Skip to main content

Invasive urothelial carcinoma, lymphoma-like/plasmacytoid variant, successfully treated by radical cystectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy: a case report

Abstract

Background

Invasive urothelial carcinoma, lymphoma-like/plasmacytoid variant, is a rare histological type of bladder cancer similar to plasma cells and is an aggressive variant of urothelial carcinoma associated with a poor prognosis.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old Asian man was referred to our hospital due to macroscopic hematuria. Cystoscopy detected a non-papillary tumor, and a transurethral resection of the bladder tumor revealed pT1N0M0 bladder cancer. A pathological examination showed high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma and a component of signet ring cell carcinoma. A follow-up of the transurethral resection with radical cystectomy was carried out, and a pathological examination showed infiltrating urothelial carcinoma, with partial features of the plasmacytoid variant. We added chemotherapy treatment with gemcitabine and cisplatin for two cycles. Our patient has been free from recurrence for 2 years.

Conclusions

We herein report the case of a patient with a plasmacytoid variant of urothelial carcinoma controlled with radial cystectomy and subsequent chemotherapy.

Peer Review reports

Background

Invasive urothelial carcinoma, lymphoma-like/plasmacytoid variant (PUC), is a rare histological type of bladder cancer similar to plasma cells and is an aggressive variant of urothelial carcinoma (UC) associated with a poor prognosis. The first report for PUC was provided by Sahin et al.; to date, only approximately 100 cases of PUC have been reported in the English literature [15]. We herein report a case of a patient with plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma that was successfully controlled with chemotherapy following radical cystectomy.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old Asian man was referred to our hospital due to macroscopic hematuria. His past history included middle ear cholesteatoma and he had no smoking history. Cystoscopy detected a non-papillary tumor, and a transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TUR-Bt) and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan revealed cT3N0M0 bladder cancer.

Laboratory data at the time of admission

The hematological and biochemical data showed no abnormal findings. A urinary analysis resulted in the following: pH 6.5, red blood cell count 10–19/high-power field (HPF), white blood cell count 1–4/HPF, protein negative, and glucose negative. The urinary cytology was class III.

Imaging findings

An MRI scan showed that the tumor extended over the bladder, as seen in Fig. 1. No obvious distal and local lymphadenopathy was observed on a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging findings in (a) T2-weighted and (b) diffusion-weighted images. The mass was believed to be invasive outside of the bladder wall (arrow)

Operative procedure

Our patient underwent a TUR-Bt, and a pathological examination revealed urothelial carcinoma (high-grade, pT1, G2) and signet ring cell carcinoma was found in a portion of the bladder tumor. Two months after the TUR-Bt, a radical cystectomy was performed according to the tumor grade of malignancy and the imaging findings (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A surgical specimen from the radical cystectomy. The tumor was located in the bladder trigone (arrow)

Pathological findings

Grossly, the infiltrating neoplasm, measuring 25 × 20 mm in size, was located in the bladder trigone. The pathological stage was pT2bN0M0. Histologically, the neoplasm was composed of isolated atypical cells that had relatively abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with eccentric nuclei, showing moderate pleomorphism. Perinuclear pale regions were occasionally seen. These features partly resembled plasma cells (Fig. 3). The immunohistochemical profile of the tumor cells was positive for keratin CAM5.2 and CK20, but negative for CK7, CD56, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD20, CD79a, kappa and lambda. Thus, the diagnosis of infiltrating high-grade urothelial carcinoma, plasmacytoid variant, was made. Plasma cells have a similar form to signet ring cells, thus it is difficult to distinguish these cells. However, plasma cells frequently show CD138 positivity, which may be useful for discriminating between the two types of cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Hematoxylin and eosin stain. Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma was characterized by isolated cells with uneven nuclear distribution. Invasive plasma cell was founded sparsely (enlarged part of image)

Immunohistochemistry for PD-1 and PD-L1

An immunohistochemical analysis was performed on 5-μm-thick sections. The slides were dewaxed with xylene and hydrated with gradient ethanol, and microwaved at the high level for 2 minutes and then at the medium-low level for 30 minutes for heat antigen retrieval (Target Retrieval Solution pH 9, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA). After 3 % hydrogen peroxidase blocking, the samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with a primary antibody to PD-1 (dilution 1:50, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or PD-L1 (dilution 1:50, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The slides were then treated with a broad-spectrum secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) and washed (Envision FLEX Wash Buffer, Dako). After diaminobenzidine staining, the slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated with gradient ethanol and xylene, and then sealed. There were no positive finding (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Immunohistochemistry for PD-1 (a) and PD-L1 (b) expression. There was no positive expression in both PD-1 and PD-L1

Postoperative course

Two months after the total cystectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin was administered (G: 2,000 mg/m2, C: 63 mg/m2). We used the following dosing schedule: day 1 G: 1,000 mg/m2, day 2 C: 63 mg/m2, and day 8 G: 1,000 mg/m2 that was administered in two cycles. No adverse event was observed. We followed up our patient with cytology and a CT scan every 3 months. Our patient has not experienced any recurrence of bladder cancer for 2 years following the radical cystectomy.

Discussion

PUC is a rare histological type of bladder cancer similar to plasma cells and is an aggressive variant of UC associated with a poor prognosis [6]. The first case of PUC was reported by Sahin et al.; to date, only approximately100 cases of PUC have been reported in the English literature [13, 5]. Most patients were in their 60s; the male-to-female ratio was 9:1. This variant is typically diagnosed at an advanced pathological stage (64 % pT3, 23 % pT4), showing metastases in 60 % of the patients [3]. This tumor initially presents as a high-grade, high-stage lesion, and diffusely invades the bladder wall; however, patients have no specific symptoms, which can lead to a delayed diagnosis and poor prognosis. Furthermore, PUC is difficult to differentiate from signet ring cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder due to overlap in the clinical and morphological presentation [4]. In the present case, the initial diagnosis was signet ring cell carcinoma, thus we performed a radical cystectomy because of the poor prognosis. However, the subsequent pathological examination revealed infiltrating high-grade urothelial carcinoma with partial features of the plasmacytoid variant, thus we administered chemotherapy.

Most urological guidelines recommend adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy as the therapy of choice in locally advanced bladder cancer. However, it has been reported that tumors with variant histology are associated with a higher risk of progression than conventional high-grade UC. Keck et al. reported that patients suffering from PUC have the worst clinical outcome regarding overall survival compared to conventional UC [7]. We searched for other cases of PUC that were treated with cystectomy and chemotherapy. Almost all cases were treated with cystectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. All cases were at an advanced stage, and the chemotherapy consisted of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (M-VAC) or GC. Cystectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with GC was relatively effective for the management of PUC in terms of overall survival (Table 1). Furthermore, Kaimakliotis et al. reported that the management of PUC should be aggressive and that cystectomy should be performed at all stages [8]. They also reported that although it is unclear whether PUC is independently associated with a poor prognosis, the prognosis in PUC is poor due to the higher stage at the time of diagnosis [9].

Table 1 The cases of PUC that were treated with cystectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy

Recently, an anti-PD-L1 drug was found to have a rapid and ongoing response in patients with urothelial carcinoma in a phase 1 study. Interestingly, this drug showed higher efficacy in patients whose tumor-infiltrating cells showed high levels of PD-L1 expression [10]. Boorjian et al. reported that higher PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was associated with the presence of advanced disease in patients with urothelial carcinoma and that it was correlated with a poor prognosis after radical cystectomy [11]. In our case, the tumor did not express PD-1 or PD-L1.

Although we predicted a poor prognosis for this variant, the tumor was successfully treated with a combination of radical cystectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy, and our patient has remained free of any sign of recurrence of bladder cancer for 2 years after the operation.

Conclusions

We herein described the case of a patient with PUC controlled with chemotherapy following radical cystectomy.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

GC:

Gemcitabine and cisplatin

HPF:

high-power field

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

M-VAC:

Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin

PUC:

Invasive urothelial carcinoma, lymphoma-like/plasmacytoid variant

TUR-Bt:

Transurethral resection of a bladder tumor

UC:

Urothelial carcinoma

References

  1. Wang Z, Lu T, Du L, Hu Z, Zhuang Q, Li Y, et al. Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a clinical pathological study and literature review. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012;5:601–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Keck B, Stoehr R, Wach S, Rogler A, Hofstaedter F, Lehmann J, et al. The plasmacytoid carcinoma of the bladder--rare variant of aggressive urothelial carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:346–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez-Roibon ND, Chaux A, Al-Hussain T, Osunkoya AO, Bezerra SM, Hicks J, et al. Dysregulation of mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in plasmacytoid variant of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:612–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Qin M, Wang G, Sun Y, He Q. Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2014;57:320–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sahin AA, Myhre M, Ro JY, Sneige N, Dekmezian RH, Ayala AG. Plasmacytoid transitional cell carcinoma. Report of a case with initial presentation mimicking multiple myeloma. Acta Cytol. 1991;35:277–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawahara T, Oshiro H, Sekiguchi Z, Ito H, Makiyama K, Uemura H, et al. High-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma with focal plasmacytoid differentiation successfully treated by transurethral resection followed by chemoradiotherapy. Int J Urol. 2011;18:851–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keck B, Wach S, Stoehr R, Kunath F, Bertz S, Lehmann J, et al. Plasmacytoid variant of bladder cancer defines patients with poor prognosis if treated with cystectomy and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaimakliotis HZ, Monn MF, Cary KC, Pedrosa JA, Rice K, Masterson TA, et al. Plasmacytoid variant urothelial bladder cancer: is it time to update the treatment paradigm? Urol Oncol. 2014;32:833–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaimakliotis HZ, Monn MF, Cheng L, Masterson TA, Cary KC, Pedrosa JA, et al. Plasmacytoid bladder cancer: variant histology with aggressive behavior and a new mode of invasion along fascial planes. Urology. 2014;83:1112–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brower V. Anti-PD-L1 antibody active in metastatic bladder cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boorjian SA, Sheinin Y, Crispen PL, Farmer SA, Lohse CM, Kuntz SM, et al. T-cell coregulatory molecule expression in urothelial cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic correlations and association with survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4800–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kohno T, Kitamura M, Akai H, Takaha M, Kawahara K, Oka T: Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Int J Urol 2006, 13(4):485–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawashima A, Ujike T, Nin M, Nishimura K, Miyoshi S: [Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a case report]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 2009, 100(5):590–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fritsche HM, Burger M, Denzinger S, Legal W, Goebell PJ, Hartmann A: Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: histological and clinical features of 5 cases. J Urol 2008, 180(5):1923–1927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soylu A, Aydin NE, Yilmaz U, Kutlu R, Gunes A: Urothelial carcinoma featuring lipid cell and plasmacytoid morphology with poor prognostic outcome. Urology 2005, 65(4):797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aldousari S, Sircar K, Kassouf W: Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a case report. Cases J 2009, 2:6647.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hayashi T, Tanigawa G, Fujita K, Imamura R, Nakazawa S, Yamamoto Y, Hosomi M, Shimazu K, Fushimi H, Yamaguchi S: Two cases of plasmacytoid variant of urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder: systemic chemotherapy might be of benefit. Int J Clin Oncol 2011, 16(6):759–762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Rie Shimizu supported the immunohistochemical study. Grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation, the Tokyo Biochemical Research Foundation, the Japanese Foundation for Research and Promotion of Endoscopy, and an International Exchange Grant from Kato Memorial Bioscience Foundation were provided to TK. There are no applicable grant numbers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Kawahara.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MO, TM, HI, YH, JT, and YMa performed the operation and YK, YM, TKo, YH, and YY conducted the patient follow-up. YI performed the pathological diagnosis. MO and TKa conceived of the study, participated in its design and wrote the manuscript. YMi and HU helped to check the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohtaka, M., Kawahara, T., Kumano, Y. et al. Invasive urothelial carcinoma, lymphoma-like/plasmacytoid variant, successfully treated by radical cystectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy: a case report. J Med Case Reports 10, 48 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0806-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0806-x

Keywords