient with a class II, skeletal I division, molar class II mandibular deficit, who exhibited both overjet and overbite between 6 and 9 mm prior to treatment. This case was solved during mixed dentition by using only the activator Equilibrator (EQ) O.S.A. ideated by Doctors Ovidi, Aprile, and Santi and commercialized by Eptamed (EQ O.S.A.; Eptamed SRL, Cesena, Italy; www.eptamed.com) according to orthopedic-functional orthodontics.

Case presentation

This study was conducted in accordance with the fundamental principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. A healthy 10-year-old white boy (without any types of diseases) was clinically examined at the Dental Clinic of the University of L’Aquila. He was examined by the same clinician (AM) who prescribed a dental panoramic radiograph, acquired extraoral and intraoral photos, and took alginate impressions of both dental arches. Based on these data, the orthodontist created a treatment plan specific to the patient according to the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) described by Brook and Shaw [12]. The diagnosis was a skeletal class II, division 1 malocclusion, molar class II, exhibiting both an overjet of 7 mm prior to treatment. According to the IOTN, our patient displayed a grade 4 treatment requirement (increased overjet > 6 mm but ≤ 9 mm; extreme lateral or anterior open bites > 4 mm). He showed a medium grade of dental crowding in both dental arches, interincisive diastemata between the upper central incisors, and an increased overjet because of tongue interposition (Figs. 1 and 2). Fortunately, he did not have any speaking or eating problems. His dental and oral health was good; in fact, he was also under the care of the dental hygienist of our Clinic. He was treated only with the use of the EQ O.S.A. 4 device (white, in natural rubber) that will be described subsequently (Fig. 3), which was replaced two times after 6 months, during 1 year of orthopedic-functional orthodontic therapy. He was under treatment until full permanent dentition was completed.
Fig. 1

Intraoral photographs before starting the orthopedic-functional orthodontic therapy

Fig. 2

Intraoral photographs before starting the orthopedic-functional orthodontic therapy

Fig. 3

The Equilibrator O.S.A. device in the oral cavity of the patient

EQ O.S.A. device

The EQ O.S.A. (Eptamed-produced) is the result of a coordinated effort among eminent chemistry and technology manufacturers to provide orthodontists a valid aid to optimize clinical outcomes. It shows a wide therapeutic range. The shape was defined in 2005 and since then it has been used in many clinical cases with excellent outcomes. This equilibrator yields several benefits: improving the chewing function, aligning the teeth, re-educating the tongue due to stimulation toward the retroincisal papilla spot, and modulating the muscular tone in occlusal-postural syndrome; furthermore, it is ideal for treating obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. After taking alginate impressions and developing cast stone models, the orthodontist uses an appropriate ruler to measure the distance between the palatal cusps of the first upper bicuspids (or the first upper deciduous molars) and will choose the correct size among the following:
  • OSA 3 – from 24 to 27 mm in mixed dentition;

  • OSA 4 – from 28 to 31 mm in mixed dentition;

  • OSA 5 – from 32 to 36 mm in permanent dentition.

Three different materials are available based on hardness: white in natural rubber (soft), lavender in elastomeric resin (medium), and mint in elastomeric resin (hard). The patient inserts his or her teeth in the fitting upper and lower splints. This device is functionalized by biting it, through soft elastic forces led by muscle energy. The activator is worn all night long and for 1 hour during the day. The activator can be worn in the day while reading, driving, or studying, but not while playing sports. Moreover, two exercises of 15 minutes each are executed, in the morning and in the evening. The basic exercise can be adapted to the patient’s features and characteristics. In Souchard’s frog position, attention is paid to breathing slowly and softly biting the activator during inspiration and releasing the jaws during expiration. The tongue remains at its position. Coordination might be difficult in the beginning, but after a few times, the patients often become familiar with it. The orthodontist checks the patient every 45 days to evaluate eventual modifications for execution on the device. The appliance must be replaced every 6 months, according to the orthodontist’s evaluations, until reaching the final orthodontic outcome. After 1 year of using the EQ O.S.A. device, our patient’s IOTN passed from grade 4 to a grade 1, as shown in Figs. 4 and 5. He completed the orthodontic treatment with a satisfactory alignment of both dental arches, and his tongue function was rehabilitated (final swallowing with the tongue in its position).
Fig. 4

Intraoral photographs at the end of the orthopedic-functional orthodontic therapy using the EQ O.S.A. device

Fig. 5

Intraoral photographs at the end of the orthopedic-functional orthodontic therapy using the EQ O.S.A. device

Discussion

Recently, knowledgeable orthodontists intending to solve cases have focused their attention on the etiopathogenesis of malocclusions instead of single clinical features. This orthodontic approach is aimed at maintaining teeth in the corrected positions after treatment and preventing orthodontic relapse. Atypical swallowing is a myofunctional problem, which constitutes a hot topic in orthodontics because it is challenging to treat. Tongue thrusting (an abnormal tongue position deviating from the physiological swallowing pattern) and mouth breathing may be associated with anterior open bite, transverse contraction of the maxillary dental arch, abnormal speech, interincisive diastema, and anterior protrusion of the maxillary incisors. It appears that several factors account for the persistence of infantile swallowing patterns and that tongue thrust plays an important role in the etiology of open bite as well as in the relapse of patients with treated open-bite. A low tongue posture is associated with mouth breathing and the development of inflammatory diseases such as otitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, and adenoid hypertrophy [1316]. Last, but not least, mouth breathers with a low tongue posture often have chronic neck pain and poor posture. The literature shows that the tongue and neck muscles are related because of common proprioception by a common trunk from the ansa cervicalis through the hypoglossal nerve [1719].

The EQ O.S.A. is a type of orthodontic appliance that stimulates growth and, through the input of muscle movements, elicits tissue development toward a suitable chewing function. The device is actually an orthopedic-functional appliance. Biting this elastomeric device balances tension up to the sphenobasilar synchondrosis, according to osteopathic medicine and philosophy. The teeth’s positions are determined by this new skull harmony through an osteopathic effect [20]. Laganà and Cozza have described a similar case treated with a similar device [6]. The EQ O.S.A. device correctly employed allows a healthier posture and freer movements of the tongue. The apex of the tongue touching its spot during swallowing together with the centripetal force of perioral muscles act as an orthodontic device to enhance reduction of the overjet, improvement of tongue function and, thereby, an enhancement of breathing, with functional and esthetic improvements.

Conclusions

The aim of this case report is to allow the orthodontist reader to learn the basic clinical skills for this appliance, which is easy to use and comfortable to wear. Enhancing the dynamic function, and thereby the cause of the malocclusion, makes orthodontic relapse much less likely and thus maintains stable occlusion over time. Proper use of the activator, in association with exercises and techniques for muscular balance, will allow the patient to gain benefits throughout the neuromyofascial system – with fewer concerns for the orthodontist.

Abbreviations

EQ O.S.A.: 

Equilibrator O.S.A.

IOTN: 

Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the staff of the Dental Division of the University of L’Aquila.

Funding

No external funding was utilized to support publication of this paper.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Authors’ contributions

MG and AM designed the study. The patient was under the care of AM. EO and RC wrote the manuscript. GA and DP revised the entire manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian(s) for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MeSVA Department, Division of Dentistry, University of L’Aquila
(2)
Giuseppe Aprile, Freelance Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS)

References

  1. Soulet R, Langlade M, Picaud M. [Cephalometric study of 20 cases treated exclusively by means of the Soulet-Besombes activators]. L' Orthodontie Francaise. 1969;40:355–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Langlade M. [Contribution to the simplified therapeutic orthodontic method of Soulet-Besombes]. L' Orthodontie Francaise. 1966;37:487–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Heideborn M. Clinical and electromyographic results of treatment with the splint-activator of Soulet-Besombes. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie. 1965;26(3):293–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Besombes A, Soulet R. A new instrument in simplified functional orthopedic treatment. Revue Francaise D'Odonto-Stomatologie. 1955;2(4):483–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Janson GR, da Silva CC, Bergersen EO, Henriques JF, Pinzan A. Eruption Guidance Appliance effects in the treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000;117(2):119–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Laganà G, Cozza P. Interceptive therapy with elastodontic appliance: case report. Annali di Stomatologia. 2010;1(3-4):22–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Montorsi A. Oltre il palato. Il metodo Soulet-Besombes. Rome: Marrapese; 2008.Google Scholar
  8. Ortu ELM, Cattaneo R, Marzo G, Gatto R, Monaco A. Electromyographic evaluation of a patient treated with extraoral traction: a case report. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2016;17(2):123–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ortu E, Pietropaoli D, Mazzei G, Cattaneo R, Giannoni M, Monaco A. TENS effects on salivary stress markers: A pilot study. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology. 2015;28(1):114–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ortu E, Sgolastra F, Barone A, Gatto R, Marzo G, Monaco A. Salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. levels in patients during rapid palatal expansion. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2014;15(3):271–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Monaco A, Cattaneo R, Mesin L, Ortu E, Giannoni M, Pietropaoli D. Dysregulation of the descending pain system in temporomandibular disorders revealed by low-frequency sensory transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: a pupillometric study. PloS One. 2015;10(4):e0122826.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1989;11(3):309–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ugo C. La terapia miofunzionale e i dispositivi ortodontici coadiuvanti la terapia miofunzionale. 2016. http://www.gnatologiafunzionale.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/La-terapia-miofunzionale-e-i-dispositivi-ortodontici-coadiuvanti-la-terapia-miofunzionale.pdf.
  14. Ortu E, Giannoni M, Ortu M, Gatto R, Monaco A. Oropharyngeal airway changes after rapid maxillary expansion: the state of the art. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2014;7(7):1632–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ortu E, Pietropaoli D, Ortu M, Giannoni M, Monaco A. Evaluation of cervical posture following rapid maxillary expansion: a review of literature. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2014;8:20–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mummolo S, Ortu E, Necozione S, Monaco A, Marzo G. Relationship between mastication and cognitive function in elderly in L'Aquila. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2014;7(4):1040–6.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards IJLV, Paton JF, Yanagawa Y, Szabo G, Deuchars SA, et al. Neck muscle afferents influence oromotor and cardiorespiratory brainstem neural circuits. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220(3):1421–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Marchili N, Ortu E, Pietropaoli D, Cattaneo R, Monaco A. Dental Occlusion and Ophthalmology: A Literature Review. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2016;10:460–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Santamato A, Panza F, Di Venere D, Solfrizzi V, Frisardi V, Ranieri M, Fiore P. Effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A treatment of neck pain related to nocturnal bruxism: a case report. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2010;9(3):132–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Monaco A, Cozzolino V, Cattaneo R, Cutilli T, Spadaro A. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) effects on mandibular kinetics: kinesiographic study. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2008;9(1):37–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement