- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Bleeding “Dieulafoy’s-like” lesion resembling the duodenal papilla: a case report
Journal of Medical Case Reportsvolume 9, Article number: 118 (2015)
Dieulafoy’s lesion is an uncommon but important cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in which hemorrhage occurs from a pinpoint, non-ulcerated arterial lesion. DLs are usually located in the stomach, most commonly in people between the ages of 50 and 70 years. In this report, we describe a teenage patient with an unusual presentation of a bleeding duodenal Dieulafoy’s-like lesion that resembled the duodenal papilla.
An 18-year-old Pakistani woman presented to our emergency department with hematemesis of 6 hours’ duration. Her past medical history was unremarkable. A nasogastric aspirate was negative for blood. The patient’s hemoglobin was found to be 4g/dl. She was resuscitated with intravenous fluids and blood transfusion. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed, which revealed swelling in the first part of the duodenum, the initial appearance of which suggested that it was an abnormally placed or accessory papilla. There was a small, <3–mm opening on the lesion that resembled the biliary or pancreatic orifice. On gentle manipulation with a catheter, blood spurted from the swelling area, and a vessel was visible. Adrenaline was used for hemostasis. After hemostasis was achieved, it became clear that the lesion was most consistent with a Dieulafoy’s-like lesion and not a papilla. Band ligation was then performed, and the patient did not develop any complications and did not have any further episodes of bleeding. The patient was eventually discharged to home in stable condition.
This case report highlights the importance of considering a DL as a cause of small-bowel hemorrhage and recognizing its potential resemblance to the papilla. Although the endoscopic diagnostic criteria for a Dieulafoy’s lesion have been described in great detail, there is a paucity of literature describing a Dieulafoy’s lesion or a similar lesion resembling the duodenal papilla.
Dieulafoy’s lesion (DL) is an uncommon but important cause of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Although the great majority of DLs are located in the stomach within 6cm of the gastroesophageal junction, DLs in other parts of the GI tract are rare. DLs rarely are the cause of small-bowel hemorrhage. They are rarely seen in teenagers. In this report, we describe a teenage patient with an unusual presentation of a bleeding duodenal Dieulafoy’s-like lesion that resembled the duodenal papilla.
An 18-year-old Pakistani woman presented to our emergency department with hematemesis of 6 hours’ duration. She did not have any past medical history of GI bleeding, chronic liver disease, peptic ulcer disease or use of alcohol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. She was taking no medications prior to this presentation and denied use of any herbal or dietary supplements. Her family history was significant for hypertension in her father. Her family had no history of liver disease, colon cancer or any other GI malignancy. Her physical examination was significant for tachycardia and lethargy. Her pulse rate was 122 beats/min, and her blood pressure was 100/60mmHg. Her respiratory rate was 18 breaths/min, and her body temperature was 37.6°C. She had no abdominal pain or any stigmata of chronic liver disease. A nasogastric aspirate was negative for blood. Her laboratory values were as follows: hemoglobin, 4g/dl (normal range, 12.3 to 15.3g/dl); mean corpuscular volume, 77.2 fl (normal range, 80.0 to 96.0 fl); white blood cell count, 9000/mm3 (normal range, 4.8 to 10.8×104 mm3); platelets, 238,000/μl (normal range, 145,000 to 445,000/μl); urea, 26mg/dl (normal range, 5 to 22mg/dl); creatinine, 0.8mg/dl (normal range, 0.6 to 1.3mg/dl); serum sodium, 136mmol/L (normal range, 134 to 142mmol/L); serum potassium, 3.2mmol/L (normal range, 3.5 to 5.0mmol/L); total bilirubin, 0.6mg/dl (normal range, 0.2 to 1.2mg/dl); aspartate transaminase, 32IU/L (normal range, 5 to 34IU/L); alanine transaminase, 40IU/L (normal range, 5 to 55 IU/L); alkaline phosphatase, 87IU/L (normal range, 42 to 140IU/L); international normalized ratio, 0.9 (normal range, 0.9 to 1.1); and prothrombin time, 12.9 seconds (normal range, 11.8 to 14.3 seconds). She was resuscitated with intravenous fluids and 4U of packed red blood cells. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed, which revealed swelling in the first part of the duodenum (Figure 1). The initial appearance of the swelling suggested that it was an abnormally placed or accessory papilla. There was a small, <3-mm opening on the lesion that resembled the biliary or pancreatic orifice. On gentle manipulation with a catheter, blood spurted from the swelling area, and a vessel was visible (Figures 2 and 3). Adrenaline was used for hemostasis. After hemostasis was achieved, it became clear that the lesion was most consistent with a Dieulafoy’s-like lesion and not a papilla. Band ligation was then performed (Figure 4), and the patient did not develop any complications and did not have any further episodes of bleeding. The patient was eventually discharged to home in stable condition. The patient was followed up for 6 months and did not have any other episodes of GI bleeding.
DL is an uncommon but important cause of GI bleeding in which hemorrhage occurs from a pinpoint, non-ulcerated arterial lesion [1,2]. DLs have the greatest propensity to develop in the stomach, within 6cm of the gastro-esophageal junction .
A number of features make our patient’s Dieulafoy’s-like lesion presentation noteworthy. DLs rarely present as small-bowel hemorrhage [4,5]. DLs that resemble the papilla make endoscopic detection challenging, are uncommonly recognized in teenagers and are mostly commonly seen in patients between 50 and 70 years of age .
The endoscopic criteria for diagnosing DLs include any one of the following three abnormalities: (1) active arterial spurting or micropulsatile streaming from a mucosal defect <3mm or through normal surrounding mucosa; (2) visualization of a protruding vessel with or without bleeding, within a minute mucosal defect or through normal surrounding mucosa; and/or (3) the appearance of a fresh, densely adherent clot with a narrow point of attachment to a minute mucosal defect . Our patient met two of the three criteria for diagnosing a DL endoscopically. Specifically, she had a mucosal defect <3mm in size with active bleeding surrounding normal mucosa (Figure 1). Additionally, a vessel was visualized once bleeding started (Figure 2). Differential diagnostic possibilities considered included hemosuccus pancreaticus or hemobilia, if the lesion was an abnormally placed papilla. However, the patient did not develop jaundice or pancreatitis after band ligation of the lesion, thus making these entities less likely. One other differential diagnostic consideration would be bleeding from a submucosal tumor. However, endoscopic manipulation demonstrated a soft lesion inconsistent with a GI stromal tumor or carcinoid tumor. A bleeding submucosal lipoma was a possibility, as lipomas are soft; however, the lesion lacked the characteristic yellow hue seen in lipomas. As such, the endoscopic findings were most consistent with a lesion similar to a DL. The lesion was thus identified as a Dieulafoy’s-like lesion. In our patient, the appearance of the lesion mimicked an accessory or abnormally placed papilla. When considering therapy for such lesions, it is important to ensure that the lesion is not the actual papilla, because accidental band ligation of the papilla can lead to complications such as acute pancreatitis and obstructive jaundice.
Present-day options for treatment of DL include endoscopic therapy in the form of endoscopic clipping or dual therapy of four-quadrant diluted epinephrine injection (1:10,000) with thermal coaptive coagulation .
Although there is no consensus regarding treatment of DL, endoscopic treatment has evolved over the years as the first-line therapy for DL . Endoscopic treatment has been further classified into regional injections, mechanical therapy and thermal therapy .
Regional injection therapy consists mainly of local epinephrine injections and sclerotherapy. Studies have shown that use of epinephrine alone in management of DLs has a higher incidence of rebleeding . Widely used thermal therapies include argon plasma coagulation (APC), electrocoagulation and heat probe coagulation. In one single-center study, researchers reported that use of APC alone is an effective way of managing DLs and that there is less chance of rebleeding . Mechanical therapy consists of band ligation and hemostatic clips placement. Studies have shown mechanical therapy to be superior to injection therapy for managing DLs, with a significantly lower rebleeding rate with mechanical therapy . Several studies and case reports have shown band ligation to be an effective modality for treatment of DLs in different locations of the GI tract [13-15]. One randomized control trial showed no difference in the efficacy or safety of the use of band ligation versus hemoclip placement for management of bleeding DLs . Failed attempts at endoscopic therapy include interventional radiology bleed localization and embolization or, rarely, surgery with oversew techniques.
Although the endoscopic diagnostic criteria for DL have been described in great detail, there is a paucity of literature describing a DL resembling the duodenal papilla. This atypical presentation of a Dieulafoy’s-like lesion, especially in the duodenum, should be borne in mind by endoscopists when searching for a source of bleeding.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Argon plasma coagulation
Ding YJ, Zhao L, Liu J, Luo HS. Clinical and endoscopic analysis of gastric Dieulafoy’s lesion. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:631–5.
Eloubeidi MA, El Majzoub NW. Duodenal Dieulafoy’s lesion. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:e6.
Lee YT, Walmsley RS, Leong RW, Sung JJ. Dieulafoy’s lesion. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:236–43.
Ibrarullah M, Wagholikar GD. Dieulafoy’s lesion of duodenum: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol. 2003;3:2.
Goldenberg SP, DeLuca Jr VA, Marignani P. Endoscopic treatment of Dieulafoy’s lesion of the duodenum. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85:452–4.
Senger JL, Kanthan R. The evolution of Dieulafoy’s lesion since 1897: then and now—a journey through the lens of a pediatric lesion with literature review. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:432517.
Baxter M, Aly EH. Dieulafoy’s lesion: current trends in diagnosis and management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:548–54.
Park CH, Joo YE, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS, Kim SJ. A prospective, randomized trial of endoscopic band ligation versus endoscopic hemoclip placement for bleeding gastric Dieulafoy’s lesions. Endoscopy. 2004;36:677–81.
Jeon HK, Kim GH. Endoscopic Management of Dieulafoy’s lesion. Clin Endosc. 2015;48:112–20.
Norton ID, Petersen BT, Sorbi D, Balm RK, Alexander GL, Gostout CJ. Management and long-term prognosis of Dieulafoy lesion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:762–7.
Iacopini F, Petruzziello L, Marchese M, Larghi A, Spada C, Familiari P, et al. Hemostasis of Dieulafoy’s lesions by argon plasma coagulation (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:20–6.
Chung IK, Kim EJ, Lee MS, Kim HS, Park SH, Lee MH, et al. Bleeding Dieulafoy’s lesions and the choice of endoscopic method: comparing the hemostatic efficacy of mechanical and injection methods. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:721–4.
Nikolaidis N, Zezos P, Giouleme O, Budas K, Marakis G, Paroutoglou G, et al. Endoscopic band ligation of Dieulafoy-like lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 2001;33:754–60.
Ego M, Shimamura Y, Ishii N. Endoscopic band ligation with double-balloon endoscopy for treatment of jejunal Dieulafoy's lesion. Dig Endosc. 2015 Mar 21.
Ikeya T, Ishii N, Shimamura Y, Nakano K, Ego M, Nakamura K, et al. Endoscopic band ligation for bleeding lesions in the small bowel. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;6:488–92.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MB analyzed and interpreted the patient data and performed the detailed literature review in preparation of the report. AK and ST did major editing and formatting of the manuscript, along with providing expert opinion. HAK participated in the care of the patient and provided all patient-related data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.