Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Gemcitabine-induced cardiomyopathy: a case report and review of the literature

  • Muhammad F Khan1Email author,
  • Silvija Gottesman1,
  • Ravichandra Boyella2 and
  • Elizabeth Juneman2
Journal of Medical Case Reports20148:220

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-220

Received: 10 January 2014

Accepted: 5 May 2014

Published: 23 June 2014

Abstract

Introduction

Newly developed antineoplastic drugs have resulted in improvements in morbidity and mortality from many forms of cancers. However, some of these new chemotherapeutic agents have potentially lethal side effects, which are now being exposed with their widespread use. Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog, which is a commonly used agent for various solid organ malignancies. Phase 1 and 2 trials with gemcitabine did not show significant risk for cardiotoxicity; however, with its widespread clinical use over the last decade, a few cases of cardiotoxicity related to gemcitabine use have been reported. Cardiomyopathy after the use of gemcitabine monotherapy is extremely rare; and only one such case has been reported in detail previously.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 56-year-old African American man with pancreatic cancer who presented with signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure after being treated with gemcitabine for two cycles (six doses). A two-dimensional echocardiography showed left ventricular ejection fraction of 15 to 20 percent with global hypokinesia. With the absence of significant risk factors for coronary artery disease and a strong temporal relationship with the initiation of chemotherapy, it was concluded that our patient’s cardiomyopathy was related to the use of gemcitabine. Gemcitabine was discontinued and our patient responded well to standard heart failure therapy. Two months later, a repeat echocardiogram showed significant improvements in left ventricular systolic function.

Conclusions

Gemcitabine should be considered as a potential cause of cardiomyopathy in patients receiving chemotherapy with this drug. We need further studies to look into potential mechanisms and treatments of gemcitabine-induced cardiac dysfunction.

Keywords

GemcitabineCardiomyopathyCardiotoxicity

Introduction

Anticancer therapy has emerged tremendously over the last few years. Newly available drugs and protocols have resulted in improvements in morbidity and mortality from many forms of cancers. However, these new antineoplastic drugs and protocols are not without potentially lethal side effects. It is therefore very important to recognize serious toxicities associated with some of these medications, so appropriate measures can be taken to avoid and manage such problems.

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog and a pyrimidine antimetabolite that inhibits deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis by inhibition of DNA polymerase and ribonucleotide reductase [1]. It is a commonly used antineoplastic for various solid organ malignancies including advanced pancreatic, ovarian, breast, bladder and non-small cell lung cancers [27]. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group Phase III trial has shown promising results and has led to the adoption of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine as the standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer [6].

Gemcitabine is generally well tolerated and is considered relatively safe as compared to many other chemotherapeutic agents. Its most common toxicities include myelosuppression, changes in gastrointestinal function (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) and abnormalities in liver and renal function tests [8].

Phase 1 and 2 studies with gemcitabine did not show significant risk for cardiotoxicity, however, with its widespread clinical use over the last decade, a few cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and arrhythmias associated with gemcitabine use have been reported. Here, we report a case of a 56-year-old man with pancreatic cancer who developed dilated cardiomyopathy after being treated with gemcitabine.

Case presentation

A 56-year-old African American man who initially presented with diarrhea, weight loss and painless jaundice, was subsequently found to have adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas. An initial workup revealed localized cancer with no evidence of distant metastases. He then underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with complete surgical resection of a 5cm moderately differentiated pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Although our patient underwent complete surgical resection, a pathological examination revealed a neoplastic invasion of the resected adjacent organs, and one out of the seven resected lymph nodes contained cancer (T3N1M0). At that point, the oncology department recommended to proceed with adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine (1000mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15 on a 28-day cycle for six cycles) to try to reduce the likelihood of recurrence.

However, after completing two cycles (a total of six doses) of chemotherapy, he presented to the emergency department with worsening exertional dyspnea, three-pillow orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and fatigue. His physical examination revealed an elevated jugular venous pressure (JVP) (10cm above the sternal angle), bibasilar rales and +2 pitting edema of both lower extremities. Cardiac auscultation revealed a gallop rhythm with an S3 and a grade 3 holosystolic murmur over precordium. A chest X-ray showed cardiomegaly with mild to moderate-sized right-sided pleural effusion. It was thought that his presentation was consistent with fluid overload secondary to congestive heart failure (CHF) and he was started on intravenous (IV) furosemide with partial improvement in his symptoms.

The next day, a two-dimensional echocardiography (2D Echo) was performed, which showed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 15 to 20 percent with global hypokinesia along with moderate mitral regurgitation. Given the findings of 2D Echo and the absence of significant risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP), it was concluded that our patient’s CMP was related to the recent use of gemcitabine. Our patient was then started on carvedilol and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in addition to diuretics and he was discharged from the hospital two days later in a euvolemic state.

At that point, the cardiology department recommended stopping further chemotherapy with gemcitabine. The oncology department advised further testing to rule out ischemia as a cause of CMP as, in their opinion, chemotherapy with gemcitabine was the only option to reduce the risk of recurrence in this patient. Two weeks later, our patient underwent myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), which showed a fixed small- to moderate-sized inferior wall defect without any evidence of active ischemia. The ejection fraction (EF) on MPI was calculated to be around 17 to 20 percent with severe global hypokinesia. Our patient was continued on standard heart failure therapy with one more admission to the hospital for CHF exacerbation about two months later. He responded well to IV furosemide and adjustment of heart failure therapy. A 2D Echo was repeated a few months later and it showed improvement in systolic function with an LVEF of 40 percent.

Due to his poor functional status and underlying CMP, further gemcitabine chemotherapy was stopped. Later, our patient developed a recurrence of his pancreatic cancer; he refused further chemotherapy and decided to proceed with palliative care.

Although the exact etiology of our patient’s dilated cardiomyopathy remains unclear, gemcitabine remains the most likely culprit. The temporal relationship of his symptoms to the initiation of gemcitabine chemotherapy; the lack of risk factors for ischemic CMP and prior history of CAD, finding of global hypokinesia on 2D Echo, absence of ischemia on MPI; and improvement in his systolic function after discontinuation of gemcitabine were all consistent with gemcitabine-induced cardiomyopathy.

Discussion

Gemcitabine is generally not considered as one of the cardiotoxic agents, and its cardiotoxicity has been very rarely reported in the literature. An overview of phase 1 trials of gemcitabine therapy revealed cardiac arrhythmias in 0.7 to 1.4 percent of the patients, significant reduction in LVEF in 0.2 percent of the patients and the development of exudative pericarditis in 0.2 percent of the patients [9].

Similarly, phase 2 trials of gemcitabine monotherapy did not show evidence of significant cardiotoxicity. To evaluate overall safety of gemcitabine, Aapro et al. reviewed 22 phase 2 clinical trials (a total of 979 patients) and found very low incidence of AMI (0.5 percent), CMP (0.4 percent), arrhythmias (0.2 percent) and only one case of mild pericarditis [8]. Among the cardiomyopathy cases, one patient had World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 toxicity indicating symptomatic cardiac dysfunction not responding to conventional therapy. The other three cases of CHF had WHO grade 3 toxicity, manifesting as symptomatic systolic dysfunction, which responded to therapy [8]. Since the publication of the above mentioned review, we could find two additional cases of heart failure [10, 11], four cases of AMI [10, 1214] and one case of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) [15] in phase 2 gemcitabine trials [Table 1]. In a recent review of the French PharmacoVigilance Database (FPVD), Montastruc et al. also found a potential association between dilated cardiomyopathy and chemotherapy with gemcitabine [16].
Table 1

Case reports of cardiotoxicity with gemcitabine monotherapy

Author

Demography

Dose of gemcitabine

Duration of treatment

Side effect

History of CAD

Timing

Outcome

Probability

Ozturk et al.[17]

59F with metastatic leiomyosarcoma

900mg/m2

8 days

Coronary vasospasm

Yes

30 minutes after infusion

Survived. Gemcitabine therapy stopped

Strong

Bdair et al . [18]

43F with metastatic NSCLC

1000mg/m2

7 weeks

NSTEMI VT

Yes

3 days after infusion

Survived. Gemcitabine therapy stopped

Weak

Kalapura et al . [19]

54M with metastatic pancreatic cancer

1900mg

5th cycle

NSTEMI

No CAD, no risk factors

6 hours after infusion

Survived. Recurrent symptoms with 7th cycle

Strong

Tayer-Shifman et al.[20]

67F with metastatic ductal carcinoma of breast

1000-1400mg/m2

3rd cycle

SVT/AVNRT

No CAD, no risk factors

Hours after infusion

Survived. Gemcitabine therapy stopped

Strong

Santini et al.[21]

78M with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

NK

1st cycle

AF

History of AF in the past

18-22 hours after the infusion

Survived 6 total episodes of AF 18-22 hours after the infusion

Strong

Ferrari et al.[22]

72F with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma

1200mg/m2

1st cycle

AF

No history of AF

18 hours after the infusion

Survived 3 total episodes of AF each after 18 hours of infusion

Strong

Ferrari et al.[22]

73F with NSCLC

1200mg/m2

3rd cycle

AF

No history of AF

12 hours after the infusion

Survived. Gemcitabine stopped

Strong

Tavil et al.[23]

65M with NSCLC

1200mg/m2

2nd cycle

AF

No history of AF

7 hours after the infusion

Gemcitabine stopped

Strong

Ciotti et al.[24]

70M with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

NK

1st cycle

AF

No history of AF

6 days after the infusion

AF recurred with further therapy

Strong

Yajima et al.[25]

82F with advanced pancreatic carcinoma

16, 800mg-total dose

Two years of treatment

HF

NK

2 years

Gemcitabine stopped

Weak

Khan et al. [present case]

56M with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

1000mg/m2

Two cycles (2 months)

CMP/HF

No prior history of CHF/CAD

2 months

Gemcitabine stopped, partial recovery

Strong

CAD, coronary artery disease; F, female; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; VT, ventricular tachycardia; M, male; SVT, supraventricular tachycardia; AVNRT, AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia; NK, not known; AF, atrial fibrillation; HF, heart failure; CMP, cardiomyopathy; CHF, congestive heart failure.

Based on the review of medical literature, cardiotoxicity of gemcitabine can be divided into acute toxicities and chronic toxicities.

Acute toxicities include arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia or infarction. In almost all the cases, AMI developed within few hours to a couple of days after gemcitabine infusion. The longest time interval between gemcitabine infusion and the development of AMI was reported to be six days, however in that case, the association of the AMI to gemcitabine therapy was weak. The exact reasons of gemcitabine-induced acute coronary syndrome are not clear, however, authors have speculated a direct endothelial injury resulting in coronary thrombosis or gemcitabine-induced vascular spasm as possible underlying mechanisms. The evidence for prothrombotic and procoagulant effects of gemcitabine comes from several reports of occurrence of vascular events (like thrombotic microangiopathies, strokes, visceral infractions and vasculitides) in association with gemcitabine infusion [26]. Furthermore, in one other study of gemcitabine monotherapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, authors noticed higher incidence of thrombosis and vascular events in patients treated with gemcitabine [10]. Vasospasm was proposed as a cause of chest pain and new-onset left bundle branch block in a patient who developed these symptoms during gemcitabine infusion. Vasospasm then resolved within 10 minutes of antianginal therapy and serological markers for myocardial damage remained negative [17]. Interestingly, all the patients who developed AMI related to gemcitabine therapy had pre-existing CAD. Two of these patients were already on appropriate antianginal medications before they experienced gemcitabine-related myocardial ischemia [17, 18]. In another patient with a previous episode of gemcitabine-induced myocardial ischemia, the next gemcitabine infusion was started concomitantly with IV nitroglycerine and beta blockers [19]. However, despite these measures he continued to have recurrent ischemic symptoms with further gemcitabine treatments.

SVTs including atrial fibrillation (AF) have been rarely reported as a manifestation of gemcitabine cardiotoxicity. In contrast to AMI, where most of the patients had underlying CAD, only one of the patients who developed AF related to gemcitabine infusion had previous history of AF [21]. Almost all the SVT episodes developed six to 18 hours after the administration of gemcitabine infusion. Based on this observation, some authors have argued that direct myocardial toxicity from an active metabolite of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine (which has a half-life of 18 to 24 hours) is likely responsible for these electrical disturbances [21, 22]. With the exception of one patient who remained in AF at the time of discharge [22], sinus rhythm could be restored in all of the other patients. Patients who underwent chemical cardioversion (amiodarone or propafenone) converted to sinus rhythm within two hours of onset of AF. Those who were treated conservatively with rate control strategy converted spontaneously to sinus rhythm on the average two days after the presentation. Three patients suffered recurrent AF episodes with further gemcitabine infusions [21, 22, 24], and two of them had recurrence of AF despite being on prophylactic antiarrhythmics [21, 24].

CMP is among the frequently reported cardiotoxicity for many chemotherapeutic agents like anthracyclines, but it has been rarely encountered with gemcitabine monotherapy. The cardiomyopathy seems to develop after a few months to years of treatments with gemcitabine. The exact mechanisms of myocardial damage, and the total dose of gemcitabine required to induce myocardial toxicity are unknown. Most of the patients in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials who developed gemcitabine-induced CMP had underlying CAD. Although our patient did not have known CAD or CAD risk factors, it is still possible that he had a prior silent event (a fixed inferior wall defect on MPI). However, a fixed inferior wall defect did not explain severely depressed left ventricular (LV) systolic function and global hypokinesia seen on 2D Echo. Given the fact that his heart failure symptoms started after the initiation of gemcitabine, we strongly suspected gemcitabine cardiotoxicity as a cause of his CMP. This argument is further affirmed by the fact that his LV systolic function improved significantly after the discontinuation of gemcitabine and the initiation of appropriate treatment.

Gemcitabine has also been implicated in the development of exudative pericardial effusions. Four cases of symptomatic and hemodynamically significant pericardial effusions requiring drainage were reported by Vogl et al. [27]. All of these patients were exposed to unblocked cardiac radiations in the past, and all these patients had pericardial abnormalities seen on echocardiography before the initiation of gemcitabine chemotherapy. The authors concluded that gemcitabine therapy in these patients resulted in radiation recall reaction, that is, gemcitabine recalled previous radiation-related inflammation in the pericardium.

Conclusions

In our opinion, gemcitabine-induced cardiotoxicity should be considered as a potential cause of arrhythmias, ischemia or cardiomyopathy in patients receiving chemotherapy with this drug. We need further studies to look into the potential mechanisms of gemcitabine-induced cardiac dysfunction. In the case of toxicity, discontinuation of further therapy with gemcitabine appears to be the next appropriate step in the management.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication could not be obtained from the patient as he has died and the next-of-kin could not be contacted despite all reasonable attempts. However, every effort has been made to protect patient anonymity and there is no reason to think that the patient or family would object to publication.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Southern Arizona VA Health Care System
(2)
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Southern Arizona VA Health Care System

References

  1. Plunkett W, Huang P, Xu YZ, Heinemann V, Grunewald R, Gandhi V: Gemcitabine: metabolism, mechanisms of action, and self-potentiation. Semin Oncol. 1995, 22 (Suppl 11): 3-10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Carmichael J, Fink U, Russell RC, Spittle MF, Harris AL, Spiessi G, Blatter J: Phase II study of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1996, 73: 101-105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Abratt RP, Bezwoda WR, Falkson G, Goedhals L, Hacking D, Rugg TA: Efficacy and safety profile of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 1994, 12: 1535-1540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gatzemeier U, Groth G, Butts C, Van Zandwijk N, Shepherd F, Ardizzoni A, Barton C, Ghahramani P, Hirsh V: Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine-cisplatin with or without trastuzumab in HER2-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004, 15: 19-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lorusso V, Crucitta E, Silvestris N, Catino A, Caporusso L, Mazzei A, Guida M, Latorre A, Sambiasi D, D’Amico C, Schittulli F, Calabrese P, De Lena M: Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus mitoxantrone as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003, 88: 491-495.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mattiucci GC, Ippolito E, D’Agostino GR, Alfieri S, Antinori A, Crucitti A, Balducci M, Deodato F, Luzi S, Macchia G, Smaniotto D, Morganti AG, Valentini V: Long-term analysis of gemcitabine-based chemoradiation after surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013, 20: 423-429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, Moore MJ, Bodrogi I, Albers P, Knuth A, Lippert CM, Kerbrat P, Sanchez Rovira P, Wersall P, Cleall SP, Roychowdhury DF, Tomlin I, Visseren-Grul CM, Conte PF: Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18: 3068-3077.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aapro MS, Martin C, Hatty S: Gemcitabine-a safety review. Anticancer Drugs. 1998, 9: 191-201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Storniolo AM, Allerheiligen SR, Pearce HL: Preclinical, pharmacologic, and phase I studies of gemcitabine. Semin Oncol. 1997, 24 (Suppl 7): 2-7.Google Scholar
  10. Duvic M, Talpur R, Wen S, Kurzrock R, David CL, Apisarnthanarax N: Phase II evaluation of gemcitabine monotherapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2006, 7: 51-58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jidar K, Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Beylot-Barry M, Paul C, Chaoui D, Sigal-Grinberg M, Morel P, Dubertret L, Bachelez H: Gemcitabine treatment in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: a multicentre study of 23 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2009, 161: 660-663.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumontet C, Morschhauser F, Solal-Celigny P, Bouafia F, Bourgeois E, Thieblemont C, Leleu X, Hequet O, Salles G, Coiffier B: Gemcitabine as a single agent in the treatment of relapsed or refractory low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2001, 113: 772-778.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gridelli C, Perrone F, Gallo C, Rossi A, Barletta E, Barzelloni ML, Creazzola S, Gatani T, Fiore F, Guida C, Scognamiglio F: Single-agent gemcitabine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II trial. Anticancer Res. 1999, 19: 4535-4538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Neubauer MA, Reynolds CH, Joppert MG, Whitaker T, Ghaddar H, Marsland TA, Asmar L: Results of a phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2. Clin Lung Cancer. 2005, 6: 245-249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Poon D, Foo KF, Chew L, Leong SS, Wee J, Tan EH: Phase II trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin sequentially administered in Asian patients with unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006, 35: 33-37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Montastruc G, Favreliere S, Sommet A, Pathak A, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Perault-Pochat MC, Montastruc JL: Drugs and dilated cardiomyopathies: a case/noncase study in the French PharmacoVigilance database. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010, 69: 287-294.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ozturk B, Tacoy G, Coskun U, Yaman E, Sahin G, Buyukberber S, Yildiz R, Kaya AO, Topal S, Ozdemir M, Benekli M: Gemcitabine-induced acute coronary syndrome: a case report. Med Princ Pract. 2009, 18: 76-80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bdair FM, Graham SP, Smith PF, Javle MM: Gemcitabine and acute myocardial infarction–a case report. Angiology. 2006, 57: 367-371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalapura T, Krishnamurthy M, Reddy CV: Acute myocardial infarction following gemcitabine therapy-a case report. Angiology. 1999, 50: 1021-1025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tayer-Shifman OE, Rottenberg Y, Shuvy M: Gemcitabine-induced supraventricular tachycardia. Tumori. 2009, 95: 547-549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Santini D, Tonini G, Abbate A, Di Cosimo S, Gravante G, Vincenzi B: Gemcitabine-induced atrial fibrillation: a hitherto unreported manifestation of drug toxicity. Ann Oncol. 2000, 11: 479-481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrari D, Carbone C, Codeca C, Fumagalli L, Gilardi L, Marussi D, Tartaro T, Oldani S, Zannier F, Foa P: Gemcitabine and atrial fibrillation: a rare manifestation of chemotherapy toxicity. Anticancer Drugs. 2006, 17: 359-361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tavil Y, Arslan U, Okyay K, Sen N, Boyaci B: Atrial fibrillation induced by gemcitabine treatment in a 65-year-old man. Onkologie. 2007, 30: 253-255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ciotti R, Belotti G, Facchi E, Cantu A, D’Amico A, Gatti C: Sudden cardio-pulmonary toxicity following a single infusion of gemcitabine. Ann Oncol. 1999, 10: 997-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yajima T, Furukawa Y, Ishii Y, Hattori Y, Matsumoto N, Yamamoto M, Yamaoka Y, Fujihara M, Fujita M, Kuniki H: Two cases of advanced pancreatic cancer responding to gemcitabine with long survival of 2 years. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004, 31: 953-957.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dasanu CA: Gemcitabine: vascular toxicity and prothrombotic potential. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008, 7: 703-716.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vogl DT, Glatstein E, Carver JR, Schuster SJ, Stadtmauer EA, Luger S, Nasta SD, Porter DL, Elstrom R, Tsai DE: Gemcitabine-induced pericardial effusion and tamponade after unblocked cardiac irradiation. Leuk Lymphoma. 2005, 46: 1313-1320.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Khan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement