Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reconstruction of advanced bone defect associated with severely compromised maxillary anterior teeth in aggressive periodontitis: a case report

  • Wisam Kamil1Email author,
  • Lina Al Bayati1,
  • Akbar S. Hussin2 and
  • Haszelini Hassan3
Journal of Medical Case Reports20159:211

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-015-0677-6

Received: 14 May 2015

Accepted: 17 August 2015

Published: 25 September 2015

Abstract

Introduction

Aggressive periodontitis is characterized by a rapid rate of attachment loss and bone resorption. Regenerative therapy offers reconstruction of the periodontium; however, certain advanced cases with a questionable prognosis might remain a challenge. We report a successful intervention outcome of a challenging case in the aesthetic zone of a patient with aggressive periodontitis.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old systemically healthy Malay woman was referred to the Periodontics Specialist Clinic of the Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia, with a chief complaint of bleeding gums and mobility of the upper anterior teeth. A diagnosis of localized aggressive periodontitis was made. A thorough non-surgical periodontal treatment was provided, followed by a series of regenerative periodontal surgeries to manage advanced bone defects. A successful treatment outcome with a good prognosis was achieved. Maintenance through the supportive treatment phase showed marked bone gain.

Conclusions

Teeth with severely compromised periodontium of unpredictable prognosis can still be maintained with satisfactory restoration of the function, support, and aesthetics, despite the baseline unpredicted treatment outcome. Proper selection of an advanced periodontal treatment plan can exclude the option of tooth extraction or prosthetic replacement.

Introduction

Aggressive periodontitis has been defined in the literature as a rapid form of periodontal destruction that develops early in life and affects systemically healthy individuals [1, 2]. The prevalence of this disease in Asian populations is between 0.2% and 1.0% [3]. A distinct radiographic feature of this form of periodontal destruction is the angular bony defects at the first permanent molars and central incisors [4]. Because there is a rapid rate of alveolar bone resorption in this disease, the circumferential bone defects may progress to more than two-thirds of the roots, affecting the tooth-supporting tissues within a few years, and, as a consequence of disease progression, a high grade of mobility, deep intra-bony defects, and pus discharge can be observed at the involved sites [5].

The relative effectiveness of non-surgical anti-infective periodontal therapy on aggressive periodontitis compared with chronic periodontitis is still unclear [6]. There is a limited opportunity to eradicate the periodontopathogens in the deep sites through non-surgical periodontal therapy (NPT) [7], and the expected healing process in patients treated with non-surgical therapy is by long junctional epithelium rather than through the regeneration, resulting in persistence of bleeding sites and disease recurrence [8]. However, recent investigations revealed the persistence of the periodontal pathogens even after a full mouth extraction [9]. Therefore, regenerative periodontal therapy for advanced periodontal defects to improve the prognosis and longevity of teeth appears promising [10].

Studies of the prognostic model of periodontally compromised teeth [1113] showed that teeth with >50% bone loss have a questionable prognosis and ultimately “hopeless” if they have inadequate attachment to maintain health. Advanced bone defects, deep pockets, and tooth mobility are found to be associated with increased risk of tooth loss. Moreover, the patient’s condition will be more critical when central incisors in the aesthetic zone are affected, owing to the difficulty in satisfying patient expectations, especially in young women, when choosing the option of tooth extraction. In a recent study [14], Cortellini and co-workers demonstrated the potential effect of regenerative therapy in changing the prognosis of hopeless teeth instead of making a decision to extract such periodontally compromised teeth. However, the inclusion criterion that had been applied included intra-bony defect presenting with a clearly detectable bone crest at the neighboring tooth or teeth.

In this report, we describe a successful clinical outcome in the reconstruction of a circumferential bony defect extending from tooth 12 to tooth 22 over the palatal aspects of the upper central incisors (UCI) of a patient with aggressive periodontitis. This condition was unpredictable and was seen as a challenge, particularly in the aesthetic zone.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old systemically healthy Malay woman was referred to the Periodontics Specialist Clinic of the Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia, with a chief complaint of bleeding gums and mobility of her upper anterior teeth. Complete medical and dental histories were taken, and a full periodontal chart was recorded, including all the clinical periodontal parameters, plaque scores and bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), recession, mobility, and furcation involvement. The chart revealed grade II mobility of the UCI and pus discharge with deep probing depths and severe CAL >6mm. The three-dimensional picture in Fig. 1 shows the circumferential bone resorption surrounding the UCI. The rapid rate of bone destruction affected the sites of the first and second molars, resulting in furcation involvement and mobility ranging from grade I to grade II with recorded PD and CAL greater than 6mm as well. The radiographic interpretation showed an angular bone defect mesial and/or distal to the first molars (Fig. 2). Because the patient was systemically healthy except for the presence of periodontitis, and based on the patient’s history, clinical periodontal records, and radiographic findings, she was diagnosed with localized aggressive periodontitis [15]. A combination of oral metronidazole 400mg and amoxicillin 500mg were prescribed for 7 days as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP). Six weeks after the NPT, the affected sites were reevaluated. The results revealed slight reductions in the patient’s BOP, PD, and CAL. However, the range of residual bleeding pocket depths was from 5mm to 6mm with no obvious clinical attachment gain. Therefore, the decision was made to provide regenerative therapy, and a surgical treatment was scheduled for the patient in spite of the questionable prognosis that had been assigned at baseline. The patient was informed verbally regarding the details of the surgical treatment plan and signed a written informed consent form before each periodontal surgical procedure as part of the clinical protocol of our institute.
Fig. 1

Three-dimensional image displays the circumferential bone defect from the palatal aspect (red arrows)

Fig. 2

Baseline orthopantomography. Red arrows indicate the angular bone defects around the first and/or second molars

The surgical procedure on the UCI included the use of a papilla preservation technique, which was applied to preserve the papilla and obtain primary closure of the inter-dental space (Fig. 3a). The technique of papilla preservation [16] that we applied, compared with the modified technique [17], provides better access to the palatal defect because it is applicable on the buccal and palatal aspects. Therefore, the incorporation of papillae with the facial part of the flap (Fig. 3a) was achieved through crevicular incisions made around each tooth without splitting the inter-dental papilla, and a semi-lunar incision was made across the palatal aspect of at least 5mm from the papillary crest, taking advantage of the keratinized palatal mucosa in protecting the graft during healing. Additionally, this palatal approach overcomes the post-operative labial scar formation in the aesthetic zone.
Fig. 3

Intra-oral photographs show the surgical area at the upper anterior teeth. a Papilla preservation technique illustrating the whole inter-dental papilla with the labial flap. b The circumferential bone defect around the upper central incisors after debridement. c The surgical area from the palatal aspect highlights the collagen barrier membrane applied to cover the bone graft. d Sutures are applied to close the flap

As a result of the intra-bony defect location, which is associated with two adjacent central incisors, significant supra-crestal components of the defect presented at the palatal area (Fig. 1). The circumferential intra-bony defects were thoroughly debrided (Fig. 3b), and cerabone bovine xenograft granules (botiss biomaterials, Zossen, Germany) were used to fill the defects. An OsseoGuard resorbable bovine collagen membrane (Collagen Matrix/BIOMET 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) covered the bone substitute, with delicate trimming of the membrane done to extend inter-proximally (Fig. 3c) using sling sutures of absorbable material to adapt the membrane well and prevent its collapse over the bone graft. The flap was sutured using an internal horizontal mattress suture, which has the advantage of providing a tension-free flap (Fig. 3d) and a stable support for the grafting area. Simple interrupted sutures were applied at the rest of the flap sites. The sutures were removed 10 days after the surgical procedure. A fixed retainer using twisted wire (177.8mm; 3M Unitek, Loughborough, UK) was constructed palatally to splint the anterior teeth and stabilize the wound healing (Fig. 4). This type of wire allows long-term stability with physiologic tooth movement.
Fig. 4

Intra-oral photograph of the palatal aspect shows the splinting of the upper anterior teeth with a fixed retainer and twisted wire

Strict oral hygiene instructions were given; however, the patient was asked to avoid normal brushing and flossing in the treated area for 4–6 weeks and replace it with the use of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash. The modified Stillman brushing method was recommended to prevent the interference beneath the gingival margin until complete resorption of the membrane was achieved. During the healing process, professional plaque control was scheduled every 2 weeks to prevent bacterial contamination of the surgical area. The patient was also instructed not to chew on the treated area for the first 4 weeks.

The application of the graft and barrier membrane resulted in remarkable bone gain and support for more than two-thirds of the root length of the UCI, as shown in the radiograph taken at 2 years (Fig. 5b), which confirmed the resolution of the defect present at baseline (Fig. 5a). There was absence of BOP, significant PD reduction up to 2mm, and greater than 5mm attachment gain. Additionally, there was almost an equivalent amount of attachment gain and bone fill. The intra-oral photographs in Fig. 6 show the clinical improvement in the gingival tissue from edematous bleeding gingiva (Fig. 6a) to the closely adapted, firm, non-bleeding sites (Fig. 6b). Furthermore, Fig. 6b depicts a good post-operative result without any inter-proximally soft tissue crater formation, which explains the pre-requisite of the papillary preservation technique.
Fig. 5

a Pre-treatment peri-apical radiograph of the patient’s upper central incisors with circumferential bone resorption. b Peri-apical radiograph of the same region 2 years later shows significant bone fill

Fig. 6

a Deep probing depth at the upper central incisors with bleeding on probing and inflamed gingival tissue. b Frontal intra-oral photograph shows healthy, firm, non-edematous gingival tissue

Three more regenerative periodontal surgeries were performed for regions of teeth 46, 26, 27, and 36. In these procedures, we used different xenograft bone granules of bovine origin (Endobone from Collagen Matrix/BIOMET 3i and Bio-Oss from Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and achieved successful results in respect to bone fill (Fig. 7) compared with baseline (Fig. 2). The patient was covered with systemic antibiotics for all periodontal regenerative surgical procedures. A decision was made to extract the partially erupted and angulated third molars because these teeth were either without antagonists or compromising the adjacent second molars. They also presented difficulties in self-performed plaque control and acted as a local factor for plaque accumulation in deep periodontal pockets. The surgical extractions were performed during the surgical periodontal therapy to minimize the required treatment time and healing process.
Fig. 7

Orthopantomography was performed 2 years after baseline. Red arrows indicate area of previous angular bone defects with marked bone gain compared with baseline as indicated in Fig. 2

During the phase of supportive periodontal therapy, the patient was treated with a schedule of professional plaque control with adjunct use of photodynamic therapy (PDT). The recall system of the maintenance phase was arranged every 3 months. At 2 years after baseline, the full periodontal chart revealed a marked improvement in the clinical periodontal records, as the percentage of sites with BOP had decreased from 40% to 16% and there was a substantial decrease in the number of deep pockets, characterized by the absence of PPD greater than 4mm compared with 22.22% before the commencement of treatment. This PPD reduction was accompanied by an average CAL gain of 3.07mm.

Discussion

Despite the rapid rate of attachment loss in patients with aggressive periodontitis, the treatment of such cases is not different from that of chronic periodontitis in respect to all phases of treatment [6]. In a recent consensus report by our group [18], it was stated that adjunctive use of systemic antibiotics and PDT supplementary to SRP are anti-infective non-surgical approaches that are required to eradicate periodontopathogens from infected sites. Nevertheless, regenerative surgical treatment is a requisite to restoring the periodontium and ensuring long-term tooth stability [6]. Although the treatment option of teeth with a “hopeless” prognosis was tooth extraction [12], advanced reconstructive therapy and selected surgical techniques could alter the prognosis with an expectation of good results [14].

The clinical presentation of aggressive periodontitis usually includes the involvement of central incisors with angular bone defects [4]. Therefore, it is fundamental to devise a good treatment plan to retain these adjacent teeth rather than extract them. Similarly, it is difficult to establish the periodontal papilla between two neighboring implants [19]. In a recent consensus report of the American Academy of Periodontology regeneration workshop [20], its authors concluded that early intervention for intra-bony defects with regenerative approaches can be successful. In respect to the treatment of patients with aggressive periodontitis with bone grafting materials, our review of the literature revealed few published case reports [2123] and controlled studies [24, 25]. Nevertheless, these cases were restricted merely to separated angular defects around premolar or molar teeth compared with the extent of defects affecting the maxillary two central incisors in our patient.

Although the immobilization of highly mobile teeth through periodontal splinting does not offer a successful periodontal improvement, stabilization of teeth during the regenerative treatment is important to stabilizing the wound healing [18]. The splinting that we applied was considered to be permanent for the patient to protect the newly gained bone from the occlusion force in the long term, as the bone substitute we used was osteoconductive in nature.

A well-established plaque control regimen with excellent patient compliance in aggressive periodontitis cases is highly recommended in the maintenance phase to ensure good periodontal health [6]. Therefore, professional and self-performed plaque control measures were instituted to help the patient achieve good oral hygiene.

Conclusions

Periodontally compromised teeth with unpredictable prognosis in the aesthetic zone of patients with aggressive periodontitis can be managed through a comprehensive treatment plan that includes an advanced surgical reconstruction approach to achieve a favorable long-term prognosis, maintain the natural healthy dentition, and overcome the need for prosthesis.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

BOP: 

bleeding on probing

CAL: 

clinical attachment loss

NPT: 

non-surgical periodontal therapy

PDT: 

photodynamic therapy

PPD: 

probing pocket depth

SRP: 

scaling and root planing

UCI: 

upper central incisors

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The support of Dr Suhaila Muhammad Ali, Dr Khairul Bariah Chi Adam and the clinical staff of the periodontics specialist clinic of International Islamic University Malaysia is gratefully acknowledged.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Periodontics Unit, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia
(2)
Orthodontics Unit, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia
(3)
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia

References

  1. Albandar JM. Aggressive periodontitis: case definition and diagnostic criteria. Periodontol 2000. 2014;65:13–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chahboun H, Arnau MM, Herrera D, Sanz M, Ennibi OK. Bacterial profile of aggressive periodontitis in Morocco: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Susin C, Haas AN, Albandar JM. Epidemiology and demographics of aggressive periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2014;65:27–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer PN. The case for periodontosis as a clinical entity. J Periodontol. 1971;42:516–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Giargia M, Lindhe J. Tooth mobility and periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24:785–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Teughels W, Dhondt R, Dekeyser C, Quirynen M. Treatment of aggressive periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2014;65:107–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang HL, Greenwell H. Surgical periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2001;25:89–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Matuliene G, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, Schmidlin K, Brägger U, Zwahlen M, et al. Influence of residual pockets on progression of periodontitis and tooth loss: results after 11 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:685–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Quirynen M, Van Assche N. Microbial changes after full-mouth tooth extraction, followed by 2-stage implant placement. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:581–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Murakami S, Bartold M, Meyle J, Agarwal R, Anagnostou F, Bakalyan V, et al. Group C. Consensus paper. Periodontal regeneration – fact or fiction? J Int Acad Periodontol. 2015;17(1 Suppl):54–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McGuire MK. Prognosis versus actual outcome: a long-term survey of 100 treated periodontal patients under maintenance care. J Periodontol. 1991;62:51–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McGuire MK, Nunn ME. Prognosis versus actual outcome. II. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in developing an accurate prognosis. J Periodontol. 1996;67:658–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McGuire MK, Nunn ME. Prognosis versus actual outcome. III. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in accurately predicting tooth survival. J Periodontol. 1996;67:666–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cortellini P, Stalpers G, Mollo A, Tonetti MS. Periodontal regeneration versus extraction and prosthetic replacement of teeth severely compromised by attachment loss to the apex: 5-year results of an ongoing randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:915–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Armitage GC. Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Ann Periodontol. 1999;4:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Takei HH, Han TJ, Carranza Jr FA, Kenney EB, Lekovic V. Flap technique for periodontal bone implants. Papilla preservation technique. J Periodontol. 1985;56:204–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cortellini P, Prato GP, Tonetti MS. The modified papilla preservation technique: a new surgical approach for interproximal regenerative procedures. J Periodontol. 1995;66:261–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lang N, Feres M, Corbet E, Ding Y, Emingil G, Faveri M, et al. Group B. Consensus paper. Non-surgical periodontal therapy: mechanical debridement, antimicrobial agents and other modalities. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2015;17(1 Suppl):34–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol. 2000;71:546–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Reynolds MA, Kao RT, Camargo PM, Caton JG, Clem DS, Fiorellini JP, et al. Periodontal regeneration – intrabony defects: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86(2 Suppl):S105–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. De Marco TJ, Scaletta LJ. The use of autogenous hip marrow in the treatment of juvenile periodontosis: a case report. J Periodontol. 1970;41:683–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sugarman MM, Sugarman EF. Precocious periodontitis: a clinical entity and a treatment responsibility. J Periodontol. 1977;48:397–409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Evian CI, Amsterdam M, Rosenberg ES. Juvenile periodontitis – healing following therapy to control inflammatory and traumatic etiologic components of the disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1982;9:1–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mabry TW, Yukna RA, Sepe WW. Freeze-dried bone allografts combined with tetracycline in the treatment of juvenile periodontitis. J Periodontol. 1985;56:74–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Evans GH, Yukna RA, Sepe WW, Mabry TW, Mayer ET. Effect of various graft materials with tetracycline in localized juvenile periodontitis. J Periodontol. 1989;60:491–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kamil et al. 2015

Advertisement