Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Heterogeneous bone marrow uptake on interim 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for lymphoma mimicking disease progression: a case report

Journal of Medical Case Reports20148:362

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-362

Received: 26 May 2014

Accepted: 1 September 2014

Published: 7 November 2014

Abstract

Introduction

The use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) scanning for baseline staging and assessment of treatment response for higher grade lymphomas is considered to be the standard of care. Evaluation of lymphomatous bone marrow infiltration on 18F-FDG PET can usually distinguish between normal regenerating marrow following chemotherapy by a characteristic pattern of uptake.

Case presentation

Here we report the case of a 51-year-old Caucasian woman with mixed low- and high-grade lymphoma with biopsy confirmed marrow infiltration. An interim post-three cycle chemotherapy 18F-FDG PET scan revealed apparent progression of marrow disease. Subsequent investigations were performed including bone marrow biopsies, repeat 18F-FDG PET scanning and a white cell scan. These revealed the interim 18F-FDG PET scan appearance was due to a highly unusual pattern of scattered islands of regenerating normal marrow, rather than progressive lymphoma.

Conclusions

Our case report highlights that apparent severe bone marrow abnormalities on 18F-FDG PET scans in lymphoma patients treated with chemotherapy are not always due to disease. Clinicians should retain a high index of suspicion for benign causes when 18F-FDG PET scan results appear incongruent with clinical response.

Keywords

LymphomaFDGPETChemotherapyResponseFalsePositiveGranulocyte colony stimulating factorPegfilgrastim

Introduction

The use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) scanning for baseline staging and assessment of treatment response for higher grade lymphomas is considered standard of care [1, 2], and in many institutions has replaced diagnostic computed tomography (CT) as the imaging modality of choice for this condition. There is overwhelming evidence in the literature demonstrating the powerful prognostic utility of 18F-FDG PET with higher grade lymphoma patients who have a persistently positive interim mid-treatment (post-two or three cycles of chemotherapy) PET scan for disease having a significantly worse prognosis compared to those who achieve complete metabolic remission [35]. As a result, many clinical trials are currently being conducted to evaluate whether a change or intensification in therapy, such as stem cell transplantation in patients with a positive interim PET scan, confers survival benefit [68].

Although spurious results can occur due to cellular uptake of 18F-FDG not being specific to lymphoma or malignancy, a false positive finding on interim PET scanning is generally low and in equivocal cases can often be resolved with tissue sampling and histological correlation.

18F-FDG PET scanning is quite sensitive for detecting bone marrow involvement in higher grade lymphomas and is typically associated with a heterogeneous pattern of increased marrow activity within the skeleton [9, 10]. In contrast, physiologic reactive marrow, which is often seen following blood loss, sepsis or shortly after chemotherapy, is usually depicted by diffuse relatively uniform increased FDG uptake throughout the axial and proximal appendicular skeleton [11].

Case presentation

In February 2013, a 51-year-old Caucasian woman presented with a several month history of back pain, hot flushes, sweats and weight loss. A subsequent CT scan demonstrated multiple enlarged cervical nodes, as well as confluent paravertebral soft tissue masses in the region of the thoracic spine and anterior to L5 to the presacral region. A CT-guided core biopsy of the presacral mass was performed and histology confirmed low grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma based on immunostaining results.

Further staging included a whole body 18F-FDG PET scan which demonstrated moderate to markedly FDG-avid right upper and bilateral lower thoracic para-spinal, lower lumbar para-spinal and presacral soft tissue masses with extension into several right lower lumbar and sacral neural foramen. Heterogeneous increased FDG uptake was also seen in a right external iliac node and throughout the skeleton, most marked and intense in the trochanteric region of the right femur and right ilium, consistent with marrow infiltration (Figure 1A). A bone marrow aspirate and trephine of the right ilium at a site of increased FDG uptake on the PET scan confirmed a marrow packed with lymphoma, with a combination of small and larger cells, the latter of which were CD20 positive. Due to sacral and lumbar neural foramen invasion, CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans along with a lumbar puncture were performed to exclude leptomeningeal disease. These were found to be negative.
Figure 1

Three-dimensional maximal intensity projection 18 F-fluorodexoyglucose positron emission tomography scan images. Baseline prior to treatment (A), after three cycles of chemotherapy (B) and at completion of six cycles of chemotherapy (C).

Despite the presacral mass core biopsy demonstrating low grade B-cell small lymphocytic lymphoma, clinical symptoms, bone marrow biopsy and 18F-FDG PET scan findings were suggestive of concomitant higher grade lymphoma. She was thus considered likely to have follicular B-cell lymphoma with high-grade transformation and treatment comprised of six cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone and rituximab (CHOP-R) chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support every three weeks. This was followed by two cycles of high-dose methotrexate due to the perceived higher risk for central nervous system disease from direct neural foramen invasion.

The first three cycles of CHOP-R chemotherapy were well-tolerated without significant complication apart from persistent low-grade lower back pain. An interim mid-treatment 18F-FDG PET scan to assess treatment response was performed at this point which demonstrated resolution of FDG-avid right upper and bilateral lower thoracic para-spinal, lower lumbar para-spinal and pre-sacral soft tissue masses and right external iliac node (Figure 1B). FDG uptake in the trochanteric region of the right femur and right ilium had also decreased, however, new heterogeneous intense FDG uptake was demonstrated throughout most of the axial and proximal appendicular skeleton, sternum and numerous ribs. Some of this corresponded with mixed lytic and sclerotic lesions on the fusion low-dose CT scan performed at the time of the 18F-FDG PET scan which was highly suggestive of widespread high-grade lymphoma progression within the marrow (Figures 1B and 2B).
Figure 2

Midline sagittal positron emission tomography scan images highlighting pattern of 18 F-fluorodexoyglucose uptake in bone marrow of the spine. Baseline prior to treatment (A), after three cycles of chemotherapy (B) and at completion of six cycles of chemotherapy (C).

A right posterior superior iliac spine bone marrow biopsy was thus performed with a view to intensifying chemotherapy if persistent lymphoma was confirmed within the marrow. This was performed at a site previously positive for marrow involvement on the pretreatment PET scan, and demonstrated a moderately hypocellular marrow with some clusters of B-cells, which may have been regenerative in nature. No convincing evidence of residual lymphoma was seen. Given the suspicious PET scan findings and potential patchy nature of disease, a repeat bone marrow biopsy was performed from the left posterior superior iliac spine, which again demonstrated no evidence of lymphoma and normal moderately hypercellular tri-lineage hemopoiesis.

As residual lymphoma was not confirmed on both bone marrow biopsies, treatment was not changed and she completed a further three cycles of CHOP-R chemotherapy, at which point another 18F-FDG PET scan was performed (Figures 1C and 2C). This scan again demonstrated a similar heterogeneous pattern of increased FDG uptake throughout the marrow of the skeleton in a similar distribution to the post third cycle interim PET scan however, overall intensity of uptake had decreased significantly and was not typical for disease progression.Due to the apparent improvement in PET scan appearances, a whole body radiolabelled white cell scan was performed to evaluate normal skeletal bone marrow activity. This demonstrated areas of normal marrow activity throughout the skeleton in a similar highly heterogeneous distribution to the interim and post-six cycle PET/CT scans. This suggested that the apparent ‘abnormal’ bone marrow appearance on the interim and, to a lesser extent, post-six cycle chemotherapy PET scans actually represented FDG uptake in scattered residual islands of regenerating and pegfilgrastim-stimulated normal bone marrow, rather than sites of progressive lymphoma (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Comparison of 18 F-fluorodexoyglucose positron emission tomography scan uptake in spine with sites of normal bone marrow activity on whole body white cell scan post six cycles of chemotherapy. White cell scan anterior planar view (A), White cell scan posterior planar view (C) three-dimensional maximal intensity projection (MIP) 18F-FDG PET scan images (B). The overall pattern of FDG uptake on PET scan is similar to the white cell scan uptake in keeping with sites of normal regenerating marrow rather than lymphoma. Arrows highlight similarities in FDG and white cell uptake in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Our patient has remained in clinical remission for three months since the post-six cycle chemotherapy PET scan, and continues to receive three-monthly rituximab maintenance therapy for the presumed lower grade lymphoma component of her disease.

The baseline, interim and completion PET scans were all performed on the same Phillips GEMINI PET/CT camera (Phillips Healthcare, Massachusetts, United States). The range of 18F-FDG dose and uptake time for the three PET/CT scans were 307 to 319 MBq and 60 to 65 minutes, respectively, suggesting differences between PET scan appearances were true changes and not due to variability in the acquisition technique.

Discussion

This case highlights assessment of treatment response in bone marrow on PET scanning can be confounded in cases where the lymphoma has caused significant disruption to normal marrow architecture, resulting in islands of normal residual rapidly regenerating marrow giving a ‘pathological’ appearance. In this circumstance a further bone marrow scan, in this case a white cell scan, is useful in discriminating between bone marrow regeneration and progressive disease by the degree of its congruence with the FDG PET study.

Our case is unusual as the focal increased marrow and bony FDG uptake in the trochanteric region of the right femur and right ilium was consistent with disease involvement on the baseline pretreatment PET scan. FDG uptake in the remainder of the skeleton appeared relatively normal despite mixed lytic and sclerotic lesions scattered throughout the skeleton on CT. The lack of FDG-avidity at these sites suggested an underlying lower grade lymphoma, with the more FDG-avid sites representing sites of transformed higher grade disease. The interim post-three cycle chemotherapy PET scan was most concerning for a mixed response to therapy, with the new highly heterogeneous appearance in the marrow being suspicious for disease progression despite metabolic resolution of the femoral and ilial bone lesions and sites of nodal disease.

The typical normal reactive marrow appearance seen following chemotherapy is that of diffusely increased relatively uniform FDG uptake throughout the marrow [11]. In patients with malignant marrow infiltration or bone involvement, successfully treated areas usually appear photopenic or inactive on follow-up PET scans. This can result in a heterogeneous appearance where sites of successfully treated lymphoma which appear photopenic are interspersed with islands of more FDG-avid regenerating normal marrow. This ‘flip-flop’ phenomenon on PET scan has been previously described in cases of high-grade lymphoma [12, 13]. In most cases of lymphomatous involvement of bone or bone marrow, the heterogeneous appearance on post-therapy PET scans can usually be reconciled from being malignant in nature by carefully comparing pre- and post-treatment PET scan appearances [14].

As our patient likely has mixed low- and high-grade lymphoma, the interim and post-therapy PET/CT scan appearances possibly represent a partial flip-flop variant, with photopenic sites representing either sites of successfully treated disease or non FDG-avid less chemotherapy responsive lower grade lymphoma.

A further likely contributing factor in this case is the timing of PET scanning post-pegfilgrastim administration. The post-three cycle interim PET scan was performed four days following pegfilgrastim administration. At this time point, pegfilgrastim was likely having its maximal stimulatory effect on granulopoiesis, resulting in any residual islands of normal bone marrow appearing particularly FDG-avid, further mimicking disease progression in the marrow [15, 16]. In contrast, the post-six cycle chemotherapy PET scan was performed 17 days following pegfilgrastim administration, a time point where pegfilgrastim effects would have subsided resulting in any residual islands of normal bone marrow appearing less FDG-avid. The findings of this post-six cycle PET study showed strong concordance with the subsequently performed white cell scan, with the distribution and intensity marrow lesions now being essentially equivalent.

Conclusions

Apparent new focal bone marrow abnormalities on PET scans in lymphoma patients treated with chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim are not always due to progressive disease. Clinicians should retain a high index of suspicion for benign causes, particularly if PET results show metabolic remission of soft tissue and/or nodal disease. In such cases, an additional bone marrow scan, such as a white cell scan or a Tc-99m sulphur colloid scan [17], may be useful in differentiating benign regenerating marrow from true disease progression.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

18F-FDG PET: 

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

CT: 

Computed Tomography

Tc-99m WCC: 

Technetium-99m labelled white cell scan.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Alfred Hospital
(2)
Department of Hematology, The Alfred Hospital
(3)
Department of Medicine, Monash University Melbourne, Central Clinical School Alfred Hospital

References

  1. Baba S, Abe K, Isoda T, Maruoka Y, Sasaki M, Honda H: Impact of FDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2011, 25: 701-716. 10.1007/s12149-011-0549-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dunleavy K, Mikhaeel G, Sehn LH, Hicks RJ, Wilson WH: The value of positron emission tomography in prognosis and response assessment in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010, 51 (Suppl 1): 28-33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Pedersen LM, Buhl T, Jurlander J, Buus S, Keiding S, D'Amore F, Boesen AM, Berthelsen AK, Specht L: FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2006, 107: 52-59. 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ, Leonard JP, Christos P, Furman RR, Atasever T, Chandramouly A, Verma S, Kothari P, Coleman M: FDG-PET after 1 cycle of therapy predicts outcome in diffuse large cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin disease. Cancer. 2006, 107: 2678-2687. 10.1002/cncr.22276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Yang DH, Min JJ, Song HC, Jeong YY, Chung WK, Bae SY, Ahn JS, Kim YK, Bom HS, Chung IJ, Kim HJ, Lee JJ: Prognostic significance of interim (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT after three or four cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Cancer. 2011, 47: 1312-1318. 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.12.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kasamon YL, Wahl RL, Ziessman HA, Blackford AL, Goodman SN, Fidyk CA, Rogers KM, Bolanos-Meade J, Borowitz MJ, Ambinder RF, Jones RJ, Swinnen LJ: Phase II study of risk-adapted therapy of newly diagnosed, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma based on midtreatment FDG-PET scanning. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009, 15: 242-248. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.11.026.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kasamon YL, Wahl RL: FDG PET and risk-adapted therapy in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008, 20: 206-219. 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3282f5123d.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Stewart DA, Kloiber R, Owen C, Bahlis NJ, Duggan P, Mansoor A, Bence-Bruckler I: Results of a prospective phase II trial evaluating interim positron emission tomography-guided high dose therapy for poor prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014, 55: 2064-2070. 10.3109/10428194.2013.862242.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Avigdor A: Staging DLBCL: bone marrow biopsy or PET-CT?. Blood. 2013, 122: 4-5. 10.1182/blood-2013-05-502575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berthet L, Cochet A, Kanoun S, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Humbert O, Toubeau M, Dygai-Cochet I, Legouge C, Casasnovas O, Brunotte F: In newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, determination of bone marrow involvement with 18F-FDG PET/CT provides better diagnostic performance and prognostic stratification than does biopsy. J Nucl Med. 2013, 54: 1244-1250. 10.2967/jnumed.112.114710.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tang B, Patel MM, Wong RH, Wood D, Wong CO, Wu D, Khong PL, Wong CY: Revisiting the marrow metabolic changes after chemotherapy in lymphoma: a step towards personalized care. Int J Mol Imag. 2011, 2011: 942063-Google Scholar
  12. Lin EC: FDG PET/CT flip flop phenomenon in treated lymphoma of bone. Clin Nucl Med. 2006, 31: 803-805. 10.1097/01.rlu.0000246858.03018.0c.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Barrington S: Atlas of Clinical Positron Emission Tomography. 2013, United States of America: CRC Press, 2Google Scholar
  14. Hong J, Lee Y, Park Y, Kim SG, Hwang KH, Park SH, Jeong J, Kim KH, Ahn JY, Park S, Park J, Lee JH: Role of FDG-PET/CT in detecting lymphomatous bone marrow involvement in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ann Hematol. 2012, 91: 687-695. 10.1007/s00277-011-1353-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez-Barca E, Canales M, Cortes M, Vidal MJ, Salar A, Oriol A, Bargay J, Bello JL, Sanchez JJ, Tomas JF, Donato E, Ferrer S, Caballero D: Predictive value of interim (1)(8)F-FDG-PET/CT for event-free survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma homogenously treated in a phase II trial with six cycles of R-CHOP-14 plus pegfilgrastim as first-line treatment. Nucl Med Commun. 2013, 34: 946-952. 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328363c695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacene HA, Ishimori T, Engles JM, Leboulleux S, Stearns V, Wahl RL: Effects of pegfilgrastim on normal biodistribution of 18F-FDG: preclinical and clinical studies. J Nucl Med. 2006, 47: 950-956.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Agool A, Glaudemans AW, Boersma HH, Dierckx RA, Vellenga E, Slart RH: Radionuclide imaging of bone marrow disorders. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011, 38: 166-178. 10.1007/s00259-010-1531-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cherk et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement