Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Intraductal papilloma in an axillary lymph node of a patient with human immunodeficiency virus: a case report and review of the literature

  • Hannah Cottom1Email author,
  • Bhavani Rengabashyam2,
  • Philip E Turton2 and
  • Abeer M Shaaban3
Journal of Medical Case Reports20148:162

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-162

Received: 23 December 2013

Accepted: 31 March 2014

Published: 23 May 2014

Abstract

Introduction

Inclusions of ectopic breast tissue in axillary lymph nodes are reported very infrequently and typically are only identified microscopically as an incidental finding. Furthermore the development of a benign proliferative lesion in the form of an intraductal papilloma from intranodal ectopic breast tissue is an extremely rare phenomenon with only three previous cases reported. This report describes an unusual and rare case of an intraductal papilloma arising in an axillary lymph node of a patient known to have the human immunodeficiency virus.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old Black African woman underwent excision of an enlarged palpable axillary lymph node. In the preceding 7 years she had received at least six separate surgical excisions to her ipsilateral breast for papillomatosis. The last surgical intervention was performed 1 year prior to presentation with an enlarged axillary lymph node. Histological examination of her axillary lymph node revealed a papillomatous proliferative epithelial lesion within an apparent encompassing duct, resembling a mammary intraductal papilloma. In the surrounding lymphoid tissue small groups of duct-like structures were additionally noted. Immunostaining with a panel of myoepithelial markers in conjunction with oestrogen receptor produced a mixed heterogeneous staining pattern in both the papillomatous lesion and the peripheral duct-like structures. This confirmed the diagnosis of a benign intraductal papilloma within an axillary lymph node, considered to have arisen from ectopic breast tissue.

Conclusions

This case demonstrates that intranodal ectopic breast tissue has the potential to undergo benign proliferative change albeit extremely rarely. Therefore this possibility must be considered to ensure the correct diagnosis is made. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report which has described recurrent intraductal papillomas and the subsequent development of an intraductal papilloma within an ipsilateral axillary lymph node, in a patient who is human immunodeficiency virus positive. There is minimal literature investigating the specific types of breast pathologies experienced by patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus and it remains unexplored as to whether human immunodeficiency virus may lead to proliferative papillomatous epithelial changes. This report considers the role of the human papillomavirus and recommends that further investigatory studies are required.

Keywords

Axillary lymph node Ectopic breast tissue HIV-infection Intraductal papilloma

Introduction

Intraductal papillomas (IDPs) are discrete benign tumours arising in mammary ducts. They comprise a proliferation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells which are supported by fibrovascular cores, producing a characteristic arborescent architecture within the duct lumen [1]. Ectopic breast tissue (EBT) usually develops along the embryological milk line with recognition that benign EBT may occur in the axillary nodes. EBT predominantly comprises single or small groups of glands and ducts which exhibit a varied morphological appearance, although the majority are composed of luminal epithelial cells and basal cells demonstrating myoepithelial differentiation [2]. Axillary intranodal ectopic breast inclusions are however an infrequent finding and typically are only identified microscopically as an incidental finding [24]. The development of a benign proliferative lesion such as an IDP from intranodal EBT is an extremely rare phenomenon. A review of the literature has revealed only three reports of an IDP arising within an axillary lymph node [46]. In this report we describe a further unusual case of an IDP arising in an axillary lymph node of a patient known to have the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and a previous history of recurrent IDPs of the ipsilateral breast.

Case presentation

Our patient was a 40-year-old Black African woman with a medical history of HIV infection and mild depression. She was a non-smoker and had no known drug allergies. Her medication included venlafaxine, and reverse transcriptase inhibitors efavirenz (non-nucleoside) and lamivudine (nucleoside). She had originally attended 4 years previously with left nipple discharge associated with pain and discomfort of her left breast. Ultrasound imaging with core biopsies revealed multiple benign IDPs in her left breast and she underwent a Hadfield’s procedure (radical subareolar duct excision). Another Hadfield’s procedure was performed in the following year (2007) after recurrence of the benign IDPs. In 2010 she underwent a left subcutaneous mastectomy with implant reconstruction following development of a further IDP in her left breast. This form of surgical treatment was decided most appropriate due to the extent of the IDP, difficulty of radiological follow-up and to exclude atypia and risk of subsequent malignancy. In the mastectomy specimen a single IDP was present measuring approximately 38×22mm in maximum dimension. The IDP contained several suspicious foci of solid atypical proliferations, which after immunohistochemical staining were regarded as atypical ductal hyperplasia. The degree of atypia was not considered to amount to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and there was no evidence of invasive neoplasia. No axillary lymphadenopathy was noted at the time of the mastectomy. In situ hybridisation for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) was performed on two separate IDPs (in 2008 and the IDP in the mastectomy specimen in 2010). In both cases no HPV was detected with the probe set used (HPV 1, 2, 6, 11, 16, 18, 31 and 33). During follow up, 2 years after her left mastectomy (in 2012), she reported a small lump in her left breast. Ultrasound imaging revealed a new 9mm well-defined hypoechoic mass. This was shown on core biopsy to be a further IDP. Diagnostic excision of the lesion confirmed a benign IDP with hyperplasia, apocrine metaplasia and no evidence of atypia.

In 2013 she developed an enlarged palpable mass in her left axilla.

Diagnostic focus and assessment

On ultrasound imaging the axillary mass corresponded to an abnormally enlarged lymph node with eccentric cortical thickening and loss of medullary fat (Figure 1A). No changes or abnormalities were detected in her left breast. Left axillary ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the lymph node revealed part of an IDP. As a result of this extremely unusual finding a diagnostic excision of the enlarged left axillary lymph node was performed. The lymph node measured 20mm in maximum dimension. The histology of the lymph node showed a reasonably well-circumscribed papillomatous proliferative epithelial lesion within an apparent encompassing duct. The lesion was confined to the node and comprised prominent tightly packed papillary fronds lined by a bilayer of luminal epithelial cells and an outer layer of basal cells supported by fibrovascular cores (Figures 1B and 1C); identical to an IDP of the breast. Cholesterol crystals, dense collections of macrophages and reactive stromatolites were also noted in part, signifying a long standing lesion and the latter indicative of previous core biopsy. No necrosis or significant atypia was evident and few mitoses were identified. At the periphery, benign lymphoid tissue was seen confirming the intranodal location of the lesion. In this surrounding lymphoid tissue small groups of duct-like structures were additionally noted (Figure 1D). In view of the curious finding of an IDP within an axillary lymph node immunohistochemical staining was performed for confirmatory characterisation of the lesion and exclusion of malignancy. The lesion and encompassing duct demonstrated mixed cytokeratin (CK) 5 and 14, p63 and smooth muscle myosin positivity (Figures 1E-G) with heterogeneous oestrogen receptor (ER) expression, indicating a benign lesion. A similar staining pattern was also displayed in the duct-like epithelial structures thereby determining their origin as breast. The histological appearances and immunohistochemical staining profile therefore substantiated a benign IDP within her left axillary lymph node, which was considered to have arisen from EBT.
Figure 1

Ultrasound imaging and photomicroscopy of the axillary intraductal papilloma. A Ultrasound imaging of the axillary lymph node. B and C: Histological appearance of the intraductal papilloma in the left axillary lymph node, magnification ×10. D: Illustration of duct-like epithelial structures in the adjacent lymphoid tissue considered to represent ectopic breast tissue, magnification ×20. E-G: Immunohistochemical staining profile of the intraductal papilloma with mixed positivity to cytokeratin 5 (E), smooth muscle myosin (F) and p63 (G), magnification ×20.

She experienced an uneventful postoperative period and remains well at follow up appointments. Her recent annual contralateral mammogram (performed 1-month post-lymph node excision) revealed no significant interval change in her right breast when compared with previous mammograms, and no palpable axillary lymph nodes were identified.

Conclusions

It is estimated that EBT is found in approximately 1% of the population [7]; however, its presence in axillary lymph nodes is uncommon and when it does occur it is frequently an incidental microscopic finding [24]. The aetiology of intranodal EBT remains unclear. It has been postulated that it may result from embryological maldevelopment leading to entrapment of mammary epithelial cells within nodal tissue or as a consequence of cell embolism following breast surgery [4, 810]. Table 1 summarises the three previously reported cases of IDP arising within an axillary lymph node and our case.
Table 1

Summary of previous reports and current case report of an intraductal papilloma arising within an axillary lymph node

Author, Reference number (year)

Patient age (years)

Previous clinical history

Presenting features of intranodal IDP

Size (mm)

Suspected aetiopathogenesis

Ichihara et al. [4] (2008)

47

5 ipsilateral IDPs in the preceding 5 years

Incidental discovery during sentinel lymph node biopsy

6

Postulation of mammary epithelial cell dissemination following multiple surgical manipulations to ipsilateral breast OR from EBP

Dzodic et al. [5] (2010)

34

Single ipsilateral IDP 10 years previously

Presentation as palpable axillary lymph node

11

Favoured evolvement from intranodal EBT as duct-like structures identified in the background lymphoid tissue

McDiwitt et al. [6] (1968)

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Description of case only

Current case (2014)

40

>6 ipsilateral IDPs in the preceding 7 years

Presentation as palpable axillary lymph node

20

Favoured evolvement from intranodal EBT as duct-like structures identified in the background lymphoid tissue

Abbreviations: EBT, ectopic breast tissue; IDP, intraductal papilloma.

The behaviour and evolution of EBT is unpredictable and particularly unexplored in relation to axillary lymph nodes owing to its rarity. Several studies have demonstrated EBT to exhibit squamous and apocrine metaplasia, cystic change and epithelial hyperplasia [3, 4, 810]. These findings would suggest that EBT is susceptible to similar hormonal influences and changes as native mammary tissue. Accordingly, it is feasible for benign proliferative lesions such as IDPs to develop from such EBT, albeit exceptionally rare within the axillary lymph nodes. It is therefore also conceivable that malignant transformation is possible. This is incredibly rare with only two case reports identified in the literature [11, 12]. Jaffer et al. (2008) in their case report described transformation of an IDP within an axillary lymph node into an intraductal carcinoma. Their patient had a previous history of an ipsilateral lumpectomy for an IDP which displayed atypical ductal hyperplasia and focal DCIS [11]. The other case report documented a case of papillary carcinoma arising in an axillary lymph node also considered to have originated from EBT [12]. Therefore an extremely important ramification of intranodal EBTs is to ensure that they are not misinterpreted as either metastatic carcinoma or a primary malignancy. This may be of particular diagnostic difficulty if there has been proliferative change. Nevertheless pathologists and clinicians must be mindful of the possible occurrence of EBT in axillary lymph nodes and the very infrequent proliferative changes that it may display. In the current case, cystic change associated with cholesterol deposition indicated a long standing lesion. Focal disruption to the IDP within the axillary lymph node was also noted with small epithelial islands seen to extend beyond the encompassing duct. This was however found in association with inflammation and reactive changes consistent with a previous core biopsy site. It was therefore considered artefactual in nature representing epithelial displacement within. In addition, the recognition and demonstration of myoepithelial cells and the heterogeneous ER and CK5 immunohistochemical staining confirmed the lesion as benign.

In our case report the patient was known to be HIV positive and had undergone to this date at least six separate surgical excisions to her left breast for papillomatosis. This included two Hadfield’s and an eventual left mastectomy and breast reconstruction. There is minimal literature investigating the specific types of breast pathologies experienced by patients infected with HIV. To the best of our knowledge this is the first case report which has described recurrent IDPs and the subsequent development of an IDP within an ipsilateral axillary lymph node, in a patient who is HIV positive. It is contemplated that HIV may affect the glandular elements of breast tissue in seropositive patients [13], although it remains unexplored as to whether this may lead to proliferative papillomatous epithelial changes. It has been demonstrated that in patients with HIV-1 disease, such as in our patient, there is greater infection with HPV in multiple locations including the nipple [14]. HPV is widely recognised as the cause of papillomas in multiple sites and therefore could have a role to play in the aetiopathogenesis of IDPs [15]. Currently though there is limited information on this relationship and certainly in our case no HPV was detected. Further studies investigating the potential role of HPV in IDPs and the effects of HIV on the breast and EBT are required.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CK: 

Cytokeratin

DCIS: 

Ductal carcinoma in situ

EBT: 

Ectopic breast tissue

ER: 

Oestrogen receptor

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

HPV: 

Human papillomavirus

IDP: 

Intraductal papilloma.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
(2)
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
(3)
Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

References

  1. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. 2003, Lyon: IARC Press, 76-78.Google Scholar
  2. Spinardi JR, Gonçalves IRD, La Falce TS, Fregnani JHTG, Barros MD, Mácea JR: Benign inclusions in lymph nodes. Int J Morphol. 2007, 25 (3): 625-629.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Edlow WD, Carter D: Heterotopic epithelium in axillary lymph nodes. J Clin Pathol. 1972, 59: 666-673.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ichihara S, Ikeda T, Kimura K, Hanatate F, Yamada F, Hasegawa M, Moritami S, Yatabe Y: Coincidence of mammary and sentinel lymph node papillomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008, 32: 784-792. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31815c6c9d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dzodic R, Stanojevic B, Saenko V, Nakashima M, Markovic I, Pupic G, Buta M, Inic M, Rogounovitch T, Yamashita S: Intraductal papilloma of ectopic breast tissue in axillary lymph node of a patient with a previous intraductal papilloma of ipsilateral breast: a case report and review of the literature. Diagnostic Pathology. 2010, 5: 17-10.1186/1746-1596-5-17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. McDiwitt RW, Stewaed FW, Berg JW: Tumours of the Breast. Atlas of Tumour Pathology, Second ser., Fasc 2. 1968, Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of PathologyGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilmore HT, Milroy M, Mello BJ: Supernumerary nipples and accessory breast tissue. S D J Med. 1996, 49 (5): 149-151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Maiorano E, Mazzarol GM, Pruneri G, Mastropasqua MG, Zurrida S, Orvieto E, Viale G: Ectopic breast tissue as a possible cause of false-positive axillary sentinel lymph node biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003, 27 (4): 513-518. 10.1097/00000478-200304000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Holdsworth PJ, Hopkinson JM, Leveson SH: Benign axillary epithelial lymph node inclusions: a histological pitfall. Histopathology. 1988, 4: 285-293.Google Scholar
  10. Turner DR, Millis RR: Breast tissue inclusions in axillary lymph nodes. Histopathology. 1980, 4: 631-636. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1980.tb02958.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaffer S, Lin R, Bleiweiss IJ, Nagi C: Intraductal carcinoma arising in intraductal papilloma in an axillary lymph node: review of the literature and proposed theories of evolution. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008, 132: 1940-1942.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Walker AN, Fechner RE: Papillary carcinoma arising from ectopic breast tissue in an axillary lymph node. Diagn Gynecol Obstet. 1982, 4: 141-145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pantanowitz L, Connolly JL: Pathology of the breast associated With HIV/AIDS. The Breast Journal. 2002, 8 (4): 234-243. 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2002.08409.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith KJ, Skelton HG, Hawks C, Yeager J, Wagner KF: Concurrent HPV-16 infection of the nipple and perianal area in an HIV-1 positive patient. Int J Dermatol. 1993, 32 (9): 664-667. 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1993.tb04023.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Balci FL, Bender O, Coskun F, Duzgun AP, Saylam , Yuney E, Rota S, Fidan I, Feldman S, Soran A: P5-05-05: human papiloma virus identification in intraductal papilloma and breast cancer using broad-spectrum primers. Canc Res. 2011, 71 (24): supp3-Google Scholar

Copyright

© Cottom et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement