Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Large hepatocellular carcinoma in a non-cirrhotic liver with peritoneal and omental metastasis in a healthy man: a case report

Journal of Medical Case Reports201711:34

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1203-9

Received: 24 August 2016

Accepted: 6 January 2017

Published: 8 February 2017

Abstract

Background

Liver cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma usually develops in the setting of cirrhosis or chronic inflammation. Major risk factors for developing hepatocellular carcinoma are chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection, alcoholic cirrhosis, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The most frequent locations for hepatocellular carcinoma to metastasize are the lungs, portal vein, bones, and regional lymph nodes.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old Sri Lankan man presented with progressive abdominal distension and on examination was found to have a palpable irregular mass in the left lobe of his liver with moderate ascites. His ascitic fluid was an exudate without malignant cells. An ultrasound scan and contrast-enhanced computed tomography of his abdomen showed a large contrast-enhancing lesion in the left lobe of his liver without features of cirrhosis. Laparoscopic assessment revealed peritoneal and omental deposits. Histology of the biopsies taken from the liver lesion, omental deposits, and peritoneal deposits supported a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. His liver biochemistry was normal and hepatitis serology was negative. He is abstinent from alcohol and did not have metabolic syndrome.

Conclusions

It is rare for a young patient to develop hepatocellular carcinoma with a normal liver without chronic hepatitis B or C infection, or any other risk factors. Intraperitoneal metastasis of non-ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma is also very rare. Here we report a rare case of a 41-year-old man with a large hepatocellular carcinoma in a non-cirrhotic liver without chronic hepatitis who presented with peritoneal and omental metastasis.

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinomaIntra-abdominal metastasisNon-cirrhotic liverYoung male

Background

Liver cancer is commoner in men than in women. In men, it is the second most leading cause of cancer death in less developed countries; in more developed countries, it is the sixth leading cause of cancer deaths among men [1]. The major risk factors for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are hepatitis B viral infection, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, alcoholic cirrhosis, hereditary hemochromatosis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, environmental toxins (aflatoxin and contaminated drinking water), and cirrhosis of almost any cause [2]. HCC in a non-cirrhotic liver without any of the risk factors is rare [3]. Intraperitoneal metastasis of a non-ruptured HCC is also rare [4]. Here we describe a 41-year-old man presenting with a large HCC in a non-cirrhotic liver with peritoneal and omental metastasis and moderate ascites. He was tested and was negative for hepatitis serology and other risk factors for cirrhosis. He refused any intervention and wished to be managed conservatively.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old Sri Lankan man presented to our unit with progressive abdominal distension and discomfort for 3 months. He also noticed loss of appetite and loss of weight for the same period of time. There was no history of sudden epigastric or right hypochondrial pain, hematemesis, melena, per rectal bleeding, or altered bowel habits. Nor did he have any confusion or altered sleep pattern suggestive of hepatic encephalopathy. He was previously well with no prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. He was abstinent from alcohol and he was not a tobacco smoker; he denied any intravenous drug abuse, blood transfusions, sexual promiscuity, or past history of hepatitis. There was no family history of liver diseases or HCC.

On examination, he was not icteric or pale and there was no bilateral leg edema or peripheral stigmata of chronic liver cell disease. His cardiovascular system examination was normal with a normal blood pressure. His abdomen was distended with a palpable irregular mass in the left lobe of his liver without a bruit. There was no splenomegaly. A moderate amount of free fluid was present. A neurological examination revealed no signs of hepatic encephalopathy.

Initial basic investigations showed anemia and leukocytosis with normal liver and renal biochemistry (Table 1). His blood picture showed normochromic normocytic anemia with mild to moderate rouleaux formation and mild neutrophilic leukocytosis. His inflammatory markers were high with an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 125 in the first hour and a C-reactive protein (CRP) of 155 mg/L (<6). His urine full report was normal. His fasting blood sugar (5.4 mmol/L) and lipid profile were normal. His lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 669 U/L (230 to 460) and amylase was 68 U/L (22 to 80).
Table 1

Full blood count, liver function tests, renal function tests, and serum iron studies

Investigation

Normal range

Investigation

Normal range

WBC = 11.15 × 103/μL

4–10 × 103/μL

Neutrophil = 85.8%

50–70%

Lymphocyte = 8.4%

20–40%

Eosinophil = 0.03%

0.5–05%

Hemoglobin = 9.7 g/dL

11–16 g/dL

MCV = 92.4 fL

80–100 fL

MCH = 29.4 pg

27–34 pg

MCHC 31.8 g/dL

32–36 g/dL

RDW-CV 0.119

0.110–0.160

Serum creatinine = 1.13 mg/dL

0.68–1.36 mg/dL

Serum sodium = 140 mmol/L

135–145 mmol/L

Serum potassium = 4.7 mmol/L

3.5–5.1 mmol/L

Albumin = 37 g/L

36–50 g/L

Globulin = 41.0 g/L

22–40 g/L

Alkaline phosphatase = 84 U/L

30–120 U/L

GGT = 60 U/L (<55)

<55 U/L

ALT = 37 U/L

<50 U/L

AST = 26 U/L

<50 U/L

Total bilirubin = 6.7 μmol/L

5–21 μmol/L

INR = 1.2

<1.4

Serum magnesium = 1.1 mmol/L

0.8–1.1 mmol/L

Ionized calcium 1.27 mmol/L

1.0–1.3

Serum iron = 100.9 μg/dL

59–156 μg/dL

TIBC = 349

291–430

Transferrin saturation = 30.8%

20–50%

Ferritin = 388 ng/mL

28–365 ng/mL

ALT alanine aminotransferase AST aspartate aminotransferase GGT gamma-glutamyltransferase INR international normalized ratio MCH mean corpuscular hemoglobin MCHC mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration MCV mean corpuscular volume RDW random distribution of red cell width TIBC total iron-binding capacity WBC White blood cell count.

Hepatitis B serology (hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B surface antibody, and hepatitis B core antibody) and hepatitis C serology (HCV antibody and hepatitis C ribonucleic acid (RNA)) were negative as were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serology and Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test. Serum iron studies were within normal range except for marginally elevated serum ferritin (Table 1). His serum alpha-fetoprotein was 12 μg/L. The result of an antinuclear antibodies (ANA) test was negative and the ceruloplasmin level in the serum was normal.

An ultrasound (USS) scan of his abdomen showed a heterogeneous ill-defined area of 4.5 × 2.4 cm in the left lobe of his liver with irregular margins. The rest of his liver was normal with normal outline and uniform echogenicity without features of cirrhosis. His gall bladder and bile ducts were normal. His spleen was mildly enlarged (12.6 cm) and moderate ascites was present. A portal vein Doppler showed normal flow pattern with no evidence of portal vein thrombosis (portal vein diameter 0.98 cm and flow velocity 25 cm/second). There was no para-aortic lymphadenopathy. His pancreas, kidneys, and prostate were normal. A posteroanterior chest X-ray (CXR-PA) showed elevation of his right hemidiaphragm (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

A posteroanterior chest X-ray showed right-side hemidiaphragm elevation

Contrast-enhanced triple-phase computed tomography (CT) showed a 7.5 × 6.5 cm lesion in the left lobe of his liver which enhanced during the arterial phase and showed a washout effect in the venous phase (Fig. 2 shows liver lesion seen at 30 seconds from contrast administration, delayed film; Fig. 3 shows liver lesion seen at 70 seconds, delayed film; and Fig. 4 shows liver lesion seen in 5 minutes, delayed film). The right lobe of his liver was normal. Intrahepatic and extrahepatic ducts were normal. There were no para-aortic masses. Gross ascites was evident (Fig. 5).
Fig. 2

Liver lesion seen in 30 seconds, delayed film. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen

Fig. 3

Liver lesion seen in 70 seconds, delayed film. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen

Fig. 4

Liver lesion seen in 5 minutes, delayed film. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen

Fig. 5

Gross ascites. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen

A diagnostic peritoneal tap revealed the ascitic fluid to be slightly turbid and mildly blood stained. His ascitic fluid albumin was 40 g/L (serum-to-ascites albumin gradient = -03 g/L) and it contained 25 neutrophils/mm3, 160 lymphocytes/mm3, and 4000 red blood cells/mm3. His glucose concentration was 4.0 mmol/L: random blood sugar (RBS) 7.0 mmol/l. His adenosine deaminase level was 29 U/L: tuberculosis (TB) 92 +/– 45, non-TB 12 +/– 11. An analysis of 200 mL of ascitic fluid for cytology showed reactive mesothelial cells, histiocytes, and lymphocytes. There was no evidence of atypical cells. A Gram stain and bacterial cultures of ascitic fluid were negative. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and culture for TB were also negative.

Laparoscopic assessment revealed gross ascites, peritoneal deposits (Fig. 6), and omental deposits (Fig. 7) with bowel adhesions. Ascitic fluid was drained and cytological analysis of 500 mL was negative for malignant cells. A liver lesion was seen at the left lobe of his liver (Fig. 8) and biopsies were taken from the liver lesion as well as omental and peritoneal deposits. TB culture, TB PCR, and GeneXpert for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in material retrieved from the liver lesion, omental deposit, and peritoneal deposit were negative. The biopsy from his liver showed nests and trabeculae of cells with vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli with sinusoidal pattern focally. Cytoplasmic bile staining and intranuclear inclusions were not seen. A biopsy from his peritoneum and omentum showed nests of similar cells infiltrating the desmoplastic stroma. These findings supported a diagnosis of HCC which was confirmed by immunohistochemistry.
Fig. 6

Peritoneal deposits visualized at laparoscopy

Fig. 7

Omental deposits visualized at laparoscopy

Fig. 8

Liver lesion seen on the left lobe of the liver during laparoscopy

He refused any surgical or oncological interventions and wished to be managed conservatively. He died 3 months later.

Discussion

There is much research on the etiology and management of HCC in the cirrhotic liver. Data on the natural history of HCC in non-cirrhotic patients are limited. A variety of risk factors for the development of HCC have been identified including cirrhosis of almost any cause, mostly chronic viral hepatitis B or C, alcohol, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and hemochromatosis. HCC usually develops in the setting of chronic liver cirrhosis or inflammation [5]; less than 20% of HCCs develop in the non-cirrhotic liver [6]. As compared to HCC in a cirrhotic liver, HCC in a non-cirrhotic liver has some peculiarities, such as: lower male preponderance; bimodal age distribution; lower prevalence of the three main risk factors of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HCV infection, and alcohol abuse; and increased prevalence of other etiologic factors (exposure to genotoxic substances and sex hormones, inherited diseases, and genetic mutations). Extrahepatic extension is also more common in HCC in patients who do not have cirrhosis [7, 8]. In the majority of patients with HCC in a non-cirrhotic liver, the etiology can most likely be related to metabolic syndrome [9]. It is also very rare to develop HCC in a normal liver without HBV and HCV infection.

One case report described a 36-year-old woman with normal liver function and negative hepatitis virus markers; abdominal USS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a tumor in segment 7 of her liver. Upon aspiration biopsy of her liver, the histopathological diagnosis was moderately differentiated HCC [10]. Tanaka et al. [3] described a 39-year-old woman with normal liver function and no evidence of past and persistent HBV or HCV infection, whose abdominal ultrasonography and abdominal CT scan demonstrated a liver tumor of approximately 40 mm in maximal diameter in the lateral segment. This tumor was a moderately differentiated HCC. Tanaka et al. concluded that it is very rare to develop HCC in a normal liver without HBV and HCV infection [3]. Liver cancer is considered to be comparatively rare in young patients. According to the 16th report of the national follow-up study of primary liver cancer by Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, only 0.6% of all cases of HCC occurred in patients younger than 35 years.

“Failure mode and effects analysis” [11] can be applied as a clinical reasoning tool to our patient. HCC is the potential failure. Effects of failure/main clinical features were progressive abdominal distension, discomfort, loss of appetite, and loss of weight [11]. There was no biochemical or radiological evidence of cirrhosis in our patient. We have excluded most of the risk factors for the development of HCC. The results of both the hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B surface antibody tests were negative which excluded acute or chronic hepatitis B infection and previous exposure. This was also confirmed by negative hepatitis B core antibodies (IgM and IgG). Negative hepatitis C serology (anti-HCV antibody and hepatitis C RNA) excluded hepatitis C infection. He was abstinent from alcohol and did not have diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, or hypertriglyceridemia suggesting metabolic syndrome, which is associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. He did not have a history of exposure to aflatoxin or other environmental toxins, which can contribute to the pathogenesis of HCC. Normal iron studies and ceruloplasmin levels excluded hemochromatosis and Wilson disease. He did not have any features of autoimmune hepatitis and an ANA test was negative. His alpha-1 antitrypsin level was not tested due to financial constraints. However, he had no features of emphysema or panniculitis. Therefore we conclude that this is a rare case of a 41-year-old patient with HCC in a non-cirrhotic liver with negative hepatitis serology. Ascitic fluid was an exudate (serum-to-ascites albumin gradient was less than 11 g/L) and was lymphocyte predominant. His adenosine deaminase level, a purine-degrading enzyme needed for maturation and differentiation of lymphoid cells, can be used to detect tuberculous peritonitis and in this case was not supportive of TB peritonitis. TB PCR and TB culture were also negative. We sent approximately 700 mL of ascitic fluid for cytological analysis as the sensitivity increases up to 80 to 90% with increasing volume of ascitic fluid. However, atypical cells were not found.

HCC is highly aggressive and often detected at a late stage. As in our patient, the symptoms are not specific in the early stages of the disease. More than 60% of patients are diagnosed at a late stage of disease after metastasis has occurred [12]. Since early stage disease has a relatively good prognosis, it is important to identify the lesion early. Alpha fetoprotein is the most commonly used biomarker for HCC detection and some other new biomarkers such as glypican-3, osteopontin, Golgi protein 73, nucleic acids including microRNAs, Dickkopf-1 (DKK1), and midkine (MDK) will become clinically available in the near future [13, 14]. Chiou and Lee [15] identified two mediators of inflammation, S100 calcium-binding protein A9 (S100A9) and granulin protein markers, as HCC-associated cancer-specific biomarkers. They belong to the cytoplasmic alarmin family of the host innate immune system [15]. Even though these biomarkers were not available to us, in future they will be useful to identify HCC at an early stage.

The most frequent locations for metastasis of HCC were lungs, portal vein, bones, and regional lymph nodes [1618]. Although the risk of metastasis in a ruptured HCC is high [4], intraperitoneal metastasis of a non-ruptured HCC is rare with an incidence of 2 to 6% detected during autopsy or laparoscopy [19]. Peritoneal metastases can occur synchronously or metachronously [20]. Our patient did not have a ruptured HCC. Sudden onset epigastric or right hypochondrial pain was the main reported complaint of patients with a ruptured HCC [21, 22]. Physical signs of hemodynamic instability, reduced hemoglobin level, and a raised aspartate aminotransferase level were more frequently found in patients with ruptured HCC than in those with non-ruptured tumors [22]. Peripheral location, protruding contour, discontinuity of hepatic surface, surrounding hematoma, and the “enucleation sign” are helpful signs for the diagnosis of a ruptured HCC in CT [23]. None of these were present in our patient.

Intraperitoneal seeding from a hepatoma can present as intraperitoneal masses, peritoneal thickening, and ascites. The main vascular feeders to intraperitoneal masses were omental branches of the gastroduodenal artery and/or the superior mesenteric artery [24]. The radiological manifestations of intraperitoneal metastasis from a HCC are single or multiple discrete hypervascular masses in the omentum. On angiography, the omental masses will show hypervascularity and are supplied by the omental branches of the superior mesenteric and inferior mesenteric arteries with prominent draining veins [25].

Surgery appears to be the optimal approach of managing extrahepatic metastasis of HCC localized to the peritoneum after considering the performance status, liver function, and tumor biology. The prognosis after cytoreductive surgery is likely to be related to the severity of chronic liver disease, the extent of peritoneal tumor involvement, and the response to surgery [26]. Resection of peritoneal metastases should be considered in patients whose primary liver neoplasm is under control and who have no metastases in other organs [20, 27]. Unfortunately, our patient decided to be managed conservatively without any interventions.

Conclusions

HCC usually develops in the setting of chronic liver cirrhosis or inflammation associated with chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Here we report a rare case of a large HCC in the non-cirrhotic liver of a 41-year-old man without chronic hepatitis presenting with peritoneal and omental metastasis. As compared to HCC in a cirrhotic liver, these tumors have some differences in epidemiology and etiology. Intraperitoneal metastasis of a non-ruptured HCC is very rare and cytoreductive surgery should be considered in those patients after careful assessment.

Abbreviations

ANA: 

Antinuclear antibodies

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

CT: 

Computed tomography

CXR- PA: 

Posteroanterior chest X-ray

DKK1: 

Dickkopf-1

ESR: 

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

HBV: 

Hepatitis B virus

HCC: 

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV: 

Hepatitis C virus

LDH: 

Lactate dehydrogenase

MDK: 

Midkine

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

RBS: 

Random blood sugar

S100A9: 

S100 calcium-binding protein A9

TB: 

Tuberculosis

USS: 

Ultrasound

VDRL: 

Venereal Disease Research Laboratory

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Ward doctors supported this case report in acquisition, and in the analysis and interpretation of data. We are thankful to the patient’s relatives for the support given in providing data. Dr Sithumini Pahalagamage helped in final preparation of the manuscript.

Funding

No source of funding.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

HMMTBH collected data, followed up the patient, did the literature review, and drafted the manuscript. AK drafted and corrected the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Hospital

References

  1. Torre LA, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosch FX, et al. Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5 Suppl 1):S5–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tanaka T, et al. A case of hepatocellular carcinoma in normal liver with no evidence of HBV or HCV infection. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43(11):1390–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sonoda T, et al. Ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma evokes risk of implanted metastases. J Surg Oncol. 1989;41(3):183–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schutte K, Bornschein J, Malfertheiner P. Hepatocellular carcinoma – epidemiological trends and risk factors. Dig Dis. 2009;27(2):80–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Alkofer B, Lepennec V, Chiche L. Hepatocellular cancer in the non-cirrhotic liver. J Visc Surg. 2011;148(1):3–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Trevisani F, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver: a reappraisal. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42(5):341–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Trevisani F, et al. Etiologic factors and clinical presentation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Differences between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic Italian patients. Cancer. 1995;75(9):2220–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Baffy G. Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Prevention. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2013;1(2):131–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Takahashi A, et al. Case of clear-cell hepatocellular carcinoma that developed in the normal liver of a middle-aged woman. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(1):129–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Wong KC. How to apply clinical cases and medical literature in the framework of a modified “failure mode and effects analysis” as a clinical reasoning tool – an illustration using the human biliary system. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10:85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Reichman ME. Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(9):1485–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Tsuchiya N, et al. Biomarkers for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(37):10573–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Song P, et al. Biomarkers: evaluation of clinical utility in surveillance and early diagnosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2016;245:S70–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiou SH, Lee KT. Proteomic analysis and translational perspective of hepatocellular carcinoma: Identification of diagnostic protein biomarkers by an onco-proteogenomics approach. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016;32(11):535–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee YT, Geer DA. Primary liver cancer: pattern of metastasis. J Surg Oncol. 1987;36(1):26–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Olubuyide IO. Pattern of metastasis of primary liver cancer at autopsy: an African series. Trop Gastroenterol. 1991;12(2):67–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Natsuizaka M, et al. Clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20(11):1781–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yeh CN, et al. Peritoneal implanted hepatocellular carcinoma with rupture after TACE presented as acute appendicitis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49(46):938–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin CC, et al. Clinical manifestations and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with peritoneal metastasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(5):815–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Miyamoto M, Sudo T, Kuyama T. Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of 172 Japanese cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86(1):67–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yeh CN, et al. Spontaneous tumour rupture and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2002;89(9):1125–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Choi BG, et al. The findings of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma on helical CT. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(878):142–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim PN, Kim IY, Lee KS. Intraperitoneal seeding from hepatoma. Abdom Imaging. 1994;19(4):309–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim TK, et al. Intraperitoneal drop metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: CT and angiographic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20(4):638–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ding JH, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma peritoneal metastases: report of three cases and collective review of the literature. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010;39(9):734–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hashimoto M, et al. Resection of peritoneal metastases in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 2013;153(5):727–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement