Skip to main content

How to apply clinical cases and medical literature in the framework of a modified “failure mode and effects analysis” as a clinical reasoning tool – an illustration using the human biliary system

Abstract

Background

Clinicians use various clinical reasoning tools such as Ishikawa diagram to enhance their clinical experience and reasoning skills. Failure mode and effects analysis, which is an engineering methodology in origin, can be modified and applied to provide inputs into an Ishikawa diagram.

Method

The human biliary system is used to illustrate a modified failure mode and effects analysis. The anatomical and physiological processes of the biliary system are reviewed. Failure is defined as an abnormality caused by infective, inflammatory, obstructive, malignancy, autoimmune and other pathological processes. The potential failures, their effect(s), main clinical features, and investigation that can help a clinician to diagnose at each anatomical part and physiological process are reviewed and documented in a modified failure mode and effects analysis table. Relevant medical and surgical cases are retrieved from the medical literature and weaved into the table.

Results

A total of 80 clinical cases which are relevant to the modified failure mode and effects analysis for the human biliary system have been reviewed and weaved into a designated table. The table is the backbone and framework for further expansion. Reviewing and updating the table is an iterative and continual process. The relevant clinical features in the modified failure mode and effects analysis are then extracted and included in the relevant Ishikawa diagram.

Conclusions

This article illustrates an application of engineering methodology in medicine, and it sows the seeds of potential cross-pollination between engineering and medicine. Establishing a modified failure mode and effects analysis can be a teamwork project or self-directed learning process, or a mix of both. Modified failure mode and effects analysis can be deployed to obtain inputs for an Ishikawa diagram which in turn can be used to enhance clinical experiences and clinical reasoning skills for clinicians, medical educators, and students.

Peer Review reports

Main text

Clinicians, medical educators, and medical students use various clinical reasoning tools such as Ishikawa diagram (which is also known as “cause-and-effect diagram”) to enhance their clinical experience and reasoning skills. The methodology of applying an Ishikawa diagram in a clinical setting is illustrated in another article [1]. The methods that can be applied to gather information for an Ishikawa diagram include brain storming, focus group discussion, interview, survey, and literature searches and review are discussed in a book chapter [2]. This article illustrates how to modify and apply failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to provide inputs into an Ishikawa diagram which in turn can be used as a clinical reasoning tool.

FMEA is a tool developed by engineers to systematically assess a complex design or process in order to identify elements that have a risk of failure [3]. In the late 1940s, FMEA was established and deployed by reliability engineers to identify potential failures in military systems [4]. Simplistically, the FMEA approach includes a meticulous study on the mode or mechanism by which a failure may occur and the effect(s) that it may cause. The severity of the effect (S), the probability of a failure occurring (O), and the probability that the failure would not be detected (D), are computed or estimated. Then, a risk priority number (RPN) is calculated by multiplying S, O, and D. The RPN is then used to prioritize the remedial and/or preventive measures. The FMEA approach is an ongoing iterative process. It should be updated when there is a change in the process or design, or when there is a failure or when a near-miss failure occurs. The ultimate objective of an FMEA is to provide a platform for the prevention, or at least reduce the likelihood and improve the detection, of failure in a system.

How can I relate this engineering approach to an application in medicine? In this article, failure is defined as an abnormality caused by infective, inflammatory, obstructive, malignancy, autoimmune and other pathological processes. I may not be able to relate the FMEA approach to the entirety of a complex human being with multidimensional complexities including psychosocial components, when an individual presents with a clinical manifestation (that is, a “failure”). Nonetheless, I am illustrating an application of the FMEA approach to a specific subsystem in a human. The “design or anatomy” of a human body and its underlying physiological processes have a potential risk of failing at its various parts anatomically and physiologically. The effect(s) of the failure could be manifested as clinical features (symptoms and signs). The severity, occurrence, and detection of the failure are complex and difficult to be estimated to compute a RPN. Hence, I am excluding RPN in this FMEA approach which I call a “modified FMEA” (in short, mFMEA). The ultimate objective of mFMEA is to provide a methodology to clinicians, medical educators, and medical students, to integrate in their clinical reasoning process and to deploy relevant clinical cases to set the scenario for teaching and learning a specific topic.

The mFMEA approach is applicable for general practitioners (GPs)/family physicians, specialists in various fields (internal medicine, surgery, emergency, intensive care, and so on), medical educators, and medical students. The bottom line is that a patient will always present with symptoms and signs (clinical features or syndromes) that need to be analyzed and put in perspective in an individualized context. An experienced clinician such as a physician or specialist may reach a spot diagnosis or provisional diagnosis, and manage the patient accordingly in a reasonably efficient timeframe. In an experienced diagnostician, the clinical reasoning and diagnostic skill seem to have become second nature to him/her, and the skills may not be explicit to an observer. However, a junior clinician or medical student may start from the first principle to work out a list of differential diagnoses using various clinical reasoning tools such as brain storming, mind mapping, and the Ishikawa diagram/fishbone diagram or cause-and-effect diagram [1]. For example, if a patient presents with a main complaint of pain in the right upper quadrant (RUQ) of the abdomen, a clinician will have a list of differential diagnoses including cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, hepatitis, peptic ulcer, pancreatitis, and referred pain. These can be illustrated in an Ishikawa diagram (Fig. 1) which is subject to ongoing update. The Ishikawa diagram comprises “gastroenterology”, “other systems”, and “miscellaneous”. The biliary system is a branch under “gastroenterology”. The Ishikawa diagram will be continually expanded and refined based on other associated symptoms in the individualized context of the patient. Then, one may ask how a mFMEA approach would fit in a clinical setting. A mFMEA can provide inputs into an Ishikawa diagram. Once you have listed the common causes in an Ishikawa diagram via brainstorming, discussion, or self-directed learning process, you turn to mFMEA to explore the potential causes of the human biliary system (Fig. 1). I would like to elaborate this in the following paragraphs.

Fig. 1
figure1

An Ishikawa diagram for a main presenting complaint of “abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant”. mFMEA modified failure mode and effects analysis

An English scientist, Richard Dawkins, once said, “Biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose.” The notable quote underpins many biological and physiological processes within a human body; for example, the human biliary system. When we review the anatomical and physiological processes of the biliary system, we should ask “what is the potential failure and its effect(s)”, “the associated main clinical features”, and “investigations that can help a clinician to diagnose” at each anatomical part and physiological process, and document them in a mFMEA table (Table 1). The mFMEA table comprises six columns: “Anatomy and physiology”, “Potential failure or pathophysiological process”, “Effects of the failure”, “Main clinical features (symptoms and signs)”, “Investigation”, and “Note”. We can start with common knowledge found in the medical literature, and then proceed to search and extract the relevant medical and surgical cases (generally known as clinical cases in this article) to fill the mFMEA table. Establishing a mFMEA can be a teamwork project or a self-directed learning process, or a mix of teamwork followed by self-directed learning to continually update it.

Table 1 A modified failure mode and effects analysis of the human biliary system

For example, the human biliary system is used for illustration (Table 1). Firstly, review the major anatomy and physiology of the biliary system, and list them in the first column. The anatomical figure of the biliary system (Fig. 2) will be helpful to provide visual cues to the physiological process. At each anatomical part or physiological process, we should explore what can be the potential failure or pathophysiological process, the corresponding effect(s), the resulting clinical features (symptoms and signs), investigation that can help a clinician to diagnose (in addition to the patient’s clinical history and physical examination), and special note. The treatment is not included in the table because the treatment option is dependent on the context of each individual. The note column is used for highlighting a key message or reminder, for example the authors of the case of clonorchiasis encourage clinicians to consider clonorchiasis or opisthorchiasis infection a possible diagnosis for all undiagnosed abdominal pain because the infection has the propensity to cause hepatic fibrosis, liver cancer and cholangiocarcinoma [5]. Also, the “note” column can be used to record citation of relevant new or additional cases (see Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure2

The human biliary system. Image courtesy of Visible Body (www.visiblebody.com)

Let us walk through the steps to establish a mFMEA in Table 1. You may refer to Table 1 and the references for citations of the relevant cases. Starting from the gallbladder, we have already known its common “potential failures” such as cholecystitis, cholecystolithiasis, and gallbladder cancer. By searching the medical literature, I have found some other failures such as gallbladder perforation, herniation, and torsion. The associated effects of the failures include obstruction, necrosis, and hernia. The main clinical features range from asymptomatic to abdominal pain with or without jaundice. The relevant investigations include abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) scan, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).

In the cystic duct and common bile duct, obstruction (caused by gallstone or cancer) and infection are two common potential failures. In the hepatic duct (intrahepatic and extrahepatic duct), the potential failures include obstruction, infection, abscess, cancer, congenital-related abnormality, for example Caroli’s disease (congenital dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts), choledochal cyst, and biliary atresia, immune-mediated destruction of the intrahepatic bile ducts (primary biliary cirrhosis), intense inflammatory fibrosis of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts (primary sclerosing cholangitis), immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related cholangitis, and abnormality in the genes encoding for the bile canaliculi formation (progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis). In addition to abdominal pain with or without jaundice, other symptoms and signs include systemic features such as fever, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, anemia, fatigue, pruritus, steatorrhea, dark urine, and hepatosplenomegaly. Other investigations include liver function test, liver biopsy, antimitochondrial antibody, and serum IgG4 level according to the context of the patient.

In the process of bile synthesis, conjugation, and transport, the potential failures are broadly categorized into Gilbert syndrome, Crigler–Najjar syndrome, Dubin–Johnson syndrome, and Rotor syndrome. The clinical features range from asymptomatic to abdominal pain with or without jaundice. The investigations include special genetic tests, liver biopsy, and urinary coproporphyrin level, and plasma sulfobromophthalein depending on the clinical history of the patient.

Other anatomical parts that relate to the biliary system include portal vein, hepatic artery, hepatic vein, sphincter of Oddi, ampulla of Vater, and the pancreas. The potential failures include iatrogenic injury from surgical procedure, thrombosis, spasm, stenosis, and cancer. The clinical features include Courvoisier sign, legs edema, ascites, fatigue, anorexia, weight loss, abdominal pain, and jaundice. Special investigations include Doppler ultrasound of the suprahepatic and cava veins, abdominal CT and angiography, and sphincter of Oddi manometry.

The relevant potential failures of the hematological process, which is not restricted to a particular anatomical structure, include glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), and hereditary spherocytosis. These abnormalities result in excessive hemolysis of red blood cells leading to hyperbilirubinemia. The clinical features include anemia, jaundice, splenomegaly, and kernicterus (in serious cases). The special investigations include serum G6PD level, genetic test, peripheral blood smear, and spherocyte osmotic fragility test.

An example of endocrinological condition has been reported in the New England Journal of Medicine - A patient with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus has excessive glucose in the blood leading to an increase in glycogen storage in the liver and inhibition of glycogenolysis resulting in glycogenic hepatopathy. The condition is manifested as hepatomegaly and pain in the RUQ of the abdomen.

After establishing the mFMEA in Table 1, I can update the relevant Ishikawa diagram for “pain in the RUQ of the abdomen” (Fig. 1) to include the detailed inputs for the “biliary pathology” as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure3

An Ishikawa diagram for a main presenting complaint of “abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant” with inputs from a modified failure mode and effects analysis. mFMEA modified failure mode and effects analysis

There are many sources of clinical cases such as:

  • Journal of Medical Case Reports

  • BMJ Case Reports

  • New England Journal of Medicine

  • Many other BioMed Central Open Access journals, for example BMC Surgery

How to keep a mFMEA table up to date.

  • Set automatic notification when a relevant research or medical case report is published, for example setting a “search alert” in Journal of Medical Case Reports. This can be easily done by using the advanced search function, perform your search, and save the search history that you want to activate “search alert”. You can always go back to your “saved searches” to refine your search algorithm.

  • Review an article and evaluate whether it fits into an anatomical or physiological part in a specific mFMEA, for example the biliary system. If a clinical case adds new findings in terms of pathophysiological process, unique clinical features, or investigation method, it should be added into the relevant columns in the mFMEA. This mFMEA process will collate and enrich the body of evidence for a specific clinical condition over time.

  • You may attach a copy of the case report in the citation as a file attachment in an electronic database such as EndNote software. This will provide handy access to the references.

  • The relevant main clinical features in the mFMEA, for example RUQ pain (or abdominal pain) can be extracted and reflected in the relevant Ishikawa diagram (see Figs. 1 and 3)

Advantages of weaving clinical cases into a mFMEA.

  • mFMEA is a methodology that collates common, important, and critical (but rare) potential causes of a clinical condition.

  • Studying clinical cases can reinforce clinicians’ reasoning and diagnostic skills, and clinical experience.

  • Clinicians may not have the opportunity to be involved in caring for patients with various potential “failure modes” of a clinical condition. Studying clinical cases and weaving them into a mFMEA will provide the opportunity to substantiate the lack of experience.

  • Medical educators can select relevant clinical cases from a mFMEA to set the scenario for teaching a relevant topic.

  • Medical educators should encourage medical students to attempt the approach of identifying the potential pathophysiology and diagnosis before providing the answer. It is acceptable to err in role playing the clinical case, and learn from the errors!

  • Interactive teaching and learning using clinical cases are more engaging and interesting compared to sole didactic teaching.

  • Medical educators can relate the clinical cases to a relevant Ishikawa diagram and mFMEA.

  • GPs/family physicians may use a mFMEA to identify and manage critical but rare conditions. They may not need to go into the details of certain pathophysiological processes which may not be relevant to their role as a GP/family physician, for example different types of gallbladder herniation. By contrast, surgeons could be interested to find out the various gallbladder herniations and surgical interventions reported in the literature to compare and enhance their clinical experiences.

Concluding remarks

The mFMEA can be deployed as a tool to generate inputs for an Ishikawa diagram. Clinicians may apply the tool in their clinical reasoning process; while medical educators may select relevant clinical cases to set the scenarios to teach and facilitate a discussion among medical students, and relate the clinical cases back into a relevant mFMEA and Ishikawa diagram.

References

  1. 1.

    Wong KC. Using an Ishikawa diagram as a tool to assist memory and retrieval of relevant medical cases from the medical literature. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5(1):120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wong KC, Woo KZ, Woo KH. Ishikawa Diagram. In: O’Donohue WT, Maragakis A, editors. Quality Improvement in Behavioral Health. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Apkon M et al. Design of a safer approach to intravenous drug infusions: failure mode effects analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(4):265–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rausand M, Hoylan A. System reliability theory: models, statistical methods, and applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Asare K et al. Microscopic identification of possible Clonorchis/Opisthorchis infection in two Ghanaian women with undiagnosed abdominal discomfort: two case reports. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8(1):369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Talley N, Martin C. Clinical gastroenterology. Sydney: MacLennan and Petty; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Boer J, Boerma D, de Vries Reilingh T. A gallbladder torsion presenting as acute cholecystitis in an elderly woman: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5(1):588.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dadzan E, Akhondi H. Choledochoduodenal fistula presenting with pneumobilia in a patient with gallbladder cancer: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6(1):61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sheridan D et al. Spontaneous acalculous gallbladder perforation. BMJ Case Rep. 2014. doi:10.1136/bcr-2014-206002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chalupa P, Kaspar M, Holub M. Acute acalculous cholecystitis with pericholecystitis in a patient with Epstein-Barr Virus infectious mononucleosis. Med Sci Monit. 2009;15(2):Cs30–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Donati M et al. An atypical presentation of intrahepatic perforated cholecystitis: a modern indication to open cholecystectomy. Report of a case. BMC Surg. 2014;14:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kumar R. Non-operative management of gallbladder perforation after blunt abdominal trauma. J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2013;5(1):45–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sharma RG et al. Spontaneous perforation of acalculous gallbladder: a case report. Indian J Surg. 2011;73(4):316–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    To H, Brough S, Pande G. Case report and operative management of gallbladder herniation. BMC Surg. 2015;15(1):72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Garcia R et al. Parastomal herniation of the gallbladder. Hernia. 2005;9(4):397–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rashid M, Abayasekara K, Mitchell E. A case report of an incarcerated gallbladder in a parastomal hernia. Int J Surg. 2010;23(2):8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rosenblum JK et al. Gallbladder torsion resulting in gangrenous cholecystitis within a parastomal hernia: findings on unenhanced CT. J Radiol Case Rep. 2013;7(12):21–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    St Peter S, Heppell J. Surgical images: soft tissue: incarcerated gallbladder in a parastomal hernia. Can J Surg. 2005;48(1):46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Benzoni C, Benini B, Pirozzi C. Gallbladder strangulation within an incisional hernia. Hernia. 2004;8(4):387–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shirahama M et al. Incisional hernia of gallbladder in a patient with gallbladder carcinoma: sonographic demonstration. J Clin Ultrasound. 1997;25(7):398–400.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sirikci A, Bayram M, Kervancioglu R. Incisional hernia of a normal gallbladder: sonographic and CT demonstration. Eur J Radiol. 2002;41(1):57–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Paolino L et al. Herniation of the gallbladder within a hernia of the abdominal wall associated with Mirizzi Syndrome. J Surg Case Rep. 2011;2011(4):3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Trotta M et al. Complication of herniation through the abdominal wall. Surgery. 2013;154(5):1135–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Goldman G, Rafael A, Hanoch K. Acute acalculous cholecystitis due to an incarcerated epigastric hernia. Postgrad Med J. 1985;61(721):1017–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sharma G, Askari R. Transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation of the gallbladder. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14), e19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Losken A, Wilson B, Sherman R. Torsion of the gallbladder: a case report and review of the literature. Am Surg. 1997;63(11):975–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Goubault P et al. Gallbladder torsion within incisional hernia: an original cholecystitis. Springerplus. 2015;4(1):305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Koyanagi T, Sato K. Complete gallbladder torsion diagnosed with sequential computed tomography scans: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6(1):289.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pezzoli A et al. Gallstone ileus treated with non-surgical conservative methods: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2015;9(1):15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Reisner R, Cohen J. Gallstone ileus. A review of 1001 cases. Am Surg. 1994;60:441–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Glenn F, Reed C, Grafe W. Biliary enteric fistula. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;153:527–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Malde S. Gallbladder agenesis diagnosed intra-operatively: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2010;4:285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Queiroz AB, de Miranda JS. Hydropic Gallbladder. New Engl J Med. 2011;364(20), e43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lemonick D, Garvin R, Semins H. Torsion of the gallbladder: a rare cause of acute cholecystitis. J Emerg Med. 2006;30(4):397–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Alevizos L et al. Gallbladder volvulus as a cause of an acute abdomen in a 95-year-old patient. Am Surg. 2012;78(1):E47–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Endeman H, Ligtenstein D, Oudemans-van SH. Spontaneous perforation of the cystic duct in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2008;2(1):338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shah S, Webber J. Spontaneous cystic duct perforation associated with acalculous cholecystitis. Am Surg. 2002;68:895–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Davies J, Burkitt M, Watson A. Ascending cholangitis presenting with Lactococcus lactis cremoris bacteraemia: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2009;3(1):3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kang H, Moon S, Song I. A unique bleeding-related complication of sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8(1):72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Qin L, Tang Z. Hepatocellular carcinoma with obstructive jaundice: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:385–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chin MW, Enns R. Hemobilia. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010;12(2):121–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yoshida J, Donahue PE, Nyhus LM. Hemobilia: review of recent experience with a worldwide problem. Am J Gastroenterol. 1987;82(5):448–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hurtado RM, Sahani DV, Kradin RL. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 9-2006. A 35-year-old woman with recurrent right-upper-quadrant pain. New Engl J Med. 2006;354(12):1295–303.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Meyers W et al. Pathology of infectious diseases. Vol. 1. Helminthiases. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology: Washington; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Baldwin M et al. Ascaris lumbricoides resulting in acute cholecystitis and pancreatitis in the Midwest. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88(12):2119–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Arora R. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as obstructive jaundice: uncommon presentation of a rare entity. Pol J Radiol. 2015;80:168–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ahmad SS et al. Cholangiocarcinoma presenting as hemobilia and recurrent iron-deficiency anemia: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2010;4:133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Peer A et al. Intrahepatic abscess due to gallbladder perforation. Abdom Imaging. 1995;20(5):452–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yu Z-Y et al. Hepatolithiasis associated with intrahepatic heterotopic pancreas: a case report and literature review. Diagn Pathol. 2015;10(1):76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gu DH et al. Caroli’s disease misdiagnosed as intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2015;21(2):175–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zhang DY et al. Caroli’s disease: a report of 14 patients and review of the literature. J Dig Dis. 2012;13(9):491–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    El-Guindi MA et al. Urinary urobilinogen in biliary atresia: A missed, simple, and cheap diagnostic test. Hepatol Res. 2016;46(2):174–82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kaplan MM, Gershwin ME. Primary biliary cirrhosis. New Engl J Med. 2005;353(12):1261–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Danzi JT, Makipour H, Farmer RG. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. A report of nine cases and clinical review. Am J Gastroenterol. 1976;65(2):109–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Shu HJ et al. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis with autoimmune pancreatitis and periaortitis: case report and review of the literature. J Dig Dis. 2012;13(5):280–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    De Both A et al. IgG4-related cholangitis: case report and literature review. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2015;78(1):62–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Nakanishi Y, Saxena R. Pathophysiology and diseases of the proximal pathways of the biliary system. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139(7):858–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sadiq J, Nandi B, Lakhoo K. An unusual variant of choledochal cyst: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2009;3:54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Metcalfe MS, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ. Management dilemmas with choledochal cysts. Arch Surg. 2003;138(3):333–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Yoo Y, Mun S. Synchronous double primary squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2015;9(1):116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bedoui R et al. Synchronous double cancer of the common bile duct. Am J Surg. 2011;201(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ogawa A et al. Double cancers in the common bile duct: molecular genetic findings with an analysis of LOH. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8(4):374–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bosma PJ et al. The genetic basis of the reduced expression of bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 in Gilbert’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(18):1171–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Fretzayas A et al. Gilbert syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171(1):11–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Mittal SK, Sinclair S. Criggler-Najjar syndrome. Report of a case. Indian J Pediatr. 1971;38(276):39–41.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Paulusma CC et al. A mutation in the human canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter gene causes the Dubin-Johnson syndrome. Hepatology. 1997;25(6):1539–42.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Renault M, Nowicki M. Persistent cholestasis following cholecystectomy: a case of Dubin-Johnson syndrome. J Pediatr. 2010;157(1):167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Dubin IN, Johnson FB. Chronic idiopathic jaundice with unidentified pigment in liver cells; a new clinicopathologic entity with a report of 12 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 1954;33(3):155–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Kagawa T et al. Recessive inheritance of population-specific intronic LINE-1 insertion causes a Rotor syndrome phenotype. Hum Mutat. 2015;36(3):327–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Wolpert E et al. Abnormal sulfobromophthalein metabolism in Rotor’s syndrome and obligate heterozygotes. N Engl J Med. 1977;296(19):1099–101.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Schiff L, Billing BH, Oikawa Y. Familial nonhemolytic jaundice with conjugated bilirubin in the serum. N Engl J Med. 1959;260(26):1315–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Jadrijevic S et al. Right hepatectomy due to portal vein thrombosis in vasculobiliary injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8(1):412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Venkatesh P et al. Portal, superior mesenteric and splenic vein thrombosis secondary to hyperhomocysteinemia with pernicious anemia: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8:286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Heinrich S et al. Right hemihepatectomy for bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1494–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Okuda K, Kage M, Shrestha SM. Proposal of a new nomenclature for Budd-Chiari syndrome: hepatic vein thrombosis versus thrombosis of the inferior vena cava at its hepatic portion. Hepatology. 1998;28(5):1191–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Carvalho DT et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome in a 25-year-old woman with Behçet’s disease: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Romagnuolo J. Recent research on sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014;10(7):441–3.

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Yaghoobi M, Romagnuolo J. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: updates from the recent literature. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015;17(8):455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Alexiou K et al. Adenoma of the ampulla of Vater: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8(1):228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Beger H et al. Tumor of the ampulla of Vater: experience with local or radical resection in 171 consecutively treated patients. Arch Surg. 1999;134(5):526–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Estrella JS et al. Malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the pancreas. Pancreas. 2015;44(6):988–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    de Gurrola GC et al. Kernicterus by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2008;2:146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Moriyama M et al. A patient with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria being treated with eculizumab who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of a case. Surg Case Rep. 2015;1(1):57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Lee JH, Moon KR. Coexistence of Gilbert syndrome and hereditary spherocytosis in a child presenting with extreme jaundice. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2014;17(4):266–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Rogal SS et al. A sweet source of abdominal pain. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(18):1762–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kam Cheong Wong.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, K.C. How to apply clinical cases and medical literature in the framework of a modified “failure mode and effects analysis” as a clinical reasoning tool – an illustration using the human biliary system. J Med Case Reports 10, 85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0850-6

Download citation