Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Successful diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis by loop-mediated isothermal amplification of cutaneous samples from an ulcerated surface lesion: a case report

  • Shuichi Kawano1,
  • Takuya Maeda1Email author,
  • Junichi Watanabe2,
  • Yuji Fujikura1,
  • Kei Mikita1,
  • Yu Hara1,
  • Soichiro Kanoh1,
  • Fumihiko Kimura2,
  • Yasushi Miyahira3 and
  • Akihiko Kawana1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20148:254

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-254

Received: 16 March 2014

Accepted: 11 June 2014

Published: 16 July 2014

Abstract

Introduction

Tuberculous lymphadenitis is the most frequent form of extrapulmonary tuberculous. Although nucleic acid amplification assays such as polymerase chain reaction have recently become mainstream techniques for diagnosing tuberculous lymphadenitis, they are still not routinely performed in developing countries because of their high costs and complicated procedures.

Case presentation

We describe a case of tuberculous lymphadenitis in a 79-year-old Japanese man who had been on continuous hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease. We employed loop-mediated isothermal amplification and the procedure for ultrarapid extraction to develop a fast and easy-to-perform procedure for diagnosing tuberculous lymphadenitis.

Conclusions

The commercially available loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay kit and a rapid purification procedure enabled us to identify and amplify a Mycobacterium tuberculosis–specific gene within just 1.5 hours.

Keywords

Fine-needle aspiration Loop-mediated isothermal amplification Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tuberculous lymphadenitis

Introduction

Tuberculous (TB) lymphadenitis is the most frequent form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and cervical lymphadenopathy is its most common clinical manifestation [1]. Because lymphadenopathy can be attributed to multiple etiologies, such as malignancy, autoimmune disease and infection, it is often difficult to differentiate TB lymphadenitis from other forms of lymphadenitis on clinical grounds alone. The advent of novel diagnostic techniques, in particular loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), provides accessible, cost-effective, easy-to-perform methods for diagnosing pulmonary TB by examination of respiratory specimens [2]. Boehme et al. demonstrated that LAMP has a diagnostic success rate of 97.7% for smear-positive sputum specimens and 48.8% for smear-negative but culture-positive specimens [3]. In our present case, to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a patient diagnosed with TB lymphadenitis, we examined boiled swab samples taken from an ulcerative lesion by LAMP after applying the procedure for ultrarapid extraction (PURE) to isolate target deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecules for use as LAMP reagents.

Case presentation

A 79-year-old Japanese man who had been on continuous hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease since 2004 visited an outpatient clinic complaining of a unilateral cervical mass and intermittent fever of more than three months’ duration. An examination at the clinic revealed three palpable right cervical lymph nodes. His body temperature was 37.4°C, with no chills or night sweats. Key laboratory data upon admission are shown in Table 1. The findings of the lab test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were negative. Computed tomography of the neck and chest revealed multiple enlarged lymph nodes measuring 40mm×20mm with low central attenuation predominantly along the lateral margin of the right sternocleidomastoid muscle (Figure 1A). In addition, several enlarged lymph nodes measuring 29mm×30mm in the supraclavicular region were also noted (Figure 1B). The result of an assay for interferon γ release was positive [4].
Table 1

Laboratory findings upon admission a

Peripheral blood

Blood chemistry

WBCs

6800/μL

T-bil

0.3mg/dL

RBCs

439×104/μL

AST

14IU/L

Hb

11.4g/dL

ALT

7IU/L

Hct

37.2%

LDH

190IU/L

PLT

23.0×104/μL

ALP

321IU/L

Seg

65.3%

γ-GTP

23IU/L

Eos

2.1%

TP

6.4g/dL

Ly

19.3%

BUN

20.0mg/dL

Mo

12.9%

Cr

5.65mg/dL

  

CPK

19.0IU/L

  

Na+

140mEq/L

  

K+

3.9mEq/L

  

Cl

101mEq/L

  

Glc

88mg/dL

  

CRP

<0.05mg/dL

  

ESR

74mm/hour

  

sIL-2R

2.05U/mL

aALP, Alkaline phosphatase; ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, Alanine aminotransferase; BUN, Blood urea nitrogen; Cl, Chloride; CPK, Creatine phosphokinase; Cr, Creatinine; CRP, C-reactive protein; Eos, Eosinophils; ESR, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; Glc, Glucose; γ-GTP, γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase; Hb, Hemoglobin; Hct, Hematocrit; K+, Potassium; LDH, Lactate dehydrogenase; Ly, Lymphocytes; Mo, Monocytes; Na+, Sodium; PLT, Platelets; RBC, Red blood cells; Seg, Segmented neutrophils; sIL-2R, Soluble interleukin 2 receptor; T-bil, Total bilirubin; TP, Total protein; WBC, White blood cells.

Figure 1

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. Arrowheads point to multiple enlarged lymph nodes at the lateral margin of the right sternocleidomastoid muscle (A) and in the supraclavicular region (B).

Suspecting TB lymphadenitis, we performed fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the para-sternocleidomastoid nodes. The obtained specimens were examined by microscopy (smears for acid-fast bacilli and fungi), microbiological culture and cytology. The smears were negative for acid-fast bacilli, and the cytology was determined to be class II, partly due to the presence of a mass of neutrophils. Among the diagnostic procedures we used, only the six-week culture for tuberculosis with the BacT/ALERT® three-dimensional microbial detection system (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) was positive, and M. tuberculosis DNA was unequivocally identified in the positive culture by means of the COBAS® TaqMan® MTB assay (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) [5].

In this case, we reached a definitive diagnosis of TB lymphadenitis in an efficient manner by using a commercially available LAMP kit (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) to amplify an M. tuberculosis-specific gene and a PURE kit (Eiken Chemical) to isolate the DNA target of interest [6]. Cutaneous swab samples were obtained by wiping the surface of an ulcerated lesion (Figure 2) with a sterile cotton swab and placing it into 960μL of DNA extraction solution. The suspension was incubated on a heat block at 100°C for 10 minutes, and DNA was rapidly extracted with the PURE kit in 30μL of solution [6]. Amplification of the M. tuberculosis– specific gene was achieved by LAMP at 64°C for 40 minutes according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and a positive LAMP result was indicated by the color change observed under ultraviolet light (Figure 3). On the basis of these results, we diagnosed TB lymphadenitis.
Figure 2

Photograph showing an ulcerated lesion on the right side of the neck.

Figure 3

Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay showing the color change to cloudy yellow. N: negative control; P: positive control; S: clinical sample.

The patient subsequently received anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy consisting of isonicotinic acid hydrazide (300mg/day), rifampicin (450mg/day) and ethambutol hydrochloride (500mg/day after dialysis). Two weeks later, he became afebrile and had no signs of exacerbation, and his painful lymphadenopathy eventually subsided.

Discussion

The current gold standard methods for diagnosing tuberculosis are microscopy and culture. However, the poor sensitivity of microscopy and the laborious, time-consuming procedures of culturing make these modalities less than ideal. Therefore, nucleic acid amplification assays such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have recently become mainstream techniques for diagnosing tuberculosis [7]. However, the molecular biological technologies on which such methods are based require not only experience and expertise but also expensive equipment; this is the principal reason why most of these sophisticated diagnostic tools are not suitable for use in resource-limited, disease-endemic regions. In contrast, LAMP can amplify M. tuberculosis–specific DNA rapidly under isothermal conditions [8]. A recent meta-analysis of 10 studies conducted to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis revealed a sensitivity of 80.0% (95% confidence interval (CI), 78%–83%) and a specificity of 96.0% (95% CI, 95.0%–97.0%) [9]. Furthermore, LAMP, which, in combination with PURE, has recently been established as a diagnostic technique requiring only limited equipment and manpower, provides an accessible, cost-effective, rapid, and more appropriate molecular diagnostic tool for tuberculosis in the field setting [6]. All procedures, including the time required for sample preparation, can be performed within just 1.5 hours.

FNA is an appropriate procedure to use in the initial evaluation in diagnostic methods targeting cervical nodular lesions, including TB lymphadenitis [10, 11]. Although FNA is a non-invasive, inexpensive, viable alternative to excisional biopsy of the lymph nodes, the detection rate of M. tuberculosis by examining aspirate specimens is disappointingly low compared to microbiological techniques. Some researchers have suggested that a combination of FNA and PCR might increase the sensitivity for diagnosing TB lymphadenitis [12]. However, the overall sensitivity of PCR with aspirate specimens is significantly lower than that with biopsy specimens and histopathological examinations [13]. PCR is also notorious for yielding false-negative results. It is thus important to establish a rapid, highly sensitive molecular diagnostic method for use with FNA specimens before proceeding to more invasive procedures such as additional excisional biopsy of the lymph nodes. Although excisional biopsy for microbiological, molecular biological and histopathological evaluations has the highest diagnostic yield [11, 14], it is also the most invasive means of reaching a diagnosis. LAMP, on the other hand, is a rapid diagnostic procedure that also plays an important role in deciding which specimen-collecting procedure to employ.

Conclusions

LAMP combined with PURE enabled us to detect M. tuberculosis from swabbed samples taken from an ulcerative lesion that had purulent exudate from the lymph nodes. The procedure could be performed in just 1.5 hours, making it beneficial and convenient for use in resource-limited, disease-endemic regions. We believe that the new commercial LAMP kit not only will be useful as a primary testing tool for TB but also will provide additional diagnostic value for TB lymphadenitis. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this diagnostic tool.

Consent

The Ethics Committee of the National Defense Medical College Research approved the design and protocol of this study (reference no. 1205). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

FNA: 

Fine-needle aspiration

LAMP: 

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PURE: 

Procedure for ultrarapid extraction

TB: 

Tuberculous.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Takashi Oda for helpful comments and suggestions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Defense Medical College
(2)
Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Defense Medical College
(3)
Department of Global Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, National Defense Medical College

References

  1. Geldmacher H, Taube C, Kroeger C, Magnussen H, Kirsten DK: Assessment of lymph node tuberculosis in northern Germany: a clinical review. Chest. 2002, 121: 1177-1182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. George G, Mony P, Kenneth J: Comparison of the efficacies of loop-mediated isothermal amplification, fluorescence smear microscopy and culture for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e21007View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Henostroza G, Raqib R, Rahim Z, Gerhardt M, Sanga E, Hoelscher M, Notomi T, Hase T, Perkins MD: Operational feasibility of using loop-mediated isothermal amplification for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in microscopy centers of developing countries. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45: 1936-1940.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Meier T, Eulenbruch HP, Wrighton-Smith P, Enders G, Regnath T: Sensitivity of a new commercial enzyme-linked immunospot assay (T SPOT-TB) for diagnosis of tuberculosis in clinical practice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005, 24: 529-536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloemberg GV, Voit A, Ritter C, Deggim V, Böttger EC: Evaluation of COBAS® TaqMan® MTB for direct detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in comparison with Cobas Amplicor MTB. J Clin Microbiol. 2013, 51: 2112-2117.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mitarai S, Okumura M, Toyota E, Yoshiyama T, Aono A, Sejimo A, Azuma Y, Sugahara K, Nagasawa T, Nagayama N, Yamane A, Yano R, Kokuto H, Morimoto K, Ueyama M, Kubota M, Yi R, Ogata H, Kudoh S, Mori T: Evaluation of a simple loop-mediated isothermal amplification test kit for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011, 15: 1211-1217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen RA, Muzaffar S, Schwartz D, Bashir S, Luke S, McGartland LP, Kaul K: Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis using PCR assays on sputum collected within 24 hours of hospital admission. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998, 157: 156-161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Geojith G, Dhanasekaran S, Chandran SP, Kenneth J: Efficacy of loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the laboratory identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in a resource limited setting. J Microbiol Methods. 2011, 84: 71-73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yuan LY, Li Y, Wang M, Ke ZQ, Xu WZ: Rapid and effective diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis with novel and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay in clinical samples: a meta-analysis. J Infect Chemother. 2014, 20: 86-92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lau SK, Wei WI, Hsu C, Engzell UC: Efficacy of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of tuberculous cervical lymphadenopathy. J Laryngol Otol. 1990, 104: 24-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fontanilla JM, Barnes A, von Reyn CF: Current diagnosis and management of peripheral tuberculous lymphadenitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011, 53: 555-562.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Singh KK, Muralidhar M, Kumar A, Chattopadhyaya TK, Kapila K, Singh MK, Sharma SK, Jain NK, Tyagi JS: Comparison of in house polymerase chain reaction with conventional techniques for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in granulomatous lymphadenopathy. J Clin Pathol. 2000, 53: 355-361.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Tachibana T, Orita Y, Fujisawa M, Nakada M, Ogawara Y, Matsuyama Y, Abe I, Sato Y, Uesaka K, Nishizaki K: Factors that make it difficult to diagnose cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. J Infect Chemother. 2013, 19: 1015-1020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee KC, Tami TA, Lalwani AK, Schecter G: Contemporary management of cervical tuberculosis. Laryngoscope. 1992, 102: 60-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kawano et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement