Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan as an alternative treatment for advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a case report

  • Yen-Man Lu1, 2,
  • Tsu-Ming Chien1, 2,
  • Chih-Hung Lin3,
  • Chee-Yin Chai3, 4, 5, 6 and
  • Chun-Nung Huang1, 2Email author
Journal of Medical Case Reports201610:98

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0879-6

Received: 22 December 2015

Accepted: 18 March 2016

Published: 18 April 2016

Abstract

Background

Currently, there is no standard salvage regimen after the failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. The combination of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan was originally designed for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Until now, there have been no reports using this combination therapy in treating advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing this possible treatment regimen for advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 90-year-old Chinese woman who was diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis. The upper tract urothelial carcinoma was well controlled by the chemotherapy regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer. Considering her age, we used only laser ablation for the treatment of her urothelial carcinoma in combination with intravesical mitomycin C chemotherapy. Follow-up cystoscopy and ureterorenoscopy showed an unexpected regression of the upper tract urothelial tumor. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography also demonstrated the same results.

Conclusions

This novel regimen for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma may merit further investigation or evaluation in clinical trials.

Keywords

Urothelial carcinoma Upper tract urothelial carcinoma Chemotherapy Epidermal growth factor receptor Target therapy Surgery

Background

Upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) are tumors derived from the urothelium along the pyelocaliceal cavities and ureters, and they account for only 5–10 % of urinary tract carcinomas [1]. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision, using either open or laparoscopic methods, is the gold standard treatment for adequate local tumor control and better long-term survival [2]. Despite optimal surgical treatment, patient outcomes are still not satisfactory. Until now, no definitive evidence has existed regarding the use of perioperative chemotherapy in the management of UTUC. The current practice guideline is almost entirely derived from research related to muscle-invasive bladder cancer [3]. Though cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the current first-line therapy regimen, its efficacy remains poorly defined [3]. Furthermore, there is no standard salvage regimen after the failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. We recently treated a double cancer case with metastatic colorectal cancer and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis. The UTUC was well controlled by the chemotherapy regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Case presentation

A 90-year-old Chinese woman with a complaint of bloody stool was admitted to our department of general surgery to undergo surgery for colorectal cancer. She also mentioned intermittent painless gross hematuria with blood clots for months. She has been taking hypertension medication (angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor) for more than 20 years. She had never smoked cigarettes and denied chemical exposure, herb use, or groundwater use. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed sigmoid colon cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Imaging of her urinary tract revealed bilateral renal pelvis, bilateral ureter, and bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Because of our patient’s advanced age and acceptable renal function, aggressive surgical treatment was not a first priority for the treatment of her urothelial carcinoma. After discussing the treatment plan with our patient and her family, we performed a urinary tract tumor biopsy and laser ablation. We then performed a robotic-assisted sigmoid colectomy using the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, CA, USA) system, and the pathologic report indicated a diagnosis of pT3N2M0. Examination of her urinary tract revealed a high-grade infiltrating urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and ureter. No complications were observed during the operation. Under a generally stable condition, our patient was discharged on the fourth day after her operation.

Analysis of codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS gene in the excised colorectal cancer tissues revealed that they were mutation-negative (wild type) (Additional file 1 to 3 : Figure S1 to S3 and Additional file 4). Therefore, nine cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated with cetuximab (Erbitux; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA) and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) for the treatment of the metastatic colorectal cancer. As for the urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, intravesical mitomycin C therapy was administered five times. Our patient tolerated the chemotherapy well. Cystoscopy, ureterorenoscopy, and urine cytology examinations were performed every 3 months. The size of the bladder tumor became smaller (Fig. 1). Surprisingly, a repeat contrast-enhanced abdominal CT showed shrinkage of the renal pelvis tumor (Fig. 2), and her hematuria also improved.
Fig. 1

Cystoscopy (ac) shows that the bladder tumor had shrunk. The three pictures were taken over the course of the treatment

Fig. 2

Repeated contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ac) shows that the left pelvic tumor, which showed no mutation (wild type), had shrunk (white arrow). The three pictures were taken over the course of the treatment

Further analysis of the urothelial carcinoma of the urinary tract was carried out, and the results showed a wild-type KRAS gene in the urothelial carcinoma tissues.

As of 20 months after the operation, our patient has a good stable condition without progression of either her colorectal cancer or urothelial cancer.

Discussion

Currently, there is no standard salvage regimen after the failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Many novel agents have been developed and have shown modest activity in urothelial carcinoma. With the advancement of molecular biology and a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of urothelial carcinoma, new approaches for treating patients using molecularly targeted therapies have emerged. Previous studies have shown that the over-expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) predicts poor survival and stage progression [4, 5]. EGFR is more strongly expressed in invasive tumors (pT2–T4) and high-grade tumors than in superficial or low-grade tumors [4]. However, mutations within the kinase domain and truncations of the EGFR are rarely seen in bladder cancer, and they have emerged as attractive therapeutic targets. Cetuximab (an EGFR inhibitor) is a chimeric human/mouse monoclonal antibody that prevents dimerization by binding to the extracellular domain of EGFR. Wong et al. [6] conducted a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel as salvage chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer. The study was closed after 8 weeks, because 9 of 11 patients had disease progression in the paclitaxel-alone arm. Progression-free survival greater than 16 weeks was noted in 12 of 28 patients in the combination arm. They concluded that cetuximab may augment the activity of paclitaxel, and the combination merits further study as salvage chemotherapy in patients with previously treated urothelial carcinoma. Although the mechanisms are unclear, it seems that cetuximab is not effective for use as a single-agent therapy. Another phase II clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT00645593) is investigating this augmentation by evaluating the effect of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy either in combination with cetuximab or not in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (above stage T4b), and results are pending. To date, there have been at least eight clinical trials aimed at treating urothelial carcinoma by targeting EGFR (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=Bladder+cancer+AND+epidermal+growth+factor+receptor&Search=Search).

Despite the widespread implementation of traditional cisplatin-based chemotherapy, other clinical trials have included synchronous chemotherapy using fluorouracil and mitomycin C combined with radiotherapy. These trials demonstrated significant improvements in the control of bladder cancer compared with radiotherapy alone [7]. Gemcitabine-based and carboplatin-based regimens have also been studied; Sio et al. [8] demonstrated a 61 % response rate with the combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan.

The Cancer Genome Atlas project performed an integrated analysis of 131 urothelial carcinoma cases to provide a comprehensive landscape of molecular alterations [9]. They determined that 69 % of the tumors could potentially be treated, through the use of therapy targeted to the phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase/AKT/mTOR pathway in 42 % of the tumors or targeted to the RTK/MAPK pathway (including ERBB2) in 45 % of the tumors. They also found that urothelial carcinoma had more frequent mutations in chromatin regulatory genes. The current findings all suggest the future possibility of targeted therapy. The development of reliable molecular markers is expected to make personalized treatment strategies possible for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. In our case, the unexpected treatment effect of cetuximab and FOLFIRI in urothelial carcinoma has not previously been reported. The urothelial carcinoma in this case harbored the wild-type form of KRAS, indicating its susceptibility to cetuximab.

Conclusions

The use of EGFR inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of UTUC may merit further investigation or evaluation in clinical trials.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital
(2)
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University
(3)
Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University
(4)
Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University
(5)
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University
(6)
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-Sen University

References

  1. Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Zigeuner R, Kikuchi E, et al. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer. 2009;115:1224–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Compérat E, Zigeuner R, Sylvester RJ, Burger M, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma: 2015 Update. Eur Urol. 2015;68:868–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Fay AP, Choueiri TK, Chang SL, Bellmunt J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2014;66:529–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chow NH, Chan SH, Tzai TS, Ho CL, Liu HS. Expression profiles of ErbB family receptors and prognosis in primary transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:1957–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blehm KN, Spiess PE, Bondaruk JE, Dujka ME, Villares GJ, Zhao YJ, et al. Mutations within the kinase domain and truncations of the epidermal growth factor receptor are rare events in bladder cancer: implications for therapy. Clin Cancer. 2006;12:4671–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wong YN, Litwin S, Vaughn D, Cohen S, Plimack ER, Lee J, et al. Phase II trial of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in patients with advanced urothelial tract carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3545–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. James ND, Hussain SA, Hall E, Jenkins P, Tremlett J, Rawlings C, et al. Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1477–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sio TT, Ko J, Gudena VK, Verma N, Chaudhary UB. Chemotherapeutic and targeted biological agents for metastatic bladder cancer: a comprehensive review. Int J Urol. 2014;21:630–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature. 2014;507:315–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lu et al. 2016

Advertisement