Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Postpartum infective endocarditis with Enterococcus faecalis in Japan: a case report

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Journal of Medical Case Reports201711:324

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1494-x

  • Received: 12 February 2017
  • Accepted: 17 October 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The clinical characteristics of infective endocarditis include the presence of predisposing cardiac disease, a history of illegal drug use, and high morbidity in the elderly. Only a few cases of the disease after delivery have been reported in the literature. We describe here a first case of enterococcal postpartum infective endocarditis without underlying disease in Japan.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 31-year-old Japanese woman with postpartum infective endocarditis by Enterococcus faecalis. She had no significant medical history or any unusual social history. After emergency surgery for severe mitral regurgitation and antimicrobial treatment for 6 weeks, she was discharged from our hospital and is now being monitored at an out-patient clinic.

Conclusions

We encountered a case of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis that occurred in the native valve of a postpartum healthy woman. Although the pathogenesis of this case remains unclear, it could be due to bacteremia arising from the administration of prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics used for cesarean section. Previous use of cefotiam and urinary catheter insertion may be risk factors for nosocomial enterococcal bacteremia in this case.

Keywords

  • Enterococcus faecalis
  • Infective endocarditis
  • Postpartum period

Background

Infective endocarditis (IE) is uncommon but causes high mortality. Differences in the causative microorganism of IE depend on backgrounds across different age groups (that is, pre-existing valvular heart disease) and countries [13]. Streptococcus species (40%) and Staphylococcus species (40%) account for 80% of the cases of IE, and Enterococcus species are responsible for up to only 10% [1, 46]. Identified risk factors of IE are intravenous drug use, congenital heart disease, and chronic rheumatic heart disease [13].

Enterococci are usually regarded as indigenous flora of the intestinal tract, oral cavity, and the genitourinary tract of humans. Among the elderly who have immune system compromise, Enterococcus species cause approximately 20% of nosocomial IE [2]. Our understanding of IE in pregnancy and the postpartum period is limited by extremely low numbers of reported incidents [7], especially regarding incidents of IE in the postpartum period due to Enterococcus species.

We report a case of IE caused by Enterococcus faecalis in a 31-year-old woman after cesarean section. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of postpartum Enterococcus faecalis IE described in the literature.

Case presentation

A 31-year-old Japanese woman presented to our hospital with approximately a 2-month history of intermittent fever and night sweats. She had delivered a baby by cesarean section in a local hospital 3 months prior to admission. These symptoms appeared within a few weeks of her labor. A month prior to admission, she reported edema of her lower limbs and dizziness. She was transferred to our hospital for general fatigue, chest pain, and dyspnea. She had no significant medical history and no relevant history of dental procedures, exposure to animals, travel, or drug abuse. She had no congenital heart disease; this was checked by echocardiography in former hospital for cesarean section.

Her body temperature was 37.8 °C, respiratory rate was 24 breaths/minute, systolic blood pressure was 70 mmHg, and she had pale conjunctivae without petechiae and no signs of Osler nodes or Janeway lesions. A laboratory workup revealed a white blood cell (WBC) count of 8.5 × 109/L, hemoglobin 9.9 g/dL, and serum creatinine (Scr) 0.83 mg/dL; her C-reactive protein (CRP) was elevated at 20.5 mg/dL.

Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a mobile, 20 × 15 mm vegetation attached to the anterior mitral valve; mitral valve replacement with a prosthetic valve was urgently performed because of the severe mitral regurgitation and worsening symptoms of heart failure.

Two sets of blood cultures drawn on admission and valve tissue culture yielded Enterococcus faecalis. The Enterococcus faecalis in this case was susceptible to benzylpenicillin G, amino-benzyl penicillin (ampicillin), and vancomycin (Table 1). The gentamicin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 8 mg/L, which was not high-level resistance as detected by E-test® strips (AB Biodisk, Sweden; Fig. 1). The diagnosis of IE was confirmed with two of the major items of the modified Duke criteria: positive blood culture and echocardiogram with an oscillating intracardiac mass on the valve. She was placed on antimicrobial therapy with intravenously administered ampicillin (2 g every 4 hours) and gentamicin (1 mg/kg every 8 hours) for 6 weeks. During the 6-week treatment period, we monitored WBC, Scr, and CRP (Fig. 2). We also checked the serum concentration of gentamicin in pre-dosing 0.4 mg/L on the fifth day after initiation of gentamicin therapy. Her renal function, with a creatinine clearance of nearly 100 mL/minute at the end of the treatment period, did not deteriorate.
Table 1

The susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis (microdilution method)

 

MIC

susceptibility

PCG

2

S

ABPC

2

S

VCM

2

S

RFP

>2

R

Abbreviations: ABPC amino-benzyl penicillin (ampicillin), MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, PCG benzylpenicillin G, R resistant, RFP rifampicin, S susceptible, VCM vancomycin

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis by E-test. Enterococcus faecalis in this case did not show high-level gentamicin resistance

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Clinical course of the patient. Transitive graph showing the clinical course of the patient from day 1 (admission day and start of treatment) to day 35 (1 week before antibiotic treatment ended). Abbreviations: CRP C-reactive protein, Scr serum creatinine, WBC white blood cell

Vegetation was not detected by transthoracic echocardiography after the mitral valve replacement. She was discharged from our hospital without any complications on the 42nd day of hospitalization. She did not have any sequelae related to the disease 19 months after discharge.

Discussion

Enterococcal endocarditis is estimated to represent only 10% of all endocarditis cases. Enterococcal endocarditis has been linked to genitourinary instrumentation and biliary portals, and unlike Staphylococcus endocarditis, valvular heart disease is not always a prerequisite.

Enterococci, including Enterococcus faecalis, are one of the normal bacterial flora of the intestine, the female genital tract, and the dental cavity [8]. Our patient was a housewife and did not receive periodic medical (including dental) treatment. This suggests that the intestinal flora, vaginal flora, and periodontal pockets might have served as potential reservoirs for the post-delivery endocarditis in this patient.

Prophylactic antimicrobials administration in cesarean sections can reduce the incidence of post-delivery infection, including fever, wound infection, and pelvic abscess [9]. The guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Infectious Disease Society of America, and the Japanese guidelines recommend the use of narrow-spectrum antimicrobials for prophylaxis, avoiding broad-spectrum antimicrobials [10, 11]. The Cochrane review showed that ampicillin and first-generation cephalosporins have similar efficacies for postoperative infection after cesarean sections [9], and broad-spectrum antimicrobials did not show any benefit. In this case, at the former hospital, despite the absence of a wound infection, the prophylactic antibiotic cefotiam, a second-generation cephalosporin, used against most common Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, was administered 1 g every 12 hours for 3 days after cesarean section. Previous reports have implicated broad-spectrum antibiotics such as moxalactam in the development of enterococcal superinfection [12, 13]. Siesing et al. [14] reported a correlation between cefuroxime, a second-generation cephalosporin, consumption, and the rising incidence of enterococci in bone and soft tissue biopsies. The most frequent site of superinfection was the urinary tract of which the incidence exceeded 5% [12]. A similar observational study has suggested that the use of second-generation and third-generation cephalosporins was a risk factor for nosocomial enterococcal bacteremia (NEB) [15]. The mechanisms of enterococcal superinfections have not been elucidated in detail. Enterococcus colonization and overgrowth appears to be linked to a rise of superinfection. The overgrowth of enterococci in the cervicovaginal microflora after three 2 g cefoxitin [16], a second-generation cephalosporin, and one 1 g ceftriaxone [17], a third-generation cephalosporin, have occurred. NEB have well-known risk factors including indwelling urinary catheter beyond 24 hours and surgery. Our patient did not have a history of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) and urine cultures were negative on the admission day with IE. Urinary catheter insertion was performed for 2 days during the hospitalization for childbirth. Previous use of cefotiam and urinary catheter insertion may be risk factors for NEB in this case [18].

Enterococcal endocarditis results in considerable mortality and cure rates of 72 to 79% are reported using standard therapy. Ampicillin monotherapy often results in clinical failures; therefore, aminoglycosides are added, because this combination enhances the bactericidal activity in vitro. Naturally, all enterococci display low aminoglycoside resistance; however, synergy is maintained with cell wall-active agents. High-level resistance to aminoglycosides abolishes the synergistic bactericidal activity of aminoglycosides in combination with cell-wall-active agents such as ampicillin, which are important in the treatment of severe enterococcal infections such as endocarditis. Enterococcal strains resistant to high levels of gentamicin (MIC > 512 mg/L) have been increasing among Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. In a study by Fernandez-Hidalgo et al., 26% of 272 patients were infected by high-level aminoglycoside-resistant strains [19]. Therefore, a gentamicin-containing regimen would not be effective for these patients. Gentamicin-associated nephrotoxicity may complicate [20] a standard 4-week to 6-week course regimen and could result in serious, life-threating complications, such as renal failure, requiring hemodialysis. To prevent renal failure, pre-dose gentamicin levels must be monitored. The American Heart Association guidelines recommend a pre-dose gentamicin concentration of less than 1 mg/L [21]. In this case, before applying a gentamicin-containing regimen, we confirmed that the causative Enterococcus faecalis did not display high-level gentamicin resistance. According to the results, we adjusted the optimal dosing to a pre-dose level of less than 1 mg/L, offering the highest efficacy without causing renal dysfunction.

In this case, 4 months’ delay to diagnosis of IE let the mitral vegetation develop larger before the urgent surgery. Before admission, two primary care physicians had seen the patient and considered that she had a cold. Since no abnormal laboratory data were obtained from the patient, they prescribed antipyretic routinely without recognizing the fever to be of unknown origin, including the possibility of IE. It is hard to suspect because she had no medical history of conventional risk factors of IE.

In our clinical setting, we examined the high-level gentamicin resistance to ensure effectiveness of the ongoing antimicrobial treatment, and did not pay enough attention to check abdominal computed tomography (CT), colon fiber examination, and serum antistreptolysin O titers. A dental examination revealed no abnormalities. Our investigation was insufficient to evaluate multiple factors of the entry site due to her bacteremia.

In considering her clinical history, the nonspecific symptoms of IE started after cesarean section. The origin of the bacteremia was naturally elicited during the perioperative processes. Our report suggested the indwelling urinary catheter and the prophylactic inappropriate antibiotics can be risk factors of IE in an ostensibly healthy postpartum woman.

Conclusions

We report here a rare case of postpartum IE caused by Enterococcus faecalis in a healthy woman. The pathogen is usually virulent to the elderly with immune deficiencies, and it often causes nosocomial infections. In this case, prophylactic cefotiam for the cesarean section might have selected the pathogen, leading to bacteremia and IE.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Kenji Mogi and Dr Kaoru Matsuura, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, for the diagnosis of the patient and Mr Naoki Suwa and Ms Masami Toyama, Clinical Laboratory of Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, for the phenotypic characterization of the bacteria isolate.

Funding

We declare that no funding has been received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

MT and MSh drafted and edited the manuscript. KF, SN, YT, YS, MA, SK, MSa, and KS helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This case report was approved by the Ethics committee of Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, approval no. 28-45.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacy, Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, 1-21-1 Kanasugi, Funabashi city, Chiba prefecture, Japan

References

  1. Hoen B, Duval X. Clinical practice. Infective endocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1425–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sy RW, Kritharides L. Health care exposure and age in infective endocarditis: results of a contemporary population-based profile of 1536 patients in Australia. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1890–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Duval X, Delahaye F, Alla F, Tattevin P, Obadia JF, Le Moing V, Doco-Lecompte T, Celard M, Poyart C, Strady C, et al. Temporal trends in infective endocarditis in the context of prophylaxis guideline modifications: three successive population-based surveys. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1968–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Prendergast BD. The changing face of infective endocarditis. Heart. 2006;92:879–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nakatani S, Mitsutake K, Ohara T, Kokubo Y, Yamamoto H, Hanai S. Recent Picture of Infective Endocarditis in Japan. Circ J. 2013;77:1558–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nakagawa T, Wada H, Sakakura K, Yamada Y, Ishida K, Ibe T, Ikeda N, Sugawara Y, Ako J, Momomura S. Clinical features of infective endocarditis: comparison between the 1990s and 2000s. J Cardiol. 2014;63:145–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kebed KY, Bishu K, Al Adham RI, Baddour LM, Connolly HM, Sohail MR, Steckelberg JM, Wilson WR, Murad MH, Anavekar NS. Pregnancy and postpartum infective endocarditis: a systematic review. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:1143–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Larsen B, Monif GR. Understanding the bacterial flora of the female genital tract. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:e69–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD007482. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3.Google Scholar
  10. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, Fish DN, Napolitano LM, Sawyer RG, Slain D, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:195–283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 120: Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:1472–83.Google Scholar
  12. Moellering Jr RC. Enterococcal infections in patients treated with moxalactam. Rev Infect Dis. 1982;4(Suppl):S708–711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Berk SL, Verghese A, Holtsclaw SA, Smith JK. Enterococcal pneumonia. Occurrence in patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens and enteral feeding. Am J Med. 1983;74:153–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Siesing PC, Alva-Jorgensen JP, Brodersen J, Arpi M, Jensen PE. Rising incidence of Enterococcus species in microbiological specimens from orthopedic patients correlates to increased use of cefuroxime: a study concentrating on tissue samples. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:319–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Pallares R. Cephalosporins as Risk Factor for Nosocomial Enterococcus faecalis Bacteremia. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ismail MA, Nelson KE, Larson P, Moses VK. Selective effect of cefoxitin prophylaxis on post-cesarean-section microbial flora. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:168–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Stiver HG, Binns BO, Brunham RC, Cheng N, Dean DM, Goldring AM, Walker JB, Tan E, McLeod J. Randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacies, costs, and vaginal flora alterations with single-dose ceftriaxone and multidose cefazolin prophylaxis in vaginal hysterectomy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:1194–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Graninger W, Ragette R. Nosocomial bacteremia due to Enterococcus faecalis without endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:49–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernandez-Hidalgo N, Almirante B, Gavalda J, Gurgui M, Pena C, de Alarcon A, Ruiz J, Vilacosta I, Montejo M, Vallejo N, et al. Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone is as effective as ampicillin plus gentamicin for treating Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1261–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Begg EJ, Barclay ML. Aminoglycosides – 50 years on. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;39:597–603.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler Jr VG, Tleyjeh IM, Rybak MJ, Barsic B, Lockhart PB, Gewitz MH, Levison ME, et al. Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:1435–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement