Adamantinoma of the distal femur diagnosed 5 years after initial surgery: a case report
© Cao et al. 2016
Received: 25 February 2015
Accepted: 27 May 2016
Published: 23 June 2016
Adamantinoma arising in the femur is extremely rare. We report a case of an adamantinoma occurring in the right medial femoral condyle that was diagnosed 5 years after the primary surgery.
A 74-year-old Asian woman first complained of right knee pain without any cause. Radiographs demonstrated a 4×4.5 cm osteolytic lesion in her medial femoral condyle. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion which showed low signal on both T1 and T2-weighted image, and enhanced signal with gadolinium contrast administration. She underwent a wide resection of the lesion and was reconstructed with a tumor endoprosthesis. On histological examination, the tumor showed clusters of spindle-shaped and squamoid epithelial cells among the fibrous stroma. Adamantinoma was considered, however, the diagnosis was inconclusive due to the unusual localization and her age. Moreover, it was difficult to exclude metastatic carcinoma. Five years later, she was diagnosed with an abnormal shadow occupying the upper lobe of her right lung in a routine physical examination. She subsequently underwent a resection of the lung mass which histologically showed proliferation of spindle-shaped and squamoid epithelial cells. The histological similarity of the lung tumor and the femoral tumor led to the diagnosis of adamantinoma arising in her right medial femoral condyle with metastasis to the upper lobe of her right lung.
In this case report, we report the clinical, radiographic, and histological features of an adamantinoma arising in the distal femur with a review of the literature.
KeywordsAdamantinoma Metastatic adamantinoma Medial femoral condyle Distal femur
Adamantinoma is a malignant biphasic tumor characterized by a variety of morphological patterns, most commonly clusters of epithelial cells, surrounded by a relatively bland spindle osteofibrous component. Adamantinoma comprises approximately 0.4 % of all primary bone tumors. It usually arises in the center of long bones, and 97 % of all reported cases occur in long tubular bones [1, 2]. The tibia, in particular the anterior metaphysis or diaphysis, is involved in 85 to 90 % of cases. Among other long bones, fibula and ulna are rarely affected [1, 2]. Clinical symptoms such as swelling and radiographic abnormality may last for many years before definitive diagnosis is made because of the difficulty of diagnosis at the referral time [2–4]. Although classic adamantinomas are easily recognizable with characteristic epithelial and osteofibrous components, in some circumstances, small clusters of epithelial cells are the only clue for a definitive diagnosis.
We report an unusual case of adamantinoma of the medial femoral condyle finally diagnosed 5 years after initial surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an adamantinoma arising in the distal femoral condyle.
Adamantinomas commonly involve the tibia, fibula, and ulna. Adamantinomas can also be in other long bones including femur, humerus, and radius, but they are rarely affected [1–3]. There are sporadic case reports of adamantinoma of the rib, spine, calcaneum, metatarsal, and carpal bones [1, 5]. To the best of our knowledge, there have been 14 case reports of adamantinomas arising in the femur [2–4, 6, 7].
Keeney et al. reported a series of adamantinomas of long bones and six cases (7.1 %) were in the femur . Five cases arose in the diaphysis of the femur and one distribution was unknown. Ii et al. described one lesion located in the lesser trochanter of the proximal femur which developed a pathological fracture . Of the 32 adamantinomas reported by Hazelbag et al., only one case arose in the diaphysis of the femur . Ramaswamy et al. reported on a recurrent adamantinoma at the right femoral diaphysis after an above knee amputation of left leg for adamantinoma of tibia . Another five cases of femoral adamantinomas were reported before 1976 and the precise locations were not available . To date, all the reported lesions in the femur are located either in the proximal femur or in the diaphysis of the femur. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an adamantinoma arising in the femoral condyle.
On radiological examination, the tumor is typically well surrounded, cortical, lobulated, and osteolytic. Lucency, septation, and peripheral sclerosis may also be seen intralesionally . The lesion commonly remains intracortical and extends longitudinally, but may also breach the cortex and invade the medullary cavity or soft tissue, which is usually accompanied by lamellar or solid periosteal reaction . MRI is useful to detect multicentricity, extension of the lesion, and possible soft tissue involvement . When tumors occur in the femur, all reported cases that had the necessary information were predominantly situated in the medullary cavity and not in the cortex with an osteolytic feature leading to a misdiagnosis. Radiographs of our case also revealed an osteolytic lesion within the medullary cavity of the femoral condyle with cortical thinning, but, no evidence of a pathological fracture.
On histological examination, classic adamantinoma is composed of an epithelial and osteofibrous component mixed in various proportions and different patterns. The four main patterns are basaloid, tubular, spindle, and squamous. Although the first two patterns are not uncommon, an admixture of all these patterns may also be seen. Basaloid and spindled variants may have a more aggressive behavior. The spindle cell component is more often observed in recurrences and in metastases [9, 11, 12]. A fifth histological pattern, the so-called osteofibrous dysplasia-like variant, in which the osteofibrous tissues are intermingled with small groups of epithelial cells, has been also described [9, 13]. In some cases, it is difficult to differentiate adamantinomas from other benign lesions, such as fibrous dysplasia or osteofibrous dysplasia. In these circumstances, a small cluster of epithelial cells may be the only feature to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. Because of the similarity in anatomic site, radiographic features, and histologic features, some believe that adamantinoma is a malignant variant of osteofibrous dysplasia . Trisomies 7, 8, 12, and/or 21 have been reported in both osteofibrous dysplasia and adamantinoma . Maki and Athanasou recently investigated the relationship between adamantinoma and osteofibrous dysplasia by using immunohistochemistry to analyze the expression of several proto-oncogene products and extracellular matrix proteins . A number of oncoproteins such as c-fos and c-jun were found to be commonly expressed, but differential expression of osteonectin, osteopontin, and osteocalcin between adamantinoma and osteofibrous dysplasia suggested its usefulness in distinguishing the two lesions.
The reasons that led to a late diagnosis of adamantinoma in our case may be attributed to two aspects. First, 85 to 90 % of adamantinoma cases arise in the tibia, and femur is an uncommon location for this rare tumor. Second, our patient’s past history of thyroid carcinoma provoked the possibility that the epithelial cells may be metastasis with squamous metaplasia. Considering her age, the diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma seemed to be more reasonable than adamantinoma arising in the femur, although a thorough examination revealed no possible lesion. Because of these difficulties, a definitive diagnosis was not possible until comparison with the lung lesion 5 years later. The resected lung tumor exhibited a strikingly similar histology to the initial tumor that arose in her femur and, most importantly, the tumor cells spread without the significant destructive growth pattern that is usually seen in squamous cell carcinoma. Based on these observations, the initial tumor which occurred in her medial femoral condyle was finally diagnosed as an adamantinoma.
Wide resection is recommended for the treatment of classic adamantinoma, which was associated with lower risk of local recurrence . Radiotherapy and chemotherapy have not shown any encouraging results . Marginal resection and histological subtype (osteofibrous dysplasia-like) were associated with a high risk of metastasis. When inadequate resection is performed, the incidence of local recurrence has been reported to be as high as 90 % . In the present case, our patient underwent an initial wide resection of the distal femur without local recurrence or metastases for 5 years. However, the biological behavior of an adamantinoma is highly unpredictable as presented in our case. Lung and spinal metastasis occurred after latency, and she is currently undergoing a palliative treatment with radiation and bisphosphonate.
We described a rare case of an adamantinoma of the medial femoral condyle. Adamantinoma is sometimes mistaken for a benign lesion and it is imperative to undertake a meticulous histological examination to detect any epithelial cell components especially when the lesion is located in an unusual place like the femur. Because of the unpredictable biological behavior of an adamantinoma, long-term follow-up is warranted.
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET-CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography; T1WI, T1-weighted image; T2WI, T2-weighted image; TTF-1, thyroid transcription factor-1
We acknowledge our patient for providing informed consent for this case report.
KC carried out data analysis and manuscript writing. MS completed the draft and critically revised the case report. IW and KN carried out collection and assembly of data. KH contributed to the manuscript writing. AS, YH, KE, and KK performed pathological examinations. MN and MM provided administrative support. HM was responsible for provision of the study material and final approval of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Kitsoulis P, Charchati A, Paraskevas G, Marini A, Karatzias G. Adamantinoma. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73:425–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keeney GL, Unni KK, Beabout JW, Pritchard DJ. Adamantinoma of long bones. A clinicopathologic study of 85 cases. Cancer. 1989;64:730–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ii S, Tsuchiya H, Takazawa K, Minato H, Tomita K. Adamantinoma of the proximal femur: a case report. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9:152–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hazelbag HM, Taminiau AH, Fleuren GJ, Hogendoorn PC. Adamantinoma of the long bones. A clinicopathological study of thirty-two patients with emphasis on histological subtype, precursor lesion, and biological behavior. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1482–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chandrasekar CR, Mohammed R, Rafalla AA, Grimer RJ. Adamantinoma of the calcaneum – a case report. Foot(Edinb). 2009;19:58–61.Google Scholar
- Ramaswamy AS, Chatura KR, Chandrasekhar HR. Metastatic or metachronous adamantinoma: An Enigma. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2012;2:132–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Thurner J, Marcacci M. A so-called adamantinoma of the right femur (author’s transl). Zentralbl Allg Pathol. 1976;120:398–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bloem JL, van der Heul RO, Schuttevaer HM, Kuipers D. Fibrous dysplasia vs adamantinoma of the tibia: differentiation based on discriminant analysis of clinical and plain film findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156:1017–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hogendoorn PCW, Kanamori M. Adamantinoma. In: Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2013. p. 343–5.Google Scholar
- Van der Woude HJ, Hazelbag HM, Bloem JL, Taminiau AH, Hogendoorn PC. MRI of adamantinoma of long bones in correlation with histopathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1737–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khan MH, Darji R, Rao U, McGough R. Leg pain and swelling in a 22-year-old man. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;448:259–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Czerniak B, Rojas-Corona RR, Dorfman HD. Morphologic diversity of long bone adamantinoma. The concept of differentiated (regressing) adamantinoma and its relationship to osteofibrous dysplasia. Cancer. 1989;64:2319–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuiko R, Mühlbauer M, Sulzbacher I, Trattnig S, Ritschl P. Lesion of the proximal tibia in a 12-year-old boy. Clin Orthop. 2004;418:266–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gleason BC, Liegl-Atzwanger B, Kozakewich HP, Connolly S, Gebhardt MC, Fletcher JA, et al. Osteofibrous dysplasia and adamantinoma in children and adolescents: a clinicopathologic reappraisal. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:363–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maki M, Athanasou N. Osteofibrous dysplasia and adamantinoma: correlation of proto-oncogene product and matrix protein expression. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:69–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qureshi AA, Shott S, Mallin BA, Gitelis S. Current trends in the management of adamantinoma of long bones. An international study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A:1122–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar