- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
A newborn tolerated severe hypercapnia during general anesthesia: a case report
Journal of Medical Case Reportsvolume 9, Article number: 196 (2015)
Severe hypercapnia is a rare but harmful complication of general anesthesia. We report the case of a newborn who developed severe hypercapnia with unknown reasons during general anesthesia but recovered well. This report will advance our understanding about the causes of severe hypercapnia during anesthesia, the possible compensatory mechanisms and the characteristics of neonatal respiratory physiology and intracellular buffering systems.
A 21-day-old Chinese baby girl who had an incarcerated hernia received an emergent exploratory operation under general anesthesia. She developed severe hypercapnia during surgery for unclear reasons. Arterial blood gas revealed a PCO2 of 149mmHg. Troubleshooting and relevant measures were taken, but the level of CO2 did not decrease. In spite of the high level of PCO2, the newborn recovered well without any complications.
Neonates are vulnerable to hypercapnia during anesthesia for their characteristic respiratory physiology. Heat and moisture exchange should be used with caution in newborns under general anesthesia as it can increase dead space. Intracellular buffering systems play an important role in tolerating severe hypercapnia. Although this case raised a great challenge to the homeostatic mechanism of the body, measures should be taken to maintain PCO2 values around the clinically acceptable level.
The process of lung maturation is not completed in a full-term newborn. A European cohort of ventilated newborn babies indicated that hypercapnia was more common than hypocapnia . However, severe hypercapnia can also bring some adverse effects in neonates such as periventricular white matter injury, intraventricular hemorrhage and retinopathy of prematurity . Here we present and analyze the case of a newborn who experienced severe hypercapnia during general anesthesia but recovered well with no complications.
A 21-day-old Chinese baby girl weighing 3.8kg with an incarcerated hernia underwent emergent inguinal herniorrhaphy. The newborn was a full-term delivery and was born on mixed feeding without any special medical history. Anesthesia was induced uneventfully with propofol 2.5mg·kg−1 and fentanyl 2μg·kg−1. She was paralyzed with atracurium 0.5mg·kg−1 and intubated with a size 3.0 cuffed tracheal tube. She was ventilated with a time-cycled, pressure-limited ventilation mode using a pediatric circle circuit, with a respiratory rate of 25min−1 and maximum pressure (Pmax) of 15cm H2O. The machine showed the tidal volume given to the newborn was 45mL. Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) fluctuated between 35 and 45mmHg. Noninvasive blood pressure, electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, PETCO2 and body temperature were monitored continuously and these remained within normal levels throughout induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil.
Twenty minutes after anesthesia, PETCO2 increased from 45mmHg to 50mmHg and rose to 90mmHg in 30 minutes. The body temperature of the newborn was 37.5°C at the beginning of surgery. When PETCO2 began to rise, she flushed and her body temperature increased to 38.3°C. The warm blanket was removed and the heating in the operating room was turned off. Ten minutes later, her body temperature was down to normal level.
Troubleshooting and relevant measures were taken when PETCO2 began to rise. The depth of the endotracheal tube was checked by auscultating both lung fields. The CO2 absorber was checked and found to be of normal condition but was still replaced. Respiratory rate and Pmax were adjusted to 40 min−1 and 18cm H2O respectively. Tidal volume showed 60ml at this time. Meanwhile, the CO2-analyzing line and CO2-analyzing water trap cassette were changed, but without any obvious change in PETCO2. Neuromuscular blockers were added to exclude the recovery of spontaneous breathing and respiratory antagonism. Manual ventilation was applied to exclude any malfunction of the anesthesia machine. In spite of all these measures, PETCO2 did not decrease.
Surprisingly, her heart rate and blood pressure fluctuated ± 20% of baseline during the increase of PETCO2. The operation was not interrupted and finished rapidly as there was no intestinal ischemia. Femoral artery blood gas analysis at the end of the surgery showed severe respiratory acidosis (Table 1). Twenty minutes after the blood gas analysis, there was no obvious change in PETCO2 but the newborn suddenly opened her eyes. She recovered spontaneous breathing. The anesthetic circuit was disconnected from the ventilator for 5 minutes and pulse oximetry saturation remained normal. So, the endotracheal tube was removed. After extubation, femoral vein blood gas analysis showed partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) of 115mmHg and the neonate was sent to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Two hours later, a repeat artery blood gas analysis indicated that PCO2 was 31.8mmHg and pH was 7.352. Postoperative review showed there were no complications.
In this newborn, the main problem noted was severe hypercapnia. Infants are more likely to develop hypercapnia because of the age-related physiological changes in vital systems and a higher metabolic rate in relation to weight. The causes of hypercapnia include two aspects: the increase of CO2 generation and the decrease of CO2 discharge. Detailed factors include malignant hyperthermia, equipment and breathing circuit malfunction, patients’ preexisting pulmonary diseases, CO2 pneumoperitoneum, improper ventilatory settings and invalidity of CO2 absorber. However, in the present case, we failed to determine the real cause of the hypercapnia. Malignant hyperthermia was excluded as the neonate’s temperature decreased to normal level after the heating was switched off in the operating room and she did not show any sign of muscle rigidity, tachycardia, etc. CO2 canisters as well as the anesthesia machine were working properly. Time-cycled, pressure-limited ventilation mode is the most widely used mechanical ventilation mode for neonates and ventilation parameters were appropriate for the newborn.
An important factor we ignored during anesthesia was that a heat and moisture exchanger (HEM) was used between the circle system Y-piece and endotracheal tube. A circuit containing HEM can increase the dead space by almost 70% compared with a circuit without HEM in a 24-month-old child undergoing general anesthesia . We did not realize the HEM was there until the tracheal extubation. It is not certain whether the HEM caused hypercapnia in this neonate, but a HEM used in pediatric anesthesia can induce hypoventilation with subsequent hypercapnia .
Hypercapnia is a two-edged sword and it exerts multiple physiologic effects on different organs. The word “permissive hypercapnia” was first described by Hickling in 1990 who suggested that adoption of low-tidal-volume ventilation strategies with tolerance of elevation in PCO2 was associated with lower hospital mortality . Hypercapnia displaces the oxygen dissociation curve to the right, which improves tissue oxygenation and perfusion and may alleviate the injury to immature lung and brain . Retrospective studies in premature neonates also concluded that higher PCO2 contributed to less lung injury .
In spite of these protective effects, it is believed that severe hypercapnia leads to an increase of intracranial pressure (ICP) via acidosis-induced cerebral arteriolar dilation, which is thought to be related with well-known neurological complications such as cerebral edema, intraventricular hemorrhage and temporary neurological impairment . Reduced skeletal muscle contractility and decreased myocardial contractility are also known to occur following hypercapnia . However, no evidence of neurological sequelae was observed in this neonate.
A few cases of severe hypercapnia have been reported in the literature. Most cases of patients with severe hypercapnia are related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exacerbation of bronchial asthma causing severe hypoxemia or defective apparatus used during general anesthesia [9, 10]. Compared with those patients, several unique characteristics in our case deserve further discussion. First, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a neonate who developed severe hypercapnia during general anesthesia for unclear reasons. Second, the neonate regained full consciousness and no residual neurological deficit was observed.
The ability to tolerate hypercapnia varies among individuals for a broad spectrum of factors such as duration of hypercapnia, the speed at which high values are reached, maximal PCO2 value, patient age and preexisting diseases. The threshold of PCO2 above which neurological impairment occurs is unclear . Hypercapnia coma has been observed in patients with PCO2 values of 58mmHg. However, a sober patient with PCO2 values of 160mmHg has also been reported .
Remarkable renal compensation enables patients with end-stage lung disease to tolerate severe chronic hypercapnia. But how to explain why the newborn can tolerate such severe hypercapnia? The first reason could be that the neonate is insensitive to elevation of CO2. Central chemosensitivity in the newborn is not the same as that in the adult. In term neonates, the ventilatory handling of a hypercapnia challenge is fully functional on postnatal day 2. Then during the following 8 weeks, ventilatory response to CO2 declines markedly and subsequently achieves adult level of responsiveness after the 9th week . The altered CO2 sensitivity of neurons, the loss of GABAergic excitation and changes in astrocytic function during development may account for the triphasic pattern of responsiveness to the CO2 . Both carotid and central chemoreceptors are important for a normal ventilatory of CO2–H+ chemosensitivity. Nevertheless, carotid plays a greater role at low levels of hypercapnia, whereas intracranial chemoreceptors are more dominant at high levels . In neonates, peripheral CO2 chemoreceptors exert greater influence than central CO2 chemoreceptors . Therefore, we may infer that a nadir of ventilatory responsiveness to CO2 in this 21-day-old newborn as well as the specificity of CO2 chemoreceptors in neonates might make newborns insensitive to elevation of CO2. This might be an important reason why the neonate can tolerate severe hypercapnia.
Clinical severe hypercapnia frequently occurred with tissue hypoxia or arterial hypoxemia. However, in this newborn, this is not the case. Oxygen saturation was continuously monitored and it never fell below 95% during the increase of PETCO2. Hemodynamics remained stable during the anesthetic procedure, which also guaranteed tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Research has indicated that the central system has a potent ability to recover from nonhypoxic severe respiratory acidosis . As long as tissue perfusion and oxygenation are preserved, effective transfer of HCO3− from extracellular space into cells by Na+/K+ changes or Na+/H+ changes will continuously occur when exposing to hypercapnia . Consequently, the drop of pH in intracellular cells is far slower than that in extracellular cells. It is important to note that this regulation is energy-consumed, which requires the cells to be oxygenation and perfused . The adequate oxygenation and strong chemical buffering capacity in intracellular cells enable important organs to tolerate extreme acidosis and that might contribute to the benign outcome of the newborn.
Gross hypercapnia occurs rarely during general anesthesia. Heat and moisture exchange should be used with caution in newborns under general anesthesia as it can increase dead space. This study will significantly advance our understanding about the characteristics of neonatal respiratory physiology, intracellular buffering systems, and causes of severe hypercapnia. Although this case raised a great challenge to the homeostatic mechanism of the body, measures should be taken to maintain PCO2 values around the clinically acceptable level.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardians for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
van Kaam AH, De Jaegere AP, Rimensberger PC, Neovent Study Group. Incidence of hypo- and hyper-capnia in a cross-sectional European cohort of ventilated newborn infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98:F323–6.
Pray-Roberts C, Smith WDA, Nunn JF. Accident severe hypercapnia during anesthesia-A case report and review of some physiological effect. Brit J Anaesth. 1967;39:257–65.
Karlin A, Umeh U, Girshin M. Hypercapnia and tachycardia in a 2-year old. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:629–30.
Hickling KG, Henderson SJ, Jackson R. Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 1990;16:372–7.
Jankov RP, Tanswell AK. Hypercapnia and the neonate. Acta Pædiatr. 2008;98:1502–9.
Gannon CM, Wiswell TE, Spitzer AR. Volutrauma, PaCO2 levels, and neurodevelopmental sequelae following assisted ventilation. Clin Perinatol. 1998;25:159–75.
Zayek M, Alrifai W, Whitehurst R, Kua K, Martino A, Eyal F. Acidemia versus hypercapnia and risk for severe intraventricular hemorrhage. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31:345–52.
Varughese M, Patole S, Shama A, Whitehall J. Permissive hypercapnia in neonates: the case of the good, the bad, and the ugly. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002;33:56–64.
Urwin L, Murphy R, Robertson C, Pollok A. A case of extreme hypercapnia: implications for the prehospital and accident and emergency department management of acutely dyspnoeic patients. Emerg Med J. 2004;21:119–20.
Potkin RT, Swenson ER. Resuscitation from severe acute hypercapnia. Determinants of tolerance and survival. Chest. 1992;102:1742–5.
Sayers JA, Smith RE, Holland RL, Keatinge WR. Effects of carbon dioxide on mental performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987;63:25–30.
Meissner HH, Franklin C. Extreme hypercapnia in a fully alert patient. Chest. 1992;102:1298–9.
Søvik S, Lossius K. Development of ventilatory response to transient hypercapnia and hypercapnic hypoxia in term infants. Pediatr Res. 2004;55:302–9.
Putnam RW, Conrad SC, Gdovin MJ, Erlichman JS, Leiter JC. Neonatal maturation of the hypercapnic ventilatory response and central neural CO2 chemosensitivity. Resp Physiol Neurobiol. 2005;149:165–79.
Forster HV, Martino P, Hodges M, Krause K, Bonis J, Davis S, et al. The carotid chemoreceptors are a major determinant of ventilatory CO2 sensitivity and of PaCO2 during eupneic breathing. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;605:322–6.
This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81171158).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
KW and WL collated the data. HX, WL and WY contributed to the patient management. KW and WY wrote the manuscript. CZ and HX provided critical revision of the manuscript. KW and WY were responsible for the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version to be submitted.