This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Torsion of a bifid omentum as a rare cause of acute abdomen: a case report
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 8 July 2016
Accepted: 16 September 2016
Published: 19 October 2016
Omental torsion is a rare and very unusual cause of acute abdominal pain. If often mimics other acute pathologies and it is very difficult to diagnose preoperatively, which can lead to deterioration of the patient. It is seldom reported in the literature.
We report a well-documented case of a 67-year-old white woman who complained about abdominal pain, which was slowly increasing in severity. She had no previous abdominal interventions. An abdominal ultrasound showed multiple gallstones. At laparoscopy, free hemorrhagic fluid was seen and further exploration showed torsion of the right part of her omentum. A partial omentectomy was performed. Her postoperative course was uneventful.
Omental torsion is a rare cause of abdominal pain. Primary omental torsion is seldom reported in the literature. Blood examinations are frequently normal. Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography can exclude other pathologies. Exploration remains the preferred diagnostic and therapeutic modality. Surgeons should include the diagnosis of omental torsion in their differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain.
KeywordsOmental torsion Acute abdomen Surgical resection
Omental torsion and infarction are rare and unusual causes of acute abdominal pain. Omental torsion and infarction is caused by the twisting of the omentum along its long axis compromising its vascularity. It often mimics other acute pathologies and is very difficult to diagnose preoperatively, which can lead to the deterioration of the patient. We report a case of primary omental torsion with infarction of the right part of a bifid greater omentum.
A 67-year-old obese white woman consulted the gastroenterologist in our hospital with a 2-day history of abdominal pain located in her right hypochonder, which was slowly increasing in severity. She did not complain of symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. She had no history of abdominal problems.
Omental torsion is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain, which can present in two ways. Eitel first described primary omental torsion in 1899 . Anatomical malformations, such as a bifid or accessory omentum consisting of an abnormal embryological position of the right part of the omentum with secondary fragile vascularity and abnormal deposits of fat, are predisposed for omental torsion [2, 3]. The omentum twists around a pivotal point impairing its vascular perfusion resulting in congestion and edema [4, 5].
Omental torsion mainly affects adults; it affects males twice as frequently as females, with the majority being overweight . Reports have described its prevalence in children [2, 6, 7]. Omental displacement caused by trauma, violent exercise, hyperperistalsis, or compression between the abdominal wall and liver are precipitating factors, but its primary cause remains unknown [2–4]. Secondary omental torsion is more common and is associated with predisposing pathologies such as intra-abdominal inflammation, adhesions, tumors, or cysts. The dependent omentum is fixed in a torsed position and unable to untwist . Detortion has been described but is very rare . Without detortion, arterial occlusion leads to acute hemorrhagic infarction and necrosis of the omentum will occur.
The primary symptom associated with omental torsion is pain, which is frequently localized in the right part of the abdomen . The pain has an acute onset and does not radiate to the abdominal wall . It can mimic other causes of acute abdomen such as appendicitis, cholecystitis, and diverticulitis; in women it can mimic gynecologic diseases . Therefore, omental torsion should be included in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen.
Blood examinations are frequently found to be normal. Because of the clinical context of an acute abdomen, ultrasound and computed tomography are useful to assist the diagnosis. Classical signs of omental torsion on computed tomography are the whirl sign of a fatty mass with concentric linear strands . Computed tomography can also exclude other pathologies such as acute appendicitis, cholecystitis, and diverticulitis. Omental infarction is only diagnosed preoperatively in 4.8 % of cases because of the nonspecific clinical symptoms [3, 12].
Exploration remains the preferred diagnostic and therapeutic modality [5, 10]. Surgical management of primary omental torsion includes resection of the involved omentum. Early diagnosis may lead to conservative management, although surgery has been recommended for avoiding severe complications such as sepsis and intra-abdominal abscess formation .
Omental torsion is an unusual cause of acute abdominal pain with nonspecific symptoms and signs of acute abdomen, making diagnosis very difficult. Surgeons should include it in their differential diagnosis of acute abdomen. Computed tomography can be useful to reveal the diagnosis or to exclude other pathologies. Surgical resection of the infarcted omentum remains the treatment of choice.
Availability of data and materials
VD, first author. PC, corresponding author. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Eitel CG. Rare omental torsion. NY Med Rec. 1899;55:715.Google Scholar
- Anyfantakis D, Kastanakis M, Karona V, et al. Prumary torsion in a 9 year old girl: a case report. J Med Life. 2014;7:220–2.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Occhionorelli S, Zese M, Cappellari L, et al. Acute abdomen due to primary omental torsion an infarction. Case Reports Surg 2014; Article ID 208382. doi: 10.1155/2014/208382.
- Scabini S, Rimini E, Massobrio A, et al. Primary omental torsion: A case report. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;3:153–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Andreucetti J, Ceribelli C, Manto O, et al. Primary omental torsion (POT): a review of literature and case report. World J Emerg Surg. 2011;6:6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mavridis G, Livaditi E, Baltogiannis N, et al. Primary omental torsion in children: ten-year experience. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23:879–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kimber CP, Westmore P, Hutson JM, et al. Primary omental torsion in children. J Paediatr Child Health. 1996;32:22–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nihei Z, Kojima K, Uehara K, et al. Omental bleeding with spontaneously derotated torsion – a case report. Jpn J Surg. 1991;21:700–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maeda T, Mori H, Cyujo M, et al. CT and MR findings of torsion of greater omentum: a case report. Abdom Imaging. 1997;22:44–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park CM, Kim SY. Primary omental torsion diagnosed during hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57:415–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ghosh Y, Arora R. Omental torsion. J Clin Diagn Research. 2014;8:NE01–2.Google Scholar
- Itenberg E, Mariadason J, Khersonsky J, et al. Modern management of omental torsion and omental infarction: a surgeon’s perspective. J Surg Educ. 2010;67:44–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsironis A, Zikos N, Bali C, et al. Acute abdomen due to primary omental torsion: case report. J Emerg Med. 2013;44:45–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar