Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Monostotic fibrous dysplasia in the proximal tibial epiphysis: a case report

  • Ji-Yong Gwark1,
  • Jin-Hoon Jeong1,
  • Sun-Chul Hwang1,
  • Dae-Cheol Nam1,
  • Jeong-Hee Lee2,
  • Jae-Boem Na3 and
  • Dong-Hee Kim1Email author
Journal of Medical Case Reports20148:452

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-452

Received: 21 June 2014

Accepted: 10 November 2014

Published: 20 December 2014

Abstract

Introduction

Fibrous dysplasia is one of many well-known disorders in which there is a defect in the remodeling process of immature bone to mature into lamellar bone, and it often exists in metaphyseal and diaphyseal parts of the long bone. In this report, we describe a rare case where fibrous dysplasia was found only in the proximal part of the epiphysis of the tibia without other bony lesions.

Case presentation

A 14-year-old Asian girl was referred to our hospital after slipping down with pain on the left knee. A radiograph showed an abnormal finding of a central radiolucent lesion with a marginal sclerotic border near the proximal tibial spine. A magnetic resonance image showed the lesion at low signal intensity on a T1-weighted image and at high signal intensity on a T2-weighted image. The biopsy results led us to conclude that the lesion was a fibrous dysplasia.

Conclusion

If an abnormal lesion on the epiphysis, especially in long bones, is detected on a radiograph, several differential diagnoses can be made. Although fibrous dysplasia is usually not encountered as an epiphyseal lesion, it is important to incorporate all the clinical, radiographic and pathologic features to diagnose monostotic fibrous dysplasia when the lesion is located at the epiphyseal location.

Keywords

Bone tumor Epiphysis Fibrous dysplasia

Introduction

The term fibrous dysplasia (FD) was coined by Lichtenstein in 1938 to describe a subset of benign bone tumors manifesting in childhood or early adult life. FD has a tendency of predominantly unilateral involvement and a prolonged clinical course characterized by pain, deformity and pathologic fracture of the affected bones[1]. FD can be manifested as a single lesion (monostotic) or as multiple lesions (oligostotic or polyostotic). According to Ippolito and colleagues, in monostotic FD, the most commonly appearing site is on the femur. Tibia, humerus, rib, clavicle and craniofacial skeleton are the next in order of frequency[2]. McCune-Albright syndrome is known as a combined condition consisting of polyostotic bone involvement, precocious puberty, hyperthyroidism and café au lait cutaneous macules[3, 4]. Mazabraud syndrome is associated with single or multiple intramuscular myxomas in monostotic or polyostotic form[5]. In this report, we describe a very rare case of a patient with monostotic FD involved solely in the epiphysis of proximal tibia.

Case presentation

A 14-year-old Asian girl visited our hospital with radiographs taken 2 months earlier at a local clinic she attended for the evaluation of knee pain after slipping down. She had experienced no antecedent pain before slipping down, and the lesion was fortuitously found on radiographs. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained. They showed a 1.5×2.0×2.0cm epiphyseal tumor in the proximal tibia. The matrix of the lesion had a clear, ground glass appearance, and the border showed well-defined marginal sclerosis. There was neither cortical disruption nor periosteal reaction. Computed tomography showed a sclerotic margin around the lesion, suggestive of a benign tumor (Figure 1). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) presented low signal intensity on a T1-weighted scan and high signal intensity on a fat-suppressed T2-weighted image, and homogeneous enhancement by gadolinium was seen in the lesion. On a technetium bone scintigraph, we detected focal, round, increased uptake only in left proximal tibia; otherwise, the image was unremarkable (Figure 2). There was no endocrinological abnormality such as precocious puberty, an absence of abnormal skin pigmentation and no specific family history. All the laboratory test results were within a normal range, except the aminotransferase level.On the basis of the clinical and radiological findings, a benign bone tumor of a slow-growing nature, chondroblastoma, was suspected at first. Excisional biopsy, curettage and filling with demineralized bone matrix followed by 2.5mm screw fixation were performed. Histologic analysis of hematoxylin and eosin–stained specimens showed irregularly shaped spicules of immature bone without osteoblastic rimming and fibrous stroma without any mitotic activity. Radiographs taken 2 years after surgery demonstrated bone formation at the lesion, and the patient was able to squat and run freely without any pain (Figure 3).
Figure 1

Plain radiographic images and computed tomograhic scan. (A) Anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) radiographs show the proximal tibial epiphyseal osteolytic lesion with marginal sclerosis and a matrix with a ground glass appearance and without periosteal reaction. (B) Coronal (left) and sagittal (right) computed tomographic scans show the absence of cartilage matrix and dense marginal sclerosis without cortical disruption.

Figure 2

Magnetic resonance imaging and scintigraphic images. Magnetic resonance imaging scans show no peripheral bone edema and no fluid-fluid level. (A) T1-wieghted coronal magnetic resonance image (echo time/repetition time, 12/566ms) shows hypointensity of a proximal tibial lesion. (B) T2-weighted image (echo time/repetition time, 50/3660ms) shows hyperintensity. (C) Enhanced image (echo time/repetition time, 12/584ms) shows homogeneous enhancement. (D) Whole-body bone scan shows increased focal uptake only at the proximal epiphysis of the left tibia.

Figure 3

Histopathologic findings and post-operative radiographs. (A) Bone tissue is replaced by loose fibrous tissue with irregular spicules of immature bone (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification, ×100). (B) The immature bone is formed from fibrous stroma without osteoblasts rimming (original magnification, ×400). (C) Simple radiographs obtained 2 years after surgery show bone formation with well-sustained screw fixation.

Discussion

FD is considered a common, benign skeletal disorder. Nixon and colleagues reported polyostotic cases and suggested that fibro-osseous aberration initially occurred in the epiphyseal growth plate with occasional extension into the epiphysis and metaphysis bidirectionally[6]. The mutation at the Gsα gene after fertilization of somatic cells at chromosome 20q13.2-13.3 is regarded as the etiologic cause of FD. This mutation activates a cascade of the enzymatic reactions and results in incomplete differentiation of marrow stromal cells into abnormal osteoblasts[7]. Developmental failures in the process of primitive bone remodeling to mature into lamellar bone or failures in realignment due to mechanical stress are considered the pathophysiologic causes of the pain, deformity and pathologic factures[8].

Single-bone lesions of monostotic presentation without any other disturbance are the most common forms of FD, and monostotic FDs are known to enlarge in proportion to skeletal growth[9]. Polyostotic forms are less common and often continue to enlarge after complete skeletal maturation. This feature can cause progressive deformity and increased prevalence of pathologic fractures in polyostotic FD[8]. The most common skeletal deformity in FD is a discrepancy between the lengths of bilateral limbs, referred to as shepherd’s crook deformity of the proximal part of the femur[10].

Clinically, several imaging modalities are used routinely. In simple radiographs, FD presents as a well-marginated peripheral sclerotic bone lesion with a variety of patterns, which may be lucent, sclerotic or mixed or may have a ground glass appearance, depending on the amount of bone trabeculae, fibrous elements and calcification. Endosteal scalloping and focal cortical thinning may be present without cortical disruption or periosteal reaction[1012]. Computed tomography, which is often not required, accurately delineates the extent of skeletal involvement and may be useful in evaluating craniofacial FD or lesions suspected to be sarcomatous transformations[12]. MRI can be used to differentiate low-grade central osteosarcomas when the radiographic features suggest FD[11]. In a pictorial review by Saha and co-workers, most of the FD was largely isointense with skeletal muscle on T1-weighted images. On T2-wieghted images, lesions are typically heterogeneously hyperintense with hypointense, isointense or markedly hyperintense areas within the lesion. In an enhanced MRI scan, FD may have patchy central enhancement, rim enhancement, homogeneous enhancement or any combination of these presentations. On both T1- and T2-weighted images, an outer hypointense rim is typically seen, and it corresponds with the sclerotic rim seen on radiographs[13]. During scintigraphic studies, FD typically exhibits markedly increased radionuclide accumulation in both early perfusion and delayed bone imaging. Even at low specificity, increased uptake in a delayed view is sensitive for early detection and assessment of the extent of involvement[14]. On the basis of radiographs, MRI scan and bone scan findings in our patient, chondroblastoma was considered the final diagnosis, not FD.

The histopathologic hallmark of the FD is fibrous tissue and immature, spindle-shaped, fibroblast-like cells within the bone marrow, and these fibrous tissues expand from the medullary cavity to the cortical bone. The strangely shaped trabeculae have been likened to "alphabet soup" or "Chinese characters." In our histologic results, immature bone filled with fibrous blastoma was found, and osteoblastic reaming was hardly seen. FD, which was not diagnosed pre-operatively, was our confirmatory diagnosis of our patient.

Chondroblastomas, subchondral cysts, infection-like Brodie abscesses and low-grade intramedullary central osteosarcomas can also occur in the epiphysis. Bone cysts may have more radiolucent lesions with thinner borders of lamellar bone and may show straw-colored fluid when aspirated. Chondroblastomas can be seen as subtle cartilaginous matrix on radiographs. They can present as marrow edema and joint effusion on MRI scans. Brodie abscesses can be displayed as serpiginous changes on radiographs and as the penumbra sign on MRI scans. Low-grade intramedullary central osteosarcoma is rare, but should be differentiated and may show the permeative border with a lack of a reactive shell, denser mineralization and more aggressive changes over time. Chondroblastomas, clear cell chondrosarcomas and Brodie abscesses are commonly painful[8, 15]. Our patient was completely asymptomatic prior to her slip and fall. In retrospect, if a computed tomography–guided biopsy or a simple bone biopsy had been performed prior to surgery, it might have prevented us from performing the extra operation.

Conclusions

It is important to incorporate all the clinical, radiographic and pathologic features to diagnose monostotic FD, despite its unusual location in bone.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian(s) for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Hong-gun Yoon (MD at our orthopedic department), who contributed to the study by acquiring data and was involved in drafting the manuscript.

This work was supported by the fund of Research Promotion Program of Gyeongsang National University Hospital in 2013, Republic of Korea.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Hospital
(2)
Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Hospital
(3)
Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Hospital

References

  1. Lichtenstein L: Polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. Arch Surg. 1938, 36: 874-898. 10.1001/archsurg.1938.01190230153012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ippolito E, Bray EW, Corsi A, De Maio F, Exner UG, Robey PG, Grill F, Lala R, Massobrio M, Pinggera O, Riminucci M, Snela S, Zambakidis C, Bianco P: Natural history and treatment of fibrous dysplasia of bone: a multicenter clinicopathologic study promoted by the European Pediatric Orthopaedic Society. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003, 12: 155-177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. McCune DJ, Bruch H: Osteodystrophia fibrosa: report of a case in which the condition was combined with precocious puberty, pathologic pigmentation of the skin, and hyperthyroidism, with a review of the literature. Am J Dis Child. 1937, 52: 806-848.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Albright F, Butler AM, Hampton AO, Smith P: Syndrome characterized by osteitis fibrosa disseminata, areas of pigmentation and endocrine dysfunction, with precocious puberty in females. N Engl J Med. 1937, 216: 727-746. 10.1056/NEJM193704292161701.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mazabraud A, Semat P, Roze R: [Report of the association of fibromyxomas of the soft tissues with fibrous dysplasia of the bones] [Article in French]. Presse Med. 1967, 75: 2223-2228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nixon GW, Condon VR: Epiphyseal involvement in polyostotic fibrous dysplasia: a report of two cases. Radiology. 1973, 106: 167-170. 10.1148/106.1.167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Weinstein LS, Shenker A, Gejman PV, Merino MJ, Friedman E, Spiegel AM: Activating mutations of the stimulatory G protein in the McCune-Albright syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991, 325: 1688-1695. 10.1056/NEJM199112123252403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DiCaprio MR, Enneking WF: Fibrous dysplasia: pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005, 87: 1848-1864. 10.2106/JBJS.D.02942.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Henry A: Monostotic fibrous dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969, 51: 300-306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris WH, Dudley HR, Barry RJ: The natural history of fibrous dysplasia: an orthopaedic, pathological, and roentgenographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962, 44: 207-233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sundaram M: Imaging of Paget’s disease and fibrous dysplasia of bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2006, 21 (Suppl 2): 28-P30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kransdorf MJ, Moser RP, Gilkey FW: Fibrous dysplasia. Radiographics. 1990, 10: 519-537. 10.1148/radiographics.10.3.2188311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shah ZK, Peh WC, Koh WL, Shek TW: Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of fibrous dysplasia. Br J Radiol. 2005, 78: 1104-1115. 10.1259/bjr/73852511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Leet AI, Magur E, Lee JS, Wientroub S, Robey PG, Collins MT: Fibrous dysplasia in the spine: prevalence of lesions and association with scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86: 531-537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Huvos AG, Higinbotham NL, Miller TR: Bone sarcomas arising in fibrous dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972, 54: 1047-1056.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gwark et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement