Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Stylistic features of case reports as a genre of medical discourse



The present paper discusses the lexical and grammatical peculiarities of English language medical case reports, taking into account their communicative purposes and intentions.


The objective of the research is to clarify the principal mechanisms of producing an effective English language medical case report and thus to provide recommendations and guidelines for medical professionals who will deal with this genre. The analysis of medical case reports will largely focus on the most significant linguistic peculiarities, such as the use of active and passive voice, the choice of particular verb tenses, and pronouns. The selected medical case reports will be considered using methods of lexico-grammatical analysis, quantitative examination, and contextual, structural, narrative, and stylistic analyses.


The research revealed a range of important stylistic features of medical case reports which markedly distinguish them from other genres of medical scientific writing: educational and instructive intentions, conciseness and brevity, direct and personal tone, and material presented in a narrative style. The present research has shown that the communicative strategies of the analyzed discourse, mentioned immediately above, are effectively implemented by means of specific lexical units and grammatical structures: the dominance of active voice sentences, past simple tense, personal pronouns, and modal verbs. The research has also detected the occasional use of the present perfect, present simple, and future simple tenses and passive voice which also serve particular communicative purposes of medical case reports.


Medical case reports possess a range of unique characteristics which differ from those of research articles and other scientific genres within the framework of written medical discourse. It is to be emphasized that it is highly important for medical professionals to master the major stylistic principles and communicative intentions of medical case report as a genre in order to share their findings with fellow researchers from all over the world. Hence, in the process of training future medical researchers, the analysis of the basic mechanisms of writing a medical case report should be an integral part of the curricula in English for Specific Purposes at universities.

Peer Review reports


Within the framework of written medical texts, case reports are traditionally classified into one of the major groups of medical discourse (along with research papers, review articles, and editorials) [1]. As a matter of fact, medical case reports (MCRs) constitute a highly valuable genre of medical literature, since “there is nothing like a good case study for arousing interest, gaining attention, ensuring encouragement, and enabling participation” [2]. Case reports are commonly considered “stepping stones” for further clinical research: “prospective, retrospective and observational randomized controlled trials are always constructed on the basis of data obtained from individual patients” [3]. Apart from their significant role in the dissemination and promotion of medical knowledge, case reports are also valuable in terms of their pedagogic and ethic potential due to their “inextricable connection between narrative and moral knowledge and experience” [2]. It is crucial for medical professionals to take into account all these peculiarities in order to be able to produce effective English language MCRs since they are an indispensable tool for the dissemination of medical knowledge all over the world.

Hence, this genre is exceptionally important as an effective tool of research advancement and for the training of future doctors, and therefore needs careful examination and analysis. The prevalence of English as not only the lingua franca, but as the important transmission medium of scientific knowledge in our time compels professionals in all spheres of science and technology to render their works in English in order to be understood and acknowledged. Thus, the ability to produce the effective English language discourse of MCRs is a vital prerequisite for the dissemination and enhancement of medical knowledge all over the world.


Taking the abovementioned into consideration, it is obvious that MCRs need careful examination in terms of their genre and stylistic features which have not yet been thoroughly investigated. The objective of the research is to analyze the genre and stylistic features of MCRs in terms of their lexico-grammatical structure and, in such a way, to provide guidelines for medical professionals for producing effective MCRs. The material of the research is the corpus of MCRs from Journal of Medical Case Reports: 15 case reports, published within the last 5 years (2011 to 2016). The selected MCRs will be considered using the method of lexico-grammatical and stylistic analyses, largely focusing on the most significant peculiarities. The use of active and passive voice and the choice of particular verb tenses and pronouns will be subjected to quantitative examination to determine their frequency. In addition, the detected features will be examined with regard to their contextual, structural, and narrative role.


MCRs are traditionally structured in abstract, introduction, case presentation, discussion, conclusion, informed consent and references. As a rule, the length of a MCR largely depends on the communicative purpose. However, brevity and conciseness are usually the most distinctive features of MCRs as a genre. In general, the author’s aim is to transfer the maximum amount of important information using the minimal linguistic tools. Another unique characteristic of MCRs as compared with other genres of medical discourse is their narrative style. That is to say, the major objective of MCRs is to “narrate”, that is, to describe, an interesting case to fellow researchers in order to warn them or to improve treatment techniques. Consequently, MCRs perform instructive and educational functions, and therefore are aimed at: (1) describing a condition for the first time, and/or (2) warning other physicians. These stylistic features determine the entire structure of MCRs, as well as the choice of lexical units.

It is necessary to admit that the use of simple past tense is a predominant feature of MCRs. This peculiarity results from the very nature of MCRs as narrative (that is, “storytelling”) texts: their primary aim is to give an account of past events. Another important aspect of MCRs is the use of active sentences, contrary to other medical scientific genres, such as research articles. In terms of academic writing, the passive voice and impersonal “it” constructions “depersonalize text and create an impression of the writer’s distance and objectivity” [4], thus providing the necessary effect of academic detachment. However, this is not the case with MCRs. Obviously, this peculiarity is also associated with the narrative style, as well as with the educational intention of MCRs as a genre: the authors of MCRs describe the unusual problem they have faced and handled, thus sharing their experience and a lesson they have learned from it.

Hence, MCRs are notable for their use of active sentences in the simple past tense (309 cases) [3, 518]: “We maintained anesthesia with inhaled desflurane at 5% and intravenously administered remifentanil at 0.2 μg/kg/min in a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.45 (…) At that moment, we administered 20 mg ephedrine, 300 μg phenylephrine, and 0.03 μg/kg/min norepinephrine to maintain adequate blood pressure (…) We did not detect any problems with his respiratory parameters (…) His systolic blood pressure remained at 40 mmHg for 10 min; we performed chest compressions to maintain his blood pressure” [5]; “We did not find cases with such an evolution in the literature, but we found some cases of spontaneous expulsion of ileal lipoma per rectum” [6]; “We found electrogram amplitude to be normal throughout the right ventricle (…) In this case we used cryoablation to avoid the pain associated with radiofrequency delivery” [7]; “An extraoral examination revealed a diffuse swelling of her left nasal alar base without tenderness” [8]; “Two patients with EHPVO presented with micrognathia, restricted mouth openings, and facial asymmetry” [9]; “Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) did not identify any abnormalities, but an ophthalmic examination revealed vertical supranuclear gaze palsy (VSGP), and analysis of peripheral blood and bone marrow biopsies identified vacuolated histiocytes” [10]; “…we considered electroconvulsive therapy; clinicians may opt for electroconvulsive therapy at an earlier stage in similar psychiatric emergencies (…) We hypothesized that our patient’s poor clinical response was from a genetic polymorphism in the drug-metabolizing activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes” [11].

However, it is necessary to point out that passive voice constructions can also be met in MCRs. In particular, they are used for the purpose of giving recommendations and warning other physicians (that is, implementation of the instructive function). In this context, the modal verb “should” plays a significant role as well (15 cases in the analyzed MCRs): “The psychological aspect of this condition should not be underestimated because he was ashamed of his front teeth and was not able to smile” [12]; “IMA malposition is a rare but potentially lethal complication of CVC that should be considered in risk factor assessments and the management of severe complications resulting from CVC” [13]; “…however, the risk of infection should be weighed against the advantages of this procedure” [8]; “We hypothesize that a difficult intubation should be anticipated in these patients” [9].

The present perfect tense is generally used to render the author’s reflections on the problem in a broader context (for instance, the results of other research, which occur primarily in the “Background” section of MCRs). The research has identified 180 cases of present perfect constructions (103 active and 77 passive sentences): “There have been a number of previous reports of CVC malpositioning in the internal mammary vein”; “Numerous complications of central venous catheterization have been reported” [13]; “Other studies have demonstrated the ability of ablation to prevent recurrence of VF in patients with a structurally normal heart, but these studies also have been of small patient cohorts followed only for a few years” [7]; “Few cases of bilateral nasoalveolar cysts have been described” [8].

In addition, the past perfect tense is applied to describe earlier events from the case history (a total of 34 past perfect constructions: 28 active and 6 passive sentences): “Of note, he had undergone a THA 31 days prior to his transfer…” [14]; “Four months later, his proteinuria had reduced to 1.4 grams/day, creatinine had improved to 155 μmol/L” [15]; “A computed tomography (CT) of her abdomen had shown nonspecific findings suggestive of colitis” [16]; “Two weeks previously, she had given birth at 40 weeks … there had been no antenatal symptoms … our patient had complained of dysuria … the baby had not required hospitalization” [17].

At the same time, our research has demonstrated the relatively seldom use of the future tense in MCRs (a total of 16 cases: 13 active and 3 passive sentences). Occasionally, the authors use it in the “Conclusions” section to provide a perspective for further research or a prognosis: “An ultrasound-guided approach rather than the use of a landmark technique to insert CVC will help” [13]; “Patients will tolerate the procedure with adequate airway preparation using topical anesthesia” [9]; “Until the effectiveness of ablation for the prevention of VF has been confirmed in a large cohort of such patients followed for a substantial duration, we will continue to recommend ICD therapy for most survivors of VF arrest even if ablation is also performed” [7]; “The tooth will preserve the remaining alveolar ridge and help the adolescent psychologically” [12].

The use of the present simple tense is also comparatively infrequent and it is generally used only in the opening section of MCRs (23 cases in the analyzed discourse): “We report a rare case of a CVC tip malpositioned in the right internal mammary artery (IMA)” [13]; “We describe the case of a 30-year-old man from the north of Morocco with no medical or surgical history and no family history of rectal disease” [6]; “We describe a case in which RVOT ectopy was complicated by ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrest despite the absence of any of the recognized risk factor for cardiac arrest and despite an apparently positive response to pharmacological therapy” [7]; “Here, we present two cases where difficult intubation was anticipated, and in which, despite trying various devices to visualize and secure the airway, only the use of a Macintosh blade proved successful” [9]; “We report a case of an acute psychotic relapse in response to polydrug use most notable for multiple recent binges of crystal methamphetamine” [11].

As one can observe from the examples above, the direct manner and personal style of MCRs are vividly embodied in the wide use of the first person plural personal pronoun. The present research has detected 77 cases of using the pronoun “we” in the analyzed MCRs. As a matter of fact, the use of “we” emphasizes the fact of joint authorship: “sole authorship should rarely be undertaken, instead the support and critical appraisal of a number of colleagues, as well as clinical mentors, offers the most likely team to ensure a strong contribution to literature” [19]. Furthermore, the patients are usually referred to as third person pronouns. This narrative strategy is aimed primarily at the protection of patients’ personal information. Hence, all relevant data (for example, a patient’s sex and age) are provided in the first sentence of MCRs, with subsequent referencing as “he” or “she”, so that the patients could not be identified. The research has found 153 cases of referring to patients as “he” or “she” in the analyzed discourse. The following examples demonstrate this strategy:

  1. 1)

    Case presentation: “A 30-year-old man from the north of Morocco presented with rectorrhagia and constipation”. Discussion: “He presented with a 1-year history of rectorrhagia and constipation (…) He was hospitalized in our surgical department when he defecated spontaneously the tumor mass. (…) At the end of radiotherapy, he had follow-up consultation every 3 months (…) After 1 year of surveillance, he has not presented any clinical symptoms and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was normal” [6].

  2. 2)

    Case presentation: “We report the case of a 54-year-old Caucasian woman with symptomatic right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias without structural heart disease who suffered a ventricular fibrillation arrest without prior malignant clinical features”. Discussion: “At the time of presentation, she was taking no medication (…) She was discharged on a slow-release preparation of verapamil 240 mg daily for control of symptoms (…) One month later, our patient was readmitted after suffering an out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest from which she was successfully resuscitated (…) On recovery, our patient accepted our recommendation that she undergo ablation of the focus of ventricular ectopy but she refused implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy” [7].

Thus, while personal pronouns are for the most part avoided in other scientific genres, they constitute a predominant feature of MCRs.


As one can easily observe, the abovementioned lexico-grammatical features of MCRs differ from research articles and other scientific genres. For instance, unlike the objective reportage of research articles, MCRs provide a personal “storytelling” description. Hence, in the process of training future medical researchers, the study of these stylistic peculiarities and their communicative purposes should be an integral part of the curricula in English for Specific Purposes at universities.


MCRs as a genre possess a range of unique characteristics, such as: narrative style, conciseness, and brevity which result from the authors’ aspiration to put their messages to colleagues as quickly and precisely as possible; personal tone, stipulated by sharing one’s own experience, as against the detached academic style which is typical of research articles; and educational and instructive intentions, aimed at warning other physicians and improving patient management. These communicative features determine the choice of lexical units and grammatical structures in the analyzed discourse: the dominance of active voice sentences, past simple tense, personal pronouns, and modal verbs. This research has also detected the occasional use of the present perfect, present simple, and future simple tenses and the passive voice which also serve the particular communicative purposes of MCRs. It is our belief that further genre and style analysis of MCRs will help medical professionals to effectively textualize their research results into the MCR genre and thus make their unique contribution to the development of medical science.



Computed tomography


Central venous catheter


Extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction


Implanted cardioverter defibrillator


Internal mammary artery


Medical case report


Magnetic resonance imaging


Right ventricular outflow tract


Total hip arthroplasty


Ventricular fibrillation


Vertical supranuclear gaze palsy


  1. Piqué-Angordans J, Santiago P. Medical Discourse and Academic Genres. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd; 2006. p. 651.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pattison S, Dickenson D, Parker M, Heller T. Do case studies mislead about the nature of reality? J Med Ethics. 1999;25:42–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Protopapas AD, Athanasiou T. Evolving dimensions in medical case reporting. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:164–6. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-5-164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hinkel E. Research Findings on Teaching Grammar for Academic Writing. Engl Teach. 2013;68(4):3–21. doi:10.15858/engtea.68.4.201312.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakano S, Nakahira J, Sawai T, Kadono N, Minami T. Unexpected hemorrhage during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:240. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1030-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sahli N, Khmou M, Khalil J, Elmajjaoui S, Khannoussi B, Kebdani T, Elkacemi H, Benjaafar N. Unusual evolution of leiomyosarcoma of the rectum: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:249. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1047-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhillon PS, Domenichini G, Gonna H, Li A, Sunni N, Mahmoudi M, Gallagher M. Ventricular fibrillation treated by cryotherapy to the right ventricular outflow tract: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:256. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1032-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sato M, Morita K, Kabasawa Y, Harada H. Bilateral nasolabial cysts: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:246. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1024-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kezo A, Patel RD, Mathkar S, Butada S. Use of a Macintosh blade in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction with difficult intubation: Two case reports. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:245. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1001-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuisset J-M, Sukno S, Trauffler A, Latour P, Dobbelaere D, Michaud L, Vallée L. Impact of miglustat on evolution of atypical presentation of late-infantile-onset Niemann–Pick disease type C with early cognitive impairment, behavioral dysfunction, epilepsy, ophthalmoplegia, and cerebellar involvement: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:241. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1038-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tucker MG, Kekulawala S, Kent M, Mostafa S, Harvey R. Polysubstance-induced relapse of schizoaffective disorder refractory to high-dose antipsychotic medications: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:242. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1031-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schaaf H, Kerkmann H, Pitka F, Niko C, Attia S. Replantation of a displaced incisor in a boy with a cleft lip and alveolus: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:255. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1041-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumada K, Murakami N, Okada H, Toyoda I, Ogura S, Kondo H, Fukuda A. Rare central venous catheter malposition – an ultrasound-guided approach would be helpful: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:248. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1026-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Boland M, Murphy M, McDermott E. Acute-onset severe gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage in a postoperative patient taking rivaroxaban after total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:129. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-6-129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan S, Oliver KA, Gray NA. An association between membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:199. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-0979-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ko H, Maymani H, Rojas-Hernandez C. Hemolytic uremic syndrome associated with Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in older adults: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:175. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-0970-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Vincent P, Davis R, Roy D. Group B streptococcus tricuspid endocarditis presenting with arthralgia in a postpartum woman: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:242. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-6-242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bressan AK, Kirkpatrick AW, Ball CG. Abdominal intra-compartment syndrome – a non-hydraulic model of abdominal compartment syndrome due to post-hepatectomy hemorrhage in a man with a localized frozen abdomen due to extensive adhesions: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:251. doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1045-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Aitken LM, Marshall AP. Writing a case study: ensuring a meaningful contribution to the literature. Aust Crit Care. 2007;20:132–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to express our deep appreciation to Prorector for Research and Development of Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, Prof. Igor P. Kaidashev, for valuable insights and recommendations which improved this manuscript significantly.


This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

All quoted material and data are available in open access publications of Journal of Medical Case Reports.

Authors’ contributions

YL analyzed the material under consideration, wrote the Results and Conclusions sections, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. HM provided the background information as to the peculiarities of the examined genre. OB provided the methodological framework of the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuliia Lysanets.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lysanets, Y., Morokhovets, H. & Bieliaieva, O. Stylistic features of case reports as a genre of medical discourse. J Med Case Reports 11, 83 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: