Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Heart failure monitoring with a cardiac resynchronization therapy device-based cardiac contractility sensor: a case series

Journal of Medical Case Reports20148:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-27

Received: 1 July 2013

Accepted: 20 November 2013

Published: 27 January 2014

Abstract

Introduction

The SonR signal has been shown to reflect cardiac contractility. It is recorded with an atrial lead connected to a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator. For the first time, clinical evidence on the use of the SonR signal in the monitoring of the clinical status of heart failure patients implanted with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator are presented through three clinical cases.

Case presentation

In the two first patients (non-Hispanic/Latino white), the SonR amplitude increases concomitantly to clinical status improvement subsequent to cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator implantation. In the third patient (non-Hispanic/Latino white), a decrease in SonR amplitude is observed concomitantly to atrial fibrillation and clinical status deterioration.

Conclusions

This case series reports the association between SonR signal amplitude changes and patients’ clinical status. Combined with remote monitoring, early SonR signal amplitude remote monitoring could be a promising tool for heart failure patients’ management.

Keywords

Heart failure Monitoring Cardiac resynchronization therapy Peak endocardial acceleration SonR Sensor

Introduction

The peak endocardial acceleration signal, or SonR signal has been shown to correlate with the first heart sound [1], supporting the hypothesis that the SonR signal amplitude correlates with left ventricular (LV) dP/dtmax, a measure of the contractile function of the heart [25] and may be a useful tool to monitor cardiac function. In order to further assess this hypothesis, we evaluated the association between SonR signal amplitude and patients’ clinical status through the three following case reports.

The hemodynamic SonR sensor (SonR™ sensor, Sorin CRM, Clamart, France) is a micro-accelerometer encapsulated in a hermetic can inside the tip of an atrial pacing lead (SonR™ sensor, Sorin CRM, Clamart, France). The SonR signal is monitored and computerized by the embedded SonR algorithm through an implantable system consisting of an atrial pacing lead (SonRTip™ lead, Sorin CRM, Clamart, France) connected to a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device. Additionally, SonR allows automatic weekly atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays optimization in heart failure (HF) CRT-D patients, at rest and exercise [69].

The three following clinical cases report information on recipients of Paradym RF™ SonR CRT-D (Sorin CRM SAS, Clamart, France), implanted for HF with either ischemic (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

Case presentation

The first patient is a 70-year-old man (non-Hispanic/Latino white) with an ICM. Two myocardial infarctions occurred in 1986 and 1997, followed by a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 1997. He was resuscitated from a cardiac arrest related to graft occlusion in 2003. A first single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted in 2006 (MADIT II indication). In 2012, the patient became severely symptomatic (New-York Heart Association (NYHA) class III) with a left bundle branch block (LBBB) and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 26%. Therefore, the single chamber ICD was upgraded to the CRT-D device. Within three weeks, the AV and VV delays were automatically adjusted by the device on a weekly basis; the patient became asymptomatic while the SonR signal amplitude increased (Figure 1). No concomitant therapy changes occurred during this period.
Figure 1

Case no. 1 - SonR signal amplitude with early improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device implantation.

The second patient is a 65-year-old woman (non-Hispanic/Latino white) who presented with a DCM related to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (left-side breast cancer treated in 2007). She was in NYHA class II/III, with a LVEF of 35% and a LBBB. The patient was implanted with the CRT-D device from the right thoracic side in November 2011. However, the first attempt of LV lead implantation was unsuccessful and ventricular pacing was prevented until the second attempt, which succeeded in February 2012. Subsequently, the patient progressively improved (NYHA class I on September 2012). Figure 2 shows the SonR signal amplitude evolution during these two periods (before and after LV lead implantation): the amplitude increased while the patient’s status improved after the successful LV lead implantation.
Figure 2

Case no. 2 - SonR signal amplitude evolution before and after cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator pacing.

A third 74-year-old man (non-Hispanic/Latino white) underwent CABG in 1993. In 2005, he experienced atrial fibrillation (AF) which resulted in HF. After treatment with amiodarone, sinus rhythm (SR) was restored and the patient became asymptomatic with a LVEF of 12% and LBBB. In 2005, the patient was implanted with a prophylactic single chamber ICD. In 2012, the patient became severely symptomatic (NYHA class III) with LBBB and a LVEF of 20%. Based on this evolution, the patient was upgraded with the CRT-D device, in May. During an outpatient visit on July 17, an electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed AF. The device diagnosis showed that AF started on July 16 with a mode switch to VVI 80bpm. Both ventricles were only captured 90% of the time. On July 26, the patient was hospitalized for HF and his HF treatment was modified. On September 9, the patient was in NYHA class I and his SR was restored by electrical cardioversion on October 10. No therapy changes occurred during this period. Figure 3 shows the decrease of the SonR signal amplitude that started concomitantly to AF and remained low as long as AF lasted. Following sinus rhythm restoration on October 10, the SonR signal amplitude started to increase, reaching its initial value after the persistence of the sinus rhythm.
Figure 3

Case no. 3 - SonR signal amplitude evolution in the presence of atrial fibrillation and partial loss of biventricular capture.

Therefore, an association between the SonR signal amplitude change and patients’ clinical status based on NYHA was observed in these three clinical cases.

Discussion

This report is the first to describe SonR signal amplitude changes according to patients’ clinical status. In the two first patients, the SonR amplitude increases concomitantly to clinical status improvement after CRT-D implantation. In the third patient, a decrease in SonR amplitude is observed concomitantly to an atrial fibrillation episode and clinical status deterioration.

Further adjustments to the SonR device could be of benefit to the monitoring process of CRT-D patients: (1) while AV and VV delays optimization are automatically performed weekly by SonR, displaying daily SonR amplitude values would be preferable for monitoring purposes; (2) finally, the percentage of modification in clinical status could be quantified for the development of an alert.

Combined with remote monitoring, which is now widely accepted based on accumulating evidence that outcomes are better compared with standard in-clinic follow-up, early SonR signal amplitude remote monitoring could be a promising tool for HF patients’ management. Several recent trials on HF monitoring based on device diagnostic information confirmed the difficulty to monitor HF using a sole indicator and suggested the need to incorporate multiple parameters [10]. In this context, the SonR signal amplitude could be combined with other device-based parameters in order to improve the accuracy of the diagnostic. However, technical improvements and outcome prospective trials are warranted.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case series and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consents is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

AF: 

atrial fibrillation

AV: 

atrioventricular

CABG: 

coronary artery bypass grafting

CRT-D: 

cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator

DCM: 

dilated cardiomyopathy

HF: 

heart failure

ICD: 

implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

ICM: 

ischemic cardiomyopathy

LBBB: 

left bundle branch block

LVEF: 

left ventricular ejection fraction

NYHA: 

New York Heart Association

SR: 

sinus rhythm

VV: 

interventricular.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Frédérique Maneval and Anne Rousseau-Plasse who provided editorial assistance on behalf of Sorin CRM SAS.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Brest, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche
(2)
EA 4324, ORPHY, Université de Bretagne Occidentale
(3)
Sorin CRM SAS

References

  1. Tassin A, Kobeissi A, Vitali L, Rouleau F, Ritter P, Gaggini G, Dupuis JM: Relationship between amplitude and timing of heart sounds and endocardial acceleration. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009, Suppl 1: 101-104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Arena G, Quirino G, Vernazza F, Bernasconi A, Garberoglio B: Is local myocardial contractility related to endocardial acceleration signals detected by a transvenous pacing lead?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996, 19: 1682-1688. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03206.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rickards AF, Bombardini T, Corbucci G, Plicchi G: An implantable intracardiac accelerometer for monitoring myocardial contractility. The Multicenter PEA Study Group. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996, 19: 2066-2071. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03280.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bordachar P, Labrousse L, Ploux S, Thambo JB, Lafitte S, Reant P, Jais P, Haissaguerre M, Clementy J, Dos Santos P: Validation of a new noninvasive device for the monitoring of peak endocardial acceleration in pigs: implications for optimization of pacing site and configuration. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008, 19: 725-729. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01105.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bordachar P, Garrigue S, Ritter P, Ploux S, Labrousse L, Casset C, Haissaguerre M, Dos Santos P: Contributions of a hemodynamic sensor embedded in an atrial lead in a porcine model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011, 5: 579-583.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Padeletti L, Porciani MC, Ritter P, Michelucci A, Colella A, Pieragnoli P, Costoli A, Ciapetti C, Sabini A, Demarchi G, Gillio-Meina L, Gaggini G, Gensini GF: Atrioventricular interval optimization in the right atrial appendage and interatrial septum pacing: a comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000, 23: 1618-1622. 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.01618.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Leung SK, Lau CP, Lam CT, Ho S, Tse HF, Yu CM, Lee K, Tang MO, To KM, Renesto F: Automatic optimization of resting and exercise atrioventricular interval using a peak endocardial acceleration sensor: validation with Doppler echocardiography and direct cardiac output measurements. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000, 23: 1762-1766. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07014.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dupuis JM, Kobeissi A, Vitali L, Gaggini G, Merheb M, Rouleau F, Leftheriotis G, Ritter P, Victor J: Programming optimal atrioventricular delay in dual chamber pacing using peak endocardial acceleration: comparison with a standard echocardiographic procedure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003, 26: 210-213. 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00018.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Delnoy PP, Marcelli E, Oudeluttikhuis H, Nicastia D, Renesto F, Cercenelli L, Plicchi G: Validation of a peak endocardial acceleration-based algorithm to optimize cardiac resynchronization: early clinical results. Europace. 2008, 10: 801-808. 10.1093/europace/eun125.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowie MR, Sarkar S, Koehler J, Whellan DJ, Crossley GH, Tang WHW, Abraham WT, Sharma V, Santini M: Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting. Eur Heart J. 2013, 34: 2472-2480. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht083.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mansourati et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement