Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Endometriosis with an acute colon obstruction: a case report

Journal of Medical Case Reports20159:150

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-015-0609-5

Received: 24 November 2014

Accepted: 28 April 2015

Published: 26 June 2015

Abstract

Introduction

The presentation of an acute bowel obstruction caused by endometriosis in an emergency department setting is rare, as it usually presents through years of complaints in the absence of a distinct acute onset. In this report, we present a case of a patient who was familiar with abdominal complaints and eventually required emergency surgery to treat an acute bowel obstruction caused by endometriosis. Endometrioses present infrequently in the acute phase, and only a few cases in which emergency surgery was required have been described in the literature.

Case presentation

A 31-year-old Caucasian woman presented to the emergency room of our hospital with a distended abdomen, pain and nausea accompanied by a history of 14 years of chronic abdominal pain and constipation. An abdominal X-ray and subsequent computed tomographic scan showed a severely distended cecum of 9cm with stenosis in the sigmoid. Cecal blow-out was considered highly likely, and, during an emergency laparotomy, an obstructing process was found in the sigmoid. An oncologic resection of the sigmoid was performed with a primary anastomosis and loop ileostomy. A pathological examination revealed a tumor of 4cm in the sigmoid, which contained a tubelike structure with cytogenic stroma and the remains of focal bleeding. These are typical aspects of endometriosis.

Conclusions

Infiltrating endometriosis is an invalidating disease that can be misdiagnosed for a wide range of other diseases. Emergency room physicians and surgeons should be aware that it can present as an acute obstruction and should be considered in diagnosing women of childbearing age. After initial colonoscopy, emergency surgery is the best therapeutic approach if there is a complete obstruction.

Keywords

Acute abdominal painDeep infiltrating endometriosisEmergency surgery

Introduction

In this case report, we describe a patient who had a long history of abdominal complaints. She came to our emergency department (ED) with a rare case of acute bowel obstruction caused by endometriosis. The diagnosis of endometriosis is usually made after years of complaints with the absence of a distinct acute onset [1,2].

Case presentation

A 31-year-old Caucasian woman with increasing abdominal distension, pain and nausea was referred to our department by gastroenterologists at the ED. She had had abdominal pain and chronic constipation symptoms since the age of 17 years. These complaints had been extensively analyzed several years earlier by the gastroenterology department, when no abnormalities were identified in blood tests or a colonoscopy. One month prior to her presentation at the ED, she had been admitted to the surgical department with complaints of decreased intake, nausea and a 10-day absence of defecation. Blood tests did not show abnormalities. An abdominal X-ray showed signs of constipation. After conservative treatment with enemas and oral debulking agents, her complaints decreased and she was dismissed from hospital.

During the intake at the ED, she was found to have no history of weight loss, and, with the use of bisacodyl and close monitoring of her diet, she had managed to regulate her bowel movements, with the exception of her recent admission. For the preceding 1 year, the patient had desired to become pregnant. Therefore, she had stopped using oral contraceptives, after which she had a regular cycle without intermediate bleeding or abnormal vaginal discharge.

In her physical examination, we encountered a painful woman with a normal body temperature. She had abdominal distension, hypertympanic percussion, active bowel movements and tenderness of the abdomen without signs of abdominal guarding. Additional blood tests showed a normal hemoglobin level of 7.8 (normal range, 7 to 10mmol/l), without any signs of an infection with 6.8×104 leukocytes (normal range, 5 to 10×104) and a C-reactive protein level of 8.0 (normal level, <10mg/l). An abdominal X-ray (Figure 1A) and subsequent abdominal computed tomography (CT) (Figure 1B,C) showed a significantly inflated cecum of 9cm and an obstruction in the sigmoid colon with a proximal distension of the colon. Because of the expansion of the cecum, a decision was made to perform emergency colonoscopy for desufflation; however, the obstruction could not be passed with a scope.
Figure 1

Pre-operative imaging studies. X-ray (A) and computed tomographic scans (B, C) of the patient’s abdomen show a significantly inflated cecum and an obstruction in the sigmoid colon with a proximal distension of the colon.

Given the threat of cecal blow-out, it was decided to perform a laparotomy. During the surgical procedure, a solitary stenosis was found in the sigmoid colon that appeared as a malignancy. Therefore, an oncological sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis was performed. Because of the distension of the cecum, a temporary loop ileostomy was constructed. Upon further inspection of the abdomen, no abnormalities were found in the liver, peritoneum or pelvis. The patient recovered quickly after the procedure and could be discharged after 1 week, with the intention to perform a loop ileostomy reversal after 3 months.

A macroscopic pathological examination of the resected sigmoid showed extensive fibrotic foci with induration in the intestinal wall without mucosal abnormalities (Figures 2 and 3). In the sigmoid wall, a tumor 4.4cm in size was found; however, this did not appear to have an obvious relationship to the mucosa. Microscopically, the tumor showed epithelial tubular structures surrounded by what was interpreted as cytogenic stroma and focal hemorrhage remnants, suggestive of endometriosis (Figure 4). Foci of tubes with ciliated columnar epithelium were present in some lymph nodes.
Figure 2

Pathological specimen obtained during sigmoid resection.

Figure 3

Extensive fibrotic foci can be seen with induration in the intestinal wall without mucosal abnormalities.

Figure 4

Microscopically, the tumor had epithelial tubular structures surrounded by arguably cytogenetic stroma and focal hemorrhage remnants suggestive of endometriosis.

Discussion

Endometriosis is defined as the implantation of endometrium outside the uterus [3,4]. In 1927, Sampson theorized that endometriosis results from retrograde deposition of endometrial remains during menstruation [5]. These endometrial cells remain sensitive to gonadotropic hormones and react to hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle. Sampson’s theory does not fully explain why endometriosis occurs only in a select group of women, and to date the exact etiology remains unknown. Recent research has shown that differences in genetic and immunological factors exist between affected and unaffected women [1,6,7].

Endometriosis affects 10% to 12% of fertile women, with the number of cases diagnosed peaking between the ages of 29 to 39 years. First onset can be as early as adolescence, making it prone to being missed as a diagnosis [1-3,8,9]. Endometriosis can occur in the entire abdominal cavity and is often classified into three groups: peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis and deep infiltrating endometriosis [10]. Deep infiltrating endometriosis is not clearly defined, but usually it is described as an ingrowth of over 5mm into the peritoneum and underlying structures [1,4,7,10]. In 5% to 12% of the women affected by endometrioses, there is infiltrating growth in the rectosigmoid [2,3,10,11]. Additional common locations for ingrowths are the uterosacral ligaments, vagina, bladder and ureters [10].

Symptoms of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid include dysmenorrhea, constipation, diarrhea, pain during defecation, dyspareunia and periodic rectal bleeding during menstruation [2,3,10,12,13]. Late presenting symptoms can be chronic because of extensive fibrosis that occurs as a result of the endometriosis depositions. Physical examination often provides insufficient clues to lead to suspicion of deep infiltrating endometriosis; hence, imaging is an important aspect of making the diagnosis [4,7]. To diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis, transvaginal ultrasound is a highly reliable imaging technique to complement the gold standard of laparoscopy [1,3,4]. Transvaginal ultrasound has a reported sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 98% [14]. For large depositions in the cavum Douglasi, and as pre-operative imaging, a magnetic resonance imaging scan with rectal contrast has additional value and is superior to CT [3,15].

Deep infiltrating endometriosis often presents at a late stage with extensive complaints due to extensive fibrosis caused by chronic inflammation of the endometriosis. Anti-inflammatory and hormonal therapies have little to no effect on the symptoms and therefore provide no added value in this stage of the disease [10]. Surgical intervention has been argued to be the treatment of choice at this stage. In recent years, a number of new techniques have been developed; however, the gold standard remains segmental resection laparoscopy or, if this is complicated because of adhesions, laparotomy [2,11,16]. In this otherwise healthy patient population, fewer complications are seen than with oncological colorectal surgery [17]. The most frequent complications are rectovaginal fistula (2% to 8%) and anastomotic leakage (0 to 3%). Similarly to oncological colorectal surgery, there is a strong link between the risk of anastomotic leakage and the position of the anastomoses [2,10,11,13,17]. There is less need for the construction of loop ileostomy in this group of healthy young women. This decision making should additionally take into consideration the severe psychological effects that accompany a stoma at this age [17]. A partial resection or curettage of the lesion is an alternative to a bowel resection with a lesion smaller than 2cm [2,4,10]. The risk of recurrence after an intervention for infiltrating endometriosis varies widely and is difficult to assess because of differing research methods and follow-up durations. Most review authors state a recurrence risk of 5% to 25% [2,10,11]. Remarkably, this is not influenced by the radicality of the resection [12].

Conclusions

This case illustrates that infiltrating endometriosis is a disabling disease. Emergency room physicians and surgeons should be aware that it can present as an acute obstruction and should be considered in diagnosing women of childbearing age. In our patient, a CT scan, rather than an abdominal X-ray, might have revealed the pending obstruction in an earlier phase. In exceptional cases, colon obstruction by infiltrating endometriosis can require an emergency laparotomy with resection of the affected bowel segment. In less urgent cases, more planning is recommended, along with discussion of the case, including medical images, among a multidisciplinary endometriosis team.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CT: 

Computed tomography

ED: 

Emergency department

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge FCO Los, PhD, research consultant, D Lee, MD, , family medicine resident, and A. Walter, pathologist (Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)/Flevo Hospital, Almere, the Netherlands).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Surgery

References

  1. Luisi S, Lazzeri L, Ciani V, Petraglia F. Endometriosis in Italy: from cost estimates to new medical treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25:734–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Koh CE, Juszczyk K, Cooper MJ, Solomon MJ. Management of deeply infiltrating endometriosis involving the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:925–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nassif J, Trompoukis P, Barata S, Furtado A, Gabriel B, Wattiez A. Management of deep endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:25–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Daraï E, Bazot M, Rouzier R, Houry S, Dubernard G. Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:308–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sampson JA. Metastatic or embolic endometriosis, due to the menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the venous circulation. Am J Pathol. 1927;3:93–110.43.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Viganò P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, Vercellini P. Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18:177–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Wattiez A, Donnez J. Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:564–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bascombe NA, Naraynsingh V, Dan D, Harnanan D. Isolated endometriosis causing sigmoid colon obstruction: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013;4:1073–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Roman H, Ness J, Suciu N, Bridoux V, Gourcerol G, Leroi AM, et al. Are digestive symptoms in women presenting with pelvic endometriosis specific to lesion localizations? A preliminary prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3440–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D’Hoore A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Penninckx F, Vergote I, et al. Surgical treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:311–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Cicco C, Corona R, Schonman R, Mailova K, Ussia A, Koninckx P. Bowel resection for deep endometriosis: a systematic review. BJOG. 2011;118:285–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mabrouk M, Spagnolo E, Raimondo D, D’Errico A, Caprara G, Malvi D, et al. Segmental bowel resection for colorectal endometriosis: is there a correlation between histological pattern and clinical outcomes? Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1314–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jelenc F, Ribič-Pucelj M, Juvan R, Kobal B, Sinkovec J, Salamun V. Laparoscopic rectal resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22:66–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hudelist G, English J, Thomas AE, Tinelli A, Singer CF, Keckstein J. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:257–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Scardapane A, Lorusso F, Bettocchi S, Moschetta M, Fiume M, Vimercati A, et al. Deep pelvic endometriosis: accuracy of pelvic MRI completed by MR colonography. Radiol Med. 2013;118:323–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. de Jong MJ, Mijatovic V, van Waesberghe JH, Cuesta MA, Hompes PG. Surgical outcome and long-term follow-up after segmental colorectal resection in women with a complete obstruction of the rectosigmoid due to endometriosis. Dig Surg. 2009;26:50–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ruffo G, Sartori A, Crippa S, Partelli S, Barugola G, Manzoni A, et al. Laparoscopic rectal resection for severe endometriosis of the mid and low rectum: technique and operative results. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1035–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Baden et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement