Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Assessment of vascularized free fibula transplantation revealing a congenital aplastic posterior tibial artery: a case report

  • Takako Kanatani1Email author,
  • Issei Nagura1,
  • Ikuo Fujita2,
  • Takuya Fujimoto2 and
  • Masatoshi Sumi1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20148:75

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-75

Received: 22 July 2013

Accepted: 20 December 2013

Published: 26 February 2014

Abstract

Introduction

Anatomical abnormalities in the lower limb vessels are uncommon. However, the preoperative evaluation of the anatomical variations is very important for planning the operation procedure to prevent jeopardizing the donor leg.

Case presentation

In this case report, a 23-year-old Asian woman who was scheduled to have vascularized free fibula transplantation for reconstruction of her wrist after excision of bone tumor in her distal radius, was found to have congenital aplastic posterior tibial arteries in both legs. These findings were found on magnetic resonance angiography (our preferred methodology due to its simplicity). We planned testing the sufficiency of her pedal pulses after temporarily clamping her peroneal artery but prior to harvesting, to ensure minimal risk to the longevity of her donor leg. During the operation, after dissection of a 10cm segment of her fibula with the peroneal artery, the peroneal artery proximal to the graft was temporarily clamped and the tourniquet was released. As adequate sustainable pedal pulses were confirmed, the graft was harvested and transplanted to her wrist. There was no morbidity in her right leg postoperatively and the union of the grafted fibula was substantiated 10 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

We concluded two findings: firstly, for accurate preoperative planning of a vascularized free fibula procedure, examination of the bilateral lower leg vasculature either by angiography or other imaging should be performed. Secondly, abnormalities are not in themselves reason to abandon the vascularized free fibula procedure. We contend that pedal pulses should be evaluated preoperatively and provided that adequate foot circulation can be confirmed (by temporarily clamping the vessels and releasing the tourniquet during the operation prior to harvesting the free vascularized fibula) the procedure should be successful without jeopardizing the donor leg.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance angiography Peroneal artery Vascularized free fibula transplantation

Introduction

A vascularized free fibula transplantation is useful to reconstruct large segmental bone defects (>6cm) of the upper extremity [13]. An anatomical assessment of bilateral lower leg vasculature either by angiography or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is recommended prior to a vascularized free fibula procedure [47]. Although anatomical abnormalities in the lower limb vessels are uncommon, angiographic abnormalities have been reported at the rate of 3% to 25% [46, 8] in different situations. These showed variations of branching of the popliteal artery with only two or even one main artery supplying the foot with either the posterior tibial, the anterior tibial or both being hypoplastic-aplastic.

This report describes a successful vascularized free fibula transplantation to the wrist (reconstruction after the excision of bone tumor) in which the donor leg was not jeopardized, where a congenital aplastic posterior tibial artery (PTA) in the donor lower leg was detected.

Case presentation

A MRA of a 23-year-old Asian woman who was scheduled for a vascularized free fibula transplantation to reconstruct her left wrist after excision of a giant cell tumor in her distal radius (Figure 1A and B) showed a congenital aplastic PTA in her right lower leg (Figure 2). Her peroneal artery (PA) replaced the PTA at the medial malleolus and a similar finding was displayed in her left leg (Figure 2). In addition, her pedal pulses on her left foot were not palpable (due to previous knee trauma) making this fibula inappropriate as a donor section. In preoperative planning, a 10cm segment of bone graft was required for partial wrist fusion. It is generally recognized that a foot survives with anterior tibial artery only without PTA if the pedal pulses are maintained. Therefore we planned to confirm the pedal pulses before harvesting the graft to prevent jeopardizing her lower leg. We advised her of the risks involved and explained the precaution of testing the sufficiency of her pedal pulses after temporarily clamping her PA prior to harvesting, to ensure minimal risk to the longevity of her donor leg. If it was found that there was insufficient palpability of her pedal pulses then the procedure would be aborted.
Figure 1

The preoperative X-ray (A) and magnetic resonance imaging (B) at the first visit.

Figure 2

The magnetic resonance angiography findings of the aplastic posterior tibial arteries in both lower legs. The peroneal arteries replaced the posterior tibial arteries at the medial malleolus; right leg (left) and left leg (right).

During the operation, after dissection of a 10cm segment of her fibula with the PA, the PA proximal to the graft was temporarily clamped and the tourniquet was released. As adequate sustainable pedal pulses were confirmed, the graft was harvested and transplanted to her wrist (Figure 3). There was no morbidity in her right leg postoperatively and the union of the grafted fibula was substantiated 10 months postoperatively.
Figure 3

A 10cm segment of fibula bone graft was used for partial wrist fusion.

Discussion

Anatomical abnormalities in the lower limb vessels are uncommon. Strauch and Yu reported the anatomical variations of the PA and classified four different types [9]. According to their classification, our case is classified as Type D; the PA took the place of the PTA in 8% of all cases. However, Pototschnig et al. analyzed the intraoperative variations of the PA of 104 cases and classified four variations [10] in which there was no case that presented as “Type D” by Strauch et al. Angiographic abnormalities have been variously reported at the rate of 5.6% [4], 15.8% [5], 25% [6] and 3% [8] in different situations. These show variations of branching of the popliteal artery with only two or even one main artery supplying the foot with either the tibial posterior, the tibial anterior or both being hypoplastic-aplastic. Most reports recommend a routine preoperative anatomical assessment of bilateral lower leg vasculature either by angiography, by MRA or by ultrasonic Doppler flow meter before a vascularized free fibula or fibula flaps procedure [47, 9]. Young et al. altered the operation plan in all 25% of cases planned for fibula harvest where angiographic abnormalities were detected [6]. However, we consider preoperative angiographic abnormalities in themselves an insufficient reason to abandon the vascularized free fibula procedure. We note that Lutz et al. reported the possibility of a false positive angiography due to vascular spasms and they concluded that clinical evaluation of pedal pulses was superior to angiography as a diagnostic tool in these cases [8].

Regarding the choice of the operation procedure, wrist arthroplasty with an articular fibular head graft was an option. However, the long-term clinical and radiographic results of the partial wrist arthrodesis with fibula bone for giant cell tumors of the distal radius were superior to arthroplasty with an articular fibular head graft [11], where wrist arthroplasty presented palmar subluxation of the carpal bones and degenerative changes in all cases. Also, Chung et al. reported that half of their cases presented those changes during the long-term follow-up period [12]. We selected the partial wrist arthrodesis because of the patient’s age of 23 years.

Conclusions

Consequently we conclude two findings: firstly, that for accurate preoperative planning of a vascularized free fibula procedure, examination of the bilateral lower leg vasculature either by angiography or other imaging should be performed. We suggest MRA would be the preferred methodology due to its simplicity in providing the required data. Secondly, where abnormalities are detected, pedal pulses should be evaluated preoperatively. Then provided adequate foot circulation can be confirmed by temporarily clamping the vessels and releasing the tourniquet during the operation prior to harvesting the free vascularized fibula, the procedure should be successful.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

MRA: 

Magnetic resonance angiography

PA: 

Peroneal artery

PTA: 

Posterior tibial artery.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the contribution of Warren McPherson PhD for his grammatical assistance with English.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe Rosai Hospital
(2)
The Department of Orthopaedics of Hyogo Cancer Center

References

  1. Hollenbeck ST, Komatsu I, Woo S, Schoeman M, Yang J, Erdmann D, Levin LS: The current role of the vascularized-fibular osteocutaneous graft in the treatment of segmental defects of the upper extremity. Microsurgery. 2009, 31: 183-189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Levin LS: Vascularized fibula graft for the traumatically induced long-bone defect. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006, 14: S175-S176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arai K, Toh S, Tsubo K, Nishikawa S, Narita S, Miura H: Complications of vascularized fibula graft for reconstruction of long bones. Plast Reconstr. 2002, 109: 2301-2306. 10.1097/00006534-200206000-00021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim D, Orron DE, Skillman JJ: Surgical significance of popliteal arterial variants: a unified angiographic classification. Ann Surg. 1989, 210: 776-781. 10.1097/00000658-198912000-00014.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Seres L, Casaszar J, Voros E, Borbely L: Donor site angiography before mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap. J Craniofac Surg. 2001, 12: 608-613. 10.1097/00001665-200111000-00021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Young DM, Trabulsy PP, Anthony JP: The need for preoperative leg angiography in fibula free flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1994, 10: 283-287. 10.1055/s-2007-1006596.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Monaghan AM, Dover MS: Short communication assessment of free fibula flaps: a cautionary note. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002, 40: 258-259. 10.1054/bjom.2002.0780.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lutz BS, Wei FC, Ng S, Chen IH, Chen SH: Routine donor leg angiography before vascularized free fibula transplantation is not necessary: a prospective study in 120 clinical cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999, 103: 121-127. 10.1097/00006534-199901000-00019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Strauch B, Yu HL: Lower leg and knee: variations of the peroneal artery. Atlas of Microvascular Surgery. Edited by: Strauch B, Yu HL. 1993, New York: Thieme, 219-Google Scholar
  10. Pototschnig H, Schaff J, Kovacs L, Biemer E, Papadopulos NA: The free osteofasciocutaneous fibula flap: Clinical applications and surgical considerations. Injury. 2013, 44: 366-369. 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Minami A, Kato H, Iwasaki N: Vascularized fibular graft after excision of giant cell tumor of the distal radius: wrist arthroplasty versus partial wrist arthrodesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002, 110: 112-117. 10.1097/00006534-200207000-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chung DW, Han CS, Lee JH, Lee SG: Outcomes of wrist arthroplasty using a free vascularized fibular head graft for Enneking stage II giant cell tumors of distal radius. Microsurgery. 2013, 33: 112-118. 10.1002/micr.22028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kanatani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.